Council unaware of other next of kin when it granted exhumation of man's remains, court hears
Charlotte Farrell-Quin purportedly did not disclose to the council that she was one of five living children of the late Gerard Farrell when she sought permission to exhume his remains from Deansgrange Cemetery last November, Ms Farrell-Quin's brother, Paschal Farrell, says in a High Court action.
Advertisement
In proceedings brought against the local authority, Mr Farrell said that he, along with other siblings, were not made aware of his sister's application for exhumation to the council.
They were further unaware of the subsequent exhumation of Gerard's remains and reinterment at a cemetery in Ashford, Co Wicklow, where Ms Farrell-Quin resides.
Mr Farrell, of Millers Wood, Bray, Co Wicklow, said that had he been aware of his sister's application to exhume their father's remains, he would have objected 'in the strongest possible terms'.
In certain circumstances, permission for exhumation of human remains is granted by local authorities in the form of an exhumation licence.
Advertisement
Mr Farrell was given permission to bring his judicial review proceedings in April, seeking to quash the council's decision to grant an exhumation licence to Ms Farrell-Quin, among other reliefs.
Ms Farrell-Quin is a notice party to the proceedings.
Ireland
Child sexual abuse trial of mother, uncle and fami...
Read More
On Tuesday, updating Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty on the case, Mr Farrell's barrister, Brendan Hennessy, said the council's position is that it was only aware of one of Gerard's children, Ms Farrell-Quin, when granting the exhumation licence.
Mr Hennessy, instructed by Benville Robinson solicitors, said there was some urgency to the case.
Ms Justice Gearty said it was possible the case would be assigned a hearing date in December or January. The judge adjourned the case to next month.
Gerard Farrell died in August 2009, aged 77. He was initially buried at a family plot in Deansgrange Cemetery, where at least three generations of his family are also interred, Mr Farrell said in his court documents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 hours ago
- The Independent
US court orders George Gibney's extradition to Ireland
A US judge has ordered the extradition of former Irish Olympic swimming coach George Gibney to Ireland. US magistrate Judge Daniel Irick made the order at a hearing in Florida on Friday. Mr Gibney appeared in federal court in Orlando before Judge Irick. In court documents, seen by the PA news agency, it stated that Mr Gibney is sought by the Irish Government, which has filed charges against him and obtained a warrant for his arrest. Mr Gibney has been charged with 78 counts of indecent assault and one charge of attempted rape against four minor females aged between eight and 15 years at the time of the alleged offences. Earlier this week, Mr Gibney had agreed to being extradited from the US to stand trial over multiple sex offence charges. He also withdrew a request to contest his continued detention, which was due to be heard in court on Friday. Mr Gibney, who had sex offence charges against him dismissed in the 1990s, has lived in the US for years. He was arrested on an Irish extradition warrant earlier this month. An order was made to remand Mr Gibney into the custody of the US Marshal pending the arrival of representatives of the Irish Government to transport him back to Ireland. It was also ordered that the transfer of Mr Gibney from custody will take place at a time agreed by the US Marshal and the Irish Government authorities. Mr Gibney's lawyer, Alec Fitzgerald Hall, said on Thursday that after meeting his client to discuss the case, the former swimming team coach agreed to be extradited to Ireland. Mr Gibney will be extradited to Ireland and is likely to appear before a Dublin court, however it is not yet known when this will take place. In 2020, the podcast Where Is George Gibney, produced by Second Captains and the BBC, highlighted allegations of abuse against Mr Gibney and prompted new complainants to come forward.
BreakingNews.ie
15 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
US court orders George Gibney's extradition to Ireland
A US judge has ordered the extradition of former Irish Olympic swimming coach George Gibney to Ireland. US magistrate Judge Daniel Irick made the order at a hearing in Florida on Friday. Advertisement Mr Gibney appeared in federal court in Orlando before Judge Irick. In court documents, seen by the PA news agency, it stated that Mr Gibney is sought by the Government, which has filed charges against him and obtained a warrant for his arrest. Mr Gibney has been charged with 78 counts of indecent assault and one charge of attempted rape against four minor females aged between eight and 15 years at the time of the alleged offences. Earlier this week, Mr Gibney had agreed to being extradited from the US to stand trial over multiple sex offence charges. Advertisement He also withdrew a request to contest his continued detention, which was due to be heard in court on Friday. Mr Gibney, who had sex offence charges against him dismissed in the 1990s, has lived in the US for years. He was arrested on an Irish extradition warrant earlier this month. An order was made to remand Mr Gibney into the custody of the US Marshal pending the arrival of representatives of the Irish Government to transport him back to Ireland. Advertisement It was also ordered that the transfer of Mr Gibney from custody will take place at a time agreed by the US Marshal and the Irish Government authorities. Mr Gibney's lawyer, Alec Fitzgerald Hall, said on Thursday that after meeting his client to discuss the case, the former swimming team coach agreed to be extradited to Ireland. Mr Gibney will be extradited to Ireland and is likely to appear before a Dublin court, however it is not yet known when this will take place. In 2020, the podcast Where Is George Gibney, produced by Second Captains and the BBC, highlighted allegations of abuse against Mr Gibney and prompted new complainants to come forward. Advertisement
The Independent
16 hours ago
- The Independent
Harry lawyers must disclose ‘payment' documents in Mail publisher case
Lawyers for the Duke of Sussex must hand over documents that relate to alleged payments made for evidence in his legal claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail, a High Court judge has said. Harry and six others, including actress Liz Hurley, Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish are bringing legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL). They have accused the publisher of conducting or commissioning unlawful activities such as hiring private investigators to tap phones, 'blagging' private records, and burglaries to order. The group also includes actress Sadie Frost, campaigner Baroness Doreen Lawrence and politician Sir Simon Hughes. ANL denies the allegations and is defending the legal action, previously describing the claims as 'lurid' and 'simply preposterous'. At a hearing in May, lawyers for ANL asked the court in London to order the group's legal team to 'search for and disclose any documents that relate to payments, royalties or inducements paid, provided or offered, or any demands or threats made, in order to obtain documents, information or other co-operation'. Antony White KC, for ANL, said a limited number of documents had been disclosed, which showed that 'payments were made or offered' to 'procure evidence and invoices'. In a ruling handed down on Friday, Mr Justice Nicklin said: 'I am satisfied that documents held by the claimants that can support a case that a witness has been paid or offered other inducement for their evidence, whether directly or indirectly, should be disclosed. 'That is because there is a real prospect that Associated will be able to rely upon this evidence to attack the credibility of such witnesses. 'Ultimately, the issue of whether the payment or inducement does affect the credibility of any witness is a matter to be resolved at trial.' He added: 'In this case, the stance adopted by the claimants has been undermined by their inconsistent and incoherent approach to disclosure of documents relating to payments to potential witnesses and/or other inducements.' Mr Justice Nicklin also ordered that lawyers for the claimants should conduct searches to identify and hand over documents ANL could rely on 'in advancing a case that potential witnesses have been given or offered financial incentives to provide information or evidence in support of allegations' of unlawful information gathering (UIG). The group bringing the case had asked the judge to order ANL to unredact some of the documents the company had provided for the legal proceedings. Mr Justice Nicklin ordered that 'targeted' un-redactions be made where necessary to assess whether certain journalists had a pattern of engaging in UIG. He said: 'In my judgment, considering Associated's denials of wrongdoing, the claimants are entitled to explore whether they can advance a case, with a real prospect of success, that the pleaded journalists have a propensity to engage in UIG.' A trial of the claims is expected to start in January and last for nine weeks.
