Verizon moves to change phone unlock rules — and Dish says not so fast
T-Mobile and AT&T didn't comment, but Dish was the one national carrier that officially submitted a comment to the FCC.
The parent behind Boost Mobile reportedly said it wasn't against replacing the current Verizon policy, but according to the carrier, there should be one national unlock policy with no exceptions.
On the other hand, seven state attorneys generals reportedly said that Verizon should have the power to control how long your phone, which you bought from the carrier, should be kept locked.
Image Credit - PhoneArena
Strangely enough, Dish currently has a one-year locking policy on most of its prepaid devices. So, theoretically, this 'nationwide policy' could impact it as well. And Verizon is yet to specify what unlocking policy it may set (it could technically be shorter than 60 days, but I somewhat doubt that).
Verizon has that 60-day policy enforced because of an agreement with the FCC when Verizon acquired the 700MHz spectrum in 2007. The deal was also reaffirmed when Verizon acquired Tracfone in 2021.
Probably Verizon currently sees the 60-day unlock policy as unfair in the current market. It's been struggling to keep customers recently, while other big players are starting to steal its thunder.
Because of the customers it's losing, Verizon may want to lock its phones for longer than 60 days. How long, nobody knows just yet, but probably as long as it can get away with.
This would create a real impact not only for Verizon customers, but on the unlocked device market as well. Prices for unlocked phones may go up, while the secondary device market may get flooded with locked phones, as Chris Price highlights in this Reddit post. The FCC is going to vote on the issue on July 24.
I personally think that having a clear and fair unlocking policy is important for giving customers flexibility and freedom with the devices they've paid for. While I understand Verizon 's concerns about customer retention and potential fraud, extending the lock period could make things harder for people who travel, switch carriers, or just want more control over their phones.
Hopefully, whatever decision the FCC makes strikes a good balance between protecting carriers and keeping things consumer-friendly. Switch to a 2-month Total 5G or 5G+ plan with Total Wireless and score this foldable deal.
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
3 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Google Pixel 10 lineup shown in multiple leaks, Week 30 in review
Welcome to your weekly news recap. Google's Pixel 10 series dominated your attention with a total of four top stories. They showed all four upcoming Pixel 10 devices in all of their colors. Google even jumped in on the action and teased the Pixel 10 Pro design officially, and showed the entire four-phone series in the Play Store. The Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, 10 Pro XL, and 10 Pro Fold are all coming alongside the Pixel Watch 4 on August 20. The Pixel 10 series will be unveiled on August 20. The lineup reportedly includes four smartphones - Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, and Pixel 10 Pro Fold. They aren't the dullest, but also not the most exciting ever. The first details about the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ surfaced this week. The phone is said to sport a screen with "1.5K" resolution and thin symmetrical bezels on all sides, a 50 MP main camera, a 50 MP telephoto camera, and a battery capacity between 7,000 mAh and 7,999 mAh. The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ will allegedly be powered by the yet-unannounced Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset. The CMF Watch 3 Pro is official with a larger 1.43-inch display, a precision-milled metal frame, and a soft-touch silicone strap. It's on sale in several countries for $99/£99/€99. A new vivo or iQOO phone is in the works, as evidenced by a Geekbench run. It packs a Dimensity 9400+ and an 8,000mAh battery! It doesn't have many improvements compared to its predecessor, but one of them is pretty significant. The watch gains dual-band GPS, ChatGPT support and new sports modes. It's available starting today in three color options. It might be the iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro+. Nokia has been parting ways with HMD in the past year, and it looks like it's looking to license its brand name to a new "large scale mobile manufacturer". Nokia had licensed its brand in several different segments – Streamview made TVs, RichGo made headphones (and other smartphone accessories), and OFF Global made laptops. As you can probably tell from the use of the past tense, those branding deals have also come to an end. Which company would you like to see pick up the Nokia brand for phones – one of the established players or another startup like HMD? According to a new rumor from China, the OnePlus 15 will launch in the country in October, but not alone. It will allegedly be unveiled alongside the Ace 6 (and possibly the Ace 6 Pro as well), which is an interesting change in strategy for the brand, which last year unveiled the OnePlus 13 in October and the Ace 5 in December. HMD stopped using the Nokia brand and has been releasing phones under its own brand. Now the Finns may be looking for another company to take up the mantle. The chipset choices are interesting too. It's not something it's done before.
