logo
One in three Massachusetts families don't have enough to eat, study finds

One in three Massachusetts families don't have enough to eat, study finds

Boston Globe17-06-2025
Related
:
There's a growing concern that more people will struggle to afford food as
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
It all raises the prospect that more families will struggle to consistently access healthy food in the future, said Food for Free director of operations Tim Cavaretta, who was not involved in the food bank report.
Advertisement
'It's hard to stay optimistic about the overall outlook of food insecurity getting better anytime soon,' he said. 'We could see this affecting populations that we previously assumed were safe, middle class.'
Related
:
Advertisement
The food bank surveyed 3,000 Massachusetts residents from November through March and 37 percent reported being 'food insecure,' defined as having less food than they need to be adequately fed.
That's nearly twice the 19 percent the food bank reported in 2019. In the same time period, the share of those who say they've been forced to skip meals has quadrupled, from 6 to 24 percent.
Hunger is most prevalent among more vulnerable populations, including Black and Hispanic residents and LGBTQ+ people. It is most common in Western Massachusetts, Suffolk County, and Bristol County, where half of residents are food insecure.
The ever-increasing cost of food has forced Jacqui Martinez of Revere into 'constant thinking and rethinking and budgeting' for herself and the 16-year-old granddaughter she raises. The 54-year-old says she is no stranger to stretching the dollar and works full time for the state Department of Mental Health, but the combination of rent, utilities, and health care costs for her diabetes and other chronic conditions is a tough burden to bear.
'Going to the grocery store with $100, you barely come out with two bags of decent food, and then you have to make the choice of whether you're going to buy fresh spinach over canned spinach,' Martinez said. 'Do I buy food, or do I pay the utility bill?'
It's a tradeoff that thousands of people across Massachusetts face all the time.
Among hungry families in Massachusetts, some 58 percent say they face 'nutrition insecurity,' a measure of access to healthy foods; eight in ten typically buy the cheapest food they can find. More than one-third struggle to pay for heat, housing, transportation, and medical needs. Most would need only $62 more each week to have enough to eat, but instead often purchasing prescriptions or seeing the dentist.
Advertisement
In that sense, the cost of so many hungry families ultimately lands on the state and taxpayers, said Dr. Lauren Fiechtner, director of nutrition at MassGeneral Hospital for Children.
People who report food insecurity were twice as likely to visit a hospital emergency room in the last year as nonhungry people, according to the report, and hospitalizations cost Massachusetts nearly $900 million in Medicaid costs.
'There's this cycle of people having food insecurity, and then you have a dietary cost because you can't afford healthy foods, and then we have the chronic conditions that come from that and very high health care costs,' Fiechtner said. 'But I really believe the state can turn the corner, no matter what happens at the federal level.'
Fresh vegetables at the Greater Boston Food Bank warehouse.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Several key federal antipoverty programs could soon be harder to access. Republicans in Congress are working to tighten eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, for instance. Doing so would save nearly $300 billion over the next decade but translate into reduced monthly benefits for millions of the poorest Americans, an
Legislators have similarly looked to
Still, locally, there are promising signs. Households struggling with hunger are more likely to visit food banks or other community organizations for help than they were even a year ago, the study found. This year, a 22 percent jump from 2023, while SNAP usage remained steady, and the state's school and summer meals programs continues to serve up to 73 percent of hungry households with children. The report also found that mothers in Massachusetts who are food-insecure have become more likely to breastfeed rather than turn to formula, which the report says can lend itself to improved health outcomes for babies.
Advertisement
The food bank surveyed 3,000 Massachusetts residents from November through March and 37 percent reported being 'food insecure,' defined as having less food than they need to be adequately fed.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
The next step for the food bank, D'Amato said, is to raise more money and expand its mission, which has already grown rapidly since the COVID-19 pandemic. It's a tall order as the federal support for food assistance shrinks, leaving all states to bear the burden.
'It's going to be extremely harmful to the health of these generations to come,' she said. 'You used to be able to say, I'm gonna go to Massachusetts. They have great benefits, they have health care, they have housing. Now where are you going to turn for SNAP? Every state's going to be the same. It's going to be difficult and uncertain and put pressure on philanthropy and the private sector.'
Diti Kohli can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress targeted Planned Parenthood, but also affected Maine healthcare provider
Congress targeted Planned Parenthood, but also affected Maine healthcare provider

