Armistice Day 2024: People in the UK and around the world pay tribute
The UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer took part in a memorial service in Paris to mark Armistice Day with French President Macon. The leaders laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
Meanwhile in London, there was a commemoration ceremony at the Cenotaph on Whitehall.It was attended by the public, by serving soldiers and veterans too.
Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh led a ceremony at the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire.
Legion Scotland took part in the service of remembrance at the Scott Monument in Princes Street Gardens, Edinburgh.
At the Sailor's Church in Ramsgate, Kent, a poppy display spilled over the roof.
Belfast Lord Mayor Mickey Murray led a short ceremony at the Belfast memorial.
Poppy wreaths were also laid during a ceremony in the Northern Ireland Parliament Buildings in Stormont.
Personnel from the Royal British Legion gathered at the Welsh National War Memorial in Cardiff to pay their respects.
Belgium was the scene of a lot of fighting during World War I.King Philippe of Belgium attended a ceremony of the Armistice in the Place du Congres in Brussels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
19 hours ago
- Scotsman
I'm first in the queue when it comes to valuing good manners
Talking of children - that's how we used to start conversations at bus stops I am passionate about queues. In my book, forming an orderly line is a practical embodiment of democracy. Your place depends not on privilege or power but on your time of arrival or if the queue agrees, on your age or disability. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I was not surprised to learn that well-ordered queues first became the social norm during World War I when people had to wait in line for essentials like bread and coal. I have no patience for queue jumpers, happy to call them out whether at boarding gates, hotel bars and increasingly Edinburgh bus stops. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I thought I was simply becoming grumpier with age, but it seems my theory that people under 35 have no time for queues is correct. A recent survey shows that more than half of Gen Z believe that pushing in is acceptable behaviour. And one in five of 18 to 29 year-olds say they do so regularly, which explains the chaos at bus stops, particularly on Princes Street. I have lost count of the number of times recently where I have been queue-jumped by a young woman, usually wearing over-sized headphones which means my muttered complaints fall literally on deaf years. As it is, city centre bus queues are crazy at this time of year with hordes of tourists jostling for position, eager to get on the next bus only to get off it immediately when the driver explains patiently that the number 44 does not go to Morningside. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I don't mind visitors from America or Europe failing to adhere to our rigid queuing system. I have used enough public transport abroad to know that each country has its own rules or, as is in the case of some parts of Africa and southern Europe, none at all. But I do object to young Scots ignoring the basic etiquette of queuing. Getting in line may be a Boomer or Gen X obsession, but as Gen X grow older they may well come to realise that there is a wider point to queuing. At the risk of sounding pompous, queuing really does represent the best of British. It shows strangers respect and a spirit of co-operation all too often missing in society today.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘Momentous occasion': how Bayeux Museum finally said yes to tapestry loan
When, in 2018, Emmanuel Macron proposed the loan of the Bayeux tapestry to Britain, an army of conservationists and experts rose up to explain why the almost-1,000 year old treasure was too fragile to be moved. Antoine Verney, the chief curator of the Bayeux Museum, said the tapestry that depicted the Norman conquest of England in 1066 was in such a bad state he 'couldn't conceive' of it going anywhere. Even slightly moving the embroidered cloth for an inspection, he later said, was 'hair raising' and required a team of 50 verdict on the president's 2018 proposal was echoed by Frédérique Boura, a Normandy cultural official. 'The work is tired, worn and fragile,' she said. 'It cannot be transported.' Fast forward seven years and the mood music is very different. This week, Macron and Keir Starmer signed a landmark loan agreement during the French president's three-day state visit to Britain. Under the deal, the almost 70-metre-long (230ft) and 50cm-high tapestry will travel to the British Museum next year, in exchange for the Anglo-Saxon treasures of the Sutton Hoo ship burial, the Lewis chessmen and other artefacts going to France. The shift in tone may seem stark, but the Bayeux Museum said it had carried out tests – including a dress rehearsal with a model – that persuaded its experts that the tapestry could be sent to the UK without excessive damage. 'In 2018, we did not know enough about the physical condition of the work, which is why the loan had to wait even though we have always believed that it would be possible,' Loïc Jamin, Bayeux's deputy mayor in charge of culture, said. 'All the expertise we have developed and shared with the [French] ministry of culture is now a major contribution to making the loan a reality.' The tapestry, which depicts how William, Duke of Normandy, and his army trounced King Harold II and English forces in the Battle of Hastings, is displayed hanging vertically on rails behind glass in a temperature and humidity-controlled atmosphere. It will be moved by extending the rails and placing it on a structure similar to a foldable screen that can then be closed and packed without putting excessive stress on the cloth and stitching. The tapestry will then be double-crated and taken by lorry and train through the Channel tunnel to London. The Bayeux Museum is scheduled to close at the end of August for a €38m (£33m) renovation which would have necessitated the moving of the tapestry regardless of any deal with Britain. 