Bulgarian ruling party leader claims US-delivered F-16 jet defective
Borisov made the remarks while criticizing Bulgarian President Rumen Radev's actions during the European People's Party congress in Valencia, Spain.
"He [Radev] quietly whispered to accompanying journalists that this new F-16 is broken and can't fly … The air force commander and Radev's close friend [Nikolay Rusev] should be fired immediately. How could we receive a broken aircraft for $100 million?" the former prime minister said.
In response, President Radev urged Borisov to influence the government to allocate more funds for F-16 maintenance, reminding that the purchase agreement was signed during Borisov's own administration in 2019.
In July 2019, the Bulgarian government signed a $1.26 billion contract to purchase eight F-16 Block 70 fighter jets from the United States. The original delivery schedule indicated that Bulgaria would receive the first jet by mid-2023. However, the timeline was delayed to 2025 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, Bulgaria also signed a contract for an additional eight F-16 jets.
UNI SPUTNIK GNK
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
a minute ago
- Deccan Herald
Rupee rises 17 paise to 86.24 against US dollar in early trade
Forex traders said uncertainty over the India-US trade deal has been a huge overhang for the forex market, leaving the rupee trading in a tight range.
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
F-16 jets deployed as Thailand, Cambodia bomb military bases in fresh attack
Thailand has deployed F-16 fighter jets along the border with Cambodia on Thursday. this development comes after the Royal Thai army reported that Cambodia targeted military bases near the northeastern part of the disputed border. In this screengrab, a Cambodian attack on Thailand's military base was recorded by passersby. (Chumchon Khon Surin /Facebook) As per Bangkok Post, the Thai Army stated that by late morning, clashes were reported at six locations along the contested border As per the Thai Army, one out of the six F-16 jets was fired into Cambodia and destroyed a military target. "We have used air power against military targets as planned," Thai army deputy spokesperson Richa Suksuwanon told reporters on Thursday. Also Read | Thailand, Cambodia shut borders, expel diplomats as tensions rise | What we know Meanwhile, Thailand has reported that Cambodian soldiers opened fire at a Thai military base in Surin and launched several rocket attacks towards Sisaket. After carrying out its air strikes, the Thai Army has stated that all F-16 jets are back at their bases. "All Thai F-16s have returned home safety and intact, after a rapid deployment to drop bombs on Cambodian battalions," the Thai army wrote in a social media post. Following Thursday's escalation, the Thai interior ministry has stated it is now working towards evacuating citizens along the border areas as a precautionary measure. Cambodia's National Defence ministry has accused Thailand from using heavy weapons, air strikes and rockets as part of an attempt to "seize" Cambodian territory. 'These unlawful and irresponsible actions not only pose a grave threat to regional peace and stability but also undermine the foundation of international order,' said Ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata as per the Khmer Times newspaper. The defence ministry further stated that Thai fighter jets dropped two bombs on a road, adding that the Thailand has violated its agreement with Cambodia and opened fire. Tensions escalate between Thailand and Cambodia. After Thursday's clashes, both sides have played the blame game and accused one another of starting the border clash. As per the Thai Army, a Cambodian drone was spotted around 7:30 AM in front of the Ta Muen Thom temple. After this, around six Cambodian soldiers were seen in front of a Thai military base, armed with weapons and grenades. Around 8:20am, the Thai Army said Cambodian military opened fire towards the military base. The 2nd Army region also alleged that Cambodian forces et up artillery in neary communities and used the citizens in border towns as human shileds.
