
Museums like the V&A shouldn't be allowed to return ‘looted' treasures
Hunt knew the law before he took the job
Hunt, director of the V&A since 2017, has declared the 1983 National Heritage Act which prevents him from returning artefacts to their country of origin, to be 'outdated and infantilising'. In fact, it is a key reason why collections, including the V&A's, have been maintained.
Britain is home to several thousand museums. Most, subject to the odd deed of trust and their constitutional obligations, are free to do as they please with the items under their care. But a handful are considered of such national importance that they are protected in law. Acts of Parliament such as the National Heritage Act, the Museums and Galleries Act 1992, and the British Museum Act 1963 strictly limit disposal of objects except in rare and carefully defined circumstances (none of which include the political motivations of a director).
Hunt appears to think that the law that prevents him from casting aside the V&A's long history, and 'return(ing)' items, is not fit for purpose. Among the treasures mentioned by Hunt during his speech at the University of Cambridge's Global Humanities Network last month are Tippoo's Tiger, a wooden tiger made for Tipu, Sultan of Mysore, and an Asante crown taken from Ghana. He is seeking an amendment to the law which would give museum trustees 'autonomy' over the fate of such items.
Conspicuously absent from this debate is any real reflection on the role that the claimant countries themselves play in these negotiations, and what that says about their commitment to contested objects.
In 2007, Ethiopia lodged a formal restitution claim for hundreds of objects now residing in the V&A, including a crown and gold chalice taken by the British in 1872. The request was denied due to the laws prohibiting restitution from the V&A. But after Hunt became director in 2017, a possible workaround was put forward: the ambassador was informed that 'the speediest way, if Ethiopia wanted to have these items on display, is a long-term loan.' This arrangement, first hinted at by Hunt in 2018, would have allowed the objects to be sent to Ethiopia on a long term or indefinite loan with an expectation that the arrangement would be renewed ad infinitum.
Ethiopia refused to play ball. 'The Ethiopian government, for perfectly understandable political reasons, took the view that…'You offering to lend stuff you stole from us' wasn't politically viable so we've reached a kind of impasse with these objects,' Hunt said.
Other countries have been more accommodating. Last year a number of Ghanian objects were sent to Kumasi from the V&A for display – an arrangement which will see the objects legally protected (from damage, loss, or sale), while permitting display in a country which values them.
A paper I co-authored for Policy Exchange earlier this year with Sir Trevor Phillips found that items returned unconditionally are often at serious risk. Benin Bronzes returned by museums across the world have disappeared into private collections. Some bronzes even seem to have gone missing from museums in Lagos and Benin City. Their fate remains unknown, but the story offers a stark reminder of the dangers of transferring artefacts into the ownership of other countries without question.
So why is a loan unacceptable to the Ethiopian government? If Ethiopia truly wishes to display these objects for public benefit, why reject a loan that guarantees just that? Their insistence on legal ownership – rather than public display – rather weakens the moral force of their claim.
The V&A is simply too historically significant to have its collection held hostage to the whims of a single, self-styled visionary. Hunt knew the law before he took the job. If he was so determined to spend his days dispatching artefacts abroad, there was no shortage of museums that would have indulged him. Instead, he accepted stewardship of one of England's great civic treasures – the first museum in the world to fling open its doors to the masses and truly democratise visual education. Cole famously installed gas lamps so that working men and women could visit after dark, helping to break the aristocratic stranglehold on art and culture.
Hunt risks undoing that work: gutting the V&A of its international collections and ensuring that the experience of world history is once again a privilege reserved for those who can afford the airfare.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
R&A must choose legacy over divisiveness for 2028 Open Championship
For the 50,171 members of the public who have signed our petition, and indeed, for many ordinary golf fans, the answer is clear: The Open Championship must not be handed to Trump Turnberry. (Image: Matthew McGregor is the CEO of 38 Degrees) 38 Degrees is a community of more than a million people who – in a moment away from their busy days – take small actions on issues they care about, which all add up to something bigger. We know that people power is one of the most effective ways to ensure decision makers listen. There's a growing chorus demanding that the integrity of our national institutions remain unblemished by divisive figures. To allow a Trump-owned course to host one of the world's biggest, oldest, and most respected golf tournaments would be to reward a divisive individual who condones war crimes and ethnic cleansing in Gaza and promotes racist, homophobic, and misogynistic messages around the world. It would signal support for a figure who ignores national and international law and undermines democratic values. The outpouring of passion for The Open Championship shows how important it is to our national identity. We want to see the world's best golfers compete on the most magnificent links courses, unburdened by external distractions. But the prospect of Donald Trump's ownership casting a shadow over the event threatens to wash that away. It hits at the very heart of what The Open Championship represents: unity, respect, and the sheer joy of the game. Whilst the R&A rightly focuses on the logistical challenges of hosting such a massive event, these challenges pale in comparison to the potential damage to The Open Championship's reputation. (Image: Trump Turnberry) The news over the last week or so that Turnberry is even being considered, despite the R&A's previous stance on ensuring the focus remains on golf and not the owner, sparks anger among those who believe the sport should rise above political entanglement and divisiveness. This decision seems unfair to the vast majority of people who simply want to enjoy the sport. 50,171 members of the public have told the R&A: Deliver on the promise of an Open that truly celebrates golf, free from the baggage of divisive figures, if you want to keep the trust of fans for generations to come. With Donald Trump in the country for the next five days, the gravity of this decision is even clearer. The integrity of the Open Championship is on the line. Do the right thing. #Saynototrump. Matthew McGregor is the CEO of 38 Degrees. To find out more about their work, go to:


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Is Trump good for Turnberry and Scottish tourism industry?