Boston Globe

time9 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Congress targeted Planned Parenthood, but also affected Maine healthcare provider

Vanessa Shields-Haas, a nurse practitioner, said the organization's clinics have been seeing all patients as usual and completing Medicaid paperwork for visits, but not submitting it because it appears the provision took effect as soon as the law was signed. 'Knowing how hard it is to access care in this state, not allowing these community members to access their care, it's cruel,' Shields-Haas said. Advertisement Maine clinics appear to be only others included in cuts Republican lawmakers targeted Planned Parenthood in one piece of what President Donald Trump dubbed the 'big beautiful' bill that Congress passed and Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up While advocates focused on Planned Parenthood, the bill did not mention it by name. Instead, it cut off reimbursements for organizations that are primarily engaged in family planning services — which generally include things such as contraception, abortion, and pregnancy tests — and received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023. The US Senate's parliamentarian rejected a 2017 effort to defund Planned Parenthood because it was written to exclude all other providers by barring payments only to groups that received more than $350 million a year in Medicaid funds. The non-profit Maine organization asserts in its legal challenge that the threshold was lowered to $800,000 this time around to make sure Planned Parenthood would not be the only affected entity. Advertisement It is the only other organization that has come forward publicly to say that its funding is at risk, too. Federal law already bars taxpayer money from covering most abortions. Instead, the money in question involves other health services, such as cancer screenings and tests, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. Proponents of that wrinkle in the law say abortion providers use Medicaid money for other services to subsidize abortion. 'This has never been just about Planned Parenthood,' Autumn Christensen, vice president of public policy for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in a statement. 'It's about any Big Abortion business or network that performs abortions. Taxpayers should never be forced to prop up an industry that profits from ending human lives.' The US Department of Health and Human Services, which is named in the lawsuit, declined to comment because it's a legal matter. Maine Family Planning goes beyond abortion Maine Family Planning operates 18 clinics across the state. In 2024, it had about 7,200 family planning patients, plus another 645 who obtained abortions. Services include pregnancy testing, contraception, family planning counseling, breast exams, cancer screenings, and treatment of sexually transmitted infections. Some of the sites also offer primary care services, where there are another 600 or so patients. There are about 800 gender-affirming care patients and about 200 who use its upstart mobile clinic, said George Hill, the president and CEO of the organization. Hill said that for about two-thirds of its patients, Maine Family Planning is the only place they get medical care in a typical year. Advertisement About half of the patients not seeking abortions are enrolled in Medicaid, and the clinics have been receiving about $1.9 million a year in reimbursements, which accounts for about one-fourth of the organization's budget. 'It's a difficult state to provide care in, and now we're facing this,' Hill said. In its lawsuit, the group says it has enough reserves to keep seeing patients covered by Medicaid without reimbursement only through October. Finding health care can be a struggle in this rural state Maine Family Planning says that if it had to turn away patients, it would be more complicated for them than simply finding another provider. There aren't enough in rural areas, the group notes — and many don't accept Medicaid. One patient, Ashley Smith, said she started going to Maine Family Planning about five years ago when she could not find other health care she could afford. While she's not enrolled in Medicaid, she fears clinics could be shuttered because of cuts. 'I am so worried that if my clinic closes, I don't know what I'll do or if I'll be able to see another provider,' Smith said. Maine Family Planning also supports care at more than 40 other health care facilities. Other than the Planned Parenthood locations that receive money from Maine Family Planning, those other providers don't stand to lose their Medicaid reimbursements. But, Hill said, the loss of Medicaid funding for Maine Family Planning would mean the group would have less to send to partners. The Maine clinics say the law violates their right to equal protection The Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing Maine Family Planning in the challenge, says in its legal filing that the defunding denies it equal protection under the law because it would have funding cut off, but organizations that provide similar services would not. Advertisement 'The administration would rather topple a statewide safety network than let a patient get a cancer screening at a facility that also offers abortion care,' Meetra Mehdizadeh, a Center for Reproductive Rights lawyer, said in an interview.

