Audigent's cookie-free journey to adtech success
Founded by: Shelton Mercer, Jon Gosier, Brian Brater, Elizabeth Hitchcock and Drew Stein
Year founded: 2016 in Philadelphia
Headquarters: New York, NY
Sector: Advertising services
Funding and valuation: Acquired by Experian in December 2024
Key ecosystem partners: Time Warner, Ben Franklin Technology Partners
In 2016, Shelton Mercer and his co-founders crammed into a tiny office in a Philly brownstone — 10 developers, hackers and software engineers sharing 500 square feet — to create an advertising technology under the name Audigent.
A dozen years later, the startup, which specializes in online advertising without cookie tracking, would be acquired by global data analytics company Experian, with a reported valuation of between $200 million and $250 million, after raising millions in funding along the way.
'I have the privilege of having Audigent be my fourth exit from a company,' Mercer said at the 2025 Technical.ly Builders Conference during the panel 'Case Studies on Entrepreneurship Access.'
Even with Mercer's experience, Audigent's rise took time, hard work and a lot of due diligence.
No cookies, no problem
Audigent's framework for advertisers and publishers allows customers to target their key demographics, as all adtech tools do. The difference with Audigent, now headquartered in NYC, is that it prioritizes the privacy of its potential customers by never using cookies (those small files that websites use to track users' online behavior). Instead, it uses data from partners, like music streamers, media companies and sports sites.
In 2019, Warner Music Group (WMG) invested in Audigent during its Series A funding round, alongside Raised In Space and Gao Xiaosong. It was a strategic investment totaling $4 million, aimed at improving digital advertising within the music industry.
'We need to see, as a value for society, entrepreneurship as a way to get people to the next level and the next strata of wealth generation for their families.'
Shelton Mercer, Audigent
To get there, Audigent underwent the long due diligence process with investor and economic development organization Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania (BFTP), something Mercer discussed at the Builders Conference with co-panelist Scott Nissenbaum, BFTP's president and CEO.
'Our process at Ben Franklin is designed like boot camp,' Nissenbaum said. 'No one says, 'That sergeant at boot camp was so nice.' That's not our job.'
Mercer admitted he was initially hesitant about going through BFTP's 6-month process of intense scrutiny. But those six months of 'kicking, clawing, scratching, screaming,' as Mercer put it, led to that successful 60-minute meeting with WMG, on top of a $1 million investment from BFTP itself.
Wealth-building through entrepreneurship
Both Mercer and Nissenbaum share a vision for Philadelphia, and regions like it, where people from all kinds of backgrounds and walks of life can turn entrepreneurship into generational wealth.
'It doesn't just have to be the Silicon Valley, the New York, the Chicago, the LA founders or even founders who are fortunate to have partners like Scott and Ben Franklin to accelerate our company and the many other investors that helped us,' Mercer said. 'We need to see, as a value for society, entrepreneurship as a way to get people to the next level and the next strata of wealth generation for their families.'
BFTP, Nissenbaum said, continues to value entrepreneurship as a driver for social change and advancement for groups underrepresented in tech.
'I think 46% of our portfolio has racial diversity in the C-suite, 56% has gender diversity,' he said.
Key strategies for engaging with economic development investors
Here are a few key things up-and-coming startups can learn from Audigent's journey:
Be prepared for the grind: Ben Franklin's process is thorough. It's not a quick check-in; it's a deep dive. See that as a good thing — it forces you to solidify your plan and address potential weaknesses while building a bridge to other investors.
Surround yourself with talent: Mercer credits Audigent's success to its strong team, with each bringing unique skill sets to the table. As Nissenbaum pointed out, most entrepreneurs are good at one thing. You need to fill in the gaps with people who excel in other areas.
Embrace the ecosystem: Don't try to do it alone. Organizations like Ben Franklin and other ecosystem orgs exist to support startups. They provide resources, connections, and, sometimes, tough love.
Don't be afraid of due diligence: While long, it helps you prepare for major deals.
Have patience: If an exit is your goal, don't expect it to happen right away.
Audigent's story shows what can happen when vision, the right support system and a lot of patience come together.
As Nissenbaum said, 'Nine years later, we're celebrating an overnight success.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Technical.ly
22-06-2025
- Technical.ly
Will there be more software developers working next year?
