logo
Lab-grown cheese is coming – but would you eat it?

Lab-grown cheese is coming – but would you eat it?

BBC News3 days ago
In an unassuming building in Stratford, east London, British start-up Better Dairy is making cheese that has never seen an udder, which it argues tastes like the real thing.It is one of a handful of companies around the world hoping to bring lab-grown cheese to our dinner tables in the next few years.But there has been a trend away from meat-free foods recently, according to the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB).The statutory research organisation says that plant-based cheese sales across the UK declined 25.6% in the first quarter of 2025, while sales of cow's cheese grew by 3%.One reason for this, the AHDB tells the BBC, might be because the number of vegans in Britain is small – just 1% of the population (the Vegan Society puts it at 3%), far fewer than the amount of dairy cheese eaters – and has slightly declined lately.The Vegan Society insists that the meat-free food market remains "competitive" and steady.
Other reasons may be concerns about health and price. A recent government survey found that that food being ultra-processed - a key challenge with vegan cheese - was the second-greatest concern for consumers, the first being cost. Plant-based cheese is generally more expensive than cow's cheese, the AHDB says.So are these efforts a recipe for success or disaster? Some think the coming years present an opportunity.In the Netherlands, Those Vegan Cowboys expects to bring its cheeses to the US later this year, and Europe in three to four years due to regulatory hurdles. This is because lab-made cheeses count as a "novel food" and so need EU approval to go on sale.Its chief executive, Hille van der Kaa, admits the appetite for vegan cheese is low right now, but her company is targeting a "silent revolution" by swapping cheeses people don't often think about."If you buy frozen pizza, you don't really think of what kind of cheese is on that," she explains. "So it's quite easy to swap."Meanwhile, French firm Standing Ovation plans on launching in the US next year, and in the UK and Europe in 2027.And back in Stratford, London-based Better Dairy hasn't launched its lab-grown cheese yet because it would cost too much right now.But chief executive Jevan Nagarajah plans to launch in three or four years, when he hopes the price will be closer to those seen in a cheesemonger, before getting it down to the sorts seen in a supermarket.
So does it taste any good?Better Dairy invited me – a committed carnivore and dairy devotee – to its lab to poke holes in this new cheese.Currently, the company is only making cheddar because it sees vegan hard cheeses as having the biggest "quality gap" to dairy cheeses. It has made blue cheese, mozzarella and soft cheese, but argues the proteins in dairy don't make as big a difference in taste.The process starts with yeast that has been genetically modified to produce casein, the key protein in milk, instead of alcohol. Jevan says this is the same technique used to produce insulin without having to harvest it from pigs.Other companies also use bacteria or fungi to produce casein.Once the casein is made through this precision fermentation, it is mixed with plant-based fat and the other components of milk needed for cheese, and then the traditional cheese-making process ensues.Having tried Better Dairy's three-month, six-month and 12-month aged cheddars, I can say they tasted closer to the real thing than anything else I've tried. The younger cheese was perhaps a bit more rubbery than usual, and the older ones more obviously salty. On a burger, the cheese melted well.
Jevan accepts there's room to improve. He says the cheese I tried was made in his lab, but in future wants artisanal cheesemakers to use the firm's non-dairy "milk" in their own labs to improve the taste.As the company cannot use dairy fats, it has had to "optimise" plant-derived fats to make them taste better."If you've experienced plant-based cheeses, a lot of them have off flavours, and typically it comes from trying to use nut-based or coconut fats – and they impart flavours that aren't normally in there," Better Dairy scientist Kate Royle says.Meanwhile, Those Vegan Cowboys is still focusing on easy-to-replace cheeses, like those on pizzas and burgers, while Standing Ovation says its casein can make a range of cheeses including camembert.Will these new cheeses find their match?It'll be a tall order. Of those who bought vegan cheese on the market in the past year, 40% did not buy it again, according to an AHDB survey – suggesting taste may be a turn-off.Damian Watson from the Vegan Society points out that resemblance to the real thing may not even be a good thing."Some vegans want the taste and texture of their food to be like meat, fish or dairy, and others want something completely different," he tells me.And Judith Bryans, chief executive of industry body Dairy UK, thinks the status quo will remain strong."There's no evidence to suggest that the addition of lab-grown products would take away from the existing market, and it remains to be seen where these products would fit in from a consumer perception and price point of view," she tells the BBC.
But both Better Dairy and Those Vegan Cowboys tout partnerships with cheese producers to scale up production and keep costs down, while Standing Ovation has already struck a partnership with Bel (makers of BabyBel).Standing Ovation's CEO Yvan Chardonnens characterises the recent unpopularity as a first wave in the vegan "analogues" of cheese faltering because of quality, while he hopes that will improve in the next phase.Besides the current concerns about a shrinking vegan market, taste, quality and price, the issue of ultra-processed foods is one that these companies may have to grapple with.They argue a lack of lactose, no cholesterol and lower amounts of saturated fats in lab-made cheese can boost its health benefits - and that any cheese is processed.Precision fermentation may also allow producers to strip out many ultra-processed elements of current vegan cheeses.Hille suggests it's a question of perception. People have a "romanticised view" of dairy farming, she says, despite it now being "totally industrialised" - a point backed by AHDB polling, which found 71% of consumers see dairy as natural."I wouldn't say that's really a traditional, natural type of food," Hille argues."We do have an important task to show people how cheese is made nowadays."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aviation staff need disability training, Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson says
Aviation staff need disability training, Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson says

