logo
Federal officials claim to have cracked the biggest health care fraud schemes in history

Federal officials claim to have cracked the biggest health care fraud schemes in history

Yahoo5 hours ago

State and federal prosecutors have announced a flurry of arrests and charges in recent days for more than 320 defendants who allegedly engaged in various health care schemes worth a collective $14.6 billion in intended losses.
Taken together, the cases represent the largest mass interception of health care fraud in Justice Department history, according to federal officials, who publicized the cases on Monday as part of the 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown.
'This record-setting Health Care Fraud Takedown delivers justice to criminal actors who prey upon our most vulnerable citizens and steal from hardworking American taxpayers,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. 'Make no mistake – this administration will not tolerate criminals who line their pockets with taxpayer dollars while endangering the health and safety of our communities.'
The takedown involved multiple investigations, some dating back years.
One effort, dubbed Operation Gold Rush, began in 2023, and has since netted charges in New York, Illinois, California, Florida, and New Jersey against 19 defendants, who are accused of working to submit $10.6 billion in fraudulent health care claims to Medicare for urinary catheters and other medical supplies using over one million stolen identities.
The alleged scheme, carried out by defendants with ties to organized crime in Russia, Estonia, Kazakhstan, resulted in a flood of hundreds of thousands of complaints to the government health service, and unwittingly involved over 7,000 physicians whose identities were used without their knowledge.
Medicare was ultimately hit with more than 1 billion catheters worth of fraudulent claims.
'I don't even know if [the United States] has the ability to manufacture 1 billion catheters in such a short time,' Isaac Bledsoe, director of strategic projects and initiatives at the Department of Health and Human Services' inspector general's office, who co-led the investigation with the DOJ and FBI, told The Washington Post. 'The absurdity, the brazenness of these actors is really just astounding.'
More than 99 percent of the fraudulent payments never reached the perpetrators, federal officials said.
Another alleged scheme announced as part of the bust involved a $650 million plot in which a Pakistani national who, working with at least 41 clinics, allegedly recruited patients from Arizona's Native American reservations, some of them homeless, and used their identities to submit claims for substance abuse treatment that were never given.
All told, between the operations, law enforcement seized more than $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and other assets as prosecutors warned of a growing push by transnational criminal networks to exploit the U.S. health care system.
'These criminals didn't just steal someone else's money. They stole from you," Matthew Galeotti, who leads the Justice Department's criminal division, told reporters Monday. 'Every fraudulent claim, every fake billing, every kickback scheme represents money taken directly from the pockets of American taxpayers who fund these essential programs through their hard work and sacrifice."
Ultimately, the takedown involved 324 defendants across 50 federal districts and 12 state attorneys general offices.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The health research Trump really cut when he joked about defunding trans mice
The health research Trump really cut when he joked about defunding trans mice

