logo
Elephant kills 2 female tourists from the UK and New Zealand in Zambian national park

Elephant kills 2 female tourists from the UK and New Zealand in Zambian national park

LUSAKA, Zambia (AP) — Two elderly female tourists in Zambia were killed by an elephant Thursday while on a walking safari in a national park, police said.
Eastern Province Police Commissioner Robertson Mweemba said the victims — 68-year-old Easton Janet Taylor from the U.K. and 67-year-old Alison Jean Taylor from New Zealand — were attacked by a female elephant that was with a calf.
Safari guides who were with the group attempted to stop the elephant from charging at the women by firing shots at it, police said. The elephant was hit and wounded by the gunshots. The guides were unable to prevent the elephant's attack and both women died at the scene, police said.
It happened at the South Luangwa National Park in eastern Zambia, around 600 kilometers (370 miles) from the capital, Lusaka.
Female elephants are very protective of their calves and can respond aggressively to what they perceive as threats.
Last year, two American tourists were killed in separate encounters with elephants in different parts of Zambia. In both cases, the tourists were also elderly women and were on a safari vehicle when they were attacked.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Northwestern sued over suicide of professor targeted in China investigation
Northwestern sued over suicide of professor targeted in China investigation

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Northwestern sued over suicide of professor targeted in China investigation

The estate of a Northwestern University professor, who died by suicide last year after being investigated in a controversial federal probe, is suing the school for allegedly discriminating against her and evicting her from her lab — blaming the university, in part, for her death. Jane Wu was a tenured faculty member in neurology, molecular biology and genetics at Northwestern's Feinberg School of Medicine for nearly two decades. She was among hundreds of Chinese American scientists targeted by the Justice Department's China Initiative, a Trump-era program seeking to counter theft of American intellectual property and research. Though Wu was never charged, Northwestern reassigned her grant funding, closed her lab and forcibly admitted her to the university's psychiatric hospital, according to a civil complaint filed June 23 in Cook County Circuit Court. The executor of Wu's estate is her daughter. The university's actions were a 'substantial and decisive factor in her decision to end her life,' the complaint stated. 'Anyone who reads the facts of this complaint will recognize that a great injustice was done to Jane Wu,' attorney Thomas Geoghegan said. A spokesperson for Northwestern said the university does not comment on pending litigation. The China Initiative was scrapped in 2022 under the Biden administration. Though more than 200 Chinese American researchers were investigated, only about 20% were charged and subsequently convicted. Critics said the program fueled a narrative of bias and created a chilling effect among the academic community. After Wu was identified in the probe, she was placed under an administrative investigation by the National Institutes of Health. Though she was a longtime professor, her grants were reassigned to her white male colleagues and her research team was dissolved, according to the filing. 'NU did nothing to support her nor help lift the racial stigma placed over Dr. Wu despite her obvious innocence and the enormous funding her work had brought to NU,' the complaint said. Even when the NIH's investigation concluded in December 2023, Wu's grants were not returned to her, according to the lawsuit. Her lab was completely shut down by May 2024, preventing her from applying for new NIH funding. Because Wu's research was listed as inactive, Northwestern reduced her salary. Feeling increasingly isolated, Wu began to spiral into a deep depression and show signs of obsessive behavior, the filing said. 'NU destroyed not only Dr. Wu's chances at NIH funding but also her research career,' the complaint said. That same month, university and Chicago police removed Wu from her office in handcuffs. She was then admitted against her will to the psychiatric unit of Northwestern Memorial Hospital 'as a means to end her active research and employment,' according to the lawsuit. Wu died by suicide weeks later, on July 10, 2024, 'with her career, her professional reputation, and her sense of personal safety shattered.' She was 60 years old. The complaint did not specify what damages the estate seeks. The filing said Wu became a naturalized citizen in 2000, and had spent nearly 40 years in the United States. She had won continuous NIH funding since 1996. Her work investigated the molecular biology of mRNA and neurodegeneration, seeking to fight diseases such as Alzheimer's and ALS. Margaret Flanagan, now an associate professor at University of Texas Health San Antonio, worked beside Wu for more than three years at the Feinberg School of Medicine. But she was more than a colleague, Flanagan said — she was a mentor and friend, with a deep passion for science and unwavering generosity. 'Her legacy is one of strength, compassion, and a relentless commitment to advancing science,' Flanagan wrote in a statement to the Tribune. Wu was intense and thoughtful, Flanagan said, and her astute advice has stuck with her colleague years later. She often reminded Flanagan to 'focus on (her) science.' Wu always centered her work around a larger mission of advancing knowledge and helping patients, Flanagan said. The pair largely fell out of touch when Flanagan left Northwestern in 2023. 'I assumed there would be time in the future to reconnect, not knowing how short that time would be,' Flanagan wrote. Andrea Chu, the Midwest organizing director for Asian American Advancing Justice Chicago, said that Wu's death shows the 'devastating' impact of the China Initiative. She pointed to the lack of cases brought by the Justice Department as an indication that the program was racially biased. A 2021 investigation from the MIT Technology Review found that 148 individuals were charged, but just 40 of them had pleaded or been found guilty. Only 19 cases included violations of the Economic Espionage Act, the intended focus of the initiative. 'The toll that it took on the scientists themselves, their colleagues and also their families is innumerable,' Chu said. 'This was a great source of fear.'