For the first time, the number of software jobs in the US has stagnated. This coincides with the broader trend of lower labor force participation across sectors. Previously, recent college grads always had a lower unemployment rate than the general workforce. That has flipped — now recent grads have a notably higher unemployment rate. Societal shifts because of new technology tend to be more noticeable over a decade than over a single year. Is AI different? Brian Brackeen says there will be fewer software developers working in the United States a year from now. I call bullshit. We're making a bet of it: Loser has to wait in line to buy the other a cheesesteak from South Philadelphia's beloved Angelo's — since we'll both be in that city for a tech-inspired celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence around the next Builders Conference (Here's coverage of our most recent one). Contrary to what I say to my friend's face, Brackeen is no fool. The proven entrepreneur–turned–provocateur venture capitalist has a point. Two big changes are hitting software development at the same time, making it difficult to distinguish between them: Higher interest rates have chilled speculative tech building, and new artificial intelligence tools are creating new efficiencies. Further complicating the trend, pandemic habits boosted international tech hiring, and the decades-old digital transformation appears to be aging. Expensive software developers seem an ideal role for executives to replace. In 2024, the American economy added new software developer jobs at the slowest year-over-year rate on record. All this comes in a strange macroeconomic moment. Take the first quarter of 2025: Tech hiring didn't just stall — it retreated. Software developer job postings were still falling even long after the pandemic-fueled bonanza had faded, a Wall Street Journal analysis found. Tech unemployment climbed above the national average, peaking at 5.7% in February. Other than robotics, most current AI excitement is concentrated in knowledge work, something college graduates specialize in. (The plumber I once worked for used to say that getting a college degree was a way to buy a chance to work in air-conditioning). So as economists research whether AI is affecting job prospects, they're focusing on degree holders. A real change is underway. For decades, the unemployment rate for recent college graduates was almost always lower than the overall unemployment rate. Following the Great Recession, unemployment peaked in June 2010 at 9.5%; It was bad for recent college graduates too, but that rate never got above 7.8%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank. The same thing happened in the recessions of 1990 and 2001. But those figures have flipped in recent years — and the gap is widening. The first quarter of 2025 ended with an unemployment rate for recent college graduates that was almost one-and-a-half times higher (5.8% versus 4% for all workers). Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees this week that over the next few years, the online commerce giant 'will reduce [its] total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Any move toward the end of knowledge work bodes poorly for software development, an especially well-paid (and occasionally rote) trade. Fewer people are working — but not (yet) because of AI This coincides with a broader trend: Labor force participation remains down from pre-pandemic levels. A recent explainer from the Federal Reserve underlined the stakes: Either we grow our economy by improving productivity or by adding more workers. With aging demographics and early retirements, we've been trending in the opposite direction. That drop isn't theoretical. There are 1.7 million fewer Americans in the workforce now than in February 2020, per the US Chamber of Commerce. That means many jobs, including tech roles, are going unfilled. So software developers are harder to come by. But I'm still betting we'll have more of them by next year. Why? For one, the trends don't line up with AI breakthroughs. The unemployment rate for recent college grads crested above the overall rate way back in 2018 – though the gulf has gotten larger. Something else is happening. Next, pricing pressure can create surprising outcomes. Often called the Jevons Paradox, falling costs in something (like the price of building software) can boost demand for it (resulting in more need). The time required for any given software development can shrink, even as the need for people to do adjacent work can grow. Job titles can change — witness the decline of ' computer programmer ' — and job descriptions too. But software skills will remain in-demand for the foreseeable future. The third reason I took the bet is the maxim credited to Bill Gates: We tend to overestimate what we can achieve in a year and underestimate what we can in a decade. (Note: I was less sure about taking Brian up on a bet over 5 years, but jumped at the bet for a year out — check the video here.) Early this year, University of Oxford researchers published a paper documenting the impact automation has had on language translators. It's changing the job and shifting the skills needed, but certain tasks remain stubbornly human. Will AI be different from other tech advancements? No question getting a job, especially a first job, in tech is harder than it has been. The leader of one coding bootcamp told me there's been 'a collapse,' and they're feverishly adapting their model. At present, that is more to do with higher-interest rates and general macroeconomic trends, with AI as window dressing. Focused on the medium term, boosters remain bullish that the growth in tech apprenticeship will continue. Brackeen's side of the bet is that AI is different from past technologies, and that the speed will sneak up on us. AI legend Geoffrey Hinton recently argued the same. My side of the bet is that even if this is right, it will happen slower than we think, and that titles like software developer will adapt, and therefore grow, for at least a while longer. We'll settle it over cheesesteaks. See you in Philadelphia next May.
