Ukraine says repatriation of war dead over after 1,245 more bodies received from Russia
"Today marks the final stage of the repatriation of fallen soldiers," Defence Minister Rustem Umerov said. "Since last week, when the implementation of the Istanbul agreements began, we have managed to bring back over 6,000 bodies."
This marks one of the largest returns of war dead since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago.
The handover of the soldiers' remains is part of the agreements reached between Russia and Ukraine during their second round of talks in Istanbul at the start of the month.
Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky, the head of Russia's delegation at the peace talks, said that Moscow had handed back the bodies of 6,060 Ukrainian servicemen. He said that Russia has received the remains of 78 of its own soldiers in return.
Ukrainian officials said that they had received 6,057 bodies. They was no immediate explanation available on the discrepancy in numbers.
The Russian Defence ministry said that Moscow was ready to hand over another 2,239 bodies to Ukraine.
Both Ukraine and Russia said that the process of exchanging prisoners of war was still ongoing.
"We are not stopping. Ahead lies the next stage: we continue the fight to bring back our prisoners of war," Ukrainian Defence Minister Umerov said in a social media post on Facebook.
The agreements on exchanging POWs were the only concrete result during the talks between Kyiv and Moscow in Istanbul. Both sides remain far apart in their vision on how to end the war, and they also failed to agree on a ceasefire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump orders US nuclear subs repositioned over ex-Russian leader's statements
US President Donald Trump said he is ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines in a warning to Russia. The move is 'based on highly provocative statements' from the country's former president Dmitry Medvedev. Advertisement Mr Trump posted on his social media site that based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Mr Medvedev he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that'. The president added: 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' It was not immediately clear what impact Mr Trump's order would have on US nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow. Mr Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. Advertisement He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week. The post about the sub repositioning came after Mr Trump, in the wee hours of Thursday morning, had posted that Mr Medvedev was a 'failed former president of Russia' and warned him to 'watch his words'. Mr Medvedev responded hours later by writing: 'Russia is right on everything and will continue to go its own way.' Mr Medvedev was president from 2008 to 2012 while Russian President Vladimir Putin was barred from seeking a second consecutive term but stepped aside to let him run again. Advertisement Now deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, which Mr Putin chairs, Mr Medvedev has been known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since the start of the war in 2022, a U-turn from his presidency, when he was seen as liberal and progressive. He has frequently wielded nuclear threats and lobbed insults at Western leaders on social media. Some observers have argued that with his extravagant rhetoric, Mr Medvedev is seeking to score political points with Mr Putin and Russian military hawks. Mr Trump and Mr Medvedev have gotten into online spats before. Advertisement On July 15, after Mr Trump announced plans to supply Ukraine with more weapons via its Nato allies and threatened additional tariffs against Moscow, Mr Medvedev posted, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care'. Earlier this week, he wrote: 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10″ and added, 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Trump says he will fire head of BLS as stocks shudder
US President Donald Trump said he would fire the head of the agency charged with publishing some of America's most closely watched economic data, after a weaker-than-expected jobs report stoked further alarm about his tariff policies. His decision to move forward with plans to sharply raise tariffs on goods from countries around the world had already sent financial markets in the US shuddering. In the US, the three major indexes dropped, with the S&P falling 1.9% by mid-afternoon. That followed earlier sell-offs in Europe and Asia, as investors dumped shares of firms such as South Korean steel manufacturers and German truck-maker Daimler. Trump's plans leave most goods coming into the US facing new taxes of 10% to 50%, depending on their origin, and will lift tariff rates in the US to the highest levels in nearly a says the measures will rebalance global trade and boost US analysts say they will raise prices for businesses and consumers in the US and weigh on the US and global economies, as sales, hiring and investment slow. This week has revived fears about economic damage, as companies update investors on their costs and new data points to slowdown in the US. Employers in the US added just 73,000 jobs in July, according the monthly Labor Department report published on also dramatically revised estimates of job growth in May and June, with far fewer gains than previously thought."The economic data since the Liberation Day announcements did not reflect that sharp deterioration in economic activity, or at least not in obvious ways. This was the week that changed," analysts at Wells Fargo wrote on Friday. The revisions appeared to spur Trump to fire the commissioner of labor statistics, Erika McEntarfer, in a post on social