Your Comprehensive Companion for IOP Startup Success
Your Comprehensive Companion for IOP Startup Success

Time Business News

time3 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Your Comprehensive Companion for IOP Startup Success

Launching an Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) requires more than just a business idea—it demands a clinically sound vision tailored to the needs of your target population. Decide whether your IOP will focus on substance use disorders, co-occurring mental health issues, trauma, or a combination of concerns. Clarify your treatment model: will it emphasize evidence-based practices like CBT, DBT, or motivational interviewing? Establishing a clear clinical foundation from the outset ensures program coherence, attracts the right staff, and positions you as a credible care provider. Launching a mid-level behavioral health service requires strategic planning, regulatory compliance, and clinical expertise. Facilities must be equipped to offer group therapy, individual counseling, medication management, and case coordination while maintaining flexibility for patients with daily life responsibilities. Understanding how to start an IOP program involves more than securing a license; it demands a deep awareness of community needs, insurance reimbursement structures, and staff training requirements. With the right framework in place, an Intensive Outpatient Program can provide effective, accessible care for individuals who need structured support without full-time hospitalization—bridging the gap between intensive and traditional outpatient treatment. Each state has specific licensing requirements for IOPs, typically governed by the Department of Health or Behavioral Health Services. These regulations often cover staffing ratios, clinical documentation, safety protocols, and physical facility standards. Begin by obtaining your facility license, which may require zoning approval, policy manuals, and mock inspections. If your program will accept insurance, start the credentialing process with Medicaid, Medicare, and commercial insurers early—this process can take several months. Compliance isn't just a one-time hurdle; it's an ongoing operational mandate that shapes how you deliver care. An IOP requires a physical space that balances functionality with therapeutic warmth. Look for a facility that includes private therapy offices, group rooms, administrative space, and a welcoming reception area. Ensure the building is ADA-compliant, meets fire safety codes, and is zoned for outpatient healthcare services. Location matters, too—proximity to public transportation, hospitals, and referral sources can enhance accessibility and visibility. Design your space to support a structured clinical environment that feels safe and confidential for clients. A successful IOP is built on the expertise and cohesion of its clinical team. Hire licensed therapists, certified substance use counselors, case managers, and support staff who align with your treatment philosophy. If your program includes medication-assisted treatment (MAT) or psychiatric care, partner with a prescribing provider. Equally important are the administrative roles—intake coordinators, billing specialists, and program managers ensure smooth daily operations. Prioritize staff training, supervision, and burnout prevention. Your team's synergy is the heartbeat of your program's effectiveness and reputation. An IOP typically consists of 9–15 hours of therapy per week, delivered over multiple sessions. Structure your schedule with a mix of group therapy, individual counseling, psychoeducation, relapse prevention, and family involvement. Develop written protocols for assessments, treatment planning, progress reviews, and discharge procedures. Incorporate evidence-based modalities and tailor care plans to individual client needs. Program consistency builds clinical credibility and enables you to meet the expectations of both regulators and payers. Choose an electronic health record (EHR) system that supports behavioral health workflows—intake, clinical documentation, scheduling, and insurance billing. Create standardized forms and processes for assessments, progress notes, treatment plans, and discharge summaries. Begin insurance credentialing as early as possible and establish systems to verify benefits, manage authorizations, and track claims. Whether billing is in-house or outsourced, accuracy and timeliness are critical to financial stability. Well-organized operations free clinicians to focus on care and protect your business from costly compliance issues. Ethical marketing is essential in the behavioral health space. Build a professional website that clearly outlines your services, admission process, staff credentials, and accepted insurance plans. Optimize your content for local SEO so that potential clients and referral sources can easily find you online. Develop relationships with hospitals, therapists, probation offices, schools, and community organizations. Avoid aggressive advertising—focus on education, transparency, and value-driven communication that aligns with your mission. Trust is your most powerful marketing asset. Use clinical and operational data to evaluate the success of your IOP. Track metrics such as client attendance, treatment completion, satisfaction surveys, and symptom reduction. Monitor staff utilization, billing efficiency, and referral sources. Use this information to refine programming, address bottlenecks, and support strategic growth. Consider adding specialty tracks, evening groups, or virtual services as demand evolves. Growth should be intentional and based on data—not just opportunity. Consistent quality builds a reputation that can scale sustainably. Launching or expanding a behavioral health facility involves more than just a vision—it requires strict adherence to state regulations and standards. Organizations operating in California must ensure full compliance with DHCS Licensing for behavioral health, which governs the approval process for providing mental health and substance use disorder services. This includes meeting specific facility, staffing, and documentation requirements set forth by the Department of Health Care Services. Understanding and fulfilling these licensing obligations is crucial to maintain credibility, secure reimbursements, and avoid legal pitfalls. Proper preparation helps streamline the process and positions the organization for long-term operational success. Launching an IOP is a meaningful venture that combines clinical care with business acumen. With a defined purpose, regulatory compliance, skilled staff, and structured programming, your IOP can become a trusted part of your community's mental health and recovery landscape. This comprehensive companion offers a roadmap for turning your vision into reality—one step at a time, with precision, compassion, and a focus on lasting impact. When built with integrity, your IOP can become more than a business—it can be a lifeline. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Dr. Oz Says Americans Shouldn't Eat Carrot Cake
Dr. Oz Says Americans Shouldn't Eat Carrot Cake

