Mum's gruesome death as she's killed and swallowed whole by gigantic python
A mum met a horrific end after she was killed and then eaten whole by a python.
The woman, who lived inin a village in Indonesia, became the second person in the country to be killed and digested by the snake species in just over a year.
Wa Tiba, 54, left her home on Muna island to visit her cornfield when she vanished, as reported by the Jakarta Post. The field was about 800m from her house in an area that was surrounded by caves, cliffs and several reticulated pythons - the longest snakes in the world.
Pythons usually digest small mammals with attacks on humans supposed to be as rare as winning the lottery and being struck by lightning at the same time, according to a Washington Post report.
However, back in 2017, the year before Wa's horrific death, a man's body was extracted from a 23-foot-long python, shown in a gruesome YouTube video, reports the Mirror US.
Tiba had been worried about wild boars, not snakes, as she walked through her cornfield that night, reported the Jakarta Post. The pigs had been raiding the crops before she disappeared, which is why she had decided to conduct the inspection of her field.
When she had not returned by sunrise, her sister set out to the field in an effort to look for her.
But when she arrived there, her sibling found only Tiba's footprints, her torch, a machete and slippers. About 100 people from the village of Persiapan Lawela soon joined in the search as they gathered together to comb the fields, Agence France-Presse reported.
The snake was found a few dozen yards from Tiba's belongings, reportedly measuring 23 feet in length and so bloated it could barely move. A long bulge midway down its body had an alarming look to it.
The villagers killed the snake, laying it out on the ground. They then crowded around it, clamouring and crying, some recording videos as a man knelt and carefully cut across the bulge with a machete.
He parted the snake flesh, revealing Tiba intact inside the snake, clothed just as she had been when she went to check her corn.
Despite being intact, it's likely she didn't die inside the snake as reticulated pythons secure their prey with a bite, then wrap their body around the victim, squeezing until the victim cannot breathe, before consuming them, according to The Associated Press.
It's incredibly rare for humans to be eaten, The Post wrote, stating that it's more common to see hoaxes. A single photo of a snake digesting a pig has previously been used to falsely claim attacks on humans in China, Africa and across Southeast Asia.
The two victims in Indonesia were extremely unlucky to fall prey to this species of snake in what was described as very rare circumstances.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
8 hours ago
- Metro
‘A shark ate my arm and leg - I wouldn't change a thing'
February 11, 2009, began as an average day for Paul de Gelder. He was conducting a military operation in Sydney Harbour as part of the navy, but while in the water he felt a whack on the back of his leg – it was the jaws of a bull shark. 'I thought the guys on the boat got too close to me but I looked down and there's a massive shark's head attached to my leg.' Paul tells Metro. 'I'm thinking, 'I've seen Shark Week, I'll jab it in the eye but I can't move my arm. I look down and my hand is trapped in the shark's mouth as well as my leg. I grab it by the nose, try to push it off me but it decides that I'm breakfast, thrashes me around, takes me underwater and the pain is so all encompassing it takes the fight out of me. I was drowning in agony, being eaten alive and I realised there was nothing I could do, so I gave up.' As Paul conceded defeat, the shark's teeth ripped off his hamstring and hand. His wetsuit made him buoyant and to his shock, he floated back to the surface and realised, by some miracle, he was still alive. 'My medical training kicked in. I kept the wound above my head and swam back with one hand and one functioning leg through a massive pool of my own blood.' Hours later Paul woke up in hospital, relieved to see his leg was still attached. 'But I only had the leg for a week. I had my leg removed and the medication couldn't manage my pain so I went through 20 hours of agonising torture, wishing I would die.' The attack was captured on film – and if you're so inclined, is available to watch on YouTube. The entire attack lasts for eight seconds – eight seconds that would completely change the course of Paul's life. It's a living nightmare few of us could ever imagine, but 16 years later, Paul's life is quite astonishing. Unbelievably, he's now one of the world's leading shark conservationists, devoting his whole life to protecting the animal that almost killed him. Paul's determination to give sharks a rebrand combined with his personal relationship with the apex predator has taken him all over the world. But the turning point came when Australia's 60 Seconds, the biggest televised interview Down Under, called with a question: 'Would you be willing to face bull sharks again?' Paul agreed to confront his fears, flying to Fiji to swim with bull sharks. 