logo
Meet Serik Akshulakov, Kazakhstan's Pioneer in Neurosurgery

Meet Serik Akshulakov, Kazakhstan's Pioneer in Neurosurgery

Euronews12-03-2025
Italian art lovers want the return of a stolen Renaissance painting but its English owner is refusing.
ADVERTISEMENT
In 1973, 'Madonna and Child' by Antonio Solario was stolen. The 16th century Renaissance-era painting was taken from the civic museum in the town of Belluno in the Dolomite mountains of northern Italy.
While it's not known exactly who stole the painting, it was later bought by Baron de Dozsa, who brought it back to his Tudor manor house in Norfolk, England.
'Madonna and Child' has been on Interpol's stolen art database ever since the incident, despite it being known that the painting is in the possession of the late baron's ex-wife, Barbara de Dozsa.
Christopher Marinello, a lawyer who is an expert in returning stolen artworks, has vowed to return the painting to Belluno, where his family has roots.
'I have a family connection to this region, and I decided I was going to stick my 2 cents' in and interfere,' said Marinello, whose company Art Recovery International has helped track down works by artists including Henri Matisse and Henry Moore and return them to their rightful owners.
But in this quest, he has so far been frustrated. Marinello said that de Dozsa has declined to give up the painting, despite telling him 'she never really liked it.'
'She doesn't hang it – it reminds her of her ex-husband,' he said.
"Madonna and Child" by Italian painter Antonio Solari
AP Photo
Marinello said the painting's rediscovery began when Barbara de Dozsa tried to sell it through an auction house in England a few years ago, and it was recognized as a stolen artwork.
The local police force, Norfolk Constabulary, was called in but eventually returned the painting to de Dozsa. Reportedly, UK judicial authorities instructed them to return the artwork because 'several years have passed and there has been no response from Italian authorities in relation to the investigation.'
Norfolk police said they are not currently investigating the case.
Paintings by Solario, who worked across Italy in the early 16th century, have sold at auction for several hundred thousand dollars. Marinello estimated the 'Madonna and Child' is probably worth less than £100,000 pounds (€119,000).
'It's not a Rembrandt,' he said, but added: 'It has a value beyond its monetary value. Solario was from the area so it's very important to the people of Belluno.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California
US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California

LeMonde

time4 hours ago

  • LeMonde

US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California

A US appeals court has upheld an order blocking immigration agents from carrying out patrols in California. The patrols have led to indiscriminate detentions without reasonable grounds to suspect people of being undocumented immigrants. The ruling, delivered by a three-judge panel late on Friday, August 2, denies the federal government's appeal to overturn a temporary July order to halt "roving patrols" in Los Angeles, which immigration rights groups have described as illegally using racial profiling. California residents and advocacy groups sued the Department of Homeland Security over the detentions. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong had ordered an end to the arrests. She had argued that such actions by agents violate a person's constitutional rights, which safeguard against unreasonable seizures by the government. She had said the detentions were being made "based upon race alone," on whether a person was speaking Spanish or English with an accent or because of their place of work, and ordered them stopped. The Jason Gavidia case Friday's ruling by the US Ninth Circuit Court of appeals described the case of plaintiff Jason Gavidia. A US citizen, born and raised in East Los Angeles, Gavidia was arrested outside a tow yard in Montebello by agents carrying military-style rifles on June 12. "The agents repeatedly asked Gavidia whether he is American – and they repeatedly ignored his answer: 'I am an American,'" the ruling said. Agents asked what hospital he was born in, and Gavidia responded he did not know, but said he was born in "East LA." The court said Gavidia told the agents he could show them his government-issued ID. "The agents took Gavidia's ID and his phone and kept his phone for 20 minutes. They never returned his ID." A victory against ICE raids Los Angeles and the surrounding suburbs have been ground zero for President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown. He ordered the US military deployed there for weeks, and agents have rounded up migrants at car washes, bus stops, stores and farms. The ruling said the government's defense team argued that "certain types of businesses, including car washes, were selected for encounters because (...) they are likely to employ persons without legal documentation." Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. Rights groups hailed the order as a victory for those seeking to bar the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from conducting the raids. "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," said attorney Mohammad Tajsar of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California. "We look forward to holding the federal government accountable for these authoritarian horrors it unleashed in Southern California."

Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case
Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case

LeMonde

timea day ago

  • LeMonde

Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case

A Miami jury has decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk is seeking to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome, but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along − despite its repeated denials − by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. "Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, "and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," claiming that the plaintiffs concocted a story "blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility." In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million in compensatory damages, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. Tesla said it will appeal. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks − falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like "driver assist" and "copilot" to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. "Words matter," Schreiber said. "And if someone is playing fast and loose with words, they're playing fast and loose with information and facts."

AI-generated videos used to tout non-existent Philippine government subsidy
AI-generated videos used to tout non-existent Philippine government subsidy

AFP

time2 days ago

  • AFP

AI-generated videos used to tout non-existent Philippine government subsidy

"DSWD education cash assistance for everyone in school," reads the English and Tagalog-language caption of a Facebook video shared on July 9, 2025. The caption also includes a link where people can register for the purported cash assistance programme offered by the Philippines' Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD). The video shows a man wearing a DSWD branded shirt speaking to camera from a school yard, with students milling about in the background. He claims all students are entitled to varying amounts of educational cash assistance, depending on their grade and urges them to register online through the provided link. Superimposed text on the video says the cash will be paid out on July 12. The logos of the DSWD and the Department of Education are also superimposed. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on August 1, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same video was also shared on TikTok, where it was viewed more than 1.2 million times. Similar videos were also shared elsewhere on TikTok and Facebook. These posts provide a link to a website where people can register their name, address and phone number, but the site is not a government webpage belonging to either the DSWD or education department. Both departments have also issued warnings about the posts. The DSWD said in a July 11 post on its verified Facebook page that the circulating posts and videos were "fake", reminding the public to be wary of information that does not come directly from its official social media accounts (archived link). An earlier post by the DSWD said it "does not offer direct financial assistance for education", but runs a scheme where students in need can receive assistance in exchange for tutoring elementary students who are struggling or have not yet learned to read (archived link). "AI videos being shared by a certain Facebook page about a supposed DSWD Educational Cash Assistance for all students is fake news," added an education department post on its verified Facebook page from July 17 (archived link). AI-generated videos A reverse image search led to more false posts, but Google's "About this image" feature identified the video as having been made with AI. The ability to detect AI-generated images is based on Google's SynthID technology, which was launched by its DeepMind AI lab in 2023 (archived here and here). Image Screenshot of the Google page indicating the video was made using AI A closer analysis of the video shows it contains a watermark in the bottom-right corner for Veo, Google's video-generation platform that allows users to create eight-second videos (archived here and here). The falsely shared video appears to have been created by splicing together three clips each around eight seconds long. Image Screenshot of the falsely shared video's final frames, with the Veo watermark magnified by AFP The falsely shared videos also contains visual inconsistencies, which despite the meteoric rise of AI technology remain an indicator of inauthentic visuals. In one video, for example, two students walking behind the speaker appear to merge into one. Image Screenshots showing two students in the falsely shared video appearing to merge, highlighted by AFP AFP has also previously debunked similar false claims about cash assistance programmes in the Philippines.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store