15 years after Deepwater Horizon oil spill, lawsuits stall and restoration is incomplete
Oil company BP paid billions of dollars in damages, propelling ambitious coastal restoration projects across five states. Yet cleanup workers and local residents who suffered health impacts they attribute to the oil spill have struggled to have their cases heard in court and few have received significant compensation.
Conservation groups say the spill catalyzed innovative restoration work across the Gulf Coast, but are alarmed at the recent halt of a flagship land-creation project in Louisiana. As the Trump administration expands offshore oil and gas, they are concerned the best opportunities for rebuilding the Gulf Coast are slipping away.
Tying health problems to the spill remains hard to prove in court
In the coastal community of Lafitte in southeast Louisiana, Tammy Gremillion is celebrating Easter Sunday, the anniversary of the April 20 spill, without her daughter. She remembers warning Jennifer against joining a cleanup crew tasked with containing the spill for BP.
'But I couldn't stop her — they were offering these kids lots of money,' Gremillion said. 'They didn't know the dangers. They didn't do what they should have to protect these young people.'
Jennifer worked knee-deep in oil for months, returning home reeking of fumes, covered in black splotches and breaking out in rashes and suffering headaches. She also was exposed to Corexit, an EPA-approved chemical applied on and below the water to disperse oil, which has been linked to health problems.
In 2020, Jennifer died of leukemia, a blood cancer that can be caused by exposure to oil.
Gremillion, who broke down in tears as she recounted her daughter's death, is '1,000% confident' that exposure to toxins during the cleanup caused the cancer.
She filed a lawsuit against BP in 2022, although the allegations have been difficult to establish in court. Gremillion's suit is one of a small number of cases still pending.
An investigation by The Associated Press previously found all but a handful of roughly 4,800 lawsuits seeking compensation for health problems linked to the oil spill have been dismissed and only one has been settled.
In a 2012 settlement, BP paid ill workers and coastal residents $67 million, but this amounted to no more than $1,300 each for nearly 80% of those seeking compensation.
Attorneys from the Downs Law Group, representing Gremillion and around 100 others in cases against BP, say the company leveraged procedural technicalities to block victims from getting their day in court.
BP declined to comment on pending litigation. In court filings, BP denied allegations that oil exposure caused health problems and attacked the credibility of medical experts brought by plaintiffs.
Controversy over coastal restoration
The environmental impact was devastating, recalled PJ Hahn, who served on the frontlines as a southeast Louisiana coastal management official. He watched the oil eat away at barrier islands and marsh around his community in Plaquemines Parish until 'it would just crumble like a cookie in hot coffee, just break apart.'
Oyster beds suffocated, reefs were blanketed in chemicals and the fishing industry tanked. Pelicans diving for dead fish emerged from the contaminated waters smeared in a black sheen. Tens of thousands of seabirds and sea turtles were killed, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Since then, 'significant progress' has been made restoring Gulf habitats and ecosystems, according to The Natural Resource Damage Assessment Trustee Council, a group of state and federal agencies tasked with managing restoration funded by penalties levied against BP.
The council says more than 300 restoration projects worth $5.38 billion have been approved in the Gulf of Mexico, which President Donald Trump renamed the Gulf of America. The projects include acquiring wetlands in Mississippi to protect nesting areas for birds, rebuilding reefs along Pensacola Bay in Florida and restoring around 4 square miles (11 square kilometers) of marsh in Lake Borgne near New Orleans.
While a tragedy, the spