
Michael Healy-Rae could be 'dark horse' in presidential race, says Ivan Yates
In an interview with BreakingNews.ie, Mr Yates said he had initally been surprised about speculation over the Kerry TD throwing his hat in the ring in the race for
Áras an Uachtaráin, however, he now believes Mr Healy-Rae would have a good chance.
Advertisement
"One name I've picked up with my political antennae, who people believe would win if he ran is, believe it or not, Michael Healy-Rae.
"What people said to me was, if there has to be another candidate other than Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Catherine Connolly, what about Michael Healy-Rae?
"This is from talking to people from all sorts of background, when I put it to them what do you think of the mad idea that the guy with the cap would run? They immediately said to me, both rural and Dublin, 'oh if he ran, he'd win'.
"The Healy-Raes are seen as doers, it's distinctive. Even second generation people in Dublin would see the merit in it, and that he has not only name recognition but a brand as well."
Advertisement
Mr Yates, who served as minister for agriculture and now hosts the Path To Power podcast with Matt Cooper, siad Mr Healy-Rae could be a "dark horse" in the upcoming presidential election.
When asked about whether Mr Healy-Rae would really consider a bid, Mr Yates said he had put it to Minister of State, but Mr Healy-Rae would "keep his cards close to his chest".
Michael Healy-Rae is different and for him that is a big plus.
"I see him as a dark horse. Only this morning I asked him for his view, one thing is certain, he will keep his cards close to his chest. A bit like Michael McDowell, he won't object to the speculation. It's always nice in politics to stay in the news, there's no downside.
"I'm surprised at the high respect he has outside of Kerry, he's seen as a doer and a successful person in his own right.
Advertisement
"I always say it's not the same that sells, it's different that sells.
"Michael Healy-Rae is different and for him that is a big plus."
The fact Fine Gael have nominated Mairead McGuinness will put further pressure on Fianna Fáil to run their own candidate, Mr Yates said.
He said the lack of an obvious choice is their main issue, and that Taoiseach Micheál Martin is the strongest candidate.
Advertisement
He also believes the fact Mary Lou McDonald has been linked with a run will bring another dimension to the race.
Kerry TD Michael Healy-Rae could be a "dark horse" in the presidential race, according to former minister Ivan Yates.
"The big factor is now that Fine Gael are running a conventional campaign with Mairead McGuinness, Sinn Féin will have to react to that. I think Sinn Féin have taken the decision to run their own candidate instead of backing a left unity candidate.
"The three choices will be Michelle O'Neill, John Finucane and Mary Lou McDonald, the strongest of those is Mary Lou in terms of driving their agenda, their brand, their statement.
"She has had two goes at becoming taoiseach without making much progress, now might be the time rather than going for taoiseach again in 2029.
Advertisement
It would suit that strategy if she could get elected to the park. I think it is a gamechanger, if she stands it becomes a completely different election.
"A lot more exciting, in terms of political capital... the stakes will be much higher."
Fianna Fáil dilemma
Mr Yates added: "For what can be a very moribund, personalised, abusive, esoteric contest, this will turn it into a proper national heavyweight title. With a Fine Gael and Sinn Féin player in it, Fianna Fáil cannot sit on their hands, they will need to run a candidate whether they like it or not.
"Party faithful will say the only one who can win it is Micheál Martin, and that he owes it to the party to stand.
"I don't see him giving up a job he's worked so hard for to be taoiseach again, I don't see him being tempted by the presidency.
"It's his personal decision and I don't think he wants it. So what will Fianna Fáil do? They can't stay out though.
"I originally thought there will be a desire not to give it to Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil and let them have everything, and that is an opportunity for Mary Lou.
"I thought Frances Black had a great chance as a unity candidate, but that would have to have buy in from Sinn Féin."
With Ms McGuinness and Ms Connolly declared as early candidates, Mr Yates believes Fianna Fáil may adopt a strategy of entering the race at a later date.
"If Fianna Fáil get involved, the route of four councils for a nomination could be choked off. So the likes of Peter Casey and Ming Flanagan will not be facilitiated.
"We know that Michael D finishes on November 11th, so the polling day has to be 60 days before that so some time between mid October and early November. I think Fianna Fáil have taken the view that by the time the media have done their forensic, in the weeds analysis of Mairead and Catherine they will be damaged goods, and they will play their hand late to try to scoop it. The problem is they don't have a candidate.
