logo
Tech abuse: What is digital coercive control and why is it increasing?

Tech abuse: What is digital coercive control and why is it increasing?

ITV News07-05-2025
Katie Templeton-Knight has been exploring the issue of technology-facilitated abuse for ITV News. You may find some of the details in this report distressing.
A woman from north Cumbria has spoken anonymously to ITV News, describing the years of technology-facilitated abuse and sexual violence she faced by a former partner.
Charities warn that coercive control through technology is increasing and as technology evolves, it's becoming easier for perpetrators to commit these types of crimes.
A woman we are calling Sarah told ITV News that initially she thought it was "sweet" and "loving" that her former partner wanted to know where she was all the time.
However, she soon started to realise that something much more sinister was happening.
He would frequently turn up in places she was, which he would claim was coincidental. He also knew information about her that she had only told close friends.
Sarah did not know this until much later, but by going through her phone when she was not looking, he found her passwords, photos and private messages.
After discovering the password to her iCloud, he logged on through his own phone, which allowed him to track her every move.
He could see who she was talking to, what she was booking online and how much money she was spending.
He started to control who she was allowed to text and later installed spyware apps on her phone.
When she tried to leave the relationship, he threatened to publish her private photos and messages on social media.
Following years of abuse, she went to the police, and the perpetrator received a lengthy prison sentence.
What is digital coercive control?
Digital coercive control refers to when technology is weaponised by a perpetrator so that they can control, harass or intimidate their partner. It is a type of technology-facilitated domestic abuse or 'tech abuse'.
Examples of this can include restricting someone's access to their devices, cyberstalking, using social media, hidden cameras, or even smart home devices like thermostats or speakers.
Coercive control has been a crime since 2015, but it wasn't until the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 that the definition was expanded to include coercive control through technology.
The Online Safety Bill, passed in 2023, also identified controlling and coercive behaviour as a 'priority offence', which means tech companies need to both prevent and remove coercive control content from their sites.
However, this is difficult to enforce when it takes place away from social media platforms, including over text.
To meet rising demand, Refuge set up a specialist technology-facilitated abuse service in 2017.
Between the first year of service to 2024, they've seen a 207% increase in referrals.
But they say this could be just the tip of the iceberg, as there's limited research done into just how common this issue is.
How the police investigate these crimes:
A report by Liverpool University looked at several police forces in the North of England, including Cumbria, Merseyside and Durham.
The report found that even when coercive control was suspected, officers could not easily distinguish it from behaviour that was not abusive.
For example, sending lots of messages in the early days of a relationship could be the sign of excitement and mutual attraction, or it could indicate monitoring.
The report also found that when gathering evidence of these crimes, basic but essential information was missing.
This included telephone numbers, profile names and IDs, and screenshots which could have been used as initial evidence or to identify the correct social media profile.
Police forces say that they've made changes to address these concerns.
For example, in the last year, Cumbria Police has increased the number of specialist investigators looking specifically at technology-related crimes.
The force has also developed a 'digital toolkit' to provide training and resources on how to spot digital coercive control.
Over the past few years, Cumbria Police has seized surveillance devices and hidden cameras disguised as everyday items such as vanity mirrors or USB sticks disguised as car keys.
How can you protect yourself?
One of the most troubling aspects of this type of abuse is that some people do not realise that it is happening to them.
Perpetrators can download spyware and surveillance apps onto their partner's phones without their knowledge, especially if the perpetrator is controlling their partner's access to their phone.
However, there is support and advice available through any of the resources below if you believe you might be at risk.
Domestic Abuse Advice and Support:
Refuge
Refuge supports more than 6,000 clients on any one day, helping them rebuild their lives and overcome many different forms of violence and abuse.
They have a step-by-step guide online as well as an interactive tool about how to secure your phone if you suspect technology-facilitated abuse is happening to you.
If you, or someone you care about, is experiencing domestic abuse, you can call The National Domestic Abuse Helpline on 0808 2000 247.
The Revenge Porn Helpline
The Revenge Porn Helpline supports all adult victims of intimate image abuse living in the UK. This includes those who have had private sexual images shared without consent, threatened to be shared without consent, or taken without consent. We also provide advice and information to those targeted by sextortion and webcam blackmail.
If you have been a victim of intimate image abuse, a helpline practitioner can give you advice and support. The number is 0345 6000 459.
Or you can send an email or online live chat.
Women's Aid
Women's Aid is the national charity working to end domestic abuse against women and children. They have been at the forefront of shaping and coordinating responses to domestic violence and abuse through practice for more than 45 years.
Freedom Project
The Freedom Project is a free domestic abuse charity based in West Cumbria, working with victims, perpetrators and children suffering from trauma and effects of domestic and sexual abuse.
ManKind:
The Mankind Initiative is the principal, expert and specialist charity in the UK focussing on male victims of domestic abuse.
The charity collaborates and works in close partnership with other organisations and practitioners to support these victims too. It was the first in Great Britain to support male victims.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I fear I'll be killed every day on streets where Yorkshire Ripper prowled for prostitutes… but there's no way out
I fear I'll be killed every day on streets where Yorkshire Ripper prowled for prostitutes… but there's no way out

