.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Cuba announces new rules for investing in hotels and a hike in state pensions
The measures, he said, are part of a government plan to boost hard currency revenue and foreign investments, and increase production in the country, though their real impact cannot be measured until related regulations are published.
Prime Minister Mario Marrero did not elaborate on the swap operations, but in the past, several Latin American countries have implemented so-called debt-for-equity swaps to reduce their foreign debt. In these transactions, a country reduces its foreign debt by giving a company an equity stake in a local company or property.
Marrero said those transactions 'will be approved without ceding sovereignty. We already approved the first leased hotel by a foreign company, and there are several under analysis to switch them to this very beneficial model for our country.'
The minister also mentioned forthcoming regulations that would eliminate the requirement for foreign hotel chains to enter into a joint venture or a similar contract with a Cuban government entity in order to lease a hotel.
Several international hotel chains have signed contracts with Cuban tourism companies, including some owned by the island's military, to lease and manage hotels on the island. Some of those properties — or the land on which they were built —have been the subject of lawsuits under the U.S. law known as the Helms-Burton Act because they were expropriated from U.S. citizens by the Cuban government without compensation shortly after it took power 1959.
Many urban hotels owned by a Cuban military conglomerate known as GAESA are included in a list of sanctioned entities kept by the U.S State Department.
Private sector imports over $1 billion
Marrero's tone regarding private enterprises was notably softer than a previous address to the National Assembly last year, when he announced several new restrictions on micro, small, and medium enterprises as well as the self-employed.
He provided figures revealing the extent of a crackdown on the private enterprises, including 2 billion pesos in fines for not following price control restrictions on certain food items, as well as the closure of over 8,000 points of sale for the same reason.
Still, he at times explicitly referred to these enterprises as 'private companies,' and said the government is seeking partnerships beyond the current leasing of empty facilities, and would allow joint ventures. He said that already there are 2,741 partnerships between government entities and private enterprises to produce food. Notably, the government has so far rejected expanding the privatization to agriculture, and he mentioned only 55 such partnerships in that sector.
Figures shared earlier this week by the country's economy minister, Joaquín Alonso, show that the private sector, including the self-employed and non-agricultural cooperatives, has imported over a billion dollars in goods and raw materials in the first six months this year.
Without providing details, Marrero also announced several new measures to be implemented before the end of the year, including reducing red tape and simplifying the approval process for foreign investment, changes to the official currency exchange system, steps to promote remittances from abroad, and additional controls on electronic commerce. He also said the government is seeking partnerships with foreign companies to address the ongoing trash collection problem in the country's largest cities.
But nothing in Marrero's speech signaled undertaking significant changes at the speed required by the country's colossal economic problems. His speech was followed by an address from the economy minister, Alonso, who described the collapse of the island's economy, which has contracted by 11% since 2019.
Alonso said that while there have been some improvements in the repair of electrical plants and the production of certain crops, he acknowledged that the country still lacks the resources to purchase the oil needed to meet the country's electricity needs and feed the population. He said that continuing to import food to distribute to the public via the decades-old ration-card system is 'economically unsustainable.'
Last week, the minister of energy and mines, Vicente de la O Levy, implied that Cuba no longer relies on oil shipments from Venezuela, which had been its principal provider.
'We don't have a stable fuel supply like we used to,' he said. 'We're turning to the international market to buy fuel, and the country's oil bill is over $4 billion.'
Money for health and pensions
Many of the measures Marrero announced Wednesday have been under discussion for several years, and some entail small changes that economists have been advocating for a long time.
For example, he said 29 state entities have been approved to use the hard currency they earn to boost their own production, rather than passing the dollars to the central government. He mentioned the Ministry of Health is among those that would be allowed to 'retain 100% of what they earn in foreign currency for the services they export.'
That statement implies that the money collected by the government as payment for its medical missions abroad was not spent mostly on maintaining the public health system. Health Minister José Ángel Portal told members of the National Assembly on Monday that the 'self-financing scheme' had been in place since last December, and the additional funds had been used to pay debts, purchase antibiotics and medical supplies.
'We had practically hit rock bottom, but these resources have been vital in prioritizing the most urgent needs,' he said.
Still, Portal said, currently, only '30% of the basic medications list' is available in the country.
