logo
The Coalition has attacked the teals for voting with the Greens in parliament. What does the data show?

The Coalition has attacked the teals for voting with the Greens in parliament. What does the data show?

The Guardian15-04-2025
The Coalition has run a wave of attack ads against the teal independents. Since January it has spent $137,000 on Facebook ads via its 'teals revealed' page. Elsewhere, billboards in key electorates promote its anti-teal campaign website, and ads are also running on YouTube.
Many ads zero in on the teals' voting record in parliament, and some highlight this News Corp article, headlined 'Teals ally with 'radical, extremist' Greens', which cites Parliamentary Library research to claim that seven teal MPs voted with the Greens 'between 73 and 81 per cent of the time' over a period of more than two years.
But the Coalition campaign is based on only a portion of the parliamentary voting data and does not show the complete picture.
It does not answer key questions, including: are teals more or less likely to vote with the Coalition than other independents? What is their voting record on votes that a Coalition MP has called for? And do Coalition MPs vote with the teals on teal-introduced motions? These are the kind of questions voters living in teal-held or tightly contested seats may want answered.
So Guardian Australia has carried out a comprehensive analysis of how the crossbench voted in the 47th parliament.
First, let's get some things clear. The term 'teal' refers to the independents who ran in previously Liberal-voting seats in 2022 but who differ from the Liberals on climate change and the need for a strong federal anti-corruption agency. The teals have some commonality with community independents or independents involved with 'voices-of' type campaigns.
The teals are not a party. If you're interested in whether or not they vote like a party, this analysis by Patrick Leslie, a political scientist at the Australian National University, is excellent.
For this analysis, two independents who were formerly in the Liberal party – Russell Broadbent and Ian Goodenough – will be excluded, as both were Liberals for the majority of the 47th parliament.
I've compared the votes on every division (a division is a vote on legislation or procedural matters) held in the House of Representatives during the 47th parliament.
On each vote I assigned the major parties (including the Greens) a single position – aye or no – depending on the majority position of party members. I then take each of the crossbenchers, including Bob Katter from Katter's Australia party and Rebekha Sharkie from the Centre Alliance, and checked the agreement between each politician and party on votes where each pair were present. Finally, a total agreement percentage was calculated.
You can see the results in the following heatmap. Darker shades indicate lower agreement and lighter shades indicate greater agreement. The heatmap is sorted by voting agreement with the Coalition (but you can re-sort for any of the other parties and politicians by clicking their headings).
So yes, it's true that the teals mostly don't vote with the Coalition and have a higher voting agreement score with the Greens.
However, at least some teals are likely to be better allies for the Coalition in the parliament than for Labor.
If we take Labor's voting agreement score with the Coalition of 36% as a benchmark, there are two teals who are above this or tied.
Allegra Spender, in the Sydney seat of Wentworth, has a higher voting agreement score with the Coalition at 39%; and Kate Chaney, from the seat of Curtin in Western Australia, is tied with Labor at 36%.
But what if we look only at votes on divisions moved by Coalition politicians?
There are five teal independents who voted with the Coalition 50% of the time or more. And all the crossbenchers voted with the Coalition on Coalition-moved divisions much more frequently than Labor did.
So, despite Peter Dutton only naming one teal in his list of potential allies in a hung parliament scenario, the evidence shows teal independents vote with the Coalition's divisions at a decent rate – they just don't vote with the Coalition so much overall.
While the independent crossbenchers support divisions moved by major party MPs a decent amount of the time, the data shows the major parties do not return the favour.
A stark divide can be seen when you look at the voting pattern on divisions moved by independents.
The agreement score between Labor and the Coalition, which is at 36% for all votes, shoots up to 83%, and the parliament becomes divided, with the two major parties on one side and the Greens and independents on the other. That is to say, the two major parties often vote together against motions from the crossbenchers.
You can explore voting agreement between the parties and crossbenchers in this next chart, including filters for division types and, when the division relates to legislation, the portfolio of the legislation it relates to.
My analysis uses vote records sourced from the Australian Parliament House's (APH) divisions API and website. I merged information from several APH sources to combine the division with the mover of the division, the mover's party, whether or not the division related to a bill, or was otherwise classified as procedural, and, if it related to a bill, the portfolio of the bill.
You can see and reuse the data here. I also cross-checked with data from the theyvoteforyou.org.au API and Pat Leslie's data here (also from the APH API).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EIS members back strike action over proposed cuts at University of the West of Scotland
EIS members back strike action over proposed cuts at University of the West of Scotland

