logo
Trump's DOJ ramps up push to strip naturalized Americans of citizenship

Trump's DOJ ramps up push to strip naturalized Americans of citizenship

Time of India21 hours ago
The US Justice Department is intensifying efforts to revoke citizenship from naturalized Americans, prioritizing cases involving serious crimes or fraud. This initiative, impacting nearly 25 million individuals, has sparked legal and constitutional concerns. Critics argue that civil denaturalization, with its lower burden of proof and lack of government-funded counsel, risks creating unequal classes of citizenship.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The US Department of Justice has directed its civil division to expand efforts to revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans , especially in cases involving serious crimes or fraud. According to a June 11 internal memo reviewed by NPR, the department has made denaturalization one of its top five enforcement priorities.Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate wrote, "The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence."The initiative, which targets individuals who were not born in the US, comes as nearly 25 million immigrants hold naturalized status, according to 2023 government data.The policy shift has already seen results. On June 13, a judge ordered the revocation of US citizenship from Elliott Duke, a military veteran originally from the UK, who had been convicted for distributing child sexual abuse material. Duke, who uses they/them pronouns, admitted to engaging in the illegal activity before obtaining US citizenship. NPR reported that Duke, now stateless, had relinquished UK citizenship during the naturalization process and struggled to secure legal representation during the civil proceedings.The use of civil litigation — rather than criminal prosecution — has raised legal and constitutional concerns. Cassandra Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, told NPR, "Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment." She added that civil denaturalization carries a lower burden of proof and does not provide the right to government-funded legal counsel.Critics say this approach revives tactics last used extensively during the McCarthy era and risks creating unequal classes of citizenship. 'It is kind of, in a way, trying to create a second class of US citizens,' said Sameera Hafiz of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, speaking to NPR.Supporters, such as Hans von Spakovsky from the Heritage Foundation, defended the move. 'Anyone who has abused the privilege of the opportunity of becoming a US citizen should have that citizenship revoked,' he told NPR. He dismissed due process concerns by stating that civil proceedings do not require taxpayer-funded counsel.Legal scholars warned that the DOJ memo's language grants wide discretion to pursue denaturalization in broad categories such as national security violations or government-related fraud. Steve Lubet, professor emeritus at Northwestern University, told NPR, 'Many of the categories are so vague as to be meaningless.'The practice of denaturalization was significantly curtailed after a 1967 Supreme Court ruling, but efforts resumed during the Obama administration under Operation Janus. Under former President Donald Trump 's first term, the process expanded further, and with Trump back in office, the policy is now being aggressively pursued once again.Robertson remains skeptical of how many cases will meet the government's criteria. 'If they're really intending maximal enforcement,' she told NPR, 'they're going to end up focusing on people who have not committed any serious infraction.'The Department of Justice and the Trump administration declined NPR's requests for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why most seniors will pay less or nothing in Social Security taxes under new tax law
Why most seniors will pay less or nothing in Social Security taxes under new tax law

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Why most seniors will pay less or nothing in Social Security taxes under new tax law

The Social Security Administration claimed that nearly 90% of beneficiaries would avoid federal taxes on their benefits due to Trump's tax law. However, the law doesn't eliminate taxes outright; it raises standard deductions for seniors, reducing taxable income. While benefiting many seniors, this change could strain Social Security's finances, potentially accelerating its trust fund's insolvency. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What's Actually in the Law $6,000 for individuals earning $75,000 or less $12,000 for married couples earning up to $150,000 How It Impacts Seniors Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Long-Term Impact on Social Security A bold claim from the Social Security Administration sparked headlines this week: nearly 90 per cent of beneficiaries won't pay federal taxes on their benefits under President Donald Trump's new tax law. But despite the headline-grabbing promise, the reality is more Social Security Administration (SSA) announced on July 3 that the law 'eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries.' The statement highlighted an enhanced deduction for people 65 and legislation, part of the sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill, doesn't eliminate taxes on Social Security outright. Instead, it offers a generous, temporary boost to the standard deduction for Americans aged 65 and older, effectively shielding many from tax law adds a temporary enhanced deduction for Americans aged 65 and older:The deduction phases out for individuals with incomes above $175,000 and couples earning over $250,000. It will remain in effect until change means benefits are still included in income calculations, but many seniors will see their taxable income reduced enough that they no longer owe taxes on those the bill passed, about 64 per cent of Social Security recipients didn't pay taxes on their benefits. The new law is expected to raise that figure to 88 per cent, according to a report from Trump's Council of Economic Advisers.'It's not eliminating taxes on benefits — it's reducing the number of people who owe them,' said Romina Boccia, a budget expert at the Cato Biggs, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said the policy achieves the president's promise in practice, if not in technical terms. 'You're either paying taxes on benefits or you're not,' he many seniors welcome the change, it could pressure Social Security's already strained finances. A June report from the SSA predicted the program's trust fund could run out by 2033. Due to lower tax revenues, the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said this tax change could move that insolvency date up by a the new law, nearly 90 per cent of Social Security recipients are expected to avoid paying taxes on their benefits, but not because the tax was higher standard deductions for seniors are doing the heavy lifting. The benefit is real but may come with long-term tradeoffs for the program's future.