'Of course there's no such thing as zero risk but we are having to move it anyway as we're working on the new museum where it will eventually be displayed,' a spokesperson said. They added: 'Our scientists have worked out a way to cause the least possible stress. The fact is we will be moving it anyway and to take it to the British Museum just means we're moving it further. It's emotional for the people of Bayeux, but the tapestry was never going to be on display here during the museum work.' The museum in northern France has also designed a structure of tilted panels on which to display the tapestry when it reopens in 2027, easing the pressure on the cloth. It has suggested these could also be loaned to the British Museum for use in what is expected to be a blockbuster exhibition from September 2026 to July 2027. While magnificent, the tapestry is showing its age: in 2020, textile conservationists inspected every centimetre and reportedly found almost 24,200 stains and 10,000 holes. The work is expected to undergo a complete renovation estimated to cost €2m after its return from the UK. The spokesperson added: 'Bayeux has always had strong links with the UK and we're very happy the tapestry we have taken care of for almost 1,000 years is returning for a few months to where it was created at the end of the 11th century. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion 'It's a momentous occasion both sides of the Channel, but it's perfectly reasonable for us to loan the tapestry to the British Museum because of our shared heritage and history. It wouldn't happen with any other country.' Verney said the two museums had enjoyed a 'close relationship' for more than a decade. 'We have already called on the considerable expertise of their conservation team, who have been members of our scientific committee since 2013, on the project for the future Bayeux Museum. This loan is an opportunity to promote the tapestry, and the sharing of resources will improve our knowledge of it, particularly in terms of understanding the context in which it was created,' he said. 'This partnership of historical and scientific expertise will also help to support and nurture the project for the new Bayeux Museum.' The exact provenance of the tapestry is unknown. It was probably commissioned by William's half-brother Bishop Odo of Bayeux in the 1070s to decorate the city's cathedral and was almost certainly sewn by English women. It was moved to its own museum in 1983 and has been there ever since. It features 58 scenes created in four stitches and thread in 10 natural dye colours, including 623 humans, more than 700 animals, 37 buildings and 41 ships and other vessels, plus 93 or 94 male genitalia depending on which British expert is counting. The tapestry has only been moved three times since it came to Bayeux, where it now attracts about 400,000 visitors a year, a quarter of them British. The first time was in the winter of 1803-1804 when Napoleon Bonaparte feared an English invasion and ordered it to be transported to Paris. In the second world war, France's German occupiers first transferred it by van to a repository then requisitioned it and moved it to the Louvre in Paris as allied troops advanced after D-day. One person who has not changed their mind about the loan is Didier Rykner, the founder and the editor in chief of La Tribune de l'art and an outspoken defender of France's heritage. He remains implacably opposed to the tapestry travelling to the UK and has described Macron's decision as 'catastrophic'. Under the headline: 'Why the Bayeux tapestry cannot (and must not) travel', Rykner republished an article from 2018 citing experts saying this would damage it. 'President Macron has once again taken a catastrophic decision for our heritage, deciding alone, against the advice of conservationists and restorers who know the Bayeux tapestry,' he wrote.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie threatened with a $740,000 council fine after he built a cubby house for his daughter on his property
An Aussie builder has been threatened with a $740,000 fine for the cubby house he built for his daughter after neighbours complained the structure was an 'eyesore'. Owner and managing director of Imagine Kit Homes, Keith Richardson, designed and built a double-storey cubby house for his daughter Sophie when she was two years old. Mr Richardson built the cubby house against the back fence line of his family's home in Upper Coomera, Gold Coast. The elaborate cubby house had specific design requirements, including cantilevered balconies, hardwood flooring, and raked ceilings. Despite the property backing onto a main road and the cubby house blending in with the trees behind the fence, a neighbour complained about the structure to the council. Mr Richardson had to go through a rigorous approval process - similar to that required for normal homes - to keep the cubby house. The tradie employed five designers and architects who submitted plans to the council and even had an engineer inspect the cubby house before he was given approval. However, eight years later, a second neighbour has complained to the council, claiming the cubby house was an 'eyesore'. In an eight-page letter, the council has now threatened Mr Richardson with a $740,000 fine if he does not make the cubby house compliant or refuses to pull it down. 'Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. My 10-year-old thinks it's the best thing she's ever seen,' Mr Richardson told the Courier Mail. 'The fact that this person thinks that is their opinion, but it's then made the council come around, do the inspections, and send this big eight-page letter basically saying that there's a $740,000 fine if I don't become compliant.' Mr Richardson said he believes the cubby house is the only one in the country that has ever had council approval. However, the council informed Mr Richardson the original approval could not be found. Mr Richardson said he could 'easily fight' the latest complaint but did not have the energy to engage anymore. 'I don't want to upset them, because I need the council, but I just think seriously... there's bigger things than a cubby house to worry about. I just can't be bothered fighting with them,' Mr Richardson said. Despite spending 'a lot of money' to build the cubby house and have it engineer-approved, Mr Richardson is offering it for free as long as it goes to a good home. The cubby house was posted to Facebook Marketplace and comes with the condition that the person removing it does so without damaging a pizza oven built next to it. Mr Richardson added a young family has already contacted him, claiming they 'love it' and are keen to take it off his hands. 'I built this for my children, and it's got emotional value,' Mr Richardson told the Courier Mail. 'When I first heard (about the council demand), I thought that was so unfair and but now I just want to give it away to someone... It's more about making sure it goes to a good family and they enjoy it.'
