logo
An ode to the remarkable people who make up the federal government

An ode to the remarkable people who make up the federal government

Washington Post20-03-2025
I have a special place in my heart for the Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals, known as the Sammies, the highest awards given to federal employees. I met my wife at the 2005 Sammies; that year, one of the top honors was given to Terence Lutes.
You almost certainly haven't heard of Lutes, but every year, right around now, you are probably grateful for his existence. He was the person at the Internal Revenue Service who spearheaded the adoption of electronic filing — one of the most significant changes (and improvements!) in the way that Americans interact with the government. E-filing may now seem obvious, but of course nothing just happens — someone in some meeting somewhere had to say, 'What if we used this internet thing for taxes?' And then a whole bunch of nameless someones had to also agree and then work together for years to make it happen.
Lutes does not make an appearance in 'Who Is Government?,' a new book edited by Michael Lewis, but he very well could have. The book, an outgrowth of a project led by The Washington Post's now-departed Opinions editor David Shipley, examines some of the remarkable people who make up the federal workforce — career civil servants who have accomplished the extraordinary in quiet ways, people whose jobs are normally buried layers below any partisan rancor.
Perhaps never before has there been a book better timed or more urgent.
Lewis assembled a group of notable writers — Casey Cep, Dave Eggers, John Lanchester, Geraldine Brooks, Sarah Vowell and W. Kamau Bell — and let them loose to find an interesting federal worker to write about. (I was a contributing columnist for The Washington Post last year but had nothing to do with this project.) Together, they paint a vivid and detailed portrait of the people behind the smooth day-to-day functioning of our federal government — and our lives.
These workers see themselves as being called to a higher purpose, to serve their fellow Americans and to actually make our country greater in some highly specific way. Christopher Mark of the Department of Labor, for instance, a former coal miner, helped prevent roof falls in mines by developing industry-wide preventive standards and practices. Heather Stone of the Food and Drug Administration, who tracks and compiles data about exotic diseases, helped save the life of a child whose brain was being eaten by an amoeba.
Page after page, the book breaks down the cynical caricature of the federal government that has persisted over the years and been amplified in recent months. It shows that far from being riddled with and corrupted by waste, fraud, abuse and laziness, the federal government is (or was) filled with people working hard — people painfully aware that they're stewarding government resources, doing so artfully under tight constraints, all of whom could be doing something for more money elsewhere.
Lewis's 2018 book, 'The Fifth Risk,' a clarion call of the importance of government, was a runaway success, and the 'Who Is Government?' project was meant to make the case amid an ominous election season that a second Trump presidency would pose a major threat to the basic foundations of our government.
It's no longer a hypothetical threat. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has unleashed haphazard and far-ranging cuts to the federal workforce — including an attempt to dismantle the federal institute that supports libraries, the parent of Voice of America and the nonpartisan Wilson Center think tank, as well as agencies that support minority businesses, mediate labor disputes, work to end homelessness and aid economically struggling communities.
Considering that the contributors to the book chose their subjects nearly a year ago, and that most of the pieces were published before Trump won his second term, it's incredible how much of the book feels like a not-so-subtle indictment of what's happening now — of the avarice, corruption and destruction unfolding inside the federal government at the hands of Trump, Elon Musk and their U.S. DOGE Service wrecking crew, such as the indiscriminate firings, the politicization of nonpartisan agencies, and the illegal cessation of congressionally authorized work and missions.
One of the workers highlighted in the book is employed in the National Archives, an agency now under attack from Trump. We meet the team of IRS criminal investigators who were instrumental in putting dark-web marketplace founder Ross Ulbricht behind bars. (Ulbricht was serving a life sentence for narcotics and money laundering, in a case that involved a murder-for-hire plot, only to be pardoned by Trump on his second day in office as part of a paean to the cryptocurrency world.)
The book also reminds us that while Musk and Trump grandstand about how government should learn from the private sector, government actually in some cases is better. Cep profiles the head of the National Cemetery Administration, part of the Department of Veterans Affairs, which — as its name hints — runs the nation's veterans cemeteries. In survey after survey, its customers (the families of veterans) have given it the highest satisfaction rating of any entity in the United States, public or private — 12 points higher than Costco's stunningly high rating of 85.
Lewis trumpets himself a bit more than necessary in his introduction — he is not exactly the first person to discover that the U.S. government is filled with interesting and honorable stories — but the profiles themselves serve as a balm for the chaos of our government right now. To read them — each takes about 20 minutes — is to drift into an alternate universe filled with the most thoughtful and caring people doing hard things for all the right reasons.
'Who Is Government?' will remind you why government is so important, of the thousands of small ways that it shapes and secures our lives for the better. As former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel says: 'The quality of life we have, it's all government. Government touches you a hundred times before breakfast, and you don't even know it.' The book shows — in specific ways — how much safer and more secure daily life is today than it was even a generation or two ago.
But more than that, the book is filled with a thousand reminders of why we have government: Because no one else will do these things. There is no profit motive in much of the work, no private business that will step in and spend years or decades solving these difficult challenges. As Eggers notes — in words written months ago that feel so prescient — 'No billionaires will fund work like this because there's no money in it. … If [government was] not doing it, it would not be done.'
We have government because we want our country to be a great place to live, work and play. What fills me with dread reading this book is that the next reminder we will get about the importance of government in our daily lives will come not in a laudatory, artful profile but in a crisis, when we find out that the person who should have been watching or monitoring or doing this one very specific task we've never thought about is no longer there.
Garrett M. Graff is a journalist, historian and author of nine books, including 'Watergate: A New History.'
The Untold Story of Public Service
Edited by Michael Lewis.
Riverhead. 243 pp. $30
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. Elizabeth Warren touts investigations into Trump administration's federal cuts