'If You Decide To...': Bangladesh, 13 Others Slapped With Trump Tariff Letters
'If You Decide To...': Bangladesh, 13 Others Slapped With Trump Tariff Letters

News18

time3 hours ago

  • News18

'If You Decide To...': Bangladesh, 13 Others Slapped With Trump Tariff Letters

Last Updated: Japan and South Korea were among the first countries to receive the letter from Donald Trump regarding imposition of tariffs on import of their goods to the United States. Embarking on a letter-post spree on Monday, US President Donald Trump sent out similar-worded letters to the leaders of 14 countries, imposing tariffs on their imports, which would go live on August 1. Japan and South Korea became the first countries to have received the letters shortly after 9.30 pm IST, July 7, as announced by Trump earlier that he would start sending letters to 12 to 15 countries about tariffs or deals with the United States. Posting the letters addressed to the leaders of the respective countries on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump imposed a 25% levy on imports from both Japan and South Korea. Minutes after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during her daily briefing that more letters are expected during the course of the day, Trump posted five more letters to Malaysia, Kazakhstan, Myanmar, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, and South Africa. Tunisia, which got the letter after a short pause, was slapped with a 25% tariff on its imports. Malaysia and Kazakhstan were slapped with a 25% tariff each on their exports to the US. Both countries widely export materials such as electronics, energy, and industrial metals to the United States. The US President further imposed as high as 40% tariffs on goods from Myanmar and Laos. South Africa will face a 30% tariff, as per Trump's announcement. Trump named more countries where he sent his letters. Thailand and Cambodia were handed over with 36% tariffs, while Serbia and Bangladesh were also slapped with 35% levies. Indonesia got 32%, while Bosnia and Herzegovina received 30% tariffs. In each of his 14 letters, Trump warned against any retaliatory tariffs, threatening reciprocation from the US. 'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by will be added onto the tariffs that we charge," Trump wrote. In his letters to Japan and South Korea – two of the closest allies in Asia for the US – Trump cited long-standing trade imbalance with the countries as the reason behind 25% tariffs. Donald Trump was making 'tailor-made trade plans" for different countries, which will be in the interest of the Americans, the White House Press Secretary said today. 'The President is making tailor-made trade deals. Approximately 12 more nations will receive the letters. The letters will be posted on Truth Social," she said. India may also receive the tariff letter from Trump today, even as both countries are engaged in negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). Check Full List: About the Author Ashesh Mallick Ashesh Mallick is a Sub-Editor with over three years of experience in news writing, video production. He primarily covers national news, politics and global affairs. You can follow him on Twitter: @ More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : Washington D.C., United States of America (USA) First Published: July 08, 2025, 01:35 IST News world 'If You Decide To...': Bangladesh, 13 Others Slapped With Trump Tariff Letters | Full List

Trump's student loan forgiveness overhaul may block immigrants, transgender support groups & more — here's what's changing
Trump's student loan forgiveness overhaul may block immigrants, transgender support groups & more — here's what's changing

Economic Times

time6 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Trump's student loan forgiveness overhaul may block immigrants, transgender support groups & more — here's what's changing

Donald Trump plans changes to student loan forgiveness. Some groups may lose access if the Education Department labels them as engaging in 'illegal activities'. The focus is on immigration, terrorism, and transgender issues. Advocates worry about political punishment. The changes could affect hospitals, schools, and nonprofits. The new rules are expected by July 2026, after public comments. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who decides what's 'illegal'? Millions already got help from this program Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump says some groups are harmful Government didn't give clear answers Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Trump is changing student loan forgiveness rules. He wants to stop giving loan forgiveness to some groups and organizations. The rule targets immigrant and transgender support groups. These groups might lose access to student loan help if the government says they're involved in 'illegal activities', claims Education Department wrote a draft plan for the change. It would let the Secretary of Education decide which groups are doing something 'illegal.' The draft focuses on 3 big things: immigration, terrorism, and transgender issues, as per the report by Associated are the main areas the government is watching to decide what counts as 'illegal.' Advocates are worried this gives too much power to the government. Betsy Mayotte from the Institute of Student Loan Advisors said it might be used for 'political punishment', as per the 1 million Americans have already had loans canceled under this program. These include teachers, nurses, firefighters, and more. The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program started in 2007, according to the report by Associated forgives the rest of your student debt if you work 10 years in public service and make 120 payments. Right now, nonprofits that work in education, law, or health also qualify. This includes groups that help transgender youth or immigrants, as per the said in March the program supports 'activist organizations' that harm national security. He ordered changes to remove groups he says break the law, especially those that support immigrants or transgender youth, according to the report by Associated PressHis plan could force many people to leave their jobs or lose loan forgiveness. If your job becomes 'ineligible,' your loan progress stops. Big groups like hospitals, schools, and nonprofits could all be affected, as per if just one department in a hospital helps transgender kids, the whole hospital might become ineligible. The draft says 'illegal activities' include things like helping undocumented immigrants or giving hormone therapy to minors, as stated by Associated if these are legal in some states, they could still be called illegal under this plan. This means even cities or states that don't work closely with immigration officials could be Dobson from Slippery Rock University warned that 'entire cities' could lose access. The plan gives the Education Secretary final say, even without a court case. There doesn't need to be a legal conviction — just a decision from the department, as mentioned in the report by Associated said this could cause doctor and nurse shortages. Emeka Oguh from PeopleJoy said the rule might hurt hospitals and clinics if used too broadly. Some experts asked the department for clear examples, but got vague answers. For example, it's unclear how schools teaching diversity (DEI) lessons will be judged, as stated in the also a new rule where employers must 'certify' they don't break laws. If they mess up the paperwork, employees could lose loan relief. The Department said they are open to making changes. But they still have the power to shape the final rule however they want, according to the report by Associated final rule will go through public comments and should be ready by July 2026. This means people can speak up before it becomes official. Last week, the Department said they are keeping Trump's promise. They said they're working to make sure the program doesn't help lawbreaking organizations, as per the that help immigrants or transgender youth could lose access if labeled as doing 'illegal activities' by the Education new rules are expected to take effect in July 2026, after public comments are reviewed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store