'They wanted tears but I gave them excitement and ended up feeding the bulls.' Now, he's just finished filming a new show for Shark Week, How To Survive A Shark Attack, where he flippantly tells me: 'I had to be attacked by sharks several times' and he's worked with A-list stars like Will Smith and Mike Tyson. He also helped British celebrities including Sir Lenny Henry and Countdown's Rachel Riley build up the courage to swim with one of the world's largest and deadliest species of sharks, the Tiger shark as part of ITV's Sharks! Celebrity Infested Waters, an alarming new reality TV series marking the 50th anniversary of Jaws. Stephen Spielberg's 1975 horror is without a doubt the reason I'll suddenly panic swimming lengths in a swimming pool – the sea is completely out of bounds. My irrational fear of being eaten alive by a shark in the sea, a lake or even the bath is shared by millions, even if there are rarely more than 10 fatal shark attacks around the world every year. Call The Midwife's Helen George is in the same boat as me, and until filming the series had been too afraid to even put her head under water for 20 years, let alone free dive with one of the ocean's largest man-eating predators. On paper, it sounds like I'm A Celebrity on steroids, but it's a surprisingly moving watch. Columnist Adam Miller shares his thoughts on the fascinating new series: On paper, Shark! Celebrity Infested Waters sounds like a Bushtucker trial ramped up to 100. An impressive cast, boasting Sir Lenny Henry, Countdown's Rachel Riley and McFly's Dougie Poynter, is helped by leading shark experts to come face to face with some of the most feared predators in the world in their natural environment. Even as somewhat of a shark obsessive (rarely a day goes by when I don't lose myself down a rabbit hole of shark videos on Instagram) I wasn't sure how or if Shark! Celebrity Infested Waters would work. Obviously, there's no real jeopardy – not that I'd want that – but without it what is the pull? Reality television is at its best with camaraderie at its core, and I can't recall another show that shows teamwork quite like this. It's refreshing and actually quite a bold move not to have any contest running through Shark! Celebrity Infested Waters but it's a gamble that pays off. I had no idea what there would be to love about watching celebrities learning to dive but there are few reality shows which show so much growth and so quickly. To read more, click here. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'The show is really touching' says Paul. 'It has all the emotions – fear, anxiety, happiness. Every spectrum of human emotion is there but it has an underlying message too. It's about the plight of sharks. 'People are out there killing sharks for fun every day and by doing so it's bringing us closer to extinction. If the sharks die, the ocean dies and we die. We're trying to get celebrities and the viewers to fall in love with sharks – which, granted, is hard because they keep biting people.' Chucking British national treasures into shark infested waters is another unexpected adventure for Paul, one more turn he didn't expect his life to take when his limbs were torn from his body. Few will ever know how they'd respond to the trauma of a shark attack, particularly one quite so cataclysmic. More Trending I've rarely met someone with so much self-assurance, so much peace. Paul says coming close to death gave him freedom in life. 'It really just opened my mindset to becoming even more unlimited in what I want to in this world and with my life,' he says. I wonder if he imagines what his life would look like without the attack? 'I do to a very small degree. I wouldn't change it – there's no reason for me to change it. I don't know who that guy is because my life went this way and I love my life. I live in America. Arnold Schwarzenegger says hello to me at the gym in the morning. I've got great friends, I get paid to travel the world, have adventures and inspire people. What's not to love about that?' Shark! Celebrity Infested Waters is available to stream on ITVX. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: Two I'm A Celebrity legends 'set to return' for epic All Stars series MORE: 'One of the most important British dramas ever made' joins major streamer MORE: Jeremy Clarkson is launching 'ruthless' Who Wants To Be A Millionaire ITV spin-off series