The Sun

time20 minutes ago

  • The Sun

I fear I'll be killed every day on streets where Yorkshire Ripper prowled for prostitutes… but there's no way out

HALF a century after the Yorkshire Ripper's reign of terror, sex workers are still working the same danger-plagued streets - and fear every night could be their last. Just a stone's throw from where evil Peter Sutcliffe prowled for victims, women ply their trade to punters in Bradford, West Yorkshire. 12 The city's deprived Manningham area remains a gritty red-light district almost five decades after serial killer Sutcliffe first struck. Three of his 13 known murder victims came from Bradford, and the women who still work the patch tell The Sun that the Ripper's shadow has never lifted. 'Nothing has changed' Mum-of-three Sarah, 30, said: "Fifty years on, what's changed? Nothing. "It's still really dangerous to be out on the streets. You don't know whose car you're getting into. "You don't know if you're going home at the end of the night. You don't know if you're going to end up in a hospital. "Every time I get into a car, I don't know if I'm coming back out." Sutcliffe lived just north of Lumb Lane in Bradford's red-light district, where he would often drive around watching the women working the streets. Desperate to lose his virginity, he was tricked out of £5 by a sex worker, and in a fit of rage, returned with a brick in a sock - only to attack the wrong woman by mistake. Experts believe it was on these streets that the violent, troubled Sutcliffe transformed into the Yorkshire Ripper. Patricia Atkinson, 32, was Sutcliffe's fourth victim but the first to be slain in Bradford, in 1977. The sex worker met Peter in Lumb Lane before being killed with a hammer in her flat on Oak Avenue. The long-derelict block of flats - now a haven for antisocial behaviour - remains frozen in time as a haunting reminder of the Ripper. Young mum Yvonne Pearson, 21, was battered with a hammer in 1978. Her body was hidden under an old sofa on a grassy embankment just streets from her home, not far from Lumb Lane. The Ripper's third Bradford victim was 20-year-old student Barbara Leach, whose murder in 1979 displayed how Sutcliffe's violence extended beyond prostitutes. 12 12 12 12 The lorry driver was for years able to carry on his brutal reign of terror in part because police attitudes saw sex workers as dispensable and only took the case seriously once "innocent young girls" had been killed. Sarah, who has worked the streets since age 14 after being groomed and hooked on drugs, accused police of similar failings today. Her aunt Shelley Armitage, 31, was one of three sex workers butchered by self-proclaimed Crossbow Cannibal Stephen Griffiths in 2010. The monster, who used power tools to dismember victims, revered and meticulously studied the methods of Sutcliffe. 'Cops saw us as dispensable' Sarah said: 'I've been sexually assaulted, beaten, robbed so many times. You tell the police - they don't do nothing. So you stop reporting it. What's the point? "They don't care. They never have." "I'm not a bad person. People think us prostitutes, we're thieves, we're liars, we're horrible, we're nasty, but we're not. We're really not. We're just human beings that are lost. "I didn't choose this life for myself. People think we just woke up one day and thought we'd become prostitutes and get hooked on drugs. "No-one wants to do what we do for £30 a go. There's no pleasure in it, there's money in it. "We just scrape by," Another sex worker, who asked not to be identified, said the fear of violence remained constant. She said: "I grew up learning about the Ripper. The first car that I ever got in, I was s***scared. "And, you know what, to this day, 20 years later I still get that feeling. "It's a constant fear every day that I could be the next victim. "I'm dying to get out of it. I'm done with this. I'm sick of it." During Sutcliffe's killing spree, women's groups accused police of institutional sexism. I've been sexually assaulted, beaten, robbed so many times. You tell the police - they don't do nothing. So you stop