There are certainly many people within Scottish tourism, golf and wider society who will find Mr Trump's ownership of Turnberry, one of the country's prized sporting and hospitality assets, and his hotel and golf resort on the Menie Estate hard to stomach. The brand of populist politics he espouses, which seems expressly designed to sow outrage and division, means many people would simply not countenance a visit to any of his properties. No matter how popular the courses are within Scotland's golfing community, or how impressive the quality of the hotels, the fact they are owned by Mr Trump will be a turn-off. Some people will not have forgotten the unedifying public battle that took place between the Trump organisation and Menie residents as he sought to progress his plans on land that opponents said had protected environmental status. Mr Trump, of course, could not give two hoots about anyone who stands in the way of his developments. He will doubtless be of the firm belief that the investments made by his business have greatly enhanced the sporting and hospitality landscape of Scotland, and are better than anything else around. And moreover, it would be categorically wrong to say that Mr Trump and his family's resorts do not have their admirers. There are plenty of people in Scotland, perhaps including those with leanings to the political right, who like what they see as his non-nonsense, straight-taking approach. They may well like his apparent ability for doing a deal, and welcome the investment the Trump business group has made in Scotland. Read more: And there is certainly no shortage of golfers who like what Mr Trump has done with Turnberry, which continues to remain off The Open rota, despite recent representations by the President's family. In an interview with The Herald's Nick Rodger back in 2016, the golf course architect tasked with re-designing the fabled Aisla course, Martin Ebert, said the investment made by Mr Trump had saved its Open Championship future, highlighting the work undertaken to revive what had been a 'fading jewel'. Mr Ebert was not to know, of course, that the R&A would announce five years later that The Open would not be returning to Turnberry while Mr Trump was associated with it, but the warm feelings towards the course remain. Leading US player Bryson DeChambeau expressed his support for The Open returning to the Aisla links just last week. 'I look at it as a golf course,' he said. 'It's one of the best golf courses in the world, and I'd love for it to be a part of the rotation. Albeit I haven't played it, I've heard so many great things about it, and anytime you get to play a special historical golf course like that, I think it's worthy of it for sure.' A similar view may be held by golf fans old enough to remember the famous 'Duel in the Sun' that took place at Turnberry in 1977, when Tom Watson and Jack Nicklaus went head-to-head for the Open title. Equally, there appears to a lot of love in the golfing world for the Trump International Golf Links on the Menie Estate, which will host the Scottish Championship, a DP World Tour event, from August 7 to 10. Beyond the golfing world, the Trump camp will likely proclaim that its investments have boosted the Scottish tourism offer more generally, and point to the jobs that are provided by the Ayrshire and [[Aberdeen]]shire resorts and the visitors they attract. Granted, the look and feel of the Trump properties will not be attractive to everyone. But some will very much like the cut of their jib. Marc Crothall, chief executive of the Scottish Tourism Alliance, said there is a case for separating the resorts from their ownership as he emphasised the importance of destinations like Turnberry to the overall tourism offer in Scotland. This would seem to be a pertinent point as the sector strives to keep international visitors coming to Scotland in an era when pressure from costs is making it difficult for hotel owners and other tourism businesses to re-invest in their properties. 'There is no doubt that Turnberry remains one of Scotland's most iconic and internationally recognised golf resorts, and the quality of the product and experience it delivers has made a positive contribution to Scotland's global tourism reputation,' Mr Crothall told The Herald. 'As with any world-class tourism asset, for many visitors, the focus will be on the destination and the experience it offers rather than its owner. 'Continued investment in Scotland's tourism product is vital, particularly in our rural economies; it supports jobs, skills, the local supply chain and brings significant benefits to those communities, while also maintaining Scotland's competitive edge in the global luxury market. 'Turnberry is a prime example of how Scotland continues to attract global visitors seeking premium experiences rooted in heritage and sport, which showcase our world-renowned natural assets. Our growing reputation as a world-class golf destination is further strengthened by the development of other resorts, such as Trump International in Aberdeenshire, which has bolstered the north-east's visitor economy.' Mr Crothall added: 'Scotland's tourism industry aspires to achieve its national strategic ambition of being a world leader in 21st-century tourism, as outlined in the Scotland Outlook 2030 strategy. Investment is critical if this vision is to be realised, and it should be welcomed, whether from an independent owner-operator, a global organisation or the public sector; all investment is investment in Scotland's wider tourism offering and both the national and local economy.' Not everyone will agree with Mr Crothall. As we will perhaps see in the coming days if protestors turn up to 'greet' Mr Trump when he lands in Scotland, the President's money will not be welcomed by all. But we can all agree that there will be no shortage of headlines, as usual, when the President comes to town.


Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
The Donald and the art of golf diplomacy
In 1969, one of the great acts of sportsmanship occurred at Royal Birkdale golf club in Southport, when the Ryder Cup came down to the last green. Britain's Tony Jacklin had a three-foot putt to halve the final match with Jack Nicklaus and make the score 16-16, but the American picked up Jacklin's marker and said he was happy to share the spoils. 'I don't think you would have missed,' he said, 'but I didn't want to give you the chance.' The gesture was immortalised in the naming of a Florida golf course, the Concession, which has just been awarded the next three senior PGA Championships, one of the majors. I suspect that Donald Trump, who owns three courses in that state, might regard Nicklaus as a loser. The coat of arms for Trump's latest course in Scotland has the motto Numquam Concedere ('never let them have a gimme', to paraphrase) and the emblem of an eagle clutching two balls. Subtle. Police and protestors are ready for Trump's visit to Aberdeenshire this weekend, where he will open the course at Menie, which is due to be named the MacLeod after his mother and has, the family boasts, 'the largest sand dunes in Scotland'. That might trigger environmentalists, since the ancient links has lost its Site of Special Scientific Interest status as a result of Trump's development. Sir Keir Starmer is expected to travel north during the visit to bend a knee and watch Trump drive, since the way to the President's heart is by admiring his swing. One of the things Trump would most like the Prime Minister to bring as a gift is the right to host the Open Championship, which was held last week at Royal Portrush in Northern Ireland. When Trump bought the Turnberry course in Ayrshire in 2014, it was with the expectation that the Open would follow. The R&A, which organises the Open, initially made positive noises and it is believed the course had been earmarked to host the tournament in 2020. Turnberry is undeniably a magnificent course, rated the eighth finest outside the US by Golf Digest, and it has hosted four excellent Opens including in 1977, when Nicklaus slugged it out for four days with Tom Watson, and the Open in 2009, when Watson almost won again at the age of 59. It would be a more than worthy venue. Then Trump decided to become president, and his controversial comments made people feel uneasy. In 2015, Peter Dawson, the outgoing chief executive of the R&A, said that a bit of time should pass before returning to Turnberry. His successor, Martin Slumbers, took a harder line, saying it could not be held there because the focus would be on the course's owner rather than the golfers. This came after the PGA of America removed the 2022 PGA Championship from Trump's Bedminster course in New Jersey following the attack on the Capitol in 2021. Since then, the position against giving Trump an Open has become more nuanced. Mark Darbon, the new R&A chief executive, says he would 'love' the Open to return to Turnberry but while he has discussed it recently with Eric Trump, Donald's son, there are 'logistical challenges'. The course is in the middle of nowhere and the transport links and hotel accommodation can't cope. Only 120,000 could attend Turnberry in 2009, while 280,000 came to Portrush. Sorry Donald, nothing personal. A feasibility study, that old favourite for kicking things into the long grass (and the rough can be very long at the Open), has been commissioned to ease the political pressure. If that fails, they can fall back on Sir Humphrey's 'in the fullness of time' tactic. The next two Opens have been allocated – Birkdale in 2026 and St Andrews in 2027 – and it is believed that Muirfield in East Lothian, which last hosted an Open in 2013, will be given 2028 as the reward for agreeing to allow women members. The last time three successive Opens were held in Scotland was 1893, so that means we're looking at 2030, when Trump will be 84 and (presumably) no longer in the White House. This may be nudged back even further if there are difficult scenes at the Ryder Cup in late September, to be held in Bethpage, New York, where the fans are notoriously raucous. Trump will surely be there on the tee, a week after his state visit to Britain, having missed the chance to host a Ryder Cup in his first term. It was to be at Whistling Straits, Wisconsin, in 2020, a few weeks before he fought re-election, but was postponed by the pandemic. A US win might have swayed the election for him. He will not miss this Ryder Cup but if it is a rowdy one – expect no sporting concessions this time – the R&A may find a new reason to delay a decision. One thing that is certain about Trump's visit to