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Is your partner REALLY gaslighting you or is he just lying? Expert reveals how to tell if you're being manipulated
An expert has revealed the difference between lying and gaslighting - as well as defining both the activities. Gaslighting has become somewhat of a buzzword both online and in real-life conversations, with people regularly accusing others of the nefarious behaviour. But often, what people describe as gaslighting is actually just lying - so what's the difference? Dr Sohom Das is a forensic psychiatrist, from London, who also runs an eponymous YouTube channel. He shares content about crime, mental health conditions, and psychology, among other topics. His previous video topics include how having ADHD can affect your love life, why women are more likely to binge watch true crime than men, and six reasons why female prison officers have sex with inmates. In one of his videos, which is titled The difference between gaslighting and lying, he explained how people can differentiate between the two. Speaking in the clip, he said: 'Do you know why gaslighting is more than simply lying? Don't worry, I'll explain it to you, and I'll also give you three specific scenarios to outline the differences.' Dr Das added that both gaslighting and lying involve distortion of the truth, however, they differ in both intent and impact. 'Lying typically involves a conscious and deliberate attempt to deceive somebody about a specific fact or event,' said the psychiatrist. 'Gaslighting, on the other hand, is a more insidious form of manipulation that aims to erode the victim's sense of reality and self worth.' First, he explained how the intent between the two behaviours diverges. Dr Das said: 'With lying, the primary intent is to conceal information, to avoid consequences or to gain an advantage. 'With gaslighting, the primary intent is to control the victim, undermine their confidence and make them question their own sanity. 'It's utilized to distort the victim's entire perception of reality, including their memories, feelings and judgments.' The expert then went on to describe three scenarios, explaining how each could be a sign of either lying or gaslighting. GASLIGHTING IN RELATIONSHIPS Gaslighting is a term that refers to trying to convince someone they're wrong about something even when they aren't. Most commonly, it takes the form of frequently disagreeing with someone or refusing to listen to their point of view. Many of us might be guilty of some mild form of gaslighting from time to time – refusing to hear what our partner has to say even if they're in the right or persistently disagreeing over some minor quibble, even when you aren't sure of your position. It can be a real form of abuse. When it's done repeatedly, over a long period of time, it can have the effect of making someone doubt their own ideas about things – or even question their sanity. Source: Relate Dr Das said: 'Number one, a partner tells their spouse that they were working late when they were actually at a bar with friends. 'So they are lying to conceal their actions, to avoid an argument and to avoid the silent treatment for the next four days.' However, he noted, 'if the same man does this, but also accuses their spouse of being overly sensitive or of imagining things, even when the spouse expresses valid concerns, [that is] gaslighting'. The intent in this scenario, the psychiatrist explained, is 'to undermine the spouse's confidence and control their behaviour'. Describing another hypothetical scenario, he said an unpleasant older brother may spread a lie about their younger sibling having an STD in order to cause embarrassment, and to stop someone from wanting to date them. 'That is a lie, plain and simple,' said Dr Das. He continued: 'However, once he's been caught, [if] that same nasty older brother dismisses your concerns, telling you that you are overreacting or making things up that is gaslighting.' The psychiatrist's third scenario related to a hypothetical situation in the workplace. He explained: 'Your boss says that he didn't receive your quarterly finance report simply because he's too lazy to analyse it in time for the board meeting. That, again, is a basic lie.' But, he said, if your boss constantly criticises your work - even when the quality is good - then 'the intent there is to manipulate you as an employee and to maintain that kind of power dynamic'. Closing the video, Dr Das said: 'In conclusion, while both lying and gaslighting involve deception, gaslighting is a more harmful and insidious form of manipulation that can have devastating impact on the victim's mental and emotional well being.' The term 'gaslighting' originates from a 