logo
Delta issues urgent warning over airplane seats as airline is forced to make cuts

Delta issues urgent warning over airplane seats as airline is forced to make cuts

Daily Mail​a day ago
Delta Air Lines has issued a warning for travelers looking to fly in a main cabin seat on any flight.
Delta President Glen Hauenstein revealed the airline industry is looking to cut its main-cabin capacity on all flights by around 1 percent by September.
Delta, specifically, is axing unpopular trips such as flights on Tuesdays and Wednesdays and trips with unusual takeoff times.
Delta hopes the trip trimming will help in consolidating main cabin travel on popular flights and boost revenue.
The goal was announced after Delta's main cabin revenue fell 5 percent during its second quarter, while its premium revenue grew by 5 percent.
'I've been in this business quite a long time, and I've really never seen that amount of capacity come out in a non-recessionary environment,' Hauenstein said.
'And I don't think anybody is predicting that we're in a recession.'
The news of the trip slashes comes after the company launched its first nonstop flight route connecting Utah to Asia.
Delta's $15.51 billion in second quarter revenue beat Wall Street's expectations even though some travelers vowed to switch to Spirit.
The company is in the process of modernizing its aircrafts and hinted at the possibility of adding in-flight gambling.
Its also hard at work in creating its new environmentally friendly aircraft through its partnership with JetZero, which is scheduled to take flight in 2027.
United Airlines is coming for Delta when it comes to futuristic jets now that it has agreed to buy up to 200 planes from JetZero.
The deal finalization for the new JetZero Z4 planes comes after United finished its first quarter with $13.2 billion, the best performance during that period in five years.
Experts predict the airline industry will continue to be unpredictable, amid changes to travel habits and economic headwinds.
Annual revenue has grown and passenger numbers have bounced back from the pandemic.
However, fears of recession and tariffs have made an impact on carrier operations.
These factors, along with the decline in international travel, has led to airlines slashing their 2025 outlooks.
'We are concerned that the new economic paradigm causes another structural leg down in corporate travel while the negative wealth effect further dampens consumption, especially by Baby Boomers,' TD Cowen wrote in April.
Despite the changes and concerns, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) is expecting this year to be successful.
'The first half of 2025 has brought significant uncertainties to global markets.
'Nonetheless, by many measures including net profits, it will still be a better year for airlines than 2024, although slightly below our previous projections,' said director general Willie Walsh.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Republican admits: Trump's tariffs will ‘hurt' district but ‘I support him'
Texas Republican admits: Trump's tariffs will ‘hurt' district but ‘I support him'

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Texas Republican admits: Trump's tariffs will ‘hurt' district but ‘I support him'

A Texas congressman laid out the often lonely task of defending Donald Trump's tariff plan to Americans on Sunday as he admitted to CNN that the measures would hurt his district but he supported them anyway. Tony Gonzales was on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday when he gave the matter-of-fact assessment. His state and district battled powerful flooding over the Fourth of July weekend that left more than 100 dead and dozens missing at a girls' summer camp and an RV/mobile home park. Gonzales was asked by CNN's Dana Bash whether the announced 'reciprocal' tariff rate for Mexico of 30 percent was too high. The congressman was also queried whether his district would be 'hurt' by the tariffs. 'It may,' responded Gonzales. 'But I do support the president in this.' President Trump began informing countries of effective tariff rates to go into effect August 1 as he seeks to apply further pressure to countries open to trade agreements. 'I think for too long, Mexico has gotten away with — been allowed to do anything,' the congressman continued. He repeated that claim a few seconds later — that Mexico was able to 'do what ever it wants', but did not give any specific examples of what he meant or how the U.S.-Mexico trade relationship had been impacted. He added that he was focused on the upcoming deadline, which appears to translate as hoping that Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum could reach a deal with the White House before that point. The spotlight on Trump's tariffs largely evaporated over the summer as it became clear that Wall Street had mostly absorbed the effects of Trump's tariffs on the market so far. Whether that will continue in August, once the remainder of Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' go into effect, remains to be seen. Trump was previously talked into extending a pause for those measures for 90 days, leading to the negotiations this month, but also revealing continued market fears about the reciprocal measures. Mexico's government said this week that it was open to an agreement. 'We believe, based on what our colleagues discussed yesterday, that we will reach an agreement with the United States government and that, of course, we will achieve better conditions,' Sheinbaum said, according to Bloomberg and the Associated Press. But she also reportedly warned, in remarks made in the border state of Sonora, that Mexico would not bow to demands for unilateral concessions. Her country signed a trade deal meant to replace NAFTA during Trump's first term, the US-Mexico-Canada trade pact known as USMCA. Trump, however, has continued to use tariff threats to bully America's two closest neighbors into line, particularly on the issue of border crossings of fentanyl, which the Trump administration blames Canada and Mexico for not stopping. In recent days, the U.S. president has used that strategy to push Canada's government to drop a new tax on U.S. tech companies and even to attempt to try and force Brazil's government to drop a criminal prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, the country's former president and a Trump ally. The Brazilian leader is accused of leading a coup to overthrow the government of his successor. The director of Trump's White House Economic Council, Kevin Hassett, said Sunday that Trump was using tariffs to pursue policy goals beyond any relation to trade deficits or unfair economic practices. 'Well, bottom line is the president has been very frustrated with negotiations with Brazil and also with the actions of Brazil,' Hassett said, while skirting around what those 'actions' actually were. 'In the end, though, you know, we're trying to put America first. I think that a lot of people, when I'm talking to negotiators from other countries, at some point they'll say, 'What did we do wrong?'' Those border crossings were the reason cited for Trump's announced 30 percent tariffs against Mexico. "Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT what Mexico has done is not enough. Mexico still has not stopped the Cartels who are trying to turn all of North America in a Narco-Trafficking Playground," Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Japan election could further hamper BOJ's drive to raise rates
Japan election could further hamper BOJ's drive to raise rates

