Sirens, gauges and flood prevention: What the Texas Legislature could do in response to Hill Country disaster
Lawmakers will return to Austin July 21 for a special session ordered by Gov. Greg Abbott, who sets the agenda for these 30 day legislative sprints. The governor has promised flood response will be at the top of the list and suggested lawmakers will have wide latitude to consider a 'top to bottom' response.
'We want to make sure that when we end that session, we end it making sure these communities are better, more resilient and have the resources that they need for the next chapter of their lives,' Abbott said at a press conference in Hunt on Tuesday. He added that the House and Senate will form committees as soon as this week.
Already, leaders of both chambers are laying out possible solutions. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who oversees the Senate, called for more sirens to warn people of approaching floodwaters and said the state should chip in the funds for communities that can't afford them.
House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican from Lubbock, said his chamber would work with experts to identify and fund solutions like flood gauges, alert systems and escape plans.
'I want to assure you, the Texas House will be organized. We will be ready,' Burrows said Tuesday. 'We stand willing and able to listen to the community and experts and do all that we can to help.
As the floodwaters receded in the Hill Country, revealing the devastation from a nearly 30-foot wall of water ripping through towns, summer camps and RV parks, questions are beginning to emerge about when and whether people were warned about the flood risks they faced that weekend.
Officials in Kerr County — the epicenter of the flood wreckage — have said the county's size, and the remoteness of its communities, make it difficult to reach people to warn them before a disaster strikes. A decade ago, Kerr County officials considered building an early flood warning system and repeatedly asked the state for help funding the $1 million project. That funding never came, and the project fizzled, the Houston Chronicle reported.
Now, after more than 100 people died, including 30 children, and with 161 people missing in Kerr County alone, state leaders are signaling they will approve money for flood-prone areas to install these sorts of warning systems. Patrick said in an interview Monday that sirens 'up and down these flash flood alleys' might have saved lives.
'Absolutely we can fund these,' Patrick said, adding he'd want them in place by next summer. 'If the cities can't afford it, we'll do it.'
State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Republican from Houston, said on X on Tuesday that he would file a bill to install these 'old-tech' sirens, saying too many people ignore or silence 'new-tech' phone alerts.
'It's time to go back to what worked and still does in Tornado Alley,' Bettencourt said.
The Guadalupe River also needs more flood gauges and a radar rainfall system to better track rising waters, Phil Bedient with Rice University's Severe Storm Prediction, Education, & Evacuation from Disasters Center, said in an op-ed this week.
The area also needs a modern flood tracking computer system, like those used in Houston, that would give local officials 'near-instantaneous flood predictions — showing, for instance, whether a hospital or nursing home is likely to be inundated,' Bedient said.
In 2016, when Kerr County began its aborted attempts at upgrading its flood warning systems, the county's emergency manager, Tony Leonard, said 'the only warning system is me getting up in the middle of the night and looking at it.'
And it's not just rural counties like Kerr. Bedient noted that San Antonio recently had deadly flooding and also needed more gauges, along with better alerts and escape plans.
Burrows cited Bedient's op-ed in his post about special session plans, indicating he would consult with him and other experts in crafting a response. Local officials have said they'll welcome the assistance, while encouraging lawmakers to ensure any legislation is tailored to specific areas.
'We need a practical warning system that will work for this area, and the key word there is practical,' Kerrville Mayor Joe Herring told the Tribune, adding that this area had challenges people from other areas might not consider, like lack of cell service, remote campgrounds and terrain that would make evacuations difficult.
Other lawmakers are calling to revive House Bill 13, which never got a hearing in the Senate during the regular session. The bill, authored by GOP Rep. Ken King of Canadian after last year's Panhandle wildfires, would have created a new government council to establish emergency response plans and give counties grants for emergency communication equipment.
'Lives depend on early notification, and the ability to reach Texans quickly and clearly is essential to saving lives during fast-moving disasters,' Rep. Drew Darby, a Republican from San Angelo, said in a letter to Abbott Tuesday.
Darby's district was also hit by flooding; Rep. Wes Virdell, who represents Kerrville, voted against HB 13, but told The Tribune he would reconsider that vote in light of what happened.
In addition to better flood warnings, the special session will also provide lawmakers an opportunity to look at Texas' flood mitigation systems.
After Hurricane Harvey in 2017, the Texas Legislature passed three significant bills directing more than a billion dollars to flood control and emergency response. As a result of that legislation, the Texas Water Development Board issued its first statewide flood plan in 2024, to address the needs of nearly 6 million Texans — almost 20% of the state population — living in areas susceptible to flooding.
The 265-page report recommended $55 billion worth of projects to further evaluate flood risks, better manage floodplains and mitigate the effects of future flooding. The Flood Infrastructure Fund, created after Harvey, has only committed $669 million to these projects so far.