Judge briefly pauses Trump administration's July 4 bid to deport 8 men to South Sudan
Judge briefly pauses Trump administration's July 4 bid to deport 8 men to South Sudan

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Judge briefly pauses Trump administration's July 4 bid to deport 8 men to South Sudan

But Moss said it appeared the men had served their criminal sentences, so the U.S. government shouldn't be trying to inflict punishment on them at this point. That is the central claim in the suit filed Thursday night: that deporting the eight to South Sudan amounts to additional punishment. Moss said he wasn't reaching any legal conclusions about that, but he said he had 'grave concerns about some of the issues' raised by lawyers for the men. 'It's almost self-evident that the United States government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances where their physical well being is at risk simply to punish them or to send a signal to others,' Moss said. Moss also noted that the State Department has a public 'do not travel' warning for South Sudan. 'It does appear that placing people in South Sudan does pose or could pose significant risk to their safety,' he said. However, the judge ultimately concluded that the Supreme Court's recent actions impacting the men in the litigation underway in Boston meant their claims should be heard there and not in the Washington court. 'I do believe that the cases should be handled in a single case instead of multiple cases around the country,' Moss said. The eight men have been marooned in Djibouti since May, when a federal judge in Boston — U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy — halted their deportation to South Sudan, concluding that the move violated an order he'd issued requiring advance notice and a 'meaningful' chance to object before people being deported from the U.S. are sent to countries where they have no previous ties. Murphy also halted an earlier attempt to send the men to Libya. They have been living in a shipping container for nearly six weeks waiting for resolution from the courts, though Murphy allowed the administration to relocate them to any other U.S. facility — or back to the mainland — so long as they remained in American custody. While the men and several U.S. immigration officers guarding them remained at Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti, the Trump administration also fought a court battle against Murphy's orders. Last week, the Supreme Court blocked Murphy's broad, nationwide order requiring certain steps before third-country deportations. And on Thursday, the justices voided separate orders the Biden appointee issued regarding the eight men. However, in neither instance did the high court's majority explain its concern about Murphy's original order, leaving lawyers to speculate about whether the justices disagreed with his conclusions about the due process deportees are entitled to, whether the justices objected to the nationwide scope of his order or whether they harbored some other concern. During the hearings Friday, Moss repeatedly lamented the uncertainty left by the Supreme Court's rulings on the issue and said the public was left to 'read the tea leaves' in the high court's decisions. 'I don't know what to make of what the Supreme Court did because that is one of the downsides of the emergency docket,' the judge said. 'We just don't know which of those arguments the Supreme Court found convincing in ordering the relief it ordered.'

Europe's human rights watchdog concerned over use of force against Serbia anti-corruption protesters
Europe's human rights watchdog concerned over use of force against Serbia anti-corruption protesters

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Europe's human rights watchdog concerned over use of force against Serbia anti-corruption protesters

BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Europe's human rights watchdog Friday expressed concern that Serbian authorities were using excessive force and arbitrary detentions to break up street protests against the populist government of President Aleksandar Vucic. Michael O'Flaherty, the Council of Europe's commissioner for human rights, said in a statement that 'freedom of assembly and freedom of expression are key human rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and it is Serbia's duty to guarantee them.' 'I am concerned about the current human rights situation in Serbia, where, despite the assurances I received from the authorities during my visit in April, excessive use of force is being applied to curb demonstrations,' O'Flaherty said. Amnesty International and Civil Rights Defenders urged restraint and an investigation into any use of unlawful force. 'Footage of Serbian riot police indiscriminately targeting peaceful protesters gathered at blockades on the street and in front of universities in Belgrade are alarming,' the rights groups said in a joint statement on Friday. 'A heavy-handed response to peaceful dissent cannot be justified.' Riot police have detained scores of demonstrators since a major rally last weekend, including university students, their professors and others, who have been blocking traffic throughout the country demanding an early parliamentary election. Tensions have soared since the rally last weekend by tens of thousands of people in Belgrade which ended with clashes between riot police and groups of protesters. Monthslong demonstrations previously had been largely calm. Police also intervened on Friday to clear traffic blockades in Belgrade, briefly detaining a number of protesters. Defiant demonstrators protesters returned to jam the streets on Friday evening. University students behind the protests have said that police have injured many peaceful demonstrators in the past several days. Witnesses told local media that riot police beat up protesters with batons and shields, and that four students were hospitalized early Thursday, including one with a broken clavicle. Police have denied the use of excessive force, warning that blocking traffic is illegal. Vucic has described ongoing protests as 'terror' and an attempt to bring down the state. O'Flaherty's statement said that 'increased levels of the use of force by the police as well as arbitrary arrests and detention have occurred during the week.' 'I am particularly concerned about the arrest of children, as well as the number of students being charged for criminal offenses or hospitalized for the treatment of injuries,' O'Flaherty said in a statement. He added that 'mischaracterization of this largely peaceful student-led movement should be avoided at all costs.' Both the European Union mission in Serbia and the U.N. Human Rights Office said Thursday that they were watching the situation closely and urged restraint. Persistent protests that have rattled Vucic first started in November after a renovated train station canopy collapsed in Serbia's north, killing 16 people. Many in Serbia blame the tragedy on alleged corruption-fueled negligence in state infrastructure projects. Critics say Vucic has become increasingly authoritarian since coming to power more than a decade ago, stifling democratic freedoms while allowing corruption and organized crime to flourish, which he has denied. Serbia is formally seeking entry to the EU, but Vucic's government has nourished relations with Russia and China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store