German lawmakers vote to suspend family reunions for many migrants
BERLIN (AP) — German lawmakers voted Friday to suspend family reunions for many migrants, part of a drive by the new conservative-led government for a tougher approach to migration.
Parliament's lower house voted 444-135 to suspend the possibility of family reunions for two years for migrants who have 'subsidiary protection,' a status that falls short of asylum.
At the end of March, more than 388,000 people living in Germany had the status, which was granted to many people fleeing Syria's civil war.
New Chancellor Friedrich Merz made tougher migration policy a central plank of his campaign for Germany's election in February. Just after he took office in early May, the government stationed more police at the border and said some asylum-seekers trying to enter Europe's biggest economy would be turned away.
The bill approved Friday is the first legislation on migration since Merz took office. It will suspend rules dating to 2018 that allowed up to 1,000 close relatives per month to join the migrants granted limited protection, with authorities making case-by-case decisions on humanitarian grounds rather than granting an automatic right for reunions.
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt told lawmakers that the change would result in 12,000 fewer people being able to come to Germany each year and 'break a business model' for smugglers.
People often know they won't get full recognition as refugees, 'but they set off for Germany because it is known that, even without asylum recognition ... you can have your family follow,' Dobrindt said. 'That is a significant pull effect and we are removing this pull effect today.'
Dobrindt said 'our country's capacity for integration simply has a limit.'
Liberal opposition lawmakers decried the government's approach. Marcel Emmerich, of the Greens, described the legislation as 'an attack on the core of every society, on a truly central value — the family.'
'Anyone who wants integration must bring families together,' he said.
The far-right, anti-migration Alternative for Germany described the move as a very small step in the right direction.
German governments have for years faced pressure to curb migration as shelters across the country filled up. The administration of Merz's predecessor, Olaf Scholz, already had taken some measures including the introduction of checks on all Germany's borders.
Asylum applications declined from 329,120 in 2023 to 229,751 last year and have continued to fall this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Aurora woman visits husband at ICE detention facility, learns he was sent for deportation
An Aurora wife and mother is speaking out after learning her husband could be deported in the coming days, following a visit to the Aurora ICE detention center. "His life is on the line," said Alexandria Dowell, "and we have a daughter. She cannot see her dad anymore. What does that mean for us?" Ariel Cruz Penton and Alexandria Dowell with their daughter Alexandria Dowell Dowell, 27, met her husband, 34-year-old Ariel Cruz Penton, when she was vacationing in Miami roughly four years ago. Penton had already been living and working in the U.S. after fleeing Cuba as a political refugee. "My husband came to the U.S. about seven years ago. When he came to the border, he presented himself and pleaded political asylum," said Dowell. Penton's attorney, Carlos Dantes, tells CBS Colorado that federal agents coerced the Cuban migrant into signing documents that he didn't know would end his right to humanitarian parole after entering the U.S. That parole would've given him temporary permission to stay in the U.S., which is required under the Cuban Adjustment Act, while he filed for an asylum claim. Under this act, Dantes says his client would have eventually been granted residency. Instead, he received a deportation order. CBS Dowell says they have been actively fighting to reopen his case and get him a green card. They also filed for citizenship through their marriage nearly a year and a half ago. "We had our immigration meeting about three weeks prior to him being detained, and then we even had another one scheduled in the books," she said. "So, we had every reason to believe that we were going to be okay." Their worst nightmare became a reality on June 10. On the same date, thousands took to the streets across the country in anti-ICE demonstrations, and federal agents detained Penton while working. "I don't know if they were following him, how they found him, but three unmarked cars just came up, cornered their cars in, had him get out of the car and arrested him. And it makes no sense why someone with no criminal background or even a speeding ticket would need that much force to be taken and detained," said Dowell. "He works really hard, we pay our taxes, we also own a home and we're a family. We're married, I'm U.S. born, our daughter is U.S. born, so we have everything on paper that should help us through this process, and yet the system has failed us." "We are waiting to speak to another deportation officer, and seeing if we can get a hearing as soon as possible," said Dantes. On Friday, June 27, Dowell took CBS Colorado with her on her family's visit to the detention center to meet and speak with her husband. However, she was not prepared to find out Penton was not only removed from the facility that morning, but that he was already being scheduled for deportation. Ariel Cruz Penton and his daughter Alexandria Dowell "What am I going to do? That's my husband," said Dowell. "But I can't do anything, and I have to be strong for my daughter." Neither Dowell nor Dantes were notified about his removal from the facility, and it wasn't until after calling multiple detention facilities and Penton's detention officer, they finally learned he was sent to El Paso and is already on the list to be deported. "Him being detained is a matter of being at the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong set of documents," said Dantes. "Even though there is a petition on her behalf for him. But what we're seeing right now is that none of this matters." All the emotions Dowell has worked to suppress over the last few weeks have now reached a tipping point. "They said he'll be out of the U.S. today or tomorrow, and I'm like, where? He's a political refugee; you can't just take him. He's waiting for his credible fear interview," said Dowell. We asked ICE numerous questions about Penton's case, including why he was detained and why loved ones were not notified about his removal from the facility on Friday. A spokesperson told us they would need more time to answer those questions. "I just wish I could see him again," said Dowell. Dowell hopes her story will show others the reality of families like hers who are being ripped apart. "It feels like no one is safe at this point, and that's the scary part," said Dowell. Dowell and Dantes are still looking for ways to prevent Penton from being deported, especially to Cuba.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