time39 minutes ago

Sen. Elizabeth Warren touts investigations into Trump administration's federal cuts

As the Trump administration says it's continuing its effort to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government through cuts at key agencies such as the Social Security Administration and the Education Department, Sen. Elizabeth Warren is touting her ongoing investigations that she said work to protect millions of Americans from restricted access to higher education and retirement benefits. "We cannot stand by and let Trump abuse his power by ripping away the programs that help people breathe a little easier," Warren said in an exclusive interview with ABC News. "People voted Democrats into office to fight for them, and they do not expect us to roll over and play dead." The Massachusetts Democrat, a former teacher and fierce defender of public education, launched her Save Our Schools campaign this spring to investigate the administration's attempts to shutter the Department of Education. The investigations probe the Department of Education's cuts including downsizing the Federal Student Aid (FSA) office and changes to the student loan system. Democrats contend slashing FSA's workforce will hinder low-income Americans' access to college and urged the agency to rehire employees critical to its financial aid operations. In April, Warren launched the Social Security War Room, a coordinated effort to combat the administration's so-called "attack on Americans' Social Security" at the Social Security Administration (SSA), which is responsible for distributing retirement disability, and survivor benefits to more than 70 million Americans. So far, Warren said her campaign has worked to cut down Social Security wait times on the phone and in person at regional offices. Warren urged President Donald Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency to take their "hands off" Social Security. She said her pressure campaign -- which included an inspector general review of the agency -- has impeded Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano from making additional layoffs after the agency announced it was aiming to cut roughly 7,000 people from its workforce. Warren said if Democrats do nothing, the Trump administration will "go ahead with no pushback." "There's a lot of anger over what Trump and the Republicans are trying to do to the Social Security Administration," she said. "We will push back with everything we've got." While Trump has vowed to safeguard Social Security and Medicare, some actions from the administration have raised concerns about potential impacts on the program -- including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's recent comments that the so-called Trump savings accounts for newborns could be a "back door" to start privatizing Social Security. Bessent later walked back the comments. The Trump administration says its workforce restructuring is part of the president's efforts to cut waste, fraud and abuse and improve Americans' lives, White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields told ABC News. He added that the president's success through DOGE is "undisputed and legal." Republicans argue the SSA changes will ensure fraudsters won't tamper with retirees' benefits and streamline the experience by utilizing artificial intelligence. Warren said large-scale changes to these agencies could have dire consequences for Americans. "Save Our Schools and the Social Security War Room are two ways that, internally, the Democrats are fighting back against administration cuts that undermine people all across this country," Warren said. SSA has said the focus of its workforce reduction and organizational restructuring is to eliminate things that don't provide "mission critical" services. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon also stressed she is not defunding federal programs and will continue to perform all of the agency's "statutory duties." Through a combination of federal investigations, oversight, storytelling and even lawsuits, Warren told ABC News her campaigns have worked to provide the administration with checks and balances. Warren took credit for recently helping millions of students receive roughly $6 billion in FY25 title funding that is typically allocated on July 1, but was withheld for more than three weeks by the Office of Management and Budget for a "programmatic review" of education funding. During the funding freeze, McMahon told ABC News that the administration wanted to ensure that student programs had "the right focus" and funds weren't being misused. "We organized groups and individuals to pressure the department to release those funds...," Warren said. "This matters because that's the money that's often used for our kids with special needs, for after-school programs and others who help our kids get a high-quality education." Despite union criticism that the Education Department is carrying out unlawful layoffs, the department's spokesperson, Madi Biedermann, told ABC News the agency followed all applicable laws and regulations when implementing its reduction in force. Before the Senate left town, Warren vowed to continue fighting for the federal workforce. "The Trump administration is committed to undercutting Social Security and eliminating the Department of Education," she said. "This is not going to be a one and done."