media."We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," he wrote on social media, referring to the large revisions to the May and June jobs numbers. Trump also lashed out at Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell, whom he has angrily criticised in recent in the US opened lower in the morning, with losses accelerating over the course of the afternoon. France's CAC 40 closed down 2.9%, while German's DAX fell 2.6%. In the UK, the FTSE fell 0.7%.Earlier the leading index in South Korea fell 3.8%, the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong dropped 1% and Japan's Nikkei fell 0.6%. When Trump first put forward his plans in April, shares in the US tumbled more than 10% in a week, the concerns spreading to the dollar and bond stock market recovered after he suspended some of the most drastic measures, leaving in place a less punishing, more expected 10% levy. In recent weeks, indexes in the US have been trading around all-time highs. "The reality is Trump got emboldened by the fact that markets came right back," Michael Gayed, portfolio manager for The Free Markets ETF told the BBC's Opening Bell. "Now he's going to try his luck again." The latest measures are less extreme than what Trump first put forward in April, when goods from key players in southeast Asia, such as Vietnam, were facing tariff rates of more than 40% and a tit-for-tat exchange with China drove US tariffs on its exports surge to at least 145%.But the tariffs still make for a radical change for the US, for decades a champion of free plans include a minimum 10% tax on most goods entering the US, with major trade partners, including the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam face tariffs in the range of 15% to 20%.Goods from China are set to facing new 30% levies, while exports from some other countries, including Switzerland and Laos face even higher changes, which are set to go into effect on 7 August, will lift the average tariff rate to roughly 18%, up from less than 2.5% as recently as had been taking the impact of tariffs in stride, sending shares in the US and elsewhere to new highs in recent weeks. Mr Gayed said markets had become less sensitive to Trump's rapidly changing trade policies, but he saw risks ahead. "The more he just whips around policy, the more the markets will not care, but as the old saying goes, nothing matters 'til it matters and then it's the only thing that matters," he said.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
MoD civil servant to step down in wake of Afghan data leak
The Ministry of Defence's most senior civil servant is stepping down in the wake of the Afghan data breach. David Williams, the department's permanent secretary, is understood to be quitting in the autumn as part of a planned shake-up of the MoD senior leadership, The Telegraph understands. Mr Williams's departure comes amid ongoing fallout over the handling of a data leak that placed up to 100,000 Afghans at risk. A recruitment process for his successor is under way, an MoD spokesman confirmed. A career civil servant, Mr Williams worked in the MoD 's finance department before being seconded to the Department for Health and Social Care in 2020. He returned to the MoD as its permanent secretary in 2021. His successor will be appointed after Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton, currently the head of the Royal Air Force, takes his post as Chief of the Defence Staff in September, it is understood. A new national armaments director – a senior civil servant in charge of defence procurement and infrastructure – is intended to be hired before the end of the year, although the recruitment process for that job has been ongoing since December. The MoD spokesman said: 'Permanent Secretary David Williams will step down this autumn, and the recruitment process for his successor is under way. Since 2021, David has led the department through a period of significant activity, and we thank him for his contribution.' A spreadsheet containing the details of 25,000 Afghans, including soldiers who fought alongside British special forces, together with family details, was accidentally leaked by a member of British special forces personnel in February 2022. As a result, 50,000 Afghan former soldiers and their family members were then brought to the UK at a cost of £7bn. When the MoD learnt of the breach more than a year later, it was granted a super-injunction to prevent the public from knowing the leaked spreadsheet – which also contained the details of more than 100 SAS soldiers and MI6 spies – was circulating online. Plans were made to add a total of 6,900 individuals to existing evacuation plans, taking place under the codename Operation Rubific. The super-injunction meant that media outlets subject to it, including The Telegraph, could not even mention the fact they had been gagged from reporting a matter of huge public interest. Parliamentary questions about the impact of the data breach and its resulting costs have so far shed limited light on how the MoD has sought to handle the multi-billion-pound fallout. Some £5mn has been spent over the last 11 months alone on flying Afghans from their home country to the UK, the MoD has confirmed. Lord Kempsell, the Tory peer, asked the Government how much it had spent on secretly moving Afghans caught up in the data breach to Britain. Lord Coaker, the Labour defence minister, said the average cost of flights per month has been £457,833.33. He said in his Parliamentary statement: 'The MoD has used both RAF and charter flights. Additionally, the International Organisation for Migration to resettle eligible Afghans has run charter flights. 'For reasons that are commercially and operationally sensitive, we cannot name the companies that organised the charter flights.'