reporting it Sarah, 30 Some victims' families were even told their loved ones had 'brought it on themselves' by working as prostitutes. The term 'non-prostitute victim' was shockingly used to distinguish Barbara Leach from others. Tracy Browne, who was bludgeoned with a hammer in Silsden, Yorkshire, in 1975, was ignored by police who doubted her story because her profile as a 14-year-old schoolgirl did not fit with senior officers' theory about the killer's motivation. The brutal attack was not filed as a Ripper assault until Sutcliffe confessed to police in Broadmoor prison in 1992. In his disturbing confessional, Sutcliffe admitted: 'I saw this Tracy Browne. She didn't look 15, she looked 19 or 20. She were all dressed up. She were walking slowly up this lane. 'I thought, 'Oh, she's probably one of these prostitutes' because I had it in my mind Silsden must be full of prostitutes. 'Anyway, I hit her with a branch or something, didn't really injure her, and threw her over a wall. I climbed over and I was thinking of bumping her off and this voice said, 'Stop, stop. It's a mistake'.' Ms Browne, 62, said: 'Sutcliffe was practising on me and as his cockiness increased, his crimes became more heinous. "All his victims were real woman with real lives and real families. 'They deserve to be remembered for who they were." That same disbelief shown from authorities is still part of life in Bradford, say the women who work those streets today. Ms Hollins added: "People think we're thieves, we're liars, we're horrible, we're nasty, but we're not. "We're really not. We're just human beings that are lost." It is feared the Ripper, who died of Covid in 2020, was behind a shocking tally of unsolved cases that have remained dormant for decades. A report after he was handed 20 life sentences in 1981 found that Sutcliffe could have been responsible for a further 13 offences. Cases linked to the Ripper include Mo Lea, who almost had her spinal cord severed as he pinned her to the ground and assaulted her with a sharpened screwdriver. Mo, 65, who was attacked in Leeds in 1980, warned that without real action the killings of Sutcliffe and Griffiths could be repeated. She said: "I've always said if these victims had been men, lessons would have been learned. At the time in the 70 and 80s, women were deemed as second class citizens. "And to this day, I still think that is the case. "I do honestly deeply believe that there is still misogyny in the police and lessons have not been learned after all these years." 12 NOBODY TALKS ABOUT HIM HERE A report after Sutcliffe was handed 20 life sentences in 1981 found that he could have been responsible for a further 13 offences. The 1982 Byford report, made public in 2006, said: "We feel it is highly improbable that the crimes in respect of which Sutcliffe has been charged and convicted are the only ones attributable to him." It was revealed in 2017 that police interviewed Sutcliffe in jail about 16 unsolved attacks but they did not quiz him about any murders. No charges were ever brought. In 2020, West Yorkshire Police apologised for the "language, tone and terminology" used in the 70s to describe Ripper victims. Force Chief Constable John Robins said the language used at the time was "as wrong then as it is now". He insisted that the force's approach to investigations was now "wholly victim-focused". By Owen Scott Wilma McCann Wilma was Peter's first victim, whom he murdered on October 20, 1975. The mum-of-four was reportedly seen leaving her home at 7:30pm, before heading to a pub for a night out with some friends. She is believed to have been picked up by Peter in his car, who then killed her in the Prince Philip Playing Fields just five minutes away from her house. Emily Jackson Emily Jackson was just 42-years-old when she was murdered by Peter on January 20th, 1976. She was working as a part-time sex worker when Peter drove her to an area near Manor Street Industrial Estate. Like Wilma, she was killed by a hammer and then stabbed with a screwdriver. Emily was then found by a workman the next day. Irene Richardson Like Emily, Irene