Phone Arena
5 hours ago
- Phone Arena
I've hated this phone design trend for years, and I'm happy it's gone
I'm now finally happy to report that one of the most annoying features of modern smartphones is finally done for in 2025. After a not-so-brief fad that spanned from high-end to entry-level devices, this is the year when curved-screen phones are now a distant memory and an exception rather than the rule. To me, there was nothing more annoying than a great flagship phone with a screen that curves towards the frame to the sides. I'll admit that the first iterations of this design fad that I experienced on the Galaxy S7 edge and the Galaxy S8 were quite intriguing and novel, successfully setting themselves apart from the rest of their rivals at the time. It was new and flashy and looked a bit futuristic. What do you mean we could suddenly make phones with curved displays that didn't have to be completely flat? As an added bonus, the arrival of curved screens coincided with the major paradigm shift in terms of interface navigation: gestures. Somehow, curved screens worked quite well with gesture-based navigation back in the day, allowing for really satisfying and precise back gestures, for example. However, over the next couple of years since the first curved-screen Samsung flagships, I used many more phones with such screens and quickly began to detest them for various, dare I say, objectively true reasons. The Galaxy S8 was exceptional and the curved design was intriguing back then, but it quickly overstayed its welcome in the coming years (Image by PhoneArena) No two ways about it - curved screens are terrible when it comes to ergonomics. The reason is glaringly obvious: less area on the side for a comfortable grip. In the most extreme cases I can recall, we had some very extreme curves that ended with barely a millimeter or two of usable area, which is barely enough for a secure hold. That's opposed to most modern phones, where the side frame you grip is as thick as the phone itself, giving significantly better contact with the user's palm even though sharper edges themselves are a whole other can of worms. Probably the most offensive aspect of a phone with a curved screen is just how much of the displayed content is lost to the curve itself. Even though a phone with such a screen was technically, say, 6.7 inches wide, the actual usable area was smaller due to the sides of the screen warping the photos, videos, or any other content you're viewing. Not cool at all. That was particularly bad if you watched a lot of video or gamed a lot on your phone, as the experience was much worse than a contemporary device with a more regular flat display. This was one of the biggest reasons why I grew to dislike phones with curved screens that much. But get this, it's not only that curved screens "ate" up usable screen real estate - the curves also gave us significant edge reflections and glare. The crests of the curves were always prone to pick up all the reflections from all nearby light sources. This only added insult to injury, as you not only had less usable screen real estate, the offending areas also blinded you and added to the inferior experience. Reflections galore (Image by PhoneArena) Accidental "ghost" touches In the earlier days of curved-screen phones, I used to accidentally trigger gestures and buttons all the time. Palm rejection wasn't great then, but even later devices often made it easy to unintentionally tap some interface element. That has never happened to me with a regular non-curved phone. Imagine how much more battery you could fit on a phone with a curved screen if it had flat edges instead. Well, probably not much, but as in all cases, every little bit helps. The unique shape of curved-screen phones means that the extreme parts of the phones were a liability rather than providing usable extra space for extra hardware. I'm a klutz, so if a phone I'm using doesn't come with a pre-applied screen protector, I usually try to get one just for the sake of protecting the screen from scratches and drops. With modern flat-screen phones, that's an easy ordeal, you can find a decent tempered glass or TPU screen protector for just about any modern phone out there. However, that's not the case with curved screens. Screen protectors were a pain to find and apply, and they typically left an unprotected area which got in the way of your finger tips and made the navigation experience that much worse. Have you cracked the screen of a phone with a curved display? I have, and the repair bill was not a particularly beautiful sight to behold. Call in anecdotal evidence, but I'm certain that curved screen replacements were always pricier than those of standard phones. And that's the problem, really: curved displays only added to the costs of ownership without actively contributing to the overall functionality of the phone itself. For me, that's the clearest case of form over function, and I',m so glad we've phased these out. I haven't had to use a curved-screen phone extensively for more than a year, and what a relief! Only dealing with flat-screen phones and not having to put up with all the negative reasons listed above has been nothing short of a mini revelation. I'm so glad we've outgrown the peculiar curves and universally adopted the modern all-flat design language, which honestly is the most sensible one around.