Last session, lawmakers passed a historic $20 billion investment in the state's water infrastructure. But as part of that bill, the Flood Infrastructure Fund will be moved into the larger Texas Water Fund, and some experts worry it will result in less funding for flood mitigation as projects to increase water supply and improve aging infrastructure take precedence.
'Are we going to be putting enough into the water fund to be able to cover all the things that we need?' asked Perry Fowler, the executive director of the Texas Water Infrastructure Network. 'While it's still a significant amount, it wasn't as much as everyone hoped for, that we actually need to meet those demands.'
The Flood Infrastructure Fund can still receive other funding, separate from the water funding approved during the regular session. Since that money will be rolled out slowly — $1 billion a year until 2047 — Fowler said he hopes legislators will consider allocating more to the state's flood mitigation systems during the special session.
'It's sad when you have to depend on a tragedy to move the needle,' Fowler said. 'But there are a lot of competing interests out there, so sometimes this is what it takes to make progress, unfortunately.'
Lawmakers are also expected to provide some short-term relief to help communities across the Hill Country recover from the floods. The economic toll is estimated to be between $18 and $22 billion, Accuweather said, accounting for damage to homes, businesses, tourism losses and the costs of recovery.
Abbott has committed to getting local officials what they need, and thanked the federal government for its swift response. President Donald Trump issued a major disaster declaration for the area, allowing people to access grants for temporary housing and home repairs, and low-cost loans for other needs.
Lawmakers have previously dipped into the state coffers to help with local disaster recovery, with a large chunk of the $1.7 billion Harvey package reserved for needs like repairing damaged buildings and infrastructure.
But people who lost everything in the floods say they need significant assistance to rebuild their lives.
Lorena Guillen owns Blue Oak RV Park and Howdy's Restaurant on the same riverfront property in Kerrville. She awoke to a raging torrent and saw RVs getting swept away, including one with a family stuck inside. She is still struggling with trauma as she considers what the future looks like for her business.
'I pay $9,000 a week in payroll, and I have employees who are relying on that income because they lost things too,' she said, standing amid the wreckage Monday. 'I need someone to help me make payroll, help me rebuild, and it's going to cost so much money.'
Some experts hope to see lawmakers give cities and counties more tools to limit development in floodplains. Camp Mystic, the Christian girls summer camp that lost at least 27 campers and counselors, and other summer camps in the area, were built in high-risk flood zones. RV parks are often pushed into these areas as well.
'We can't have this race to the bottom where some places are just the Wild West, and they're able to build whatever they want while others are trying to be responsible stewards of safety and lower property damage,' Andrew Rumbach, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute who studies climate risk, told the Tribune this week.
Disclosure: Rice University has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Shape the future of Texas at the 15th annual , happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin! We bring together Texas' most inspiring thinkers, leaders and innovators to discuss the issues that matter to you. Get tickets now and join us this November.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A Senate vote this week will test the popularity of DOGE spending cuts
The House has already approved Trump's request on a mostly party line 214-212 vote. The Senate has little time to spare to beat the deadline for the president's signature. Another House vote will be needed if senators amend the legislation, adding more uncertainty to the outcome. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's a closer look at this week's debate. Advertisement Public media on the chopping block Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System to support national programming. The potential fallout from the cuts for local pubic media stations has generated concerns on both sides of the political aisle. Advertisement Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he's worried about how the rescissions will hit radio stations that broadcast to Native Americans in his state. He said the vast majority of their funding comes from the federal government. 'They're not political in nature,' Rounds said of the stations. 'It's the only way of really communicating in the very rural areas of our state, and a lot of other states as well.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., said that for the tribal radio stations in her state, 'almost to a number, they're saying that they will go under if public broadcasting funds are no longer available to them.' To justify the spending cuts, the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have cited certain activities they disagree with to portray a wide range of a program's funding as wasteful. In recent testimony, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought criticized programming aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion. He said NPR aired a 2022 program entitled 'What 'Queer Ducks' can teach teenagers about sexuality in the animal kingdom.' He also cited a special town hall that CNN held in 2020 with 'Sesame Street' about combatting racism. Targeting humanitarian aid As part of the package, Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind about $8.3 billion in foreign aid programs that aim to fight famine and disease and promote global stability. Among the targets: — $900 million to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases and strengthen detections systems to prevent wider epidemics. — $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. — $4.15 billion for two programs designed to boost the economies and democratic institutions in developing and strategically important countries. Advertisement — $496 million to provide humanitarian assistance such as food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. Some of the health cuts are aimed at a program known as PEPFAR, which President George W. Bush, a Republican, began to combat HIV/AIDS in developing countries. The program is credited with saving 26 million lives and has broad bipartisan support. On PEPFAR, Vought told senators 'these cuts are surgical and specifically preserve life-saving assistance.' But many lawmakers are wary, saying they've seen no details about where specifically the administration will cut. The administration also said some cuts, such as eliminating funding for UNICEF, would encourage international organizations to be more efficient and seek contributions from other nations, 'putting American taxpayers first.' U.S. leaders have often argued that aiding other nations through 'soft power' is not just the right thing to do but also the smart thing. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told Vought there is 'plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding,' but he called the administration's attempt to root it out 'unnecessarily chaotic.' 'In critical corners of the globe, instead of creating efficiencies, you've created vacuums for adversaries like China to fill,' McConnell told Vought. Trump weighs in The president has issued a warning on his social media site directly aimed at individual Senate Republicans who may be considering voting against the cuts. He said it was important that all Republicans adhere to the bill and in particular defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,' he said. Advertisement For individual Republicans seeking reelection, the prospect of Trump working to defeat them is reason for pause and could be a sign the package is teetering. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opted to announce he would not seek reelection recently after the president called for a primary challenger to the senator when he voted not to advance Trump's massive tax and spending cut bill. Getting around a filibuster Spending bills before the 100-member Senate almost always need some bipartisan buy-in to pass. That's because the bills need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster and advance. But this week's effort is different. Congress set up a process back when Republican Richard Nixon was president for speedily considering a request to claw back previously approved spending authority. Under those procedures, it takes only a simple Senate majority to advance the president's request to a final vote. It's a rarely employed maneuver. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush, a Republican, had some success with his rescissions request, though the final bill included some cuts requested by the president and many that were not. Trump proposed 38 rescissions in 2018, but the package stalled in the Senate. If senators vote to take up the bill, it sets up the potential for 10 hours of debate plus votes on scores of potentially thorny amendments in what is known as a vote-a-rama. Democrats see the president's request as an effort to erode the Senate filibuster. They warn it's absurd to expect them to work with GOP lawmakers on bipartisan spending measures if Republicans turn around a few months later and use their majority to cut the parts they don't like. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer offered a stern warning in a letter to colleagues: 'How Republicans answer this question on rescissions and other forthcoming issues will have grave implications for the Congress, the very role of the legislative branch, and, more importantly, our country,' Schumer said. Advertisement Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., took note of the warning. 'I was disappointed to see the Democrat leader in his recent Dear Colleague letter implicitly threaten to shut down the government,' Thune said. The Trump administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along.
CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
New law in New Hampshire allows for public drinking within "social districts"
Cities and towns in New Hampshire will soon get to decide if they want to allow public drinking in designated "social districts" thanks to a new law. Gov. Kelly Ayotte recently signed off on the legislation. The new law takes effect on Sept. 5. "Our state is the best in the nation for economic opportunity because we respect local decision making and give businesses the freedom to grow," Ayotte said in a statement to the Union Leader. "It's common sense that we would give our cities and towns this opportunity to grow their revenue and strengthen local tourism." What is a social district? The law defines a social district as "a defined outdoor area in which a person may consume alcoholic beverages sold by a licensee." The area must be clearly marked with signs telling people where and when they can drink. People can only drink alcohol that they bought from a business or vendor inside the social district. Alcoholic beverages sold for consumption within the social district must be in non-glass cups that say "Drink Responsibly -- Be 21,' the legislation states. Social districts in New Hampshire Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota are some of the other states that allow communities to form social districts for public drinking. Cities and towns that want to create social districts have to hold a public hearing first, and then put it to a vote via ballot question. One Republican lawmaker who backed the bill calls it "true conservative reform" that can help boost downtown economies. "It puts power back in the hands of Granite Staters, supports small businesses, and safeguards public safety — all without raising taxes or imposing one-size-fits-all mandates," State Rep. Bill Boyd, of Merrimack, said in a statement.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Governor Says Emails With Musk Are Too 'Embarrassing' to Release
The Texas Newsroom requested records of all correspondence between Governor Greg Abbott and billionaire Elon Musk from their legislative session this year. After initially approving the request and charging the newsroom $244 for the records, Abbott's office refused to share any documents, stating that the exchanges between Musk and Abbott were too 'intimate and embarrassing' to be released. 'Section 552.101 encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that is … highly intimate or embarrassing, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person and not of legitimate concern to the public,' a letter from Abbott's counsel read. 'Embarrassment' is a ludicrous reason to block the public release of messages between one of the country's most powerful Republican governors and the richest man in the world, who has plenty of his own political motivations. And as ProPublica notes, that 'common law privacy' doctrine is usually only levied in situations that involve highly personal information, health data, or children, not to very wealthy, public, and powerful men. Were Musk and Abbott chatting about bringing a Grok data center to Texas? Were they planning a trip to Mars? Were they flirting? What could be so embarrassing and intimate about these messages? We'll likely never know, as a recent ruling from the Texas Supreme Court has granted more protections to public officials who are asked to divulge public records. Abbott's office has yet to elaborate.