"It's hard to know when some of them don't know themselves yet. What I'm hearing from Fianna Fáil over the last six months is when it comes to the presidency, it costs €500,000, no guarantee you'll get your 12.5 per cent vote for your money back, it can be unpredictable. Look at Fine Gael, they got 38 per cent of the vote in the 2011 general election and Gay Mitchell received 6 per cent in the presidential election."
Mr Yates believes the presidential election would be more "party political" than personality driven if Mary Lou McDonald takes the Sinn Féin nomination.
Mary Lou being in the running changes things as it will make it highly political, and almost tribal.
He added that the Coalition parties would be desperate to keep her out of Áras an Uachtaráin, as she would likely take up an active commentary on various national issues rather than the ceremonial role some believe the President should fulfill.
"Mary Lou being in the running changes things as it will make it highly political, and almost tribal.
"Let the games begin.
"What we're looking at now is a much more party political election. Previously it was more of a personality contest with the likes of Joe Duffy and Miriam O'Callaghan linked with bids.
"It now looks like a more conventional party gun fight. They will all be more invested in it, but unlike a European election it will be very door to door, fought through the media and on debates.
"I remain to be convinced that the currently declared candidates will provide the winner.
"There's a fundamental dichotomy of views about the presidency. One is it's a representational role, the other is that it's to change Ireland. This is a constitutional and political row.
"With someone like Mary Lou it's limitations would become even more frayed, and maybe attritional, but a lot of people would say that's a good thing. They're not in favour of an FF/FG heghemony and that in itself will be an issue upon which the public is very divided.
"We live in a world of culture wars, so that will be thrown in to everything."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
'Sometimes it's bigger than basketball': Calls grow for Govt support over Ireland-Israel fixture
Politicians and former players are calling for the Government to support Basketball Ireland while it considers its next steps after being drawn in the same group as Israel for a women's European campaign. James Weldon's side will be in qualifying Group A in the Women's EuroBasket 2027 qualifiers, along with Israel, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Luxembourg. Advertisement Ireland are due to travel to Israel for an away game on November 18th. In a statement, Basketball Ireland highlighted that on commencement of the competition, it would be subject to a fine of up to €80,000 should Ireland fail to fulfil their first fixture with Israel. Meanwhile, failure to play the return game would lead to a fine of up to €100,000 and removal from the FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2027 Qualifiers, as well as the FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2029 Qualifiers. Former player, Rebecca O'Keeffe, said the sporting body will need the backing of the government. Advertisement "If there are sanctions, absolutely the Government should be stepping in to help. Basketball is a very underfunded sport in this country, even though it's one of the fastest-growing," she said. The two sides met in a controversial qualifier in the Latvian capital, Riga, in February of 2024, despite public pressure to boycott the game over Israel's bombardment of Gaza. "I appreicate the transparency with Basketball Ireland this time round where they said [they] have been talking to the relevant delegations and sporting bodies and the government can absolutely step in and help," O'Keeffe said. "There is public support for this. They have options. Sometimes it's bigger than basketball, sometimes it's bigger than money." Advertisement Social Democrats sports spokesperson, Sinead Gibney, said other sports need to examine whether they compete in competitions involving Israel. She said Athletics Ireland should consider its participation in the World Athletics Championships in September. "I certainly think Athletics Irleand should be looking at it, absolutely. And I realise what that means, I realise what we're asking of our athletes and I don't want to apply pressure to any individual athelete. "That's why the governing bodies need to be the ones to look at it and take that action." Sinn Féin foreign affairs spokesperson, Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire, said the responsibility of the situation in Gaza should not be on the players' shoulders. "I think the Irish people, they're not looking towards the likes of the basketball team to make decisions, albeit boycotts are imminently justifiable and I think right," he said. "They're looking at the Irish Government. They want to see the Occupied Territories Bill advanced. They want to see the issue in relation to the war bonds being resolved and they want to see further action and a more vocal approach at a European level."


