How will USDA cuts affect Centre County? Food bank, others brace for unclear future
In early March, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said it would cut more than $1 billion in funding for two programs: the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program, which allows states to purchase and distribute locally sourced food to feeding programs like food banks and pantries, and the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program, which provides federal funding to school districts to purchase food directly from local sources such as farmers and other suppliers.
The pandemic-era programs were implemented by the USDA under the Biden administration with the goal of providing local, healthy food to those who needed it, and to build and bolster resilient local food and agricultural supply chains, according to the programs' websites.
USDA has said the programs are a legacy of the pandemic, as the Trump administration and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency say they're slashing federal spending to reduce waste.
The USDA gave a 60-day notification period after announcing the cuts, which would mean the programs would end May 6.
Allayn Beck, the State College Food Bank's executive director, said that while the food bank doesn't directly receive funding from the USDA programs being cut, she fears the potential ripple effects in the community.
'I am anticipating that when the (Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement) program ceases to exist, the current options for fresh and local produce, dairy, meats — they're just not going to be available anymore,' Beck said. 'And that effect is going to trickle down too. I think that's going to be the case for any pantry that is purchasing local produce, meats and dairies.'
As a result of the cuts, Beck expects less food will be readily available to distribute at the food bank. More food and monetary donations from the public will likely be required to meet the needs in the community.
The State College Food Bank served a record number of individuals and families in 2024, and Beck only expects that to continue.
'Grocery stores are still going to be serving the same produce, dairy and meats that they always do, but as prices rise not everyone will be able to afford to get their goods there,' Beck said. 'While we can't say for sure yet, I'd ... think that we'll be seeing more and more people coming to the food bank for their goods.'
During the pandemic, the community rallied around the food bank, Beck said, providing help when it needed it most.
She's hoping for a similar, if not greater, level of support now.
'Because of the amazing community support we received back in 2020 we were able to keep our doors open, but I'd say that what we're dealing with right now is harder than back then,' Beck said. 'We're serving more people, food is more expensive, even running electricity to our coolers is more expensive. ... It's more expensive for everybody. I think that we need more help now than ever, especially with determining what's yet to come.'
She aims to secure fresh and local produce, dairy and meat products from other sources if need be, although it has yet to be determined what that would look like.
The effects of the cuts and concerns was a topic at a quarterly meeting with the directors of Centre County's other food banks and pantries, Beck said.
Joe Arthur, the CEO of the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank — an organization that purchases and distributes fresh, local food other Pennsylvania food banks — said that with the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement cut, the organization is missing out on $1.8 million through 15 months, an amount that could supply 500,000 meals.
'We've been deeply concerned about the funding cut to the (Local Food Purchasing Assistance Cooperative Program),' Arthur said. 'It also means fewer resources for our local farmers, who supply the fresh, nutritious food that makes this program so impactful. This isn't just about meals — it's about families, communities, and our local economy.'
Much like Centre County's food banks, State College Area School District Food Service Director Megan Schaper said that so far, the school district hasn't been directly impacted by the cuts. But when they take effect, she's unsure about the amount of fresh, local foods the district will be able to provide.
'To be fair, I guess (the program's funding) was extra money. Prior to the pandemic we never had those type of funds,' Schaper said. 'With the current reimbursement rates and what parents pay for meals, I'll still be able to buy food and have meals for students, but will I be able to have local food though? Maybe not so much. Buying from big factory farms is less expensive than buying from local — it stinks but that's how it is.'
Moving forward, Schaper also anticipates the Trump administration making it 'significantly harder' for children to get access to free and reduced-cost lunches.
Proposed spending cuts to fund Republican's tax bill include changes to how schools provide free and reduced lunch. The Community Eligibility Provision, which provides a school district's students with free lunches based on the percentage of the school's population that's deemed eligible for free meals through participation in programs like SNAP, is currently set at 25% but a Republican proposal would raise it to 60%.
While SCASD does not currently participate in the Community Eligibility Provision, a school that does would see the cost of their students' lunches reimbursed by USDA through a reimbursement formula.
'That's definitely one of the hammers that we're waiting to see fall, and when it does, it's going to have a big effect on a lot of schools,' Schaper said. 'I mean, if you read Project 2025, they are not particularly interested in making school meals easily accessible to all students, which I find to be concerning and disappointing.'
