logo
US policymakers may start relying on Trump tariffs for federal revenue

US policymakers may start relying on Trump tariffs for federal revenue

Andrew Duehren
US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government, a new source of revenue for a heavily indebted nation that US policymakers may start to rely on.
As part of his quest to reorder the global trading system, Trump has imposed steep tariffs on America's trading partners, with the bulk of those set to go into effect on August 7. Even before the latest tariffs kick in, revenue from taxes collected on imported goods has grown dramatically so far this year.
Customs duties, along with some excise taxes, generated $152 billion through July, roughly double the $78 billion netted over the same time period last fiscal year, according to Treasury data.
Indeed, Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the United States. Members of his administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed last month, which are expected to cost the government at least $3.4 trillion.
'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labour market.
Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than $2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit.
'I think this is addictive,' said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.'
Trump has long fantasised about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the US away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods.
Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to larger tax increase for them compared to richer Americans.
Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year.
'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official.
'But it's really a political question.' Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Social Security recipients need a PIN from August 18? Here's all details
Will Social Security recipients need a PIN from August 18? Here's all details

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Will Social Security recipients need a PIN from August 18? Here's all details

Will Social Security recipients need a PIN from August 18? The Social Security Administration has reversed a planned policy requiring millions of recipients to obtain a PIN for identity verification. After backlash from advocacy groups and concerns over accessibility, the SSA clarified the PIN will be optional. Fraud prevention remains a focus, with changes to direct deposit also underway. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads SSA Faces Pushback Over PIN Requirement Experts Warned of Accessibility Issues Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads AARP Urges Reconsideration SSA Clarifies PIN Use is Optional Focus on Fraud Prevention Continues Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Direct Deposit Mandate Begins in September Political Tensions and Future Cuts FAQs A recent policy reversal by the Social Security Administration has clarified that a planned requirement for a personal identification number (PIN) will now be optional. The change comes after criticism from advocacy groups and experts who raised concerns about the burden on seniors and people with Social Security Administration (SSA) initially announced that starting August 18, Social Security recipients would need to either go online or visit a field office to obtain a PIN. The PIN would have been necessary to complete tasks like address updates, tax form requests, and claim status to a regulatory filing, the policy aimed to enhance security for recipients. However, the SSA estimated that the change would result in about 3.4 million additional field office visits per Romig from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) raised concerns about the new requirement. She noted that many Social Security recipients live in rural areas or face mobility issues. She argued that the change would cause significant inconvenience and pointed to the lack of public CBPP also highlighted that most recipients live at least one hour away from their nearest SSA office. The group questioned whether the SSA had provided sufficient evidence of fraud that would justify the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) sent a letter to SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano. The letter pointed out that older Americans and people with disabilities may not have access to a computer or internet connection. This would force them to make in-person visits to SSA emphasized the need for accessible alternatives, especially for those who are unable to travel the backlash, the SSA clarified that the PIN feature will not be mandatory. A spokesperson stated that the expanded Secure Authentication Project (SAP) feature was always intended to be who do not wish to use the PIN or who lack a 'my Social Security' account can continue using existing identity verification methods. The SSA added that the customer experience will remain unchanged for those opting regulatory filing has not yet been updated, but the SSA confirmed it plans to amend it soon to reflect the optional nature of the PIN PIN requirement was part of broader fraud prevention efforts by the SSA. In spring, the agency launched anti-fraud phone software to detect suspicious activity. Each year, the SSA receives about 4.5 million phone-based claims, with around 70,000 marked as potentially fraudulent.A previous SSA policy proposal aimed to end identity verification over the phone. Had it been implemented, about six million seniors would have needed to visit SSA offices. That plan was also reversed earlier this major change will take effect on September 30. The U.S. Department of the Treasury will stop issuing paper checks to Social Security recipients. All payments will need to be made through direct deposit or other electronic directive comes from a White House executive order and is expected to save about $750 million annually. The move also aims to reduce fraud related to mailed checks. Around 1.9 million additional field office visits are expected because of this must enroll in direct deposit before the deadline to avoid delays in their Commissioner Frank Bisignano recently responded to criticism from Democratic senators about alleged mismanagement and growing backlogs at the agency. Meanwhile, concerns persist over future Social Security funding, with projections suggesting benefit cuts of more than $18,000 per person if issues are not The SSA confirmed that using the PIN is optional. Recipients can continue to use current methods for identity verification without needing to visit a field who fail to enroll in electronic payments by the deadline may face delays in receiving benefits as paper checks will no longer be issued.