Buzz Feed

time3 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Dr. Oz Says Americans Shouldn't Eat Carrot Cake

If you know Dr. Mehmet Oz, you probably know him from his TV show, The Dr. Oz Show. The show was a spin-off of Oz's health segment on The Oprah Winfrey Show and ran from 2009 to 2022. He has been criticized over the years for promoting pseudoscience through his own advice and through the guests he had on the show, including conspiracy theorists, psychics, and, uh, RFK Jr. All that said, it may come as no surprise that President Donald Trump awarded Dr. Oz a spot in his administration. Oz is currently serving as administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, overseeing government programs that have faced continuous threats (and moves toward) defunding. In a clip posted to X, Oz says that Medicare "was a promise to the American people to take care of you if you were having problems financially or if you were having an issue 'cause you were older and needed healthcare." "And it changed the country in a good way for many reasons," he continues. "But we're all in it together, Stuart." "Which means we'll be there for you, the American people, when you need help with Medicaid and Medicare, but you've gotta stay healthy as well. Be vital. Do the most you can do so you can live up to the potential, your God-given potential to live a full and healthy life," Dr. Oz says. Then things "And, y'know, don't eat... carrot cake," Oz says, gesturing at the carrot cake sitting between them. "Eat real food," he continues as he and Varney crack up. "That's what you've given me," Varney says, laughing. Part of me thinks Oz meant to say "don't eat carrot cake, eat carrots," but that's none of my business. Needless to say, the internet was a tad befuddled. "So what are they saying - if you eat desserts you will be barred from receiving healthcare? 'If you don't do what we think you should than you won't get help,'" this person tweeted. This person echoed the sentiment, saying the messaging sounds like Oz is suggesting if you choose to eat carrot cake "you arent healthy enough to continue living with healthcare." "Is Dr. Oz seriously suggesting carrot cake is the problem with healthcare?" someone asked. This person came right for Dr. Oz himself. Another user pointed out that the "unhealthy" American diet is largely a systemic issue, rooted in poverty. "Then start by teaching Nutrition in schools and serve actual healthy food. Not French fries," this person replied. A LOT of people pointed out how Republicans reacted to first lady Michelle Obama's healthy eating initiatives. And others thought the call was coming from inside the house. What do you think? Weigh in in the comments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store