was a sex worker who was killed with a hammer by Peter but her death came almost a year after Peter had claimed his second victim. She was a mum-of-three who was last seen near the Gaiety Pub, which was the same pub that Peter had kidnapped Emily. Irene was killed on February 5, 1977, in Soldier's Field before being found the next morning by a jogger. Patricia Atkinson Patricia was Peter's fourth victim, but the first to be killed in his hometown of Bradford. This forced the police to consider that the killer may be operating in a larger area than Leeds. Patricia, known by friends as Tina, met Peter in the Red Light District before being killed with a hammer in her flat on Oak Avenue. Jayne MacDonald Jayne was just 16-years-old when she became Peter's youngest victim. She had been working as a shop assistant in Grandways Supermarket in Leeds before her death on June 26, 1977. Jayne was returning from a night out when Peter followed her home and killed her. Her body was found by a group of school children the next morning, who came across her body in the playground. Jean Jordan Jean was Peter's first victim to be killed outside of West Yorkshire. He met Jean in Moss Side, Manchester, on October 1, 1977, before killing her. She was found eight days later by a local worker named Bruce Jones, who fans of the show Coronation Street may recognise as Les Battersby. Yvonne Pearson Peter's crime spree continued into 1978, when he murdered 21-year-old prostitute Yvonne Pearson. He killed Yvonne in his home town Bradford, on January 21, leaving her two-year-old Colette and five-month-old Lorraine without a mother. They had been staying with a neighbour on the night that she was driven to a waste ground and killed. Her body was hidden with a sofa and wasn't found until March 26, just over two months after her disappearance. Helen Rytka By the time of Helen's death, Peter was being referred to by the media as 'The Yorkshire Ripper'. He murdered Helen on January 31, 1978, just over a week after he murdered Yvonne. Helen was only 18-years-old when she was killed in a timber yard but it took days for her body to eventually be found. She had been working as a prostitute at the time of her death, just like her twin sister Rita. Vera Millward Vera lived in Hulme in Manchester, where Peter was only known to have struck once. She was a mother-of-seven who had serious health problems, including only having one functional lung. Vera was killed just outside Manchester Royal Infirmary, before her body was found the next day. She had left home to meet a regular client, but instead got into Peter's car on May 16, 1978. Josephine Whitaker Josephine worked as a clerk in Halifax, before Peter killed her with a screwdriver on April 4, 1979. She was the tenth person to be killed by The Yorkshire Ripper, but her case was another turning point for the police. A boot print, matching the ones left at Patricia Atkinson and Emily Jackson's murders, was found next to her body which confirmed that the killer had struck again after a year of silence. Barbara Leach Barbara was a student at Bradford University and was just 20-years-old when Peter murdered her. She left a shared home belonging to some friends in Grove Terrace on the night of September 1, 1979, when Peter began following her. Barbara was then dragged into an alley and stabbed, but it took two days for her to be reported as missing. Marguerite Walls Marguerite left her office in Leeds later than usual on August 20, 1980, since she was preparing to go on holiday the next day. The civil servant walked home through Farsley, which she knew was a brightly-lit way home. However, unbeknownst to her, Peter had begun following her. After killing her with a hammer and rope, Peter hid her body in the grounds of Claremont House where she was later discovered by some gardeners. Jacqueline Hill Peter's final known victim was Jacqueline Hill, who was a student at Leeds University. The Yorkshire Ripper murdered her just 100 yards from her flat, with the hammer and screwdriver that now typified his crimes. Her body was found a day later.