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Japan election could further hamper BOJ's drive to raise rates

TOKYO, July 14 (Reuters) - Japan's central bank may face political pressure to keep interest rates low for longer than it wants, as opposition parties favouring tax cuts and loose monetary policy are expected to gain influence after a July 20 election. Opinion surveys suggest Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's coalition may lose its majority in the upper house of parliament, forcing it to court an array of smaller parties pushing for easier fiscal and monetary policy. The governing bloc led by Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party is already a minority in the more powerful lower house, so a stalemate in both chambers could give opposition parties outsized influence in policy decisions. Ishiba has supported the Bank of Japan's policy of gradually lifting interest rates from near zero as inflation picks up in the world's fourth-biggest economy, while trying to curb the biggest government debt burden in the industrial world. But if opposition groups gain traction with their pressure on the BOJ to avoid rate hikes and for the government to cut the sales tax, that could boost bond yields and complicate the bank's efforts to normalise monetary policy, some analysts say. The BOJ declined to comment on the potential impact of the election on monetary policy. "There's a 50% chance the ruling coalition could lose its majority in the upper house, which could lead to increased debate about cutting Japan's consumption tax rate," said Daiju Aoki, chief Japan economist at UBS SuMi Trust Wealth Management. "That would push up Japan's long-term interest rates by stoking concern over the country's finances," he said. Sohei Kamiya, head of the upstart right-wing party Sanseito, has criticised the BOJ for slowing its bond buying when the economy remains weak. "The Ministry of Finance and BOJ should work hand in hand in taking aggressive steps for a few years to boost domestic demand," Kamiya told a press conference this month. Another small group, the Japan Innovation Party, wants the BOJ to go slow in raising rates to restrain the cost of interest on the government's debt. Yuichiro Tamaki, head of the Democratic Party for the People, a party seen as a strong candidate to join Ishiba's coalition, has urged the BOJ to loosen, not tighten, monetary policy to keep the yen from rising and hurting the export-reliant economy. Even if the coalition keeps its majority, Ishiba may need to ditch his hawkish fiscal tilt and boost spending to cushion the economic blow from threatened U.S. tariffs and rising costs of living. "There's a good chance the government will compile an extra budget to fund another spending package to the tune of 5 to 10 trillion yen ($35 billion-$70 billion). That would push up bond yields further," said former BOJ board member Makoto Sakurai, who expects the central bank to avoid raising rates at least until March. Japan's public debt is equal to 250% of gross domestic product, far above that of Greece at 165%. The government spends nearly a quarter of its budget to finance a 1,164-trillion-yen ($7.9-trillion) debt pile, with the cost expected to rise steadily as the BOJ exits zero-interest rates. To be sure, inflation - above the BOJ's 2% target for three years - boosts nominal tax revenues, which can help the government avoid ramping up bond issuance to fund further spending. But cutting the sales tax rate, an idea Ishiba has ruled out for now, would leave a bigger hole in Japan's finances. Once a fringe idea, cutting the 10% sales tax is now among Japan's most popular economic policy proposals. In a recent poll by the Asahi newspaper 68% of voters thought a sales tax cut was the best way to cushion the blow from rising living costs, compared with 18% who preferred cash payouts. If the sales tax is on the chopping block after the election, it is the kind of vital issue that could prod Ishiba to dissolve the lower house and call a snap election - a move that would prolong political uncertainty. If Ishiba were to step down, an LDP race to replace him could revive market attention to candidates like Sanae Takaichi, an advocate of aggressive monetary easing whom Ishiba narrowly beat in the party's leadership race last year. Unlike Ishiba, who gave a quiet nod to BOJ policy normalisation, Takaichi has said it would be "stupid" for the central bank to raise rates. All this would mean the BOJ's rate hikes, already on pause due to uncertainty over U.S. tariffs, could be put on hold even longer. "We may need to brace for a long period of political uncertainty and market volatility," said Naomi Muguruma, chief bond strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities. "That would just give the BOJ another reason to sit on the sidelines and wait for the dust to settle." ($1 = 146.8800 yen)

