Iran says airspace to remain closed until Wednesday afternoon
Majid Akhavan, spokesman of the Roads and Urban Development Ministry, said the decision was made in light of the recent developments and to ensure the safety of passengers and flights, noting that the flight suspension would remain in effect until 2:00 p.m. local time (10:30 GMT) on Wednesday.
Iran closed its airspace after Israel launched airstrikes on Tehran and other parts of the country on June 13.
A ceasefire between the two sides was declared early Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
Alumni seminar held in Mauritania to mark 60th anniversary of diplomatic ties with China
NOUAKCHOTT, July 13 (Xinhua) -- The Association of Mauritanian Alumni of Chinese Universities has held a celebratory seminar to mark the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Mauritania and China. The seminar was held on Saturday in Nouakchott, the capital of Mauritania, under the theme "Mauritania-China Relations and Prospects for Joint Cooperation." It brought together intellectuals and political figures, who highlighted the history and evolution of bilateral ties as well as prospects for future cooperation. Yarbane Kharrachi, president of the association, said Mauritania-China relations have been rooted in mutual respect, solidarity, and non-interference in internal affairs. He noted that the relationship has since expanded into various fields, directly impacting Mauritania's development trajectory. Kharrachi added that the 60th anniversary offers a valuable opportunity to strengthen bilateral cooperation in support of inclusive and sustainable development. He also conveyed the association's hope for increased Chinese investment in Mauritania's key sectors to help create jobs and drive economic growth. For his part, Chinese Ambassador to Mauritania Tang Zhongdong expressed his delight at attending the event, underlining the resilience and strength of bilateral relations despite global changes. Tang noted that the past six decades have seen fruitful cooperation between the two countries across multiple sectors. He called for building a China-Mauritania community with a shared future and turning bilateral relations into a model of mutually beneficial cooperation.
The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
German finance minister urges EU to push back if tariff talks with U.S. fail
BERLIN, July 13 (Xinhua) -- German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said on Sunday that the European Union (EU) must take firm action against the United States if tariff negotiations fail to ease the escalating global trade conflict, according to German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung. Klingbeil's remarks are in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's threat on Saturday to impose a 30 percent tariff on imports from the EU on Aug. 1, after negotiations so far have failed to yield a deal. Urging an end to the escalating trade tensions, Klingbeil said "Trump's tariffs produce only losers. They threaten the American economy just as much as they harm businesses in Europe." Klingbeil was quoted by Sueddeutsche Zeitung as saying that EU doesn't "need new threats or provocations," but "a fair deal." In addition, Klingbeil warned that Germany would not remain passive if discussions break down. "If a fair solution cannot be reached, we must take decisive countermeasures to protect jobs and businesses in Europe," he said, adding that preparations were already underway. "Our hand remains outstretched, but we will not go along with everything." Klingbeil also said Germany would accelerate efforts to diversify its global trade ties. The United States is Germany's largest export market. In 2024, Germany exported goods worth 161 billion euros (188 billion U.S. dollars) to the United States, with a trade surplus of nearly 70 billion euros, according to German government data. (1 euro = 1.17 U.S. dollar)
New Straits Times
15 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Patriots limit 'Trump doctrine'
AS some 20 Iranian ballistic missiles headed for the United States air base at Al Udeid in Qatar last month following US strikes against Iran, the only US personnel at the almost entirely evacuated base were some 40 air defence personnel manning a Patriot missile battery flown in a few weeks earlier. According to a press briefing by US chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Daniel Caine, a few days later, together with another Patriot detachment from the Qatari military also present at the base, the US team fired more of the defence missiles than in any previous engagement since the system was first deployed in the first Gulf War in 1991. "They crushed it," he said, noting that damage to the base was minimal with no casualties. On the surface, officials from the Trump administration have painted last month's US strikes against Iran as an unusually decisive use of US power, talking of a new "Trump doctrine" in which military force is used with much clearer aims than under previous presidents. They argue it has "restored American deterrence", sending a clear signal to other potential foes, including Moscow and Beijing. The administration had also presented its 52-day bombing campaign against Houthi militants in Yemen as being similarly successful in restoring freedom of navigation there — only for the Houthis to restart attacks on shipping in recent days. All of that comes amid growing divisions within the administration over the future use of US military force. On that front, recent events in the Gulf have had consequences in Washington and beyond. According to reports last week, the US has barely 25 per cent of the Patriot missile stockpile the Pentagon believes it needs. Consumption of those missiles in the Middle East and Ukraine has made growing those stocks impossible despite heightened production. Last week, that prompted a Pentagon edict stopping shipment of several weapons types to Ukraine, including Patriot, long-range HIMARS strike rockets and artillery shells, described at the time as a deliberate decision to help rebuild US stocks. That decision, however, has since been reversed by President Donald Trump amid reports it had never received White House authorisation in the first place. "We have to," Trump told a press conference in Washington. "They have to be able to defend themselves." The US president has become increasingly critical of his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in recent days, accusing him of being uninterested in Trump's efforts to mediate a peace deal as Russian forces have launched the largest drone strikes of the war against Ukraine. That will likely worry the powerful group within the current administration known as "the restrainers", keen to rein in the multi-decade US tendency to make open-ended defence commitments. On one side are several top US commanders who argue Ukraine should be supported as its defeat could embolden Moscow and Beijing to launch future attacks. On the other are individuals, including Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon No. 3 civilian official Elbridge Colby, who have argued publicly that too much support to Ukraine helps China by driving down already limited US weapons stocks. Ironically, the restrainers — including Vice-President JD Vance, among the most publicly committed US officials to reducing America's overseas military footprint — had been among the most supportive of Trump's actions on Iran. "Number one: you articulate a clear American interest ... in this case, that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. "Number two, you try to aggressively diplomatically solve that problem. "Number three, when you can't solve it diplomatically, you use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it becomes a protracted conflict," Vance told an Ohio fundraising dinner last month. Another even more significant challenge is that the threats the US now most needs to deter — a potential Chinese attack on Taiwan, or a Russian assault into Eastern Europe — are likely impossible to counter through a single US strike. Instead, Trump or his successors would likely face a choice between either unleashing a massive open-ended US conventional military campaign — at the very least an air, drone and missile offensive against advancing Russian or Chinese forces — or abandoning Taiwan and eastern European allies to their fate.