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

The health research Trump really cut when he joked about defunding trans mice

In a high-profile attack on LGBTQ science research this spring, President Donald Trump decried supposedly wasteful research like $8 million for 'making mice transgender.' Trump played the mice remark for laughs during a joint address to Congress on March 4. But the $8 million in funding was not a joking matter; the federal grants supported six research efforts funded by the National Institutes of Health that focused on HIV, asthma, infertility, breast cancer, and other pressing concerns. These studies are among countless medical and public health research initiatives, many benefiting LGBTQ patients, that were targeted by the administration this year—NIH terminated or delayed more than 2,400 grants, according to an analysis by The New York Times. And while it's not known how many of the NIH cuts were LGBTQ-focused or LGBTQ-inclusive, it's undisputed that they were driven by the fervor against diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, or DEI. Not all the administration's cuts to research budgets are aimed at individual scientists; some target an entire university, such as at Harvard, and others take aim at once-celebrated health missions, such as ending support for the development of an HIV vaccine. Even as universities and scientists are pushing back in the courts with some notable success, medical research is in disarray. The termination of LGBTQ-benefiting medical research comes at a time when more people are identifying as LGBTQ than ever before. Research shows LGBTQ youth are at higher risk of poor mental health such as suicidal thoughts, experiences of violence, and sexually transmitted infections. LGBTQ communities would be the prime beneficiaries of the studies involving so-called transgender mice, but the findings also had the potential to improve the health of cisgender women, according to scientists involved in the work. 'It's funny to imagine a mouse being canceled for being trans. That's not at all what's happening,' said Dane Samilo of Out to Innovate, a society of LGBTQ students and professionals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. 'We're not funding things that are frivolous. This is science that is relevant and rigorous and has potential implications.' What Does It Mean to 'Make Mice Transgender'? The $8 million in grants from the NIH cited by Trump helped fund six research efforts that were focused on the role of hormones and hormone therapies in disease treatment and prevention. One of the studies listed as 'making mice transgender' was led by Patricia Silveyra, who is a lung disease researcher, a professor, and chair of the environmental and occupational health department at Indiana University. Her focus is not transgender health, though her findings could possibly benefit trans women, among a larger pool of patients. She is studying how asthma is affected by female hormones, which have been linked to more severe symptoms. To do this, she's using mice that were genetically modified to share opposite sex traits. She said her findings could pave the way for a new drug for asthmatic women dealing with hormonal changes as a result of pregnancy, giving birth, taking oral contraception, or while transitioning from male to female. An estimated 10% of the U.S. adult female population suffers from asthma. 'Part of what we're trying to understand is how the hormones regulate the process that leads to asthma so that we can treat it directly,' said Silveyra, whose team has published seven papers from her multiyear research on the subject. Silveyra's grant that Trump cited did not, in the end, get canceled. She received a one-year, no-cost extension through next June, a status that allows scientists to continue their grant research but without any new funding. HIV Erasure Another project called out by the administration enabled scientists to treat mice with opposite-sex hormones to study how gender-affirming hormone therapy affects the immune system's response to HIV vaccines, especially in transgender women, who are at a higher risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. The goal was to understand the influence of sex hormones on immunological health, and inform more effective vaccine designs. Worldwide, transgender people are 13 times more likely to be HIV-positive than the general population. Findings from the study could have benefited not only the transgender population but also cisgender women, who are more prone to autoimmune disorders and adverse effects to vaccines, and to cisgender men, who have a higher mortality rate when it comes to certain diseases such as SARS and COVID-19, according to Aria Arus-Altuz of the Duke Human Vaccine Institute. Arus-Altuz said the end of HIV vaccine research 'hurts deeply,' acknowledging that while there are treatments that extend patients' lives, 'there are communities around the world where lifelong treatments are neither affordable nor accessible. . . . A preventative vaccine is key to ending this epidemic once and for all.' Beyond Mice Numerous other LGBTQ-inclusive medical studies, not involving mice, have been targeted in the so-called war on woke and waste in science. On March 7, Brooke Rollins, U.S. Department of Agriculture secretary, announced the cancellation of a $600,000 grant to study what she called 'menstrual cycles in transgender men.' But the researcher actually sought to study the toxic synthetics in feminine hygiene products and their possible replacement by natural fibers grown in Louisiana. Trans men who still get a period were mentioned once in the NIH summary, which otherwise focused on women of menstruating age. Studying and Caring for LGBTQ Communities The budget axe also fell on public health research, including a study of 900 LGBTQ people of color to examine how race- and gender-based stigma affect HIV risk and participation in HIV prevention initiatives. This study was to be led by researcher Sean Arayasirikul, a medical sociologist and an associate professor at the University of California, Irvine, who had two other studies canceled and one delayed by NIH earlier this year. The other grants would have supported training of public health students and professionals to conduct research into sexual and gender minorities—which Arayasirikul called a highly under-researched group. 'The grants focused on educating the next generation of the public health workforce to study HIV but also serve and care for LGBTQ people,' said Arayasirikul, who goes by they/them. 'The impacts of terminating those grants cut very deep.' Arayasirikul has joined a group of scientists who on May 20 sued NIH in the U.S. District Court in Maryland over the termination of grants affecting LGBTQ people. That case is pending. A recent court ruling offers some hopeful signs for scientists. On June 16, U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young of Massachusetts ordered the NIH to restore approximately 800 of the more than 2,400 grants it had revoked or delayed. He called the cuts discriminatory on the basis of race and against the LGBTQ community. Still, scientists remain wary. The ruling applies only to grants named in the lawsuits and in the 16 states where attorneys general brought suit. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees NIH, 'is exploring all legal options, including filing an appeal and moving to stay the order,' according to Andrew Nixon, HHS director of communications. In addition, the fate of funding beyond next year casts a long shadow over the future of scientific research. Meanwhile, those researchers who are LGBTQ feel doubly targeted: both as scientists and as members of a community that has been in the administration's crosshairs. 'They are killing two birds with one stone,' said Dane Samilo of Out to Innovate. 'Trans people's rights and protections are on the docket. But then so is funding for science in general.'