Technical.ly
10-06-2025
- Technical.ly
Meet the ESHIP Alliance: New name for the national ecosystem building movement
Andy Stoll has one t-shirt, loads of post-it notes and a new job that's a lot like his old job. Stoll is the founding executive director of what is now called the ESHIP Alliance, a nonprofit startup that announced its new name last week in Indianapolis at the Global Entrepreneurship Congress (GEC). The GEC is a global conference organized by the Global Entrepreneurship Network (or GEN, which is lovingly pronounced like the name Jen by its many admirers). Stoll made his announcement alongside GEN founder and CEO Jonathan Ortmans, and right before Right to Start's Victor Hwang, another entrepreneurship booster with his own big announcement. They're just three of a constellation of groups that have spun off from the Kauffman Foundation 's decades-long investment in entrepreneurship. Last year, Kauffman announced plans to narrow its focus to economic opportunity in its hometown of Kansas City, winding down its national programming funding. Stoll joked that his ESHIP Alliance could be the younger sister to GEC, which makes the Kauffman Foundation mom and dad, and Hwang a kind of attentive uncle — with plenty of cousins and lots of folksy Midwestern charm to go around. Catching the ecosystem-building bug Stoll was a local organizer in Iowa first, working on startups and gatherings in the early 2000s and 2010s. Hwang, once an influential Kauffman executive, gave Stoll the language to describe what he and thousands of others were doing. 'Victor told me: What you're doing is the future of place-based economic development,' Stoll said. 'And I said: I'm doing the what of what?' In 2012, Hwang published ' The Rainforest,' a widely cited book on local economic development, and in 2017 hired Stoll. Together they produced Kauffman's Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Building Playbook, which put institutional heft behind rag-tag community efforts flourishing around the country. From 2017-2019, Stoll was emcee and organizer of annual Kauffman-backed ESHIP Summits. Hundreds came from around the country to discuss rebuilding their local economies from the ground up: some were there as part of their jobs, many others were not. But most talk fondly and passionately about being part of something that seemed overlooked then and is now taken more seriously. Stoll and his team would stock up on colorful post-it notes, markers and engagement activities. As a 2023 report on the origins of inclusive entrepreneurship tracked, many grassroots efforts to reshape local economies took hold after the Great Recession and steadily grew during the 2010s. One of the most enduring is the 'entrepreneurial ecosystem building' that is sometimes called ' place-based economic development ' among industry insiders. Their shared and primary push: state and local policymakers and civic leaders should put entrepreneurship at the center of their strategies for economic growth, opportunity and development. Like scripture passages, these believers cite studies showing that new businesses create effectively all net new jobs, and that each 1% increase in entrepreneurship correlates with 2% declines in poverty. The ecosystem metaphor teaches that big institutions are vital, but must prioritize the many differently sized, aged and types of organizations that overlap to make an economy. NRPs: National ecosystem resource providers Stoll is friendly, chatty, and millennial nerd chic enough to be among the movement's leaders, backed by the influence and checkbook of the Kauffman Foundation. Over a decade-plus, from an early Startup Champions summit to SXSW activations and beyond, I've seen Stoll at his most comfortable in a t-shirt, effusing folksy modesty while cracking self-effacing jokes and serving as a community historian of the work, preferably leading an exercise on collaboration with post-it notes. Pushed out of the comfortable confines of the Kauffman Foundation, Stoll is now stitching together a coalition so this on-the-ground change can last. Among his partners is Black-entrepreneurship focused Forward Cities, which also got its start with Kauffman funding and has been long led by Stoll's years-long collaborator Fay Horwitt. Together this week, they introduced the ESHIP Alliance's renewed focus to a network of so-called national ecosystem resource providers (NRPs) — organizations that address needs common to many ecosystems or state and local entrepreneurial communities. 'At its core, this alliance is about strengthening the profession of ecosystem building across the United States,' Stoll said in a GEC session. 'We need entrepreneurship, we need ecosystems, but we need to center equity so anyone, anywhere who wants to be an entrepreneur has the opportunity to participate.' The alliance will gather these resource providers and help advance and formalize 'ecosystem building' as a discipline for state and local governments to embrace. Events, training material and policy positions will help. As part of that work the ESHIP Alliance launched the ESHIP Commons, a social network intended to help ecosystem builders connect, share ideas and find resources. What's next for the ESHIP Alliance Turns out Technically itself is an NRP, so I was at one of Stoll's tables at GEC — years since the last time I saw him in action. On stage, he guided about a hundred NRP leaders through a series of exercises to identify the next set of challenges and potential solutions for ecosystem building. Much to attendee amusement, Stoll's presentation included a photo of him from years ago wearing the same 'Mass Collaboration' t-shirt he wore this week, signaling that while much has changed, many faces haven't. Horrowit was up next with an exercise that cleverly required attendees to never reference funding as a problem. As she said, 'That's a problem for everyone, give us something new.' That let us focus on more specific obstacles to advance the work of centering entrepreneurship in local policymaking and economic development. Good for an exercise, but what's next? Stoll, like this conversation, has graduated from the Kauffman nest (the group was initially called the Ecosystem Builders Leadership Network, so the rebrand gives it a fresh start). Entrepreneurship rates have surged post pandemic, led by women and people of color. That's caught the attention of serious state and local leaders. Stoll, Hwang and so many others have for years advocated for a bigger stage, and now they have it. Stoll donned a dress shirt to get on the GEC main stage and announce his organization's new name. He seemed more at home the next day in his t-shirt, pushing all of us who support local entrepreneurship and innovation efforts across the country. Said Stoll: 'We have who we need in the room.'
