logo
Do you have ‘money dysmorphia'? How to recognise and overcome it

Do you have ‘money dysmorphia'? How to recognise and overcome it

Irish Examiner2 days ago
Have you ever found yourself doomscrolling through Instagram late at night, wishing you had more money to afford the lavish lifestyles your followers flaunt on social media? You aren't alone.
The pressure to 'keep up with the Joneses' can fuel money dysmorphia, or a perception of financial reality that is skewed, resulting in intense anxiety, guilt, and stress related to spending and saving.
Matthew Parden, CEO of money management app Marygold & Co, explains money dysmorphia, the factors that contribute to it, and strategies to manage and overcome it.
What exactly is 'money dysmorphia'?
'Money dysmorphia is effectively when the distorted perception of one's financial health, how you feel about your money, doesn't necessarily reflect the reality,' says Parden.
'This can be emotionally driven, shaped by irregular patterns or social pressures to keep up.'
Money dysmorphia can lead to either overspending or excessive saving, depending on the individual's perception.
'We've worked with anxious savers, avoidant savers, and people who like to spend, so there's lots of different types of personality and money dysmorphia can manifest in all of them,' says Parden.
What are some signs or red flags that someone might be experiencing money dysmorphia?
'Feeling uncertain or anxious about money, even though there is no apparent or immediate shortfall in money, could be a sign of money dysmorphia,' says Parden.
'It could be that you avoid checking your bank statements or balances and this could be because of stress, or it could be because of a fear of what you might see in there.
'Another sign could be fluctuating between periods where you're spending a lot and reining it back and spending a little, so you kind of vacillate between overspending and underspending.
'Money dysmorphia could be when you are playing down your success, payments, or debts and you feel that you've fallen short, that what you have isn't enough, even though it might be sufficient.'
Social media and societal pressures can contribute to feelings of inadequacy when it comes to personal finances.
'Social media presents a curated version of life, where people are only showing the best side of financial life, without providing the context,' says Parden.
'You don't see the debt, the lack of savings, the stress — that is all hidden. It does kind of amplify these 'norms' and create unrealistic expectations. It provokes spending, which is really emotionally driven and creates a constant pressure to keep up, so that even if your financial footing is secure, you still feel that you've got some way to go.
'And that, in itself, can lead to insecurity and a distorted sense of your own financial situation and reality.'
Can money dysmorphia be tied to past financial trauma or upbringing?
'If you've grown up in a financially unstable environment or been through times of poverty or crisis or scarcity, that can often make people carry fear and shame around money,' says Parden.
'Those experiences can drive/impact many things in your life around behaviour and emotions, and money is just one of the areas where that might manifest itself.'
What consequences can money dysmorphia have?
'Money dysmorphia can often make people avoid getting involved with money and that means they are avoiding financial planning and rganisation of their financial life,' says Parden.
'This can lead to missed opportunities, like having a safety-net reserve of cash.
'You don't have any savings because you are constantly spending, you may feel like you haven't ever got enough and will consistently avoid doing it. That, in itself, can affect your mental and physical health.'
How can someone begin to overcome money dysmorphia?
Ignorance is not always bliss, especially when it comes to finances. So, be proactive and start engaging with your finances.
'Take a step back and work out what it is that may be impacting your relationship with money,' says Parden.
'Just start with small, repeatable steps, like taking 10 minutes out of every week to look at your finances and understand what you're doing and where your money has gone and what is coming up.
'If you recognise an issue, try not to judge yourself. Just do regular, gentle reviews, because that helps you start to engage with it and might help reduce the fear. It might also help you move towards bridging that gap between how you feel and what is true in your finances.'
Apps can give you a good overview of your financial life.
'If you begin to understand your finances from a behavioural aspect, that could help you identify emotional triggers that cause you to spend or save,' says Parden.
'Apps can also help you to not spend or withdraw. On the Marygold & Co app, you can set a time lock, and other apps have similar tools that can put a bit of friction on your spending before you make payments.'
What are the benefits of having a clearer, healthier financial mindset?
'If you have a positive financial mindset and the tools, it gives you the ability to actually start saving for those things which are going to help you in your financial life, like building up cash reserves,' says Parden.
'Creating a financial plan will also help you meet your short-term and long-term objectives, whether it's saving for a wedding or for a holiday.
'Just engaging with your finances can have tremendous long-term benefits.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia outlaws YouTube for teens as media ban widens
Australia outlaws YouTube for teens as media ban widens