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Justice department forms ‘strike force' to investigate Obama over 2016 election
The US justice department has formed a 'strike force' to investigate claims that the Obama administration carried out a 'treasonous conspiracy' by using false intelligence to suggest Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump. Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, announced the new force's formation after the release of a trove of declassified documents from Barack Obama's national security team by the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. On Thursday, two Republican senators, Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn, both members of the judiciary committee, called on Bondi to appoint a special counsel into what they called 'an unprecedented and clear abuse of power' by Obama's administration. 'For the good of the country, we urge Attorney General Bondi to appoint a special counsel to investigate the extent to which former President Obama, his staff and administration officials manipulated the US national security apparatus for a political outcome,' the senators said in a staement. Gabbard has alleged that Obama and his senior officials concocted a 'years long coup' against Trump – manifested in a special counsel investigation and FBI inquiries – by 'manufacturing' intelligence in the weeks after Trump's 2016 victory over Hillary Clinton that was meant to show collusion between his campaign and Russia. She has recommended that criminal charges be pressed, including against Obama embraced her argument and has said Gabbard's findings reveal 'irrefutable proof' of treason. Bondi set the scene for a justice department investigation after Gabbard presented what she claimed was evidence of a crime at a White House news conference on Wednesday. 'The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people. We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice,' Bondi said in a statement. Fox News cited a source close to Bondi's strike force as saying no serious lead is off the table. However, any moves to prosecute Obama are likely to be stymied by last year's US supreme court ruling granting presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution for acts committed in the course of their presidential duties. The ruling was widely viewed as favoring Trump, who has faced criminal investigations for acts committed in his first presidency – including the retention of classified documents. Ironically, it may now form an obstacle to Trump's stated desire to pursue 'retribution' against his political opponents. Obama's office issued a rare statement on Tuesday, calling the allegations 'outrageous' and 'ridiculous'. Several others named in Gabbard's document could be targeted. They include James Clapper, her predecessor as director of national intelligence, John Brennan, the former CIA director, James Comey, who was FBI director until he was fired by Trump, Comey's former deputy Andrew McCabe, ex-national security adviser Susan Rice, John Kerry, the former secretary of state, and Loretta Lynch, the then attorney general. Brennan has already been the subject of a criminal referral by the current CIA director, John Ratcliffe. Kash Patel, the FBI director, has opened a criminal investigation into Brennan and Comey, according to Fox News, although its scope is unclear. During his first presidency, Trump publicly accepted the FBI's findings that Russia had sought to interfere in the 2016 race, although he also publicly accepted Putin's denials of the US intelligence community conclusions at a 2018 summit in Helsinki. An 1,000-page Senate intelligence committee report in 2020 also found that Russia had intervened on Trump's behalf, noting that Trump's campaign chair had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer. But in Wednesday's White House appearance, Gabbard unveiled the declassification of a 2020 report from the House of Representatives' intelligence committee which she said showed that the goal of Russian meddling was to undermine faith in the US electoral process rather than to help Trump. The report found that Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, did not plan to leak the most damaging material about Clinton until after the election, Gabbard said. These included revelations of 'possible criminal acts' and emails from a hacking of the Democratic national committee (DNC) showing that she suffered from 'psycho-emotional problems', and 'uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness'. She was also supposedly on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers'. Gabbard also alleges that an intelligence community assessment of Putin's efforts deliberately excluded 'significant' intelligence that contradicted the key findings of Russia's purported preference for Trump. Clinton has previously suggested that Gabbard – a former Democrat member of Congress – was being 'groomed' by Russia as a possible presidential candidate. Gabbard, who has no prior intelligence experience, has also been criticized for repeating Kremlin talking points, including after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Her report appears to misrepresent aspects of the intelligence agencies' assessments of Russia's meddling in the 2016 race. The assessment found that Russia did not conduct cyber-attacks against election infrastructure to change vote tallies, but hacked and leaked documents from the DNC to damage Clinton's campaign – activity that Trump publicly encouraged at the time. While Obama's national security officials have remained silent on the matter, some intelligence veterans have criticized Gabbard's effort. 'The Trump Admin's politicization of the 'intelligence community' is very troubling. Every admin wishes they could do it, and several succeed, but this cohort is off to a flying start,' Fulton Armstrong, a former CIA analyst and national intelligence officer, wrote in an email. 'It's not an entirely new trick – books have been cooked for decades – but it's now institutionalized and, as Tulsi's behavior shows, encouraged.'


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Hulk Hogan rips off his shirt at RNC in support of Trump in resurfaced clip after WWE star's sudden death
Former pro wrestler Hulk Hogan famously ripped off his shirt in support of Donald Trump at the Republican National Convention last summer, in a resurfaced clip following his death. Hogan spoke at the RNC on behalf of Trump as part of his re-election campaign. The WWE legend's death was announced by TMZ on Thursday (24 July). He was 71. Medics were reportedly called to Hogan's Clearwater, Florida, home Thursday morning. In May, a spokesperson for the retired wrestling legend, 71, told TMZ that he had undergone 'a little fusion procedure' on his neck.