DeSantis OKs law shielding addresses of federal, state, local officials from public view
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis approved a bill that shields home addresses and telephone numbers of "certain state and local officials," including state lawmakers and members of Congress, "along with their spouses and children" from public disclosure. The bill (SB 268) seamlessly swept through the Florida Legislature this year, passing both chambers with only four votes against it. It got little attention until mid-June, where lawmakers raised the need for the public records exemptions after two Minnesota lawmakers were attacked in their homes. DeSantis signed the bill into law without comment on June 27. It had been sponsored by a Democrat: state Sen. Shevrin Jones of Miami Gardens. Minnesota shooting: Assassination suspect arrested after fatal attack on Minnesota lawmakers "The Legislature ... finds that the harm that may result from the release of such personal identifying and location information outweighs any public benefit that may be derived from the disclosure of the information," the bill says. The law, which goes into effect July 1, grants exemptions to the following: the governor, the lieutenant governor, members of the Florida Cabinet, state representatives and senators, U.S. representatives and senators, property appraisers, supervisors of elections, school superintendents, school board members, mayors and city and county commissioners. First Amendment advocates raised concerns it could hinder journalists and voters from finding out whether lawmakers actually live in the districts they were elected to represent. Officials' cities of residence and ZIP codes are still publicly available, however. "This was a major blow to accountability and a dangerous precedent in a time when transparency is already under siege," the Florida First Amendment Foundation said in a statement. "While the bill will do little to deter bad actors, it makes it extremely difficult for people to check whether their elected officials actually live in their districts." The Legislature found it a "public necessity" to shield more personal information to prevent threats. Lawmakers' safety drew national attention after a gunman murdered Minnesota Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband at their home in mid-June. The same person also shot and critically injured Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife in their Minnesota home. More: Who are Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman, the Minnesota state lawmakers shot on June 14 Florida law governing access to public records is known for its broad scope. In 1992, 83% of Florida voters supported a constitutional amendment that allowed public access to records and also ensure open government meetings. Florida's Chapter 119 generally mandates that records made or received by public agencies are available for inspection, unless specifically exempted. And every year, lawmakers create more exemptions; there are now well over 1,000. But in federal court, Florida has also been criticized for its lengthy public records process under Gov. Ron DeSantis. DeSantis lawsuit: Judge questions DeSantis administration's response time for public records requests American Oversight, a government accountability watchdog organization, sued DeSantis and his administration in 2024 for failing to respond to public records requests in a "timely and lawful manner." In May, the group reached a settlement and said the governor's office began providing tracking number and signing employee names in emails. This reporting content is supported by a partnership with Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. USA Today Network-Florida First Amendment reporter Stephany Matat is based in Tallahassee, Fla. She can be reached at SMatat@ On X: @stephanymatat. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: DeSantis signs law shielding elected officials' home, phone details
Wall Street Journal
3 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Why Shouldn't Europe Seize Russia's Assets?
Your editorial 'Trump Wins the Battle of NATO' (June 26) notes the good news: Our European allies are finally going to pony up more for their security. But when it comes to Russia's illegal and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, our treaty allies shouldn't only commit additional billions to defense. They should also seize frozen Russian sovereign assets as a powerful form of deterrence. Having immobilized an estimated €210 billion of Russian funds, Europe can impose additional costs on Moscow through confiscation, diverting many of these resources to Ukraine's defense. I co-authored the REPO Act, which allows for the seizure of Russian sovereign assets in the U.S. Though President Biden signed the bill in April 2024, the White House chose not to use it for months. With President Trump at the helm, we can end the Biden-era policy of hesitation and move swiftly to implement the law—starting by transferring $5 billion in immobilized Russian funds held in the U.S. to Ukraine. If NATO countries are making the significant choice to spend more on defense, using Russia's frozen assets should be an easy decision. How can NATO members urge their taxpayers to chip in more while letting Vladimir Putin off the hook?