Trump escalates threat level, says more tariff in 24 hours
Trump escalates threat level, says more tariff in 24 hours

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump escalates threat level, says more tariff in 24 hours

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: US President Donald Trump Tuesday threatened to 'very substantially' increase the 25% tariff on imports from India over continued purchases of Russian oil, maintaining his aggressive posture. This comes a day after New Delhi's strong response to comments by him in a similar vein over the past week or so.'India has not been a good trading partner because they do a lot of business with us, but we don't do business with them. So we settled on 25%, but I think I'm going to raise that rate quite substantially in the next 24 hours,' Trump said in an interview to CNBC that was aired on Tuesday evening in India. The US President reiterated his claim that India has the highest tariffs.'They're buying Russian oil and fuelling the war machine. If they are going to do that, I'm not going to be happy,' he said, adding that the main sticking point remained that India's tariffs were too high. 'With India, what people don't like to say is, they have the highest tariffs of anybody.'On Monday, India reacted strongly after Trump threatened substantial tariffs for purchasing Russian oil and 'selling it in the open market for big profits.'This is helping to fund Russia's war against Ukraine, according to had accused the US and the European Union of unfairly 'targeting' India when they themselves were importing essential material from Russia. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' the ministry of external affairs had said.'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' India also pointed out that the US had initially backed India's purchases from Russia 'for strengthening global energy markets stability.'Trump had last week announced a 25% duty on all Indian goods, in addition to a penalty for buying a 'vast majority' of Russian military equipment and crude oil. The US President has targeted India and Russia for their close ties and said the two can take their 'dead economies down together.'India had responded by reiterating that it will take all necessary steps to safeguard its national interest, besides pointing out that its economy — the fastest-growing major one — was a bright spot amid global had earlier threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS members, which he said were aligning themselves against the US. His threats come amid the two sides negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), the first part of which is planned to be concluded by trade negotiators are scheduled to visit India for the sixth round of talks on August 25-30. The US was India's largest export destination in FY25 with shipments valued at $87 billion, accounting for about a fifth of the $437 billion total.

Donald Trump signs executive order to create 2028 Olympics task force for LA Games
Donald Trump signs executive order to create 2028 Olympics task force for LA Games

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Donald Trump signs executive order to create 2028 Olympics task force for LA Games

Donald Trump signs executive order to create 2028 Olympics task force for LA Games (Image via Getty) Donald Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday, August 5, 2025, at the White House in Washington D.C. For the 2028 Summer Olympics and Paralympics, which will be held in Los Angeles, California, this group will direct efforts on security, transportation, visa and credential processing. Having been instrumental in winning the U.S. bid, Trump said he considered supervising these Games during his second term to be a great honor. Donald Trump and Cabinet to lead 2028 Olympics task force President Donald Trump will head the 2028 Olympic task force, which will include cabinet members and officials from agencies such as the Departments of Homeland Security, Transportation, State, Treasury, Defense, Justice, and the FBI. — nicksortor (@nicksortor) Its work will coordinate federal, state, and Los Angeles city teams on key logistics. An administration official confirmed that the task force will also streamline visas and access credentials for foreign athletes, coaches, officials, and media. Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said during his first term Trump helped win the U.S. bid and now calls it a global honor to oversee this event. She added that sports remain one of Trump's greatest passions. Casey Wasserman and 2028 Olympic respond to Donald Trump's move Casey Wasserman, chairperson and president of LA28, the local organizing committee for the 2028 Olympics, welcomed the announcement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Discover the AI-powered language app that's changing how everyone learns Talkpal AI Undo He said forming the task force is a key step that shows a shared commitment to delivering 'not just the biggest, but the greatest Games the world has ever seen in the summer of 2028.' The 2028 Olympics has also thanked the administration for leadership and support. The federal 'One Big Beautiful Bill' allocates $1 billion to fund security, planning, and related Games costs. Co-hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, this task group follows a comparable one established in March 2025 for the 2026 FIFA World Cup also chaired by President Trump. Also Read: Olympic Gold Medalist Justin Best To Marry Lainey Duncan In Philadelphia After Viral Live TV Proposal It comes against political tensions between Trump's administration and Los Angeles authorities, mostly over federal immigration raids and the use of National Guard soldiers in the city. Still, preparations in Los Angeles continue, and both city leaders and the 2028 Olympics are arguing over city personnel use and venue permission standards. The goal is still to make sure the Games go smoothly and safely three years hence. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store