The prime minister also announced a modest increase in state pensions, which will double the amount earned by those receiving the minimum (1,528 pesos monthly). However, the boost will barely add the equivalent of $4 a month. Those receiving more than 4,000 pesos a month will see no increase. The measure, he said, will benefit 1.3 million Cubans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
No one defies Trump like Brazil's president
Lula granted his first interview to The New York Times in 13 years on Tuesday, in part because he wanted to speak to the American people about his frustration with Trump. Trump has said that, starting Friday, he plans to impose 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian goods, in large part because Brazilian authorities have charged former President Jair Bolsonaro with trying to hold on to power after losing the 2022 election. Trump has called the case a 'witch hunt' and wants it dropped. Lula said that was not up for negotiation. 'Maybe he doesn't know that here in Brazil, the judiciary is independent,' he said. Advertisement In the interview, Lula said the US president is infringing on Brazil's sovereignty. 'At no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country,' he said. 'We know the economic power of the United States; we recognize the military power of the United States; we recognize the technological size of the United States, but that doesn't make us afraid. It makes us concerned.' Advertisement There is perhaps no world leader defying Trump as strongly as Lula. The president of Brazil — a leftist in his third term who is arguably this century's most important Latin American statesman — has been hitting back at Trump in speeches across Brazil. His social media pages have suddenly become filled with references to Brazil's sovereignty. And he has taken to wearing a hat that says 'Brazil belongs to Brazilians.' On Tuesday, he said he was studying retaliatory tariffs against American exports if Trump carries through with his threats. He also said that if the Jan. 6, 2021, riot on the US Capitol had happened in Brazil, Trump would be facing prosecution just like Bolsonaro. 'The democratic state of law for us is a sacred thing,' he said in a lofty room draped in a colorful tapestry in the modernist presidential palace, where emus roam the lawns. 'Because we have already lived through dictatorships, and we don't want any more.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has gone after Brazil to come to the aid of his ally, Bolsonaro. His proposed 50 percent tariffs would be among the highest levies he has issued against any country, and they appear to be the only ones driven by overtly political reasons and not economic ones. Trump has said that he sees his legal fight in the criminal trial against Bolsonaro. Trump and Bolsonaro — two politicians with strikingly similar political styles — both lost reelection and then denied having lost. Their subsequent efforts to undermine the vote culminated in mobs of their supporters storming their nations' capital buildings, in failed bids to prevent the election winners from assuming the presidency. Advertisement The stark difference is that four years later, Trump returned to power, while Bolsonaro is now facing prison. This month, Alexandre de Moraes, the Brazilian Supreme Court justice overseeing Bolsonaro's criminal case, ordered the former Brazilian president to wear an ankle monitor before his upcoming trial on coup charges. De Moraes said Bolsonaro's efforts to lobby Trump suggested he might try to flee the country. Bolsonaro could face decades in prison if convicted. In an interview with the Times in January, Bolsonaro said that to avoid prosecution in Brazil, he was pinning his hopes on intervention from Trump. At the time, the wish seemed unrealistic. However, this month, Trump intervened. In a July 9 letter to Lula, Trump called the criminal case against Bolsonaro 'an international disgrace' and compared it to his past charges. 'It happened to me, times 10,' he said. He also criticized de Moraes for his rulings on social media content. And he said Brazil was an unfair trading partner, claiming incorrectly that the United States had a trade deficit with Brazil. The US had a $7.4 billion trade surplus with Brazil last year on about $92 billion in trade. Lula, 79, said it was 'disgraceful' that Trump issued his threats on his social media site, Truth Social. 'President Trump's behavior strayed from all standards of negotiations and diplomacy,' he said. 'When you have a commercial disagreement, a political disagreement, you pick up the phone; you schedule a meeting; you talk, and you try to solve the problem. What you don't do is tax and give an ultimatum.' He said Trump's efforts to help Bolsonaro are going to be paid for by Americans who will face higher prices for coffee, beef, orange juice, and other products that are significantly sourced from Brazil. 'Neither the American people nor the Brazilian people deserve this,' he said. 'Because we are going to move from a 201-year-old diplomatic relationship of win-win to a political relationship of lose-lose.' Advertisement He has been cast as Brazil's guardian of democracy by many on the left, but his growing power has also raised concerns about whether he poses a threat to Brazil's democracy. Now he has become a target of the White House. This article originally appeared in

Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Special prosecutors file arrest warrant for South Korean ex-Pres. Yoon
SEOUL, July 30 (UPI) -- South Korean special prosecutors investigating allegations against former First Lady Kim Keon Hee said Wednesday that they requested an arrest warrant to bring in former President Yoon Suk Yeol for questioning over election meddling charges. The request was made after Yoon defied a summons by prosecutor Min Joong-ki for a second time. "The special prosecutors again notified former President Yoon, who failed to appear yesterday, to appear at 10:00 AM today," assistant special counsel Oh Jeong-hee said during a press briefing. "However, former President Yoon did not appear, both yesterday and today, without providing any reason." "The special prosecutor's office filed an arrest warrant for former President Yoon Suk Yeol this afternoon," Oh said. Yoon's legal representatives claim the former president was unable to attend due to health issues, according to local media reports. Yoon is already being held at the Seoul Detention Center on separate charges related to his short-lived Dec. 