A Terrible Five Days for the Truth
A Terrible Five Days for the Truth

Atlantic

time11 hours ago

  • Atlantic

A Terrible Five Days for the Truth

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Awarding superlatives in the Donald Trump era is risky. Knowing when one of his moves is the biggest or worst or most aggressive is challenging—not only because Trump himself always opts for the most over-the-top description, but because each new peak or trough prepares the way for the next. So I'll eschew a specific modifier and simply say this: The past five days have been deeply distressing for the truth as a force in restraining authoritarian governance. In a different era, each of these stories would have defined months, if not more, of a presidency. Coming in such quick succession, they risk being subsumed by one another and sinking into the continuous din of the Trump presidency. Collectively, they represent an assault on several kinds of truth: in reporting and news, in statistics, and in the historical record. On Thursday, The Washington Post revealed that the Smithsonian National Museum of American History had removed references to Trump's record-setting two impeachments from an exhibit's section on presidential scandals. The deletion reportedly came as part of a review to find supposed bias in Smithsonian museums. Now, referring to Presidents Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton, the exhibit states that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal.' This is false—Trump came closer to Senate conviction than Clinton did. The Smithsonian says the material about Trump's impeachments was meant to be temporary (though it had been in place since 2021), and that references will be restored in an upcoming update. If only that seemed like a safe bet. The administration, including Vice President J. D. Vance, an ex officio member of the Smithsonian board, has been pressuring the Smithsonian to align its messages with the president's political priorities, claiming that the institution has 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology.' The White House attempted to fire the head of the National Portrait Gallery, which it likely did not have the power to do. (She later resigned.) Meanwhile, as my colleague Alexandra Petri points out, the administration is attempting to eliminate what it views as negativity about American history from National Park Service sites, a sometimes-absurd proposition. During his first term, Trump criticized the removal of Confederate monuments, which he and allies claimed was revisionist history. It was not—preserving history doesn't require public monuments to traitors—but tinkering with the Smithsonian is very much attempting to rewrite the official version of what happened, wiping away the impeachments like an ill-fated Kremlin apparatchik. The day after the Post report, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced that it will shut down. Its demise was sealed by the administration's successful attempt to get Congress to withdraw funding for it. Defunding CPB was a goal of Project 2025, because the right views PBS and NPR as biased (though the best evidence that Project 2025 is able to marshal for this are surveys about audience political views). Although stations in major cities may be able to weather the loss of assistance, the end of CPB could create news and information deserts in more remote areas. When Trump isn't keeping information from reaching Americans, he's attacking the information itself. Friday afternoon, after the Bureau of Labor Statistics released revised employment statistics that suggested that the economy is not as strong as it had appeared, Trump's response was to fire the commissioner of the BLS, baselessly claiming bias. Experts had already begun to worry that government inflation data were degrading under Trump. Firing the commissioner won't make the job market any better, but it will make government statistics less trustworthy and undermine any effort by policy makers, including Trump's