Extra.ie​

timea day ago

  • Extra.ie​

Australia outlaws YouTube for teens as media ban widens

Australia has announced that YouTube is going to be added to the sites covered by their unique social media ban for teenagers. The video-sharing site was originally exempt from the ban but that decision has now been reversed with the possibility of a legal challenge now on the way. Due to a survey which found that 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform, Australia decided to comply with their internet regulator's urges. Australian PM Anthony Albanese confirmed the ban extension. Pic:Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated: 'I'm calling time on it.' He went on to highlight that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms and reminded social media platforms of the responsibility that they have to keep users safe.. The PM added: 'I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' The ban will broaden to include YouTube from December onwards. YouTube has hit back at the decision, stating that it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15 and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. A YouTube spokesperson wrote: 'Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media.' Platforms that were already covered by the ban, such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, were unhappy with YouTube's exemption last year and complained that it has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. Originally, the government had exempted YouTube due to its popularity with teachers but now all accounts for under-16s will be outlawed, with parents and teachers allowed to show videos on it to minors. YouTube have hit back at the decision. Pic:Angela Falkenberg, President of the Australian Primary Principals Association, stated: 'Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious.' Adam Marre, Chief Information Security Officer at cybersecurity firm Arctic Wolf, added that social media platforms like YouTube have been flooded with misinformation due to the rise in Artificial Intelligence. He said: 'The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids.' The decision now brings a potential legal challenge from Alphabet, the company that owns YouTube, after they already threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters that it had written to the government urging it 'to uphold the integrity of the legislative process'. Australian media then said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. Communications Minister Anika Wells told Australian parliament: 'I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids.' The Australian government is due to receive a report in the near future on tests of age-checking products, with the results set to influence the enforcement of the ban introduced last November. Currently, social media platforms that fail to take the 'reasonable steps' to keep out Australians younger than 16 will face a fine of up to A$49.5million (€27.9million).

Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption
Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption

Australia said it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the internet regulator urged the government last month to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform. "I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement, highlighting that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms, and reminding social media of their social responsibility. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban set to take effect in December. YouTube said it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15, and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Since the government said last year it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms covered by the ban, such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, have complained. They said YouTube has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. The ban outlaws YouTube accounts for those younger than 16, allowing parents and teachers to show videos on it to minors. "Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious," said Angela Falkenberg, president of the Australian Primary Principals Association, which supports the ban. Artificial intelligence has supercharged the spread of misinformation on social media platforms such as YouTube, said Adam Marre, chief information security officer at cyber security firm Arctic Wolf. "The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids," he added in an email. The reversal sets up a fresh dispute with Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had written to the government urging it "to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. "I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids, "Communications Minister Anika Wells told parliament today. The law passed in November only requires "reasonable steps" by social media platforms to keep out Australians younger than 16, or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million (€27.9m). The government, which is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, has said those results will influence enforcement of the ban.

Injunction granted restraining Gavin Pepper from filming home of Pepper Finance boss
Injunction granted restraining Gavin Pepper from filming home of Pepper Finance boss

Irish Times

time2 days ago

  • Irish Times

Injunction granted restraining Gavin Pepper from filming home of Pepper Finance boss

An interim injunction has been granted against a far-right councillor restraining him from filming and besetting the home of the head of debt firm Pepper Finance Corporation (Ireland) Ltd DAC. The High Court injunctions against Independent Dublin city councillor Gavin Pepper (who has no connection to Pepper Finance) also restrain such activity against members of Ian Wigglesworth's family. The managing director has five children, including one with Down syndrome, who was visibly upset after being recently filmed playing outside his home. The injunctions also prohibit Mr Pepper from obstructing, harassing, threatening, pursuing or intimidating Mr Wigglesworth and his family, who live in a Dublin housing estate. Cllr Pepper, of Plunkett Green, Finglas, Dublin, must also remove social media posts which contain video footage taken outside Mr Wigglesworth's home. READ MORE Brian Conroy SC, for Mr Wigglesworth and Pepper Finance, said Cllr Pepper has a well established association with the far right and social media posts promoting far-right ideas. This injunction application, brought on a one-side-only represented (ex parte) basis, was urgent in the context of recent events, he said, adding that his clients were concerned about the possibility of such events becoming more serious. Mr Wigglesworth, in a sworn statement, said Cllr Pepper has engaged in a series of threats and acts of intimidation against him and Pepper Finance. On July 25th, he arrived at Mr Wigglesworth's family home, set up a video camera with tripod and began filming his family, including his son with Down syndrome. It was particularly distressing that Cllr Pepper sought to disparage his son in a recent social media post which was published on X, Facebook and Instagram, he said. A second defendant in the case is David Rafferty, of Plunkett Green in Finglas, Dublin, who holds a mortgage account with Pepper has admitted to disseminating personal information about Mr Wigglesworth, including his address. He is sued arising from the sequence of events that followed but there was no application for an injunction against him. Cllr Pepper has published a total of 14 social media posts in relation to Mr Wigglesworth and his company. The posts are offensive, defamatory, threatening and replete with misinformation, Mr Wigglesworth said. In Cllr Pepper's first post on June 12th, he signalled his intention to attend the homes of named people. On July 25th, he threatened to camp outside Mr Wigglesworth's home if he didn't 'come to the table' in relation to the interest rates Pepper Finance charges. In commentary with his posts, Cllr Pepper said he had 'all the information about the staff' at Pepper Finance and another company. This prompted threatening comments from other social media posts. Mr Justice Brian Cregan also ordered Cllr Pepper be restrained from publishing the staff's addresses. He said he would deal with the issue of extending the injunctions to Pepper Finance itself when the case returns on Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store