One of her other main concerns with the canceling of the two USDA programs is the havoc it could wreak among farmers, small businesses and other local food providers.
'I fear they might be on the worst end of these cuts,' Schaper said.
The Happy Valley Meat Company, a large meat supplier to SCASD and around 150 other Pennsylvania schools, will likely be one of the businesses impacted by the cuts, although owner Dan Honig said he's not sure exactly how yet.
'Honestly, my business would not be feasible if it weren't for schools buying our product, primarily our ground beef,' Honig said. 'We're left with a few serious questions: What do we do to adapt to potentially less income? How do we prepare? I'd like to think that we provide an good enough service that the schools will still come to us without the additional funding, but we aren't even sure of that.'
To retain relationships with some of his most important customers, Honig may start readjusting the delivery deals he's made with school districts to a rate that they can afford, with weekly deliveries potentially turning into monthly, and so on.
Regardless of possible future delivery adjustments though, Honig said that the cuts alone deserve a call to action.
'If this is an issue you're truly concerned about, I'd say get up, reach out to your child's school district and tell them that you believe local is important,' Honig said. 'Tell them you want local, even if you recognize that there are cuts. Now is your chance say to your school district, 'this is what's important to me and my kids.' They should have better food — it's the fuel of their lives.'
Late last month Gov. Josh Shapiro announced that his administration objects to, and would be filing a direct administrative challenge against, the 'unlawful' decision to cancel Pennsylvania's agreement with the federal government under the Local Food Purchasing Assistance Program.
'Earlier this month, we received notice from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that the Trump administration had decided to cancel our agreement,' Shapiro said in a written statement. 'I've directed Secretary [Russell] Redding to immediately appeal the USDA's decision to unlawfully terminate this agreement and demand that the federal government honor their obligations under the agreement we signed just four months ago.'
According to a news release, Pennsylvania's $13 million contract for the LFPA program supports 189 Pennsylvania farms and 14 food banks across the commonwealth.
Shapiro is proposing a combined $8 million bump to crucial in-state food programs to be added to the 2025-26 state budget — $4 million to Pennsylvania Agricultural Surplus System and $4 million to the State Food Purchase Program.
The increases would see the total funding for the two programs sit at $34.6 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Car buyers aren't waiting for prices to go higher, survey finds
Middle-income Americans have accelerated their car-buying timelines amid worries about rising prices, according to new research shared first with Axios. Why it matters: On-again, off-again tariffs, along with other policy shifts in Washington, are confounding not just auto companies, but car buyers, too. But amid record pent-up demand, many consumers are deciding there's no point in putting off their car-buying decisions any longer. Driving the news: The findings are part of the latest quarterly survey by Santander Holdings USA, which aims to get a pulse on how economic conditions and future price uncertainty are impacting American households. While most middle-income consumers surveyed are worried about prices and feeling pinched by housing costs, they remain resilient, with three-quarters believing they are on the right financial track, Santander found. Between the lines: The findings underscore why vehicle access is so important to families. "Our research finds consumers are taking proactive steps to secure what matters most, especially autos," says Betty Jotanovic, president of auto relationships at Santander Consumer USA. "While they may have to make certain trade-offs, households are focused on maintaining vehicle access and prioritizing it within their budgets." Zoom in: Consumers are closely watching how future price uncertainty could affect their purchasing plans, and they are adjusting expectations accordingly, according to the survey, which was conducted by Morning Consult on behalf of Santander. While 52% had delayed a vehicle purchase over the past year due to cost, 55% are now considering buying in the year ahead, up from 47% in Q1 — and the first time in two years that prospective buyers outnumber those delaying a purchase. Nearly one in five (18%) expedited key purchases in Q2 amid future price uncertainty, with 41% of them buying a car. Higher prices haven't scared them off; if anything, they've motivated buyers to act now. Half of prospective buyers say they are now more likely to take out an auto loan. 48% are more likely to purchase a used vehicle. 42% are more likely to transact in the next three months. The big picture: Industry sales have been on a roller-coaster since President Trump launched his trade war against friends and foes alike. Vehicle sales surged in early 2025 as consumers raced to pre-empt tariffs and policy-driven price increases. As Trump began waffling on his trade policies, however, demand returned to normal. Now, with some of the uncertainty lifting, there's renewed interest among consumers to act fast. What to watch: Look for more sales pitches like the one delivered last week by Tesla CEO Elon Musk during an earnings call with investors. Citing the government's plan to end EV tax credits on Sept. 30, and Tesla's own intention to pare back incentives, Musk urged consumers not to wait.