Hundreds of police officers accused of domestic violence keep their jobs
Hundreds of police officers accused of domestic violence keep their jobs

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Hundreds of police officers accused of domestic violence keep their jobs

Figures obtained by the Mirror revealed just 69 constables lost their jobs or voluntarily quit over abuse allegations between 2022 and 2024 - despite 1,240 complaints being logged Over a thousand police officers were accused of domestic violence in the last three years – but hardly any got the chop. ‌ Just 69 constables lost their jobs or voluntarily quit over abuse allegations, despite 1,240 complaints being logged. Some forces with a slew of serious reports failed to sack a single officer. ‌ Our figures, obtained under Freedom of Information laws, came as the government pledged £50 million to tackle violence against women and girls. The Metropolitan Police, Britain's largest force, recorded 523 abuse allegations against staff between 2022 and 2024, yet only 53 got the boot. Across the other 28 forces that responded to our requests, 16 officers were dismissed over the same period. ‌ Twenty Hertfordshire officers were accused of domestic violence but all kept their jobs. Of the 14 complaints logged by West Midlands police, just one was asked to undertake 'reflective practice'. In Bedfordshire, 22 people were accused but only three were fired or voluntarily resigned. Several forces failed to provide figures so the true number of allegations is likely far higher. Last night Ellie Butt, of domestic abuse charity Refuge, said: 'It is essential that police handling of violence against women and girls is scrutinised but this alone isn't enough. Labour committed to the suspension of all officers accused of domestic abuse or sexual offences pending an investigation. ‌ 'The government must make good on this manifesto pledge as a matter of urgency. We keenly await further details of plans to improve police vetting, which is integral to rooting out police perpetrators, protecting survivors, and restoring police confidence in the justice system as a whole. Women's confidence in the justice system is currently at a crisis point and we continue to see abuse perpetrated by police officers themselves.' A string of abusive officers have lost their jobs in recent years. PC Amarjit Dhallu, who worked with vulnerable children, was dismissed from Kent police in 2021 over allegations he strangled a former partner and hit her with a belt. Detective sergeant Paul Whitehurst, who worked in Warwickshire Police 's anti-corruption unit, was jailed after admitting five charges of beating an ex-girlfriend. ‌ A Met police spokesperson said: 'We are committed to rooting out officers and staff whose behaviour falls below the high standards expected. We have stepped up our commitment to tackling allegations of domestic abuse against our officers and staff, as we understand the heavy impact of such offending on victim-survivors. The National Police Chiefs' Council added: 'We need the strongest possible response to police perpetrators of domestic abuse that protects victims and gives the public confidence in policing. The government scheme announced last Thursday will see perpetrators offered one-to-one support to help them come off drugs and alcohol and resolve their personal issues. Home Office minister Jess Phillips said the money would give victims a 'better and safer future'.

Bad Sisters star's 'breathless whodunnit' that had fans 'hooked' now streaming on Disney Plus
Bad Sisters star's 'breathless whodunnit' that had fans 'hooked' now streaming on Disney Plus

Daily Mirror

timea day ago

  • Daily Mirror

Bad Sisters star's 'breathless whodunnit' that had fans 'hooked' now streaming on Disney Plus

Bad Sisters star Sarah Greene's beloved 2019 crime drama Dublin Murders has just landed on the streamer Bad Sisters star Sarah Greene's "breathless whodunnit" that had fans "hooked" is now streaming on Disney Plus. ‌ Sarah gained acclaim as Bibi Garvey in Sharon Horgan's hit Apple TV+ show, and is also celebrated for her role in another intense Irish drama. ‌ Adapted from Tana French's acclaimed Dublin Murder Squad books, the show sees Sarah's character, Cassie Maddox, and her partner Rob Reilly (Killian Scott) delve into the chilling murder of a young girl on the outskirts of Dublin. ‌ For Rob, the investigation dredges up haunting memories, as he was the only child to emerge from a harrowing event in same woods, where two of his friends disappeared without a trace. As Rob battles with his buried traumas, the tension mounts, casting shadows over their quest for truth, reports Belfast Live. ‌ Alongside Sarah and Killian, the series also stars Michael D'Arcy, Tom Vaughan-Lawlor, Eugene O'Hare, Moe Dunford, Ellie O'Halloran, Niall Jordan, and Ian Kenny. Game of Thrones star Conleth Hill also appears in a guest role. Initially broadcast on BBC One, RTÉ One, and Starz back in 2019, Dublin Murders found its first streaming home on BBC iPlayer. Now, Disney+ has acquired all eight episodes for UK viewers to binge-watch. If you haven't got a subscription to the streamer yet, there are three different plans to choose from, including with ads, standard and premium options. ‌ The Disney+ standard with ads plan is usually £4.99 per month, whereas the standard plan removes the ads and costs £8.99 a month, or £89.90 for the entire year. If you'd prefer to go down the premium route, it would set you back £12.99 a month or £129.90 a year, and allows users to stream on up to four devices at the same time. ‌ Dublin Murders was met with critical acclaim following its debut, with The Guardian hailing it "a breathless whodunnit" and praising its "sophisticated and slickly satisfying" storyline. The show's viewers also shared their praise on various social media platforms. "I absolutely loved this mind-twisting psychological thriller. The characters are flawed and have dark pasts which interweave beautifully with the main plot. Well worth the binge-watch," one person wrote on IMDb. Another added: "This gets you hooked from the first episode. One of the best shows on TV in a long time. Brilliant cast." A third fan similarly said: "I found this show to not only be a gripping mystery, but also a realistic study on PTSD and a detective crumbling under the pressure of working in such a traumatising field. One of the best crime shows out there." Dublin Murders is available to stream on Disney+

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store