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Aviation staff need disability training, Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson says

Airline and airport staff should be better trained to support disabled passengers, a Government-commissioned review led by Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson has found. The Paralympian and crossbench peer said the 19 recommendations put forward by her taskforce should be 'turned into action' which puts accessibility 'at the heart of aviation'. The Aviation Accessibility Task and Finish Group called for disability awareness training to be rolled out across all aviation roles, including airline crew, assistance providers, ground services, security and hospitality staff. It highlighted a need for passengers to access information easily about their travel, including how they can request and book assistance, where they can find in-airport support services, and detailed guidance on how their mobility aids will be transported. The taskforce also called for passengers to be able to find transparent information on complaints procedures. The group will now work to help ensure its proposals are adopted by airlines, airports and regulator the Civil Aviation Authority. Lady Grey-Thompson said: 'This report is the next critical step in making air travel more inclusive for disabled people. 'I'm grateful for the commitment the industry has shown to making change and breaking down barriers in aviation for everyone, bringing freedom to travel, whether for leisure or work, and to connect with friends and family. 'We know there's more work to be done, and I look forward to seeing these recommendations turned into action which truly puts accessibility at the heart of aviation.' Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'Everyone should be able to travel with dignity and be respected at every stage of their journeys, including disabled passengers. 'That's why we established this group in November last year, and I welcome this report's findings which will clear the runway for greater accessibility in aviation.' Tim Alderslade, chief executive of trade body Airlines UK, said carriers are 'committed to removing barriers so that flying is accessible to all', and will support the 'implementation of these recommendations'. Karen Dee, boss of industry group AirportsUK, said the report will 'build on the work already being done by airports, and the wider sector, to ensure air travel is accessible to all'. In June, BBC journalist and wheelchair user Frank Gardner was forced to wait 95 minutes for a medical lift so he could leave an aircraft that had arrived at Heathrow's Terminal 5. The airport apologised and said the delay was caused by its assistance provider responding to a medical emergency, which reduced the number of vehicles available.

Look at increasing Scottish Government borrowing limits, MPs tell UK Government
Look at increasing Scottish Government borrowing limits, MPs tell UK Government

Western Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Look at increasing Scottish Government borrowing limits, MPs tell UK Government

Currently, the Government is limited to borrowing £600 million for day-to-day spending and £450 million for capital projects. But in a report from the Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster on the fiscal arrangements north of the border, MPs pushed for the limits to be increased. The report said: 'At present, the Scottish Government's limited borrowing powers constrain its ability to manage fiscal shocks, as it is only able to borrow for resource purposes to cover forecast errors. We encourage the UK Government to consider reforming the Scottish Government's capital borrowing powers Scottish Affairs Committee report 'Capital borrowing limits are currently linked to, and grow in line with, inflation, which may not necessarily be the highest metric of growth.' It added: 'We agree with the Secretary of State that borrowing limits should be linked to the measure which offers the Scottish Government the highest level of flexibility but, crucially, we note that which metric delivers this remains undetermined. 'The UK Government should therefore publish a transparent analysis of what borrowing limits would look like based on the different metrics advised in the evidence for this inquiry. 'At the next fiscal framework review, we encourage the UK Government to consider reforming the Scottish Government's capital borrowing powers, by automatically coupling borrowing to the metric which offers the highest limit.' The report comes at the end of an inquiry by the committee which sought to gauge the effectiveness of the Barnett Formula – the measure which dictates the level of funding the UK Government sends to Scotland every year. The MPs found the measure was 'fit for purpose', although it is 'imperfect'. Scotland's Finance Secretary reiterated her Government's support for 'full fiscal autonomy' in a written submission to the committee (Jane Barlow/PA) The committee also rejected calls for the formula to shift and provide funding to Scotland based on need. Scotland, the report said, already receives more funding per head than any other country in the UK and a change in the framework could see funding cut. In written evidence to the committee, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison reiterated the Scottish Government's support for full fiscal autonomy – an arrangement which would see powers over tax and spending devolved. But the committee dismissed such a move as not being a 'realistic prospect'. 'Fundamental questions remain about how full fiscal autonomy would work in practice, and whether it would be operable within the constraints of the UK's current devolution settlement,' the report said. 'Practicality aside, we do not believe that a compelling case has been made that such a change would automatically result in Scotland receiving a higher level of funding.' Ms Robison declined an invitation to appear before the committee, leading the MPs to say 'do not see how we can consider this a serious proposition, and we remain to be convinced that this proposal is desirable in principle, let alone workable in practice'. Responding to the report, Ms Robison said: 'This report rightly recognises that Scotland's finances remain largely dictated by the UK Government's spending decisions, irrespective of the impact on Scottish public services. 'That has meant Scotland has been left with a shortfall of £400 million to pay for the Chancellor's national insurance increase, and saw Scotland short-changed by more than a billion pounds over the next three years at the recent spending review. 'The decisions we have taken to ask higher earners to pay a little bit more – while most income tax payers pay less than in the rest of the UK – mean that we can support vital public services and provide free tuition, prescriptions and the Scottish child payment to help tackle child poverty.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'The spending review provided the Scottish Government with an extra £9.1 billion, giving them a record settlement. 'People will expect that to deliver better outcomes for Scots – lower NHS waiting lists and better attainment in our schools. 'Spending per head in Scotland is around 20% higher than the rest of the UK thanks to the Barnett formula. This report confirms that it appears to be the position of the Scottish Government to scrap that formula that delivers higher funding – they should explain why they want less money for public services in Scotland. 'Their plans for full fiscal autonomy would mean a £12 billion cut in public spending for Scotland.'

