
Mehul Choksi challenges ED bid to tag him fugitive offender
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Diamond merchant Mehul Choksi , a key accused in the $2 billion Punjab National Bank fraud case, has moved the Bombay High Court seeking dismissal of the Enforcement Directorate 's (ED) application for declaring him a fugitive economic offender (FEO).Since Choksi is currently detained in a prison in Belgium where the police arrested him on India's request, he is already in the constructive custody of Indian investigating agencies and hence the proceedings should be dropped against him, his counsel Vijay Aggarwal argued in the court Monday.An FEO tag is necessary for the ED to attach his foreign assets.Choksi and his nephew, Nirav Modi , are the main accused in the PNB case being probed by the ED and CBI. It has been over a year since the ED filed an application before the court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act seeking to declare the two accused fugitive economic offenders. However, arguments are yet to commence owing to various pleas filed by Modi and Choksi in various courts contesting the ED application.A court at Antwerp that had ordered the arrest of Choksi following India's request for his extradition, held that the charges of fraud, criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of trust levelled against him were punishable in Belgium, according to court documents accessed by ET. However, the charge of causing evidence of the crime to disappear cannot be tried as it isn't punishable in Belgium, the court held in its ruling on November 25 last year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
US bill proposes 500% tariff on India, China over Russia business ties
A proposed US Senate bill, backed by President Donald Trump, could impose 500% tariffs on countries, including India and China, that continue trading with Russia, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said in an interview with ABC to ABC News, Graham stated, "If you're buying products from Russia, and you're not helping Ukraine, then there's a 500% tariff on your products coming into the United States. India and China buy 70% of Putin's oil. They keep his war machine going."advertisementThe bill is reportedly expected to be introduced in August, marking a significant escalation in US efforts to isolate Russia economically. If enacted, the bill could severely impact India and China, the largest buyers of discounted Russian crude. For India, the move also risks tariffs on exports like pharmaceuticals, textiles, and IT is a major buyer of Russian oil, and imported EUR 49 billion worth of crude oil in the third year of the Ukraine invasion. Traditionally, India sourced its oil from the Middle East, but began importing a large volume of oil from Russia soon after the invasion of Ukraine in February development also comes on the heels of the much-expected India-US bilateral trade agreement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Tuesday that the trade deal is "very close", even as an Indian delegation continued discussions with US officials in Washington after trade talks hit a deadlock over key agricultural demands, sources told India proposed bill, co-sponsored by Graham and Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, reportedly has 84 co-sponsors and aims to pressure nations into halting Russian oil purchases, weakening "Moscow's war economy" and pushing it toward peace negotiations in told ABC News that Trump gave the green light during a golf game. "For the first time yesterday, the President told me I was playing golf with him. He says, 'It's time to move your bill.'"Originally proposed in March, the legislation faced delays after the White House signalled Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration had 'quietly pressured' the Senate to soften the bill by changing mandatory language ("shall") to discretionary ("may").Graham later reportedly proposed a carve-out for countries supporting Ukraine, likely to ease concerns among the US's European allies. "We are going to give President Trump a tool in the toolbox," Graham this bill becomes law, it may alter US's trade relationships with both China and India. Given that the US is India's primary export market, the policy could also trigger substantial economic repercussions and diplomatic tensions.- EndsTune InMust Watch


India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
Officers, not Tom, Dick and Harry: Karnataka High Court to X on Railway's notice
The Karnataka High Court backed the Union government after it told the court that its officers are 'not Tom, Dick and Harry.' This came as X Corp India, the Indian arm of Elon Musk-owned X (formerly Twitter), challenged a Ministry of Railways notice asking the platform to take down a video of a woman driving a car on railway tracks in Advocate KG Raghavan, appearing for X, questioned the legality of the notice. 'What if every Tom, Dick and Harry officer sends notice to me? See how this is being misused,' he argued. He also asked whether posting such videos amounts to unlawful content, adding, 'Dog biting man is not news, but man biting dog is,' as reported by Live General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union of India, objected to the remarks. 'They are officers, not Tom, Dick and Harry. International bodies should not have this arrogance,' he said. He added that no social media company can expect unregulated functioning in India.'They are bound by regulations in all other countries but in India they want this luxury,' he M Nagaprasanna backed the objection and said, 'These are officers of the Union of India. I take objection to this.'advertisementX Corp has sought a declaration that Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act does not empower authorities to block content directly, and that such orders must follow the procedure under Section 69A and its Advocate Aditya Sondhi, appearing for a digital media association, said content creators are affected by takedown orders. But the bench questioned how the association is aggrieved when the dispute is between X and the government. Mehta objected to the intervention, saying, 'Twitter is competent. It does not require external support.'The court posted the matter for final hearing on July 8. It allowed X Corp to amend its petition and include various ministries as parties. The Union government was directed to file its objections.- EndsTune InTrending Reel IN THIS STORY#Karnataka


India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
More interests than just one country: Jaishankar on China factor in India-US ties
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said that it is a "very gross oversimplification" and "even misleading at times" to make the India-US relationship about was responding to a question on how much of the India-US relationship is defined by its stance on China."I think it's a very gross oversimplification to make India-US about China. In fact, it's not just an oversimplification. I think it's even misleading at times," Jaishankar said on Monday during a conversation with Newsweek CEO Dev Pragad at the publication's headquarters at One World Trade Centre near the 9/11 Memorial in He said that the India-US relationship is about "so many other things," noting the large Indian community, which contributes significantly to the US."I think it's been a game-changer. It has got nothing to do with China," he stressed that Washington and Delhi have a very strong economic connect."Look at our trade numbers and look at the relevance of that trade to our respective economies. Look at our technology connect," he said, adding that there is a tendency to point even the defence or security cooperation towards China, but "I ask you to look at the other coast. We work to keep the Arabian Sea safe for global shipping."This is (an) age of oversimplification. I urge you not to fall into that. I think the world is much more nuanced. It's much more multi-causal. We have many more interests than just one country. I would certainly like to believe that the relationship is going well because there is great merit in them," Jaishankar added that there are certain realities of the landscape, and one of them is that the relationship between the US and China is not what it used to be, it has acquired a much sharper competitive edge."Frankly, where we are concerned, we look at these two countries, and each one of them has made up its mind about how it views the other. Obviously, there will be an element of tactics to it. There's a larger strategic view that they have of each other," he said, adding that "we would look quite honestly to see in what way are our interests furthered in this landscape"."I think in many ways, you can see that we have very strong convergences with the United States. At the same time, we are China's largest neighbour. We share a land boundary. We want stable relations with China," he said, adding that Beijing is a very large trade partner as well, even though it is an imbalanced trade."So for us, how to sort of steady the China relationship, create an equilibrium that is fair to us (and) at the same time, how do you work the convergences with the United States and get the most out of it. I mean, that's, frankly, the way we would approach it," he said.- EndsMust Watch