1938 play that explored psychological torment - Gas Light, by British playwright Patrick Hamilton, which is set in Victorian London. The story centres on a husband, Jack Manningham, who convinces his wife Bella she is going insane. While he searches their attic for hidden jewels belonging to a woman he murdered, he repeatedly dims the gas lights in the house. When Bella notices and questions the change in lighting, her husband insists she's imagining it. This sinister act of manipulation, along with his other lies and dismissals, chip away at her grip on reality. The play was later adapted into the 1944 Hollywood film Gaslight, starring Ingrid Bergman, which solidified the concept in the cultural imagination. But it wasn't until the 1960s and 70s that it began to appear in psychological literature. Mental health professionals used 'gaslighting' to describe a specific form of emotional abuse, often in intimate relationships, where one partner systematically undermines the other's confidence and perception of reality.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Serial killer's horrifying murder spree inspired huge Bruce Springsteen hit
Bruce Springsteen's 1982 album Nebraska is an iconic record - but the source of inspiration for the title track is a real-life horror story that continues to captivate the public Bruce Springsteen, the iconic rock star, drew inspiration for one of his most beloved tracks from a harrowing true crime. The Boss delved into some grim territory for his 1982 album 'Nebraska', spinning yarns about outlaws and the downtrodden, some sprung from his own mind, others ripped from the headlines. The eponymous song recounts the chilling saga of Charles Starkweather, a 19 year old killer. Starkweather's rampage resulted in ten lives snuffed out over just eight days, leading to his eventual capture. He wasn't flying solo; his 14 year old "girlfriend," Caril Ann Fugate, was by his side. The true nature of their bond is still hotly contested. At her trial, Fugate maintained she was Starkweather's captive, taken against her will. Initially, in court, Starkweather corroborated Fugate's story of abduction and claimed she played no part in the killings, but he later flip-flopped on his testimony. He took the stand against her, accusing her of being an active accomplice, reports the Mirror US. The first life Starkweather claimed was over a teddy bear denied to him on credit, likely meant as a gift for Fugate. He revisited the shop that night, shotgun in hand, and a scuffle ensued, culminating in the shopkeeper's demise. Two months on, Starkweather unleashed a murderous spree that left 10 dead, starting with the savage slaying of Fugate's family, her baby sister among them. Publicly, Starkweather and Fugate have clashed over her involvement, with debates on whether she was present at the killings or even knew about them. Despite the uncertainty, the pair stayed in the house for nearly a week after the murders, hiding Fugate's family behind the chicken coop before fleeing. Their escape took them to Wyoming, leaving a trail of death in their wake. A massive manhunt ensued, involving the National Guard and vigilante groups, ending with their capture following a high-speed pursuit in Natrona County, Wyoming. Starkweather was returned to Nebraska, where he faced the electric chair, meeting his end on June 25, 1959. He remained silent at his execution, but had previously written to his parents, "but dad I'm not real sorry for what I did cause for the first time me and Caril have more fun." Those haunting words were later captured by Springsteen in his song 'Nebraska'. Fugate, found guilty as an accomplice, was sentenced to life on November 21, 1958, but was paroled in June 1976 after 17.5 years behind bars. According to Ultimate Guitar in 2023, she is still alive at 80, residing in Hillsdale, Michigan. The infamous case seized the public's imagination, sparking fierce debate over capital punishment. Starkweather's name remains etched in history as Nebraska's last execution until 1994, and his story continues to fascinate those studying the minds of serial killers. Before crafting Nebraska, Springsteen reportedly immersed himself in the Starkweather murders and even had conversations with Ninette Beaver, the writer who had documented the killings. However, Springsteen didn't base the entire track on the real events, the actual motives, or Fugate herself. "I wanted black bedtime stories," he wrote in his 2016 autobiography, Born to Run, looking back on the creative period that produced Nebraska. "I thought of the records of John Lee Hooker and Robert Johnson, music that sounded so good with the lights out. I wanted the listener to hear my characters think, to feel their thoughts, their choices."
