logo
Dana Carvey says he was ‘delicate' with Joe Biden ‘SNL' impression because ex-prez was ‘compromised mentally'

Dana Carvey says he was ‘delicate' with Joe Biden ‘SNL' impression because ex-prez was ‘compromised mentally'

New York Post13 hours ago
Dana Carvey had a tricky task impersonating Joe Biden on 'Saturday Night Live.'
During a recent episode of his 'Fly on the Wall' podcast, the 70-year-old comedian explained why he took a 'delicate' approach to playing the former president, 82, on the sketch comedy show's 50th season.
'I knew that he was compromised mentally. I mean, it was obvious,' Carvey said. 'But it was a delicate thing in the comedy world.'
Advertisement
7 Dana Carvey as Joe Biden, Andy Samberg as Douglas Emhoff, and Maya Rudolph as Kamala Harris on 'SNL' in Nov. 2024.
Will Heath/NBC via Getty Images
Carvey continued, 'There were a lot of people who did not want to do anything that would kind of ding him in an awkward way.'
'But it's comedy!' guest Julie Bowen pointed out, a notion that Carvey agreed with.
Advertisement
7 Dana Carvey performs during Moontower Just For Laughs at the Long Center in Austin, Texas in April 2022.
Getty Images
7 Joe Biden speaks at the White House in July 2024.
Getty Images
'That's the key, if I can do Biden, if I can make Biden funny to everybody, then I am where I want to be,' he explained. 'And to make it funny, it had to be recognizable. And so there were certain things I did not include in my package.'
The comedian also described his experience spoofing Biden as 'surreal,' 'bizarre' and 'at times a lot of fun.'
Advertisement
7 David Spade and Dana Carvey on their 'Fly on the Wall' podcast.
Fly on the Wall with Dana Carvey and David Spade/Youtube
Carvey's co-host and fellow 'SNL' alum David Spade noted that Biden's role in the government made him 'fair game' to be mocked on the show.
'I think it's easier to make fun of him if he's the president than if it's just a 90-whatever-year-old man and just go, 'Look at this a–hole,'' said Spade, 60. 'So once he's president, he's more fair game. But no one made fun of him forever.'
7 Joe Biden and Kamala Harris on the Fourth of July in 2024.
AP
Advertisement
Carvey made his 'SNL' debut as Biden during the Season 50 premiere in September. The episode also featured Maya Rudolph as Kamala Harris, Andy Samberg as Harris' husband Douglas Emhoff, Jim Gaffigan as Harris' running mate Tim Walz, Austin Johnson as Donald Trump and Bowen Yang as Trump's VP JD Vance.
7 James Austin Johnson as Donald Trump, Dana Carvey as Joe Biden, and Alec Baldwin as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 'Saturday Night Live' in Nov. 2024.
Will Heath/NBC via Getty Images
The comedian previously revealed on 'Fly on the Wall' that 'SNL' creator Lorne Michaels asked him to play Biden after Carvey started doing impersonations of the politician on his podcast.
7 Dana Carvey attends Chris Rock's comedy show in West Hollywood in March 2023.
Getty Images for Netflix
'I didn't see it out there enough, a Biden impression,' Carvey said. 'A lot of brilliant Trumps, Shane [Gillis], James Austin Johnson. Biden is trickier.'
Over the years, Biden has also been spoofed by Jason Sudeikis, Woody Harrelson, Jim Carrey and Mikey Day on 'SNL.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Total border encounters last month were less than ‘a single day under Biden,' Tom Homan says
Total border encounters last month were less than ‘a single day under Biden,' Tom Homan says

New York Post

time42 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Total border encounters last month were less than ‘a single day under Biden,' Tom Homan says

Federal authorities encountered fewer migrants attempting to illegally enter the US last month than what officials faced daily during the Biden administration, border czar Tom Homan revealed Tuesday. 'Total Border Patrol encounters for the entire month of June 2025 was 6,070,' according to Homan, who noted in an X post that the figure is 'less than a single day under Biden.' 'As a matter of fact, the total number of encounters is less than half of a single day under Biden on many days,' the Trump administration official said, adding that 'none of the 6,070 were released into the US. ZERO.' Advertisement 3 Homan attributed the sharp decline in illegal border-crossings to 'The Trump Effect.' Getty Images The total released by Homan marks a 93.1% drop in nationwide Border Patrol encounters from June 2024, when 87,606 migrants were nabbed trying to enter the country illegally. It's also a 94% and 97% decline from June 2023 and June 2022, when, respectively, 100,606 and 193,027 migrants were encountered by Border Patrol. Advertisement In June 2022, the average daily total of migrant encounters was about 6,434 per day. Last month, Border Patrol reported encountering just over 10,000 migrants nationwide. Homan attributed the massive reduction in border-crossings to President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration, calling it, 'The Trump Effect.' 3 Trump has deployed thousands of US troops to the southern border in an effort to combat illegal immigration. AP Advertisement 3 Monthly migrant encounters are massivly lower than they were under former President Joe Biden. Anadolu via Getty Images 'President Trump has created the most secure border in the history of the nation and the data proves it,' the border czar asserted. 'We have never seen numbers this low. Never.' 'God bless the men and women of the US Border Patrol and God bless the men and women of ICE,' Homan continued. 'The interior arrests and consequences help to drive down illegal immigration.' 'The TRUMP EFFECT keeps America winning.'