Technical.ly
08-06-2025
- Technical.ly
Most companies don't IPO, so here's how to plan for your likely exit
The most important day of an entrepreneur's journey might be the one when it ends. The big question: Will it end on your terms? That's the dilemma behind most startup exits, whether they take place through a merger, acquisition or an initial public offering (IPO). Experts put that distinction front and center during the 2025 Builders Conference session titled 'M&A or IPO: What is Your Company's Destination?' Moderated by Mike Ravenscroft of the University System of Maryland's Maryland Momentum Fund, the conversation featured attorney Kim Klayman of Ballard Spahr and Alexis Grant, founder of the M&A-focused newsletter They Got Acquired. Together, they laid out a candid, often under-explored roadmap of what founders really need to know about exiting — and why waiting until it's too late to plan is a mistake. 'Think about it early,' Grant said. 'Gives you more options.' The numbers are clear, Ravenscroft noted: Only a tiny fraction of companies ever go public, and even among VC-backed firms, IPOs are rare. The vast majority of exits happen via mergers and acquisitions (M&A). The panelists agreed that the perception gap around what makes an exit 'successful' can obscure the reality of its true impact. A $7 million sale might be life-changing for a bootstrapped founder with majority ownership. But if that same company had raised venture capital at a high valuation, the founder might walk away with little or nothing. 'If someone raises $5 million and they sell for $5 million, they probably didn't get any money,' Grant said. That disconnect is even more stark during economic downturns or slower capital markets. Klayman pointed to the increase in smaller companies acquiring other small firms — sometimes simply to pad revenue, not gain technology. But these all-stock or acqui-hire (in which a company gets acquired for their talent) deals can mask another story: Sometimes, the best-case scenario is simply survival. 'The reality is most companies end up in an M&A situation, even if it's a multi-generational business,' Klayman said. 'It does end up a lot of times in an M&A transaction if there is no succession plan.' The hardest parts that too few talk about Asked what founders need to prepare for, both panelists were unequivocal: The due diligence process is brutal. 'For many [founders], due diligence ends up being a second job,' Grant said, adding: 'You also have to keep running the business, and you want to run it in a way that performance does not drop, because that's the worst thing that can happen when you're going through a deal.' That's why both she and Klayman emphasized the need to 'get your house in order' — and do so early. From knowing who owns the IP to having clean cap tables and documented promises of equity shares, small oversights can kill a deal late in the game. 'I have actually seen one deal die because the whole company was built on this one piece of software, and that's what the buyer wanted,' Klayman said. 'And it was like, a software developer did it 25 years earlier, and they didn't paper it because it wasn't that important. And the deal just died.' She advised founders to use tools like Carta or diligence-prep software to identify red flags before a transaction is even on the table. Attorneys can help, but so can platforms that flag missing consents or unsigned option grants. 'Being organized is like 95% of the battle,' Klayman said. The stories behind the headlines Of course, learning these details can be difficult when many companies don't discuss them soon after an M&A takes place. The panel also pulled back the curtain on how mergers and acquisitions are framed in public — and how different the internal reality can be. Grant, whose company profiles founder-led exits, said PR statements often overhype vague synergies and downplay job losses or underwhelming returns. She added that sellers are often far more candid a year or two post-sale. 'Most of the stories we write, they're usually at least six months after the acquisition has taken place,' Grant said. 'The seller is more open to sharing real details at that point.' Klayman agreed: Sometimes the announcements make it seem like someone got a bunch of money, when usually the investors, even if they're paid first, 'are getting like 10 cents on the dollar,' she said. 'I don't think that people want those types of transactions to happen,' she said, 'but when they do happen, it takes effort and, I think, actually responsible founders to make it happen.' All emphasized that outcomes must be evaluated in context. Founders may sell to give their team stability, find a new role or offload a company responsibly instead of shutting down. What matters, they said, is alignment between a founder's goals and their investors' expectations. The closing message to founders was clear: Plan for your endgame from the beginning. Think through potential paths — and not just the flashy ones. Ask investors what their expectations are. Build a network that includes not just mentors and peers, but service providers who understand exits and won't charge you just to ask questions. 'If you don't know what success looks like, you're going to be poor no matter what,' Ravenscroft said, 'because you won't know it if you get it.'