Who profited most from Club World Cup $1bn prize pot?
Who profited most from Club World Cup $1bn prize pot?

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Who profited most from Club World Cup $1bn prize pot?

The Club World Cup has had its critics but for the clubs involved the competition's $1bn prize pot has proved a lucrative the first edition of the new-look tournament now complete, we are able to analyse the financial rewards reaped by those competing Sport explains the breakdown of the prize money and what it means for the clubs getting it. How much money was on offer? The new look competition had a prize pot of $1bn (£726m) to give out to the 32 competing clubs, with $525m divided between all clubs for participation and $475m awarded on a performance-related awarded for participation for European clubs was weighted by a ranking based on sporting and commercial criteria, meaning some were awarded more than others for taking part. European clubs were handed between $12.81m and $38.19m just for turning up, while teams from other continents were given a set fee - that was $15.21m for South America, $9.55m for North and Central America, and Asia and Africa, and $3.58m for has not confirmed the individual amounts given to European clubs for taking part, so we have used estimates from football finance website The Swiss Ramble based on Uefa's club coefficient system. The prize money figures have been converted from US dollars into pound sterling. The big winners Tournament winners Chelsea were by far the most financially successful team, earning about £84m, while Paris St-Germain made about £78.4m in their run to the clubs, who generally enjoyed larger participation fees, made an average of around £39m while impressive runs from the likes of semi-finalists Fluminense meant that South American clubs made £24m on was on offer for results in the group stage, with around £1.5m for a win and £730k for a clubs, including Pachuca and Seattle Sounders, lost all three group games meaning they only received their participation fee. Auckland City hit the jackpot Despite prize money figures for the likes of part-time side Auckland City looking small, the competition has been incredibly lucrative for them within the context of their overall finances. The £3.3m taken home by Auckland City was around seven times their overall 2024 revenue of approximately £488,000, while the £67m made by Real Madrid was just 4% of their 2024 figure of £ this is a huge positive for the part-time club, football finance expert Kieran Maguire has concerns for the impact on other sides from New said: "They have earned so much money that it's difficult to see anybody being able to compete with them if they invest in the playing squad."And there's a huge incentive for them to do that because it enhances the chances of them qualifying for the next Club World Cup."It's good for them, but it's not necessarily good for the league when you're trying to sell a competitive league to broadcasters." Extra transfer funds For the European clubs, the extra revenue has been welcomed as a way of increasing their transfer line with Uefa rules, clubs are limited to spending 70% of their revenue on wages, transfers and agents' fees - so for every £50m earned, an extra £35m is available for clubs have already paid off their summer transfer business by taking part in the competition. More than 65% of Borussia Dortmund's £57.9m transfer business so far this summer has been paid off from their participation in the United States after they reached the quarter-final £27m Dortmund paid to Sunderland for Jobe Bellingham has already been completely paid have spent £198m on reinforcements so far this summer on the likes of Joao Pedro and Liam Delap - £84m of that has been covered by their impressive run at the Club World Manchester City's surprise last-16 exit to Al-Hilal, they still earned around £38m from the tournament - which equates to 35% of the summer business they have conducted so more simple terms, it has paid for their £31m acquisition of Rayan Ait-Nouri from Madrid paid Liverpool a fee of around £8.4m for Trent Alexander-Arnold to get him a month early to be part of their squad for the competition - that was paid off after just three matches."It's welcome for the accountants at football clubs. The business will be happy," said finance expert Maguire about the competition's lucrative incentives."But I'm not sure fans will be happy, particularly of European clubs, and it'll be the same for players and managers."We're reaching a crisis point as far as player welfare is concerned. We could be entering a period of conflict between players and owners."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store