Daily Record

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Record

EIS members back strike action over proposed cuts at University of the West of Scotland

Over 94 per cent of members who participated in the ballot supported taking industrial action, signalling their deep-seated opposition to the university's proposals. Members of the Educational Institute of Scotland University Lecturers Association (EIS-ULA) have delivered a strong mandate for strike action at the University of the West of Scotland (UWS) in response to the university's proposed redundancies. ‌ Over 94 per cent of members who participated in the ballot supported taking industrial action, signalling their deep-seated opposition to the university's proposals. ‌ UWS is seeking 75 redundancies relating to academic and academic related staff, which the EIS believe will have an adverse impact on the quality of education students would receive. ‌ The staff cuts would also place additional burdens on an already stretched workforce at UWS. The EIS lodged a dispute in March in response to the proposed redundancies, but a lack of meaningful consultation discussion resulted in a ballot for strike action being opened last month. ‌ The EIS has formally complained to the university that it has not shared sufficient information and that the university identified redundancy pools without the pre-requisite initial consultation on avoiding redundancies. Commenting on the ballot results, the EIS National Officer for Higher Education, Garry Ross said: 'With over 94 per cent of those who voted electing to take strike action, this sends a loud and clear message to management at UWS that staff will fight against these proposed redundancies. 'Our members are hard-working, dedicated professionals who are not only concerned for the job losses that the university are set on making, but the impact the removal of these posts will have on the number of courses being made available at the university and the quality of the learning and teaching that students will receive in future at UWS.' ‌ He added: 'Now is the time for management at UWS to hold constructive talks with the EIS and remove their redundancy plans, avoiding the need for their staff to take industrial action to save their jobs.' The EIS urges UWS management to reconsider their redundancy plans and engage in meaningful talks to find an alternative solution that projects jobs and maintains the university's academic capacity. The union remains open to constructive talks and is seeking to avert taking disruptive strike action, but its members are prepared to defend their livelihoods and the quality of education at UWS. ‌ The EIS supports the Scottish Government's intervention at the University of Dundee and its call on the university not to make compulsory redundancies. The EIS believes that academics at Robert Gordon University and the University of the West of Scotland also deserve similar government support in avoiding compulsory redundancies. * Don't miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here. And did you know Lanarkshire Live is on Facebook? Head on over and give us a like and share!

Greens Holyrood candidate confirms late bid for party leadership
Greens Holyrood candidate confirms late bid for party leadership

The National

time13 hours ago

  • The National

Greens Holyrood candidate confirms late bid for party leadership

Dominic Ashmole has entered the contest after being selected as a South Scotland regional candidate for the upcoming Scottish Parliament election, according to The Herald. He joins MSPs Gillian Mackay, Ross Greer and Lorna Slater in fighting for the two co-leader posts. The 58-year-old research and development manager placed third on the South Scotland list behind the party's Laura Moodie and former Hamilton by-election candidate Anne McGuinness. He said his goal was to challenge the party to speak more plainly about the difficult times he believes are ahead, and to demand 'emergency action' at Holyrood and in wider society in response to 'the collapse of climate and nature'. READ MORE: Scottish Greens election 'clusterf***' as key member quits in candidate row 'Some people might assume that only MSPs can stand for this role," he said. "But the Scottish Greens have the luxury of two co-leaders, and this can be turned to our advantage. "With my colleague focused on delivering Green policies at Holyrood, I can work directly with the public, with civic society and with our excellent Green councillors, to help accelerate and scale up the change we so urgently need. 'We have a problem with hope. Everyone craves it – voters perhaps demand it. But 'hope' has also become a cynical rallying cry for vested interests and the super-rich." He went on: 'Tragically, the future is not in fact full of hope. 2.5 degrees of heating is expected by 2040, with 4 degrees probable before 2100 – and scientists warn we'll soon cross multiple 'tipping points' that endanger continued life on Earth. "As Greens, we are rightly proud of our achievements in both local and national government. But the brutal truth is that the situation demands bigger and faster change. Rather than selling 'hope', we should be issuing a call to arms. Let's mobilise civic society to mount a grassroots emergency response, and to empower a bolder politics.' Ashmole contested Conservative MP David Mundell's Westminster's constituency, Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale & Tweeddale, in 2024. He placed sixth with 3.4% of the vote share. (Image: Christian Gamauf) The list of Green Holyrood candidates sparked controversy earlier this week when MSP Maggie Chapman (above) was not included as a lead candidate in the North East region. Instead, she has been replaced by activist Guy Ingerson, who previously lodged a bullying complaint against Chapman. The National previously reported that the complaint alleged that the MSP contacted Ingerson's place of work in October 2024 to suggest that he was "untrustworthy and should be 'watched'". On Tuesday it was revealeda key member had quit their role after an internal row erupted over the candidate list. Kate Joester resigned from her position as internal elections officer on Monday night. Internal messages seen by The National showed members raising concerns about the selection process for some of the lists, with some members demanding a recount. The National understands concerns were also raised around the selection contest between Harvie and Ellie Gomersall – who placed second on the Glasgow list –particularly around the transferring of votes to Gomersall from candidates who were knocked out in previous voting rounds. READ MORE: Daily Express front page piles pressure on Labour to act on Gaza The party had sought to reassure members on Monday evening, as a spokesperson was quoted saying in the media that the party's internal elections officer (IEO) "has confirmed that the process and the methodology used are compliant with our selections procedure, and the lists published are correct". However, shortly after that comment was published, Joester announced she had quit the role and claimed she had no part in the statement. "To clarify regarding the statement in the press on members' concerns about counting irregularities; this did not come from me as Internal Elections Officer, and I am no longer in that post as of this evening", she told members. Joester then shared with members that she resigned from the role because "I hadn't done a good enough job", adding that she had made an error in "not spotting the anomaly in the results spreadsheets when they were initially sent to me". However, she clarified that she did "not know whether there is a problem with the results".