Diddy trial jurors face unrealistic expectations, failure to sequester was a mistake: expert
Diddy trial jurors face unrealistic expectations, failure to sequester was a mistake: expert

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Diddy trial jurors face unrealistic expectations, failure to sequester was a mistake: expert

Jury deliberations stalled early Monday in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial for sex crimes when a juror had a difficult time following instructions given by Judge Arun Subramanian. Multiple notes were sent back from the jury only hours after Judge Subramanian provided detailed instructions for the 12 jurors deciding Diddy's fate. The "Last Night" rapper's trial previously faced issues within the jury pool when the judge dismissed one juror in early June, while another juror was under scrutiny, but remained on the case. Problems within the jury could have been avoided, according to attorney David S. Seltzer, who told Fox News Digital that simply sequestering the jurors throughout the duration of the seven-week trial could have prevented additional issues reaching a verdict. "I don't see how people are not influenced by outside factors," Seltzer said. "We live in a technology world where everyone wants their information now. I know the jury was instructed not to read anything, but I don't think that was realistic given the length of the trial." Seltzer noted that not sequestering the jury was a mistake. "I have been saying from day one that it is impossible to tell people to stay off media and/or computers for six weeks-plus, when people are addicted to their devices. I think the court is relying on the admonishment, but respectfully turning a blind eye." WATCH: HARVEY WEINSTEIN'S FORMER LAWYER REVEALS QUESTIONS SHE'D WANT ANSWERS TO IN DIDDY TRIAL DELIBERATIONS The jury sent two notes to the court throughout the five and a half hours of deliberations. The first note from the jury claimed one juror could not follow Judge Arun Subramanian's instructions. After a lengthy discussion on what to send back to the jury, Judge Subramanian adopted the language for the note proposed by the prosecution. The note sent read, "I received your note. I remind every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law. With that instruction in mind, please continue deliberating." The note also explained not to include specific details about deliberations in any future notes. "Courts will always push a jury to get to a unanimous verdict, but at the end of the day, it is up to the jury if they think they can get there," Seltzer noted. "Often times when there are issues within the jury, they cannot get there, and it ends up in a hung jury." Right before the end of the court day, the jury asked for clarification regarding the alleged distribution of drugs. "If a recipient asks for a controlled substance, and another person hands it over to them, are they distributing?" The judge told the court that the jury would be given an answer on Tuesday. While sequestering a jury — essentially isolating the 12 jurors and six alternates assigned to the case from the outside world — can be challenging, the process may prove to be essential in eliminating external influences. Albany-based criminal defense attorney Paul DerOhannesian explained to Fox News Digital that jurors may have been swayed by the Internet and access to social media. "Unfortunately, courts are reluctant to utilize one of the few tools historically used to inoculate jurors against external sources of information during a trial or deliberations — sequestration," DerOhannesian said. "We did see sequestration of the jury in the Casey Anthony and OJ Simpson trials. Sequestration in a federal trial is virtually non-existent in recent history." WATCH: THE DIDDY CASE CAN 'ABSOLUTELY' BE RETRIED IF THERE IS A HUNG JURY, SAYS CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY John J. Perlstein, a Los Angeles litigator, admitted it would be "naïve to believe that jurors universally adhere to these instructions and not read up on the situation they find themselves in." "I don't believe that any jury needs to be sequestered unless it is a safety concern," Perlstein added. "The instructions are what they are. The jurors are admonished daily, and all one can hope is that they abide." Diddy remained in the courtroom for about 20 minutes after the judge decided to provide the jury with the government's proposed response to their first letter. He was sitting at the defense table with his attorneys. On his way out of the courtroom, he held up the two books he had with him. One is, "The Power of Positive Thinking." The other is "The Happiness Advantage." The jury was sent to deliberate around 11:30 a.m. ET by the federal judge after lengthy instructions. Authorities charged Diddy with racketeering, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted, he could face life in prison. A 12-person jury comprised of eight men and four women will make the decision on whether to convict Diddy of federal crimes or let the fallen music mogul walk free following a seven-week trial. Prosecutors began closing arguments Thursday with a focus on Diddy's alleged stance as the leader of a criminal enterprise, a point they've attempted to drive home to the jurors with more than 30 witness testimonies. The rapper's defense team, headed by Marc Agnifilo, argued Friday that the prosecution's evidence proved that the government was unfairly targeting Diddy and insisted he was innocent of the charges. If found guilty, the rapper faces a minimum of 15 years behind bars and a maximum sentence of life in prison. Diddy has maintained his innocence throughout the trial.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store