
Mexico City unveils plan to tackle gentrification after mass protests
Mexico City Mayor Clara Brugada said officials will propose a law to regulate rental prices, strike a balance between the rights and obligations of landlords and tenants, prevent people from being displaced and regulate short-term rental properties.
Many residents say they've been priced out of their neighborhoods, in part because of overtourism, short-term home rentals and an influx of people and businesses with higher purchasing power.
Brugada said on Wednesday that an 'objective and rigorous methodology' will be worked out to regulate temporary housing rentals to prevent residents from being displaced and avoid 'the loss of the community's roots and identity.'
The city government will also set up an agency to enforce the rent law and penalize offenders.
Brugada said living in Mexico City should not be a privilege for a few, but rather a guaranteed right for all its residents.
'The issue of gentrification is one of the most important issues in the city today, but it is not new either. It is not only an issue for the city, but also for the entire world, and it means the displacement of thousands of families,' the mayor said.
The proposal comes days after residents demonstrated on July 4 against gentrification and the rising cost of living in the Mexican capital, which some have blamed on an influx of foreigners from the United States and Europe.
While the demonstration was largely peaceful and reflected growing anger about inequality in the city, some protesters vandalized stores in wealthier neighborhoods and used anti-immigration language that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum criticized as xenophobic.
Frente Anti Gentrificación Mx, one of several groups that helped organize the protest, pushed back against Sheinbaum's characterization, saying the demonstration was meant to highlight the plight of those priced out of their homes and to demand reforms from the government.
'We are not against migration because gentrification is not a problem of migration (which is) a human right. We are against violence as a government model,' spokesperson Yessica Morales told CNN last week.
Housing costs in the country have soared to 286% since 2005 while real wages have gone down by 33%, according to Morales, citing data from the National Institute of Statistics and Geography and the Federal Mortgage Society.
Mexico City's mayor on Wednesday called on protesters to engage in dialogue.
'To the people who are promoting the marches and mobilizations, I say that with all the more reason we will open the necessary discussions with them on this issue,' she said.
Experts say gentrification in Mexico City has been happening for decades and can't be blamed on immigration alone. But the arrival of short-term rental platforms like Airbnb and remote work policies during the Covid-19 pandemic turbo-charged the gentrification debate in recent years.
Airbnb defended its activities in Mexico City last week, saying it helped generate more than $1 billion in the local economy last year, and argued that guests who booked accommodations also spent money on shops and services in the capital.
The issue is not unique to Mexico City. Across Europe, residents of tourist destinations have also protested gentrification, while local governments have announced restrictions on short-term rentals in several cities.
CNN's Rocio Muñoz-Ledo contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How the dropping dollar could scramble Trump's agenda
President Trump and his aides are closely watching the US dollar's drop over the first six months of this year as they track a change that could have wide-ranging effects, from how tariffs are felt to Federal Reserve policy to America's role in the world. The question, which notably remains a somewhat open one even among Trump's aides, is whether the net effects may include at least some positive short-term consequences for the president's agenda or whether the dollar needs to be strengthened at all costs. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick offered a limited case for a weaker dollar on CBS over the weekend when he responded to a question about rising consumer prices by saying that "the dollar declining sort of softens tariffs completely." The currency's moves so far this year — which have surprised some economists who expected Trump's tariffs to put pressure in the other direction — could indeed boost exports but could also complicate Trump's goals for the coming months, primarily by pushing prices up for US consumers of foreign goods. Trump himself remains very much in the strong dollar camp, as he reiterated just a few days ago, saying that he is "never going to let the dollar slide." The only way that could happen, he added, is "if you have a dummy" as president. The somewhat mixed messaging comes as the US dollar index — a measure of the US currency against various foreign currencies — has fallen significantly and is now down almost 10% since Inauguration Day. Declines in recent days have put the currency, as of Tuesday afternoon, near two-year lows. It's a change that, if it sticks, will have varied consequences for Trump's agenda — and not just on the trade front. RSM's Joe Brusuelas offered in a note this week that a weakening dollar tends to be followed by inflation pressure — "but it usually takes nine to 12 months" — which could work most directly against Trump's keen interest in lower interest rates. If the dollar holds or declines further, the economist wrote, "such a scenario will most likely lead the Federal Reserve to hold its policy rate steady through the end of the year at best" due to inflation uncertainty. 