own aides, to improve the economy. The New York Times ' Ben Casselman catalogs plenty of examples of leaders who attacked economic statistics and ended up paying a price for it. (Delving into these examples might provide Trump with a timely warning, but as the editors of The Atlantic wrote in 2016, 'he appears not to read.') The next day, the Senate confirmed Jeanine Pirro to be the top prosecutor for the District of Columbia. Though Pirro previously served as a prosecutor and judge in New York State, her top credential for the job—as with so many of her administration colleagues —is her run as a Fox News personality. Prior to the January 6 riot, she was a strong proponent of the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen. Her statements were prominent in a successful defamation case against Fox, and evidence in the case included a discussion of why executives yanked her off the air on November 7, 2020. 'They took her off cuz she was being crazy,' Tucker Carlson's executive producer wrote in a text. 'Optics are bad. But she is crazy.' This means that a person who either lied or couldn't tell fact from fiction, and whom even Fox News apparently didn't trust to avoid a false claim, is being entrusted with power over federal prosecutions in the nation's capital. (Improbably, she still might be an improvement over her interim predecessor.) Even as unqualified prosecutors are being confirmed, the Trump White House is seeking retribution against Jack Smith, the career Justice Department attorney who led Trump's aborted prosecutions on charges related to subverting the 2020 election and hoarding of documents at Mar-a-Lago. The Office of Special Counsel—the government watchdog that is led at the moment, for some reason, by the U.S. trade representative —is investigating whether Smith violated the Hatch Act, which bars some executive-branch officials from certain political actions while they're on the job, by charging Trump. Never mind that the allegations against Trump were for overt behavior. Kathleen Clark, a professor of law at Washington University in St. Louis, told the Post she had never seen the OSC investigate a prosecutor for prosecutorial decisions. The charges against Trump were dropped when he won the 2024 election. If anything, rather than prosecutions being used to interfere with elections, Trump used the election to interfere with prosecutions. This is a bleak series of events. But although facts can be suppressed, they cannot be so easily changed. Even if Trump can bowdlerize the BLS, that won't change the underlying economy. As Democrats discovered during the Biden administration, you can't talk voters out of bad feelings about the economy using accurate statistics; that wouldn't be any easier with bogus ones. Trump is engaged in a broad assault on truth, but truth has ways of fighting back. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News The Texas House voted to issue civil arrest warrants for Texas Democrats who left the state to delay a vote on a Trump-backed redistricting map. Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump's special envoy for peace missions, will head to Russia this week in an effort to secure a Ukraine cease-fire before a Friday deadline. The European Union paused planned retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods for six months amid ongoing trade talks with the Trump administration. Dispatches Explore all of our newsletters here. Evening Read Grief Counseling With Kermit By Sophie Brickman After a great loss, some people find themselves communing with nature, at the seaside or deep in a forest. Others turn to spirituality, toward a temple or church. Me? I'd come to grieve with the Muppets. Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Culture Break Watch. In 2022, Shirley Li recommended 15 underseen TV shows that are worth your time. Have a laugh. The comedian Marc Maron's style is still confrontational and opinionated —but now his subjects are different, Vikram Murthi writes. Play our daily crossword.