Business Insider
13 minutes ago
- Business Insider
African students studying in U.S. advised against traveling amid Trump's new immigration policy
The Trump administration's revised immigration policy is raising alarm among African students in the United States, following the introduction of stricter visa conditions that could prevent them from leaving the country until after graduation. The Trump administration's revised immigration policy imposes stricter visa conditions on African students in the U.S. Many students and families express concerns about re-entry difficulties during emergencies or holidays. Students are advised to remain in the U.S. until completing their studies to avoid visa complications. Under the new rules, international students on F-1 visas, particularly those from Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, and Cameroon, will now receive single-entry visas valid for only three months. African students who make up a growing share of international enrolments are among the hardest hit. In 2023, over 50,000 students from sub-Saharan Africa studied in the U.S., an 18% jump from the previous year This development has triggered concern among students and families about the implications for travel flexibility during emergencies, holidays, or internships abroad. This means students must enter the U.S. within that period, but once inside, they are permitted to remain for the full duration of their academic program. However, if they leave the U.S. before graduation, they risk being unable to return without undergoing a fresh and potentially delayed visa application process. The new visa framework, introduced by the U.S. State Department and effective from July 8, 2025, significantly tightens restrictions for most nonimmigrant and non-official visa categories. For Nigerian applicants, the policy shift is a sharp break from previous norms that allowed multiple-entry visas valid for up to five years. . With the fall semester approaching, many international students now face added pressure to navigate the evolving U.S. immigration landscape, one that may increasingly require them to choose between staying the course or risking denial of re-entry. Experts clarify new U.S. visa rules, dispel misinformation Business Insider Africa reached out to Sasha Ramani, Head of Corporate Strategy at MPOWER Financing, a U.S.-based lender that supports international students, for clarification following rising concern over the new U.S. visa policy, which has caused anxiety among prospective African students and their families. While the policy change has sparked widespread worry on social media and in the press, Ramani says the practical impact on students' academic plans is minimal. ' Nothing significant should change with regard to their educational plans, ' Ramani said. ' The process of obtaining a student visa remains the same. Once students enter the U.S., they are allowed to stay for the full duration of their studies.' Ramani explained that the new visa regulation mirrors rules long applied to countries like Vietnam and stems from the principle of reciprocity —where the U.S. adjusts visa conditions to reflect how its own citizens are treated abroad. Still, he acknowledged the emotional toll of restricted mobility. ' We recommend that students affected by this policy not leave the U.S. until after graduation, ' he added. ' Admittedly, we understand this may limit their ability to see family or attend to other personal priorities during their studies.' In response, MPOWER is expanding its student support efforts, offering free visa preparation courses, mock interviews with former U.S. visa officers, and tailored webinars to help international students navigate the complexities of the U.S. immigration system. ' Many students rely on agents or online forums that may not always provide accurate guidance,' Ramani noted. ' Our goal is to equip students with clear, expert-backed information so they can make informed decisions and stay focused on their academic goals.' He also stressed that fears of travel bans or blanket disqualifications are misplaced. ' We've spoken with students who incorrectly believe their country is now subject to a travel ban. That's simply not true,' he said. 'What's needed now is clarity—not panic.' Ultimately, affected students are advised to enter the U.S. within the three-month visa validity window and remain there until their studies are completed. While this may limit holiday travel, Ramani notes it could also reduce travel costs and help with long-term budgeting. 'The United States continues to welcome talented international students,' he emphasized. ' And with the right preparation, these recent policy adjustments shouldn't stand in the way of anyone's educational dreams. ' While the new visa policy introduces tighter travel restrictions, it should not discourage African students or aspiring travelers from pursuing their educational goals in the United States.
NBC News
13 minutes ago
- NBC News
U.S. and China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
STOCKHOLM — Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the center of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an Aug. 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump 's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most E.U. goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined to comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. 'We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes,' Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. 'Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place,' said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. 'I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome,' Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption — a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October.