'People vote with their feet' The somewhat surprising dollar moves so far this year have also spurred some concerns that recent declines could be early signs of a loss of faith from global investors. As JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon put it recently, "people vote with their feet," and "if people decide that the U.S. dollar isn't the place to be ... that will become a problem." Eurasia Group's Ian Bremmer added in a recent analysis that the dollar's role as the world's global reserve currency is likely safe for now, but the US is entering a period where investment trends "could start a long term slide to become closer to parity in trust and utility with the Euro." Some analysts are pushing back, saying the evidence isn't there (at least yet) for a long-term slide. A recent analysis from Monty Gandhi at the SMBC Group called the flows away from the dollar "still more myth than reality" and found that "speculative positioning may reflect short-term bearishness on the dollar, actual capital flows continue to favor U.S. assets." Another note of skepticism about any long-term effects came from Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, who wrote in a note that his expectation is that if the trade uncertainty is resolved, "the US dollar is expected to appreciate again" after what he describes as a rebound in demand for US assets that began in May. (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo Global Management.) It's also a narrative that the White House pushes hard against, with Trump taking an aggressive stance against BRICs, an intergovernmental organization comprising 10 countries that had floated a long-shot idea of a common currency. "They wanted to try and take over the dollar," the president said. Trump promised a 10% tariff in response and gloated last week that the group's influence is "fading out fast," likening the possible loss of the dollar's status as a reserve currency to "losing a world war." "Ten-year Treasury yields rallying down since Inauguration Day, four consecutive expectation-beating inflation reports, and the trillions in historic investment commitments that have poured into the United States since Election Day are all indicative of the confidence that investors and markets continue to have in our economy and currency," added White House spokesperson Kush Desai in a statement. Read more: What is the 10-year Treasury note, and how does it affect your finances? A long-simmering Trump-world debate This summer's focus on the dollar is just the latest in a debate within Trump's orbit that stretches back even before the 2024 election around whether the dollar is overvalued. As the Atlantic Council recently put it: "What's the Trump administration's dollar strategy? It depends on who you ask." On one side historically are figures like Stephen Miran, the chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, who touted the idea of a "Mar-A-Lago accord" last year, before he joined the administration, that was largely built on a premise that the US dollar is "persistently overvalued" and that tariff inflation can be avoided if currency issues are also addressed simultaneously. His argument was that tackling the currency question alongside tariffs could rebound in America's favor on a variety of fronts — from the national debt to national security arrangements to providing a boost to US businesses. It was an argument that Lutnick appeared to resurface in part over the weekend. It's also a line of thinking that has faced clear resistance from other aides (and apparently from Trump himself) who shy away from any public suggestion that the Trump administration is interested in lessening the US dollar's strength. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — a former currency trader himself — has repeatedly downplayed the dropping dollar, saying that "it's natural for currencies to go up and down and what we've seen is not out of the ordinary." Bessent is often quick to note that the dollar also declined in 2017 — the beginning of Trump's first term — but then rose in the following years. He often casts the moves — as he did on CNBC earlier this month — as better understood as a strengthening of the euro instead of a weakening of the dollar. So far, at least, Trump's actions have focused on one side of Miran's thesis, the implementation of tariffs, but with much less focus on his corollary currency ideas beyond things like a mention of "currency practices" in his "Liberation Day" tariffs executive order. It has even led Miran to offer some distance from his own paper and, on possible currency actions, to suggest "could it be something that is entertained down the road? Sure." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hunter Biden lashes out at George Clooney, other Democrats, over Joe Biden's 2024 campaign
Hunter Biden has criticized prominent Democrats and party advisers in a recent interview. In a podcast published Monday, he expressed frustration over George Clooney's call for President Joe Biden to drop out of the 2024 race.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FEMA Chief Quits in Disgust at Kristi Noem's Texas Flood Response
The head of FEMA's Urban Search and Rescue Branch has resigned, telling colleagues that the Trump administration's disastrous response to the deadly flooding in Texas had driven him over the edge, CNN reported. Ken Pagurek, who had worked in that branch for more than a decade, reportedly told colleagues that his departure Monday from FEMA had come after mounting frustrations with the Trump administration's efforts to gut the disaster aid agency. But Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's pitifully delayed response to the flooding over the Fourth of July weekend was apparently the straw that broke the camel's back. Noem had severely botched FEMA's Texas response by failing to renew contracts with companies staffing FEMA call centers, resulting in a majority of calls going unanswered for days as the floodwaters raged. The secretary dismissed the reporting as 'fake news.' She also reportedly delayed FEMA's initial response by instituting a policy that required her to personally sign off on all DHS expenditures exceeding $100,000. FEMA officials, who were unaware of the new rule, didn't receive Noem's go-ahead for 72 hours. In his resignation letter, Pagurek didn't mention the floods at all. 'This decision was not made lightly, and after much reflection and prayer, it is the right path for me at this time,' he wrote. 'I have been continually inspired by the unwavering dedication, unmatched courage, and deep-seated commitment we share for saving lives and bringing hope in the face of devastation.' One DHS spokesperson defended the response to the floods, while another criticized Pagurek's decision, saying that it was 'laughable that a career public employee, who claims to serve the American people, would choose to resign over our refusal to hastily approve a six-figure deployment contract without basic financial oversight.' 'We're being responsible with taxpayer dollars, that's our job,' the second spokesperson said. Last month, Donald Trump said he plans to 'phase out' FEMA after this year's hurricane season, and future disbursements would come straight from him. 'We're going to give it out directly. It'll be from the president's office. We'll have somebody here, could be Homeland Security,' Trump said at the time. Clearly, putting Noem in charge of personally approving decisions in a disaster comes at a cost, and the Trump administration's mismanagement of relief is more far-reaching than just the flooding in Texas.