Economic Times
a minute ago
- Economic Times
Markets betting on economic strength, not trade deals: Ed Yardeni
"But the stock market has concluded that maybe the US economy is resilient enough to withstand all the volatility and uncertainty that is coming out of Washington on tariffs. And maybe the same thing seems to apply to the to the global economy," says Ed Yardeni, Yardeni Research. ADVERTISEMENT What are you making of the speculation that the street has right now with the US-EU deal? The number is being pegged at 15%. What could that look like? Ed Yardeni: Yes, it very much looks as though the President Trump is aiming now at a 15% base tariff. For a while there it looked like he was satisfied with 10% and then would negotiate whether there would be any additional tariffs depending on the conditions that were open or close to American goods in various countries. But now it looks like he wants 15%. The reason for that is he needs it to help raise revenues to help to reduce the federal deficit. At the end of the day that tariff is going to wind up being a tax probably mostly at American businesses and American consumers and to a certain extent I presume that foreign exporters will be leaned on by their American customers to try to help to a certain extent. But all in all, he is getting kind of what he wants. It will probably be 15% base rate with the EU and then we will see whether the EU opens up. It is hard to imagine that they will because they have been relatively closed for quite some times because a lot of special interest groups that do not want to have easy competition for foreign companies. I am just wondering how does one read into the reaction of the equity markets? I mean, I can see that the VIX is compressing quite sharply. You have got the dollar index which is completely stabilised now. Do you think the markets have much priced in all the tariff negotiations so far? Ed Yardeni: Well, the markets have priced in a fairly optimistic scenario. It is quite a radical change from what the thinking was in the markets back in March, April, and maybe even early May. But really ever since the president backed off or postponed his Liberation Day tariffs on April 2nd, he announced them on April 9th, he postponed them. And now we have got a hard deadline of August 1st. And we are getting some deals, but we certainly did not get 90 deals in 90 days, that that did not happen. And some of these deals that we have so far look more like frameworks than not. But the stock market has concluded that maybe the US economy is resilient enough to withstand all the volatility and uncertainty that is coming out of Washington on tariffs. And maybe the same thing seems to apply to the to the global economy. ADVERTISEMENT All in all, the global economy has held up pretty well despite all the turmoil about tariffs. This does not look like Smoot-Hawley, the 1930s tariff that brought the global economy down and maybe that is because economies are stronger. They are more services oriented. Tariffs are usually put on goods, not on services. But when you put it all together, the stock markets around the world, but particularly in the United States, are discounting what I have been calling since the beginning of the decade the roaring 2020s. There is a lot of focus on technological innovation and how that is going to increase productivity. Let us face it, there is a lot of excitement about artificial intelligence everywhere around the world. Everybody wants to suddenly build these data centres. Some of that is going to turn out to be hype. Some of that may turn out to be leading to overcapacity. But for now, it is happy days are here again. ADVERTISEMENT So, what does that indicate about which way money is going to move in? And do you think it continues to be US first and then emerging markets or is there a tactical shift there? Ed Yardeni: Well, I have been very focused on overweighting the US since 2010, and it has worked out really-really well. Not earlier this year, but now it looks as though maybe the US again looks like it is winning relative to other countries. Look, it is not that hard to underweight the United States and overweight the rest of the world because the United States accounts for 70% of the market capitalisation of stock markets around the world. So if you feel uncomfortable with that and you want to only put 65% in and therefore overweight the rest of the world that is fine if you can find the opportunities and there are opportunities including India, of course, which has already done remarkably well. But all in all, we are looking at a situation where investors are getting a little bit excited here, maybe too excited, but I am looking for bull-bear ratios to get to the point where there is just too many bulls. We are not quite there yet, but we could get there very quickly. ADVERTISEMENT How do you assess the current sentiment shaping up for the global auto sector as a whole because we just had the earnings from Tesla, which was once again a miss, this whole US and Japan deal that is through, that bodes well for the Japanese auto sector. And now, there is a chatter of that US-EU deal as well. How do you see the sentiment for the global auto sector as of now? Ed Yardeni: Well, I think that sentiment certainly improved overnight in Japan. We saw those stocks doing very well. On the other hand, GM has been hurt by to the tune of a billion dollars by Trump's tariffs. And we have yet to really see these tariffs settle in. There is still uncertainty about exactly what they are going to be, but that uncertainty will be gone presumably within a couple of weeks, we will know exactly what the tariffs are. And the auto industry is still going to be challenged. I look at it as a long-term issue. The real long-term issue for autos is we are going to have autonomous cars. We are going to have cars that drive themselves and then the question is, what is the point of owning a car if you can get access to cars that will take you anywhere any time of the day, what is the point of having your own car parked in the parking lot of your work and or in the garage at night? On the other hand, if you want to make some money, you can buy a car and make autonomous taxi out of it. So, there is a lot of challenges here, but we may not need as many cars as we have out there if we can all just use an app to call a car.