Key things to know about Trump's ‘massive' trade deal with Japan
Key things to know about Trump's ‘massive' trade deal with Japan

The Independent

time13 hours ago

  • The Independent

Key things to know about Trump's ‘massive' trade deal with Japan

Japan agreed a trade deal that would see the US cut import tariffs on automobiles from the East Asian country from 25 per cent to 15 per cent. The deal is a significant boost to the Japanese automobile industry which sends over a quarter of its total exports to the US market. American president Donald Trump described it as the 'largest TRADE DEAL in history' and an 'exciting time for the United States of America'. Here are the key features of the agreement. Japanese investment in US economy The deal commits Japan to investing $550bn in the US economy. Prime minister Shigeru Ishiba confirmed the deal had been struck on Wednesday, just days after his ruling Liberal Democratic Party suffered a major loss in a key upper house election. Despite facing calls to step down in the wake of the loss, Mr Ishiba vowed to move forward with the agreement, insisting it didn't compromise Japan's agricultural interests. 'This agreement does not sacrifice Japanese agriculture,' he said, adding that US rice imports would remain within existing quotas. American access to Japanese market The agreement expands market access for American goods like automobiles, rice and other agricultural products. The full terms are still to be made public, however. Mr Ishiba said he would closely review the agreement before releasing it, noting his chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, had made eight trips to Washington since April to negotiate with treasury secretary Scott Bessent and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. Stock and currency market reactions Japanese markets reacted positively to the deal, with Nikkei rising two per cent in early trading, led by automakers. Toyota's shares jumped 10 per cent while Honda gained nine per cent. However, Japanese bond futures fell sharply, with the 10-year benchmark dropping 0.92 yen to its lowest since March. The yen initially surged to a near two-week high before falling amid reports of Mr Ishiba's impending resignation. The dollar index fell for the third consecutive day. 'There's some dovishness infecting the market at the moment around the US dollar,' Michael McCarthy, market strategist at Moomoo Australia, said. Criticism from American auto industry The agreement drew criticism from American carmakers who argued that the deal gave preferential treatment to Japanese imports. 'Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no US content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles… is a bad deal for US industry and US auto workers,' said Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council. Tariffs on vehicles made in North America remain at 25 per cent. Exclusion of metals and defence The new agreement does not address the longstanding issue of 50 per cent American tariff on Japanese steel and aluminium. It also excludes provisions related to defence budgets. Mr Trump, however, indicated that Japan could join a proposed US-backed natural gas pipeline project in Alaska. 'They're all set to make that deal now,' he said during brief remarks at the White House. More deals to follow? Mr Trump said that EU trade negotiators would arrive in Washington on Wednesday, signalling momentum for further deals in the coming days. Mr Bessent suggested that the US was open to extending the tariff negotiation deadline of 1 August if progress was made in talks with partners. The US deal with Japan follows months of tension over trade and may help stabilise economic relations between the allies. In 2024, total two-way trade stood at nearly $230bn, with Japan holding a surplus of approximately $70bn. Japan remains the largest foreign investor in the US, with over $2tn in American assets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store