Phone Arena
5 hours ago
- Phone Arena
We finally got rid of the most annoying phone design trend, and I couldn't be happier
I'm now finally happy to report that one of the most annoying features of modern smartphones is finally done for in 2025. After a not-so-brief fad that spanned from high-end to entry-level devices, this is the year when curved-screen phones are now a distant memory and an exception rather than the rule. To me, there was nothing more annoying than a great flagship phone with a screen that curves towards the frame to the sides. I'll admit that the first iterations of this design fad that I experienced on the Galaxy S7 edge and the Galaxy S8 were quite intriguing and novel, successfully setting themselves apart from the rest of their rivals at the time. It was new and flashy and looked a bit futuristic. What do you mean we could suddenly make phones with curved displays that didn't have to be completely flat? As an added bonus, the arrival of curved screens coincided with the major paradigm shift in terms of interface navigation: gestures. Somehow, curved screens worked quite well with gesture-based navigation back in the day, allowing for really satisfying and precise back gestures, for example. However, over the next couple of years since the first curved-screen Samsung flagships, I used many more phones with such screens and quickly began to detest them for various, dare I say, objectively true reasons. The Galaxy S8 was exceptional and the curved design was intriguing back then, but it quickly overstayed its welcome in the coming years (Image by PhoneArena) No two ways about it - curved screens are terrible when it comes to ergonomics. The reason is glaringly obvious: less area on the side for a comfortable grip. In the most extreme cases I can recall, we had some very extreme curves that ended with barely a millimeter or two of usable area, which is barely enough for a secure hold. That's opposed to most modern phones, where the side frame you grip is as thick as the phone itself, giving significantly better contact with the user's palm even though sharper edges themselves are a whole other can of worms. Probably the most offensive aspect of a phone with a curved screen is just how much of the displayed content is lost to the curve itself. Even though a phone with such a screen was technically, say, 6.7 inches wide, the actual usable area was smaller due to the sides of the screen warping the photos, videos, or any other content you're viewing. Not cool at all. That was particularly bad if you watched a lot of video or gamed a lot on your phone, as the experience was much worse than a contemporary device with a more regular flat display. This was one of the biggest reasons why I grew to dislike phones with curved screens that much. But get this, it's not only that curved screens "ate" up usable screen real estate - the curves also gave us significant edge reflections and glare. The crests of the curves were always prone to pick up all the reflections from all nearby light sources. This only added insult to injury, as you not only had less usable screen real estate, the offending areas also blinded you and added to the inferior experience. Reflections galore (Image by PhoneArena) Accidental "ghost" touches In the earlier days of curved-screen phones, I used to accidentally trigger gestures and buttons all the time. Palm rejection wasn't great then, but even later devices often made it easy to unintentionally tap some interface element. That has never happened to me with a regular non-curved phone. Imagine how much more battery you could fit on a phone with a curved screen if it had flat edges instead. Well, probably not much, but as in all cases, every little bit helps. The unique shape of curved-screen phones means that the extreme parts of the phones were a liability rather than providing usable extra space for extra hardware. I'm a klutz, so if a phone I'm using doesn't come with a pre-applied screen protector, I usually try to get one just for the sake of protecting the screen from scratches and drops. With modern flat-screen phones, that's an easy ordeal, you can find a decent tempered glass or TPU screen protector for just about any modern phone out there. However, that's not the case with curved screens. Screen protectors were a pain to find and apply, and they typically left an unprotected area which got in the way of your finger tips and made the navigation experience that much worse. Have you cracked the screen of a phone with a curved display? I have, and the repair bill was not a particularly beautiful sight to behold. Call in anecdotal evidence, but I'm certain that curved screen replacements were always pricier than those of standard phones. And that's the problem, really: curved displays only added to the costs of ownership without actively contributing to the overall functionality of the phone itself. For me, that's the clearest case of form over function, and I',m so glad we've phased these out. I haven't had to use a curved-screen phone extensively for more than a year, and what a relief! Only dealing with flat-screen phones and not having to put up with all the negative reasons listed above has been nothing short of a mini revelation. I'm so glad we've outgrown the peculiar curves and universally adopted the modern all-flat design language, which honestly is the most sensible one around.