3 declaration of martial law. A court-issued arrest warrant would allow the special counsel team to physically bring in Yoon for questioning. Min Joong-ki's team is investigating the former first lady on a range of allegations, including stock price manipulation, accepting luxury goods in exchange for political favors and meddling in election nominations. Yoon faces questioning over the election meddling charges, which involve power broker Myung Tae-kyun, the special prosecutor's office said last week. The former presidential couple is suspected of influencing candidate nominations for Yoon's People Power Party in local and parliamentary elections. The arrest warrant comes as Yoon awaits trial on charges including insurrection for his martial law declaration. The decree was quickly overturned by the National Assembly and led to Yoon's impeachment and eventual removal from office. The former president was arrested on Jul. 10 over concerns he may destroy evidence ahead of the trial, marking Yoon's second time in custody. In January, after a weeks-long standoff using his presidential security detail, Yoon was arrested on insurrection charges. He was later released in March on procedural grounds. Special prosecutors indicted Yoon on additional charges last week, including an allegation that he abused power by not holding a required meeting with all cabinet members before declaring martial law. He is also accused of creating a false document claiming the full cabinet endorsed the martial law decree and later destroying it. The insurrection charges Yoon faces are punishable by life imprisonment or the death penalty. On Wednesday, the ruling Democratic Party launched a committee to assist the ongoing special counsel probes into Yoon. In addition to the martial law bid and corruption allegations against Kim Keon Hee, Yoon is also at the center of a third investigation over alleged interference in the probe of the 2023 death of a marine. "We will do our utmost to ensure that the special prosecutors' investigations proceed without a hitch and restore the constitutional order and judicial system that the Yoon Suk Yeol administration has undermined," Rep. Jeon Hyun-heui, who will head the 46-member committee, said. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Mark Cuban wants key artificial intelligence (AI) use illegal
Mark Cuban has become a billionaire who also has complicated political views he's willing to share. People on the right see him as a left-wing activist, but he's more against extreme right-wing positions than he is an actual die-hard importantly, the "Shark Tank" billionaire does not have one strict has dedicated much of his life to making drugs more affordable for Americans, but he has done so as part of a for-profit venture. Cuban has also been willing to anger anyone on either side of the a recent post on X, the former Twitter, he takes a shot at White House AI Czar David Sacks. Related: Intel announces a drastic decision to fix its struggling business "Hey @DavidSacks, my one request is that we make it illegal for AI models to offer advertising. And, we need to really examine referral fees as well," he posted."The last thing we need is to have algorithms designed to maximize revenue driving LLM (large language model) output and interactions. They are already recommending brands and we don't know if they are getting paid for it. We need to have learned our lessons from algos in social media," he added. Not every internet personality agreed with Cuban. Jordi Hayes, an online talk show host, took issue with the billionaire. "Mark Cuban is promoting a policy that would almost certainly make the best AI inaccessible for low-income Americans and lead to greater wealth inequality over time," Hayes posted on X, the former Twitter. Most of the comments responding to Hayes were surprisingly reasonable by internet standards. "Just subsidize the free tier by charging everyone a tad bit extra like they are now. Mark's concern is advertisers trying to control output in any way, which will eventually lead to what we have now with pharma and their control of content," Bob posted. More Experts: Stocks and Markets Podcast: Prairie Operating CEO on energy businessDave Ramsey warns Americans on Social SecurityLegendary fund manager reveals new trades after S&P 500 rally Others believe that ads are essential to ensure access. "There's also the fact that ads based content (including LLMs) makes it more accessible for a larger part of the internet who can't pay subscription fees for everything," Lucas Dickey added. Kris Richens had perhaps the most measured response. "When AI is clearly identified, it's a tool, like any other ad platform. But as soon as it blurs the line with authentic human interaction, it enters a grey area that feels less like marketing and more like digital puppetry. We need to uphold AI transparency to build digital trust, not erode it," he wrote. While Cuban called out a White House official, the debate around his comment was surprisingly non-partisan. The billionaire did make it clear that he believed free AI isn't going anywhere, although it will change. "My guess is that the free version will stay free for a while, then most likely it will be bundled with phone and broadband carriers, and phone manufacturers. There is a winner take all attitude among the biggest models, so they will try to get their basic versions everywhere they can, on every device they can and upsell to subscriptions," he posted. Cuban did double down on the idea of AI ads needing full transparency. "Because AI will be part of everything we do, we will want to trust that its responses are not biased towards maximizing revenue. Let's let political candidates spend money to weight responses about their race in their favor? Maybe put out to bid which candidate the model will favor? Or put out to bid the weights for training data as it relates to a product or service. You pay us enough and we will train on your data to the exclusion or minimization of your competitors," he shared. Some posts did take issue with Cuban's use of the word "illegal" when it comes to AI ads. "People's intuitions about banning things go into overdrive when AI is involved. They demand far stricter tradeoffs (safety over consumer value, transparency over efficiency) than they'd apply elsewhere, yet rarely explain why AI is so vastly different as to justify this," wrote Tamay Besiroglu. Related: Mark Cuban says AI will end 1 essential job as we know it The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.