Cities near LA abandon July 4th celebrations as Trump's immigration crackdown takes hold
Cities near LA abandon July 4th celebrations as Trump's immigration crackdown takes hold

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Cities near LA abandon July 4th celebrations as Trump's immigration crackdown takes hold

Los Angeles and several surrounding cities are canceling — or postponing — Fourth of July celebrations in response to increased activity by federal immigration officials in the area. The County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation postponed a summer movie and concert series, while canceling this year's East Los Angeles Rock'n 4th of July celebration "out of caution and in response to recent ICE enforcement activity." One of the city's biggest Fourth of July events that drew thousands in 2024, the Gloria Molina Grand Park Summer Block Party, has been indefinitely postponed due to "the ongoing circumstances impacting the region." Other communities surrounding Los Angeles also reportedly decided to cancel their Fourth of July events in light of the ongoing federal immigration enforcement in the area, including the cities of Bell Gardens, Boyle Heights, Cudahy, Huntington Park, Whittier and the town of El Sereno. In Huntington Park, the cancellation goes beyond just the Fourth of July holiday and includes a 30-day pause on "certain public summer events," according to a statement released by the city. "Reports of unmarked vehicles and unidentified federal agents have created widespread anxiety, particularly among immigrant and mixed-status families," according to the Huntington Park statement. "Many residents have expressed fear and uncertainty, leading them to remain indoors, refrain from work, and withdraw from daily public life. Our priority is and will continue to be the safety and peace of mind of our community." Officials from these communities halting their Independence Day events have been outspoken against the Trump administration's decision to ramp up federal immigration enforcement. Huntington Park Mayor Arturo Flores has described the increased prevalence of ICE raids in and around Los Angeles as a "campaign of domestic terror" and "psychological warfare that I've only seen in theaters of war," according to The Guardian. Meanwhile, the vice mayor of the City of Cudahy allegedly called on gang leaders in a now-deleted TikTok post to defend their territory from ICE. A report Monday by The New York Times found that, since June 6, "agents from several federal agencies have arrested about 2,000 immigrants in the Los Angeles region," according to documents obtained by the outlet, which added that the arrests have "been one of the reasons so many are on edge." This week, the Pentagon released 150 California National Guard troops from their federal security mission in Los Angeles to help fight wildfires.