Texas Democrats flee state amid heated redistricting battle. Has this happened before?
Texas Democrats flee state amid heated redistricting battle. Has this happened before?

USA Today

time12 hours ago

  • USA Today

Texas Democrats flee state amid heated redistricting battle. Has this happened before?

WASHINGTON - A president jumping out of a window, a senator carried feet-first from their office, and state legislators moving into an out-of-state hotel: For as long as Americans have been legislating, they've been fleeing from legislatures to prevent votes from happening. Texas House Democrats fled the Lone Star State on Aug. 3 in an attempt to block a redistricting that would give Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives up to five more seats in the 2026 midterms. The Democrats dispersed to friendly blue states: Many traveled to the Chicago area in Illinois, greeted by Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker, while other groups landed in Boston, Massachusetts and Albany, New York. Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to expel any Democrat who was not back in Austin by the time the legislature reconvened Aug. 4 at 3 p.m. CT. Republicans need what is called a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers needed to be present on the floor to carry out business. But the tactic of fleeing to deny quorum is one that's been used by both parties since the 1800s. Some lawmakers have hid out in their offices, while others have fled their state to avoid being compelled to show up to vote, as is the case with Texas Democrats. These are some of the most prominent examples from history. 1840: Abraham Lincoln jumps out of a first-floor window Before Abraham Lincoln served as president, he was a member of the Illinois state legislature from 1834 to 1842. He once jumped out of a first-floor window to try to prevent a quorum on a vote to shut down a state-run bank in 1840, according to The New York Times. Lincoln, a member of the Whig Party at the time, was an advocate of the state-run bank while his Democratic colleagues were not, the Times reported. Samuel Wheeler, who is the llinois state historian, told the Times that Lincoln had already been marked present for the quorum, making his effort pointless. 'It's not an episode that he's very proud of later,' Wheeler said. 1988: Bob Packwood carried into the chamber Oregon Sen. Bob Packwood, a Republican, tried to avoid a quorum call in February 1988 amid opposition to a Democratic-driven campaign finance reform bill, according to the U.S. Senate. He hid in his office until Capitol police later found him. The New York Times reported that Packwood had placed a chair against one door to prevent the officers from forcing it open. 'It was their mass against my mass,' he said at the time. The officers entered Packwood's office through another door, and they 'transported him feet-first into the Chamber,' the U.S. Senate website says. 2003: Texas Democrats protest redistricting effort Texas Democrats fled the state in 2003 to break quorum over Republican redistricting efforts. House Democrats went to Oklahoma until the regular session of the legislature ended, the Texas Tribune reported. Eleven Democratic state senators went to New Mexico after former Gov. Rick Perry called a special session, according to the Tribune. Then Democratic Sen. John Whitmire returned to Texas, officially allowing Republicans to advance with their redistricting plans after reaching a quorum. 2011: Wisconsin Democrats challenge anti-union bill Wisconsin Democrats fled their state in February 2011 in an attempt to block a budget-repair bill that would curtail collective bargaining rights from public employee unions, though the bill still ended up passing, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The lawmakers went to Illinois, but stayed at different places due to security concerns. When they returned in March, nearly 70,000 trade union and Democratic supporters greeted them at Capitol Square, according to The Guardian. 2011: Indiana Democrats flee to Comfort Suites in Illinois Indiana Democrats fled their state 14 years ago to halt legislative business and challenge the passage of a controversial anti-union legislation, The Daily Illini reported. They headed to the Comfort Suites hotel in Urbana, Illinois, on Feb. 22 that year and didn't return to their home state until March 28, the paper reported. Their bill total came out to be over $84,000 dollars. 'It was a very difficult decision - very difficult - and it got more difficult every day,' State Representative Ed DeLaney, who fled with his colleagues, told The New York Times in an interview. 'You only have so much ammunition, and this is a way to spend an awful lot of your ammunition on one point, and draw a lot of criticism in the process.' Contributing: Savannah Kuchar, USA TODAY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store