ALEX BRUMMER: A reckless plan risks a return to boom and bust
ALEX BRUMMER: A reckless plan risks a return to boom and bust

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

ALEX BRUMMER: A reckless plan risks a return to boom and bust

Chancellor Rachel Reeves was working at Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS), a major mortgage lender, during the great financial crisis of 2008. But she appears to have forgotten the key lessons of that searing experience. HBOS collapsed after embarking on a mad dash to become Britain's largest consumer and mortgage bank. It had abandoned the prudence which should be at the core of safe lending. As a result, HBOS was forced into a rescue merger with Lloyds-TSB, while Gordon Brown's Labour government propped up the enlarged institution with £20.3billion of taxpayer money. Yet under new proposals unveiled by Ms Reeves last night amid the grandeur of the Mansion House in the City of London, tough rules designed to keep the financial system safe will be swept away. Helping young people gain a foothold on the housing ladder is a laudable goal and ending the 'red tape' sounds like a great idea – particularly if it supports the dream of a home-owning democracy first advocated by Margaret Thatcher more than four decades ago. But those of us old enough to remember the collapse of the housing market in the 1990s – when interest rates soared under John Major's government – and the subsequent catastrophic collapse of Northern Rock in 2007 cannot but be horrified. Ms Reeves's plan is a slap in the face for prudence. In the 1990s 'negative equity' – when the cost of mortgages exceeded the value of the homes purchased – saw thousands of buyers abandon their properties and drop the keys back through the doors of mortgage lenders. Northern Rock collapsed after it junked historic affordability rules and granted buyers 100 per cent-plus mortgages –destroying confidence in its prospects of remaining solvent. The subsequent run on the bank, not to mention the long queues of customers seeking to withdraw their money, are etched on the national memory. The then head of the employers' group the CBI, Richard Lambert, argued that it sent a terrible image around the world and made the UK 'look like a banana republic'. It was hard to disagree. Yet under the Chancellor's proposed arrangements, borrowers will be able to obtain home loans at up to six times their salaries, a huge leap from the current four-and-a-half times limit. Prospective home owners could, in future, apply for mortgages with an income of just £30,000, down from £35,000, and with joint incomes of only £50,000. The Treasury says that these new 'Helping Hand' mortgages – to be administered by Nationwide – are aimed at people with low incomes. True, they might genuinely help aspirational homeowners in some regions of the country. But they will do little to address the plight of young people in London and other areas of fast economic growth such as Cambridge, where house prices are driven ever higher by the availability of well-paid starter jobs. Moreover, together with the weaker income and spending checks that Ms Reeves plans to usher in, easy-to-get mortgages are bound to increase the prospect of defaults. And that, in turn, could damage future lending capacity. Since taking office, Ms Reeves has been seeking new tools to drive growth. She believes that prosperity has been held back by rules imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority (the City regulator) and the Bank of England. Yet there is no escaping the real reason for Britain's vanishing growth and the accompanying assault on jobs: the culprit is the Chancellor and her £40billion tax-raising budget with its crippling rise in employers' National Insurance contributions. Now Ms Reeves is seeking a backdoor solution to a flatlining economy by reinvigorating the housing market and encouraging consumer credit. Yet she also risks returning to Britain's appalling record of financial boom and bust.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store