The upside of missing deadlines
The upside of missing deadlines

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

The upside of missing deadlines

With help from Camille von Kaenel and Jordan Wolman SILENCE IS GOLDEN: California regulators' reluctance to implement the state's nation-leading climate disclosure laws could be their saving grace in court. The California Air Resources Board was supposed to finish writing rules for SB 253 and SB 261 — the contentious laws that will require large companies to disclose their carbon footprint and climate-related financial risks — on Tuesday, under an agreement lawmakers hashed out with the agency and Gov. Gavin Newsom last year. CARB Chair Liane Randolph made it clear in an exclusive interview last week that those rules won't be finalized until the end of the year and that the agency isn't planning to put out any updates in the short term. That's potentially a potent — if unintentional — legal strategy. State attorneys were in a Los Angeles federal courtroom Tuesday morning, arguing against the U.S. Chamber, the California Chamber of Commerce, the Farm Bureau and other groups' request that Judge Otis D. Wright II immediately block the two laws as the case over whether they violate the First Amendment plays out. The crux of Deputy Attorney General Caitlan McLoon's argument is that the rules businesses will need to follow haven't even been finalized yet, so there's no reason to put the laws on hold. 'If there is no requirement to speak, there can be no First Amendment harm,' McLoon said. If Wright buys that argument — and there's reason to think he could, after he dismissed two claims earlier this year that the laws violate Congress' authority to regulate interstate commerce, in part because companies hadn't proved any immediate harm — it would be an ironic twist in the years-long fight between CARB, Newsom and the laws' authors over how quickly and aggressively to implement what will be first-of-their-kind standards in the United States. Focus on SB 253 and SB 261 has been heightened since President Donald Trump's victory in November and his promise to immediately roll back climate rules. California's laws could offer a model for other Democrat-led statehouses, after Trump's Securities and Exchange Commission announced in March that it would stop defending a Biden-era federal disclosure law in court. But Trump's win wasn't enough to defuse tensions with Sen. Scott Wiener, the influential Senate Budget Committee chair who wrote SB 253, who slammed CARB in December for telling companies covered under the law that they'll get a break from having to perfectly tally their greenhouse gas emissions during the first year of the rule. Wiener and CARB are playing nice at the moment. Wiener said in an interview Tuesday that he's been in communication with the agency and that he understands officials need more time. 'My hope was to get it done July 1, but that's not feasible for them,' Wiener said. 'It's fine, because it's not going to impact the disclosures themselves, which are the most important thing.' CARB has told companies to start getting ready for when the disclosure laws take effect in 2026, a point that Eugene Scalia, the lead attorney (and son of former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia) representing the plaintiffs, highlighted in his oral arguments. 'My client members are incurring costs, and are on the cusp of having to engage in unconstitutional speech,' he told the judge. Both sides also offered arguments on the merits of the First Amendment debate: McLoon said that the state has the right to regulate emissions disclosures and that the vast majority of companies that already disclose emissions as part of their business strategies do so in a way that is incomplete or misleading. Scalia countered that companies have a First Amendment right to remain silent and picked apart the studies CARB has cited to bolster their claims of misleading business practices. That fight to untangle those arguments could stretch into next year, but Wright's decision on the preliminary injunction — which he didn't offer a specific timeline for — is expected to come much sooner. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! INSIDE THE BILL: The California Chamber of Commerce is taking its swing at one of the boogeymen of the year: electric bills. The business group released a study Tuesday by the Blue Sky Consulting Group that determined that the costs of wildfire mitigation and rooftop solar represent 13 and 14 percent of the average residential monthly bill from an investor-owned utility, with another 7 percent coming from state public purpose programs like one to subsidize low-income customers. (The study largely reflects the findings of legislative analysts in January.) The Chamber is touting its new numbers as a reason to support its preferred policy fixes, which include reducing rooftop solar incentives, as proposed by Assemblymember Lisa Calderon. It's also arguing against limiting the infrastructure costs utilities can recoup from ratepayers and creating a new financing authority for transmission projects — measures proposed by energy chairs Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris and Sen. Josh Becker as part of their energy affordability packages. — CvK RAKE TIME: Newsom trolled Trump from a fire lookout tower near Colfax on Tuesday morning, challenging the White House to adopt a 'model executive order' to increase firefighter pay and staffing. It's not the first time either of them have tried to score political points by criticizing the other on wildfire management. But Newsom's dig reflects his fraying relationship with the president over federal immigration enforcement raids in California. It also comes as peak fire season is ramping up, with red flag warnings blanketing Northern California on Tuesday and evacuations underway in the San Jacinto Mountains of Riverside County, where a fire has grown beyond 2,000 acres. Newsom hammered the point that the federal government owns 57 percent of the forested land in California, compared to the state's 3 percent. And he attacked the Trump administration's job cuts at federal land management, science and disaster response agencies. 'The president of the United States needs to do more to back up his rhetoric with investments and resources,' Newsom said. The White House did not respond to a request for comment by publication time. — CvK AROUND THE CAMPFIRE: Water agencies, Big Tech and timber companies are banding together to ask state lawmakers for more money for wildfire prevention. The Association of California Water Agencies, the Bay Area Council and the California Forestry Association are all members of a new coalition called the 'Wildfire Solutions Coalition,' along with more than a dozen conservation groups. Their ask: As part of the slated reauthorization of the state's landmark cap-and-trade program this year, they want ten percent of future revenues to go to 'regionally appropriate wildfire resilience strategies, as part of a larger set of dedicated investments for nature-based solutions.' They'll be fighting with transit agencies and various energy groups for the pot of money. — CvK AND FIRETECH TOO: Fire Aside, a company that sells software streamlining defensible space inspections, has signed contracts with a series of new Bay Area fire agencies, including municipal departments in El Cerrito, Hayward, Fremont and Richmond, it told POLITICO exclusively this week. It's one of a number of companies making inroads as both the Newsom and Trump administrations try to claim the growing sector for their own. MEGA MEGA: The U.S. Senate softened its phase-out of a tax credit for wind and solar projects to get holdouts on board with the massive tax and spending bill it passed on Tuesday. But renewable energy groups are still fuming, with American Clean Power Association CEO Jason Grumet calling the bill 'an intentional effort to undermine the fastest-growing sources of electric power [that] will lead to increased energy bills, decreased grid reliability, and the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs.' The last-minute compromise, as POLITICO's Josh Siegel and Kelsey Tamborrino report, strikes a proposed added excise tax on wind and solar projects. But it still requires most solar and wind energy projects to be placed in service by the end of 2027 to get the tax credit, potentially derailing hundreds of planned projects. The bill also kills the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles that automakers have been trying to save. The megabill is now back in the House, where California Reps. David Valadao and Young Kim are among the few Republicans who have stumped for clean energy tax credits and have said they'll vote against it. — The NYT has a deep dive on the former EPA employee whom Project Veritas recorded calling federal climate funding 'gold bars.' — It's not just California — the Sunbelt is also starting to experience a house-building slowdown. — Farmers can sell their groundwater rights to urban developers desperate for water in Arizona under a new state law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store