Aberdeenshire is that he will have a GREAT opening round. He is a more than decent golfer to judge by footage (though his declared handicap of 2.8 raises eyebrows), but he has never knowingly played badly, certainly not at a club he owns. Two weeks ago, he won the members' championship at Bedminster yet again, while in 2023 he won a two-day competition at his West Palm Beach course, despite being 600 miles away on the first day. Trump explained that he'd had a brilliant practice round two days before and so submitted that as his Saturday scorecard in absentia, meaning the field began Sunday five strokes behind. This performance, Trump declared, proved that he had the 'strength and stamina' to deserve a second term. He certainly has the sneakiness and chutzpah, though he falls a long way behind Kim Jong-il, the Eternal Scratch Champion of Pyong-yang, who famously once had five holes-in-one during a round that was 38 under par. Trump and Kim's sporting prowess matches that of Vladimir Putin, who has scored eight goals in an ice hockey match three times, and Mao Zedong, who was said to have swum ten miles of the Yangtze in just over an hour. It was ever thus with vain leaders, whose sporting boasts are rarely challenged. The Emperor Nero competed at the Olympics in the race for four-horse chariots, steering a vehicle pulled by ten horses. The excessive horsepower meant Nero crashed at the first corner, but he successfully persuaded the judges to award him the laurels since he should have won. Trump's latest visit to Bedminster put him within sight of Barack Obama in the list of golf-mad presidents. Obama played 306 rounds while in office, and Trump is now up to 304 after six months of his second term. During the 2016 election, Trump claimed he would be too busy to play golf as president. He then squeezed in 11 rounds in his first eight weeks. This term, he was back on the course on Day 6. And again on Day 7. Trump is also not far behind Bill Clinton, the only president whose handicap went down in the White House – but he has some way to go to beat the top two. Dwight Eisenhower notched up 800 rounds in office, some quite iffy. Bob Hope quipped: 'If Eisenhower slices the budget like he slices a golf ball, the nation has nothing to worry about.' Way out in front is Woodrow Wilson, who played every other day during the first world war, including at the Versailles peace conference, but he remained mediocre. As a presidential duffer, he comes behind William Taft, who once recorded a 27 on one hole, including 17 to get out of a bunker, but believed that it was gentlemanly to be honest. 'There is nothing which furnishes a greater test of character and self-restraint than golf,' Taft said. Trump takes a different view, which is why it is unsurprising that world leaders now see golf as a tool of diplomacy. Shinzo Abe, the deceased former prime minister of Japan, played five rounds with Trump and in 2016 gave him a $3,700 golden driver. Abe did so well out of this that Yoon Suk Yeol, the President of South Korea, took up the sport to help his own diplomatic game. Nigel Farage's close friendship with Trump may in part be due to this shared interest – the Reform UK leader says he almost took up a US college golf scholarship – though Farage's bad back doesn't allow him to play any more. When Cyril Ramaphosa visited the White House in May, the South African President took with him a pair of major-winning golfers, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, in the hope that it would impress Trump. Alexander Stubb, the Finnish President and a former college golfer in South Carolina, negotiated the purchase by the US of some Finnish icebreakers after he played (and won) a tournament in Palm Beach with Trump as his partner in March. That will be the challenge for Starmer when he pays homage. Unlike David Cameron, who rewarded Obama for his Brexit intervention in 2016 with a round at the Grove in Hertfordshire, Starmer can't fake an interest in golf. He was the first prime minister to reject honorary membership of the Ellesborough golf club near Chequers. Perhaps he will bring a star golfer like Sir Nick Faldo with him to swing for Britain. Starmer did have a professional golfer on his backbenches in Brian Leishman, MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, but the Socialist Campaign Group member, who recently lost the whip for rebelling, will surely not play ball. How about the Paymaster General? Nick Thomas-Symonds's skill with a mashie niblick is unknown, but he was named Nicklaus by a golf-mad father. For diplomatic reasons, Starmer may want to allow Trump to say that his course was blessed by a British Nicklaus. Just don't expect the President to concede any short putts.