Who is Anita Anand? Indian-origin appointed as Canada's foreign minister
Anita Anand
, the
Indian-origin Canadian politician
, has been appointed as Canada's new foreign minister in a major Cabinet reshuffle by Prime Minister
Mark Carney
.
Anand replaces Mélanie Joly in the role and previously served as the country's defence minister.
She took her oath with her hand on the Bhagavad Gita, a tradition she has followed in previous Cabinet appointments as well.
The 58-year-old was born in Nova Scotia to Indian immigrant parents—her mother from Punjab and her father from Tamil Nadu. She has built a strong career in law, teaching, and public service.
Before entering politics, she worked as a corporate lawyer and joined an Ontario government expert panel in 2015.
She was elected MP from Oakville in 2019 and served as minister of public services and procurement during the Covid-19 pandemic, later becoming defence minister.
Anand is married to Canadian lawyer and business executive John Knowlton, and they have four children. Although she had recently announced plans to step away from politics, the fall of former PM Trudeau's government and Carney's rise brought her back into leadership.
Anand holds four degrees, including a BA in Political Studies from Queen's University (gold medallist), a BA in Jurisprudence from Oxford, a law degree from Dalhousie, and a Master of Laws from the University of Toronto.
The reshuffle comes as Carney builds his newly elected Liberal government. His Cabinet includes 28 ministers and introduces secretaries of state, aiming to signal a fresh start from the Trudeau era.
Anand became the first Hindu to serve in Canada's federal Cabinet in 2019. She has earned praise for her disciplined and focused approach, especially during her time at the defence ministry.
Carney's appointments balance experience and diversity, with women making up half of the Cabinet.
The changes come amid tense
Canada-US relations
. Carney has promised to stand firm against US President Donald Trump, particularly on trade.
In a statement, Carney said the Cabinet was chosen to 'deliver the change Canadians want and need.'
Anand visited the Vaishno Devi Temple in Oakville on Mother's Day.
She posted on X: "It warmed my heart to see so many families across #Oakville coming to celebrate and remember our mothers together."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
26 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
'Japanese First' party emerges as election force with tough immigration talk
Birthed on YouTube during the COVID-19 pandemic spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and a cabal of global elites, the party broke into mainstream politics with its "Japanese First" campaign.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
China electronics entry may hinge on tech transfer JVs with Indian firms
The Indian government is considering backing Chinese investments in the electronics sector. This support hinges on joint ventures with Indian firms. Technology transfer is a key requirement, not just assembly units. The move aims to boost local manufacturing and value addition. It also addresses concerns about trade restrictions and supply chain issues. Several joint venture proposals are awaiting government approval. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The government is likely to support Chinese investments in the electronics sector if they come through joint ventures with Indian firms and entail technology transfer , instead of only setting up assembly units, said ministry of electronics and IT (MeitY) is clear that approval to some Chinese investments is critical for manufacturing to shift to India, as well as for the success of the upcoming component incentive scheme, they told ministry is, hence, backing easing of norms for investments from the neighbouring country, they views are aligned with those of the industry, which has been seeking government agreement for tie-ups with Chinese players, as well as those of government think tank Niti Aayog, which proposed allowing Chinese entities to buy up to 24% stake in Indian firms without additional backing for Chinese investments in electronics manufacturing comes close on the heels of external affairs minister S Jaishankar's meeting with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing. Government officials, however, emphasised that Chinese investments should be permitted only in joint ventures with Indian partners and only if there is clarity on the way technology and know-how would be transferred.'If some player just wants to add assembly lines in partnership with a Chinese firm, it won't be supported,' an official privy to the details said, on condition of anonymity. Another official said domestic players need to learn technology processes, and that if they have to scale up, Chinese support is needed. This is because many of the components and other manufacturers come from from China are also key to increasing local value addition in electronics products, a stated aim of the government. Local value addition in electronics has crossed 20% within six to seven years, with a major thrust coming from the production linked incentives scheme. The government has set a target of crossing 30% in the next two to three years and reaching 38% within five years. China has a local value addition of 38%, the highest in any country.A third official said MeitY will abide by the broader stance of the government, but has fundamentally been supportive of joint ventures where there's been technology transfer. An industry executive pointed out that most of the cases that were cleared earlier through Press Note 3 – under which prior government approval is mandatory for investments from countries sharing aland border with India – were from MeitY because of the requirements of the domestic electronics sector.'What is fundamentally important for the government is that an electronics ecosystem needs to develop in India and if some joint venture proposals enable this, then support will be provided,' said a senior electronics executive, who did not wish to be companies have been pushing for a review of trade ties with China, particularly concerning Press Note 3. The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, in 2020, tightened the foreign direct investment policy through Press Note 3 in the backdrop of the India-China border clashes earlier that local manufacturing of smartphones and their exports increasing sharply since 2020 at the cost of China, the latter has hit back with informal trade barriers since last year. Over the past eight months, it has extended the curbs to electronics adding to the woes of the domestic industry, China's latest restrictions on exports of rare earth materials spell potential input shortages for smartphone makers in India. China recently asked some of its companies to shutter their Indian operations and withdraw trained Indian personnel, in an effort to restrict technology is seeking to deepen and expand the supply chain by launching a Rs 22,919-crore electronics component manufacturing scheme to incentivise local production. To push this, Indian companies need expertise from Chinese entities that currently make the bulk of the components supplied globally. Quite a few Indian contract manufacturers, such as Dixon Technologies and Bhagwati (Micromax), have signed joint venture agreements with Chinese partners that are awaiting approval from the electronics industry recently raised alarm over informal trade restrictions by China, saying they could dent its competitiveness and threaten the $32-billion smartphone exports target for this financial year.'These disruptions are leading to operational inefficiencies, impacting scale and above all raising costs of production, since producing this equipment locally or in collaboration with Japan or Korea costs three to four times more than Chinese imports,' the industry said in a recent letter to the government, seeking help to resolve the matter at the 2020, smartphone manufacturing in India has surged, with production of devices worth $64 billion in FY25, of which exports accounted for over $24 billion. In contrast, domestic mobile phone production was worth $26 billion in FY19. From the 167th rank in India's exports basket in FY15, smartphones have climbed to become the country's principal export.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'I may put a restriction on them': Donald Trump threatens to block $4 billion Commanders stadium plan
Donald Trump has injected himself into the Commanders' stadium deal, threatening to block the $4 billion project (Getty Images) In a fiery twist to the Washington Commanders' search for a new stadium, U.S. President Donald Trump has inserted himself into the debate—threatening to block the team's proposed $4 billion stadium deal unless it changes its name back to the "Redskins." The team rebranded as the Commanders in 2022 following growing criticism over the racially insensitive nature of the previous name. But Trump is now using his political leverage to demand a reversal. Donald Trump calls the 'Commanders' name 'ridiculous' and demands return to tradition Taking to his platform Truth Social, Donald Trump didn't mince words. "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make deal for them to build a stadium in Washington," he wrote. This declaration not only brings political pressure into the NFL but also reopens a cultural wound many hoped had started healing. Trump insists that reviving the old name would increase the franchise's value and restore its traditional legacy. Ties to larger political message: 'MIGA – Make Indians Great Again' Trump's message was broader than just Washington's NFL team. He also criticized the Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Indians, accusing the Dolan family of erasing cultural identity. In his post, Trump wrote: 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige are systematically being taken away from them... OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' The former president has even launched a campaign dubbed MIGA: Make Indians Great Again. Commanders' owner stands firm amid rising name-change pressure Despite increasing noise around the name change, team owner Josh Harris has previously made it clear there are no plans to revert. In February, he said the organization will 'honor the past' but move forward under the Commanders' name. Trump's threat adds a new layer of controversy, potentially pitting federal influence against social progress. As the stadium negotiations heat up, so does the political firestorm around the Commanders' identity. Also Read: Kirk Cousins dragged into viral affair scandal as Netflix shades Astronomer CEO with Coldplay moment FAQs 1. Why is Donald Trump threatening to block the Commanders' new stadium? Donald Trump says he won't support the $4B stadium deal unless the team changes its name back to "Redskins." 2. What reason did Donald Trump give for demanding the name change? He claims the old name honors Native American heritage and would make the team "more valuable." 3. Has the team responded to Donald Trump's demand? Owner Josh Harris previously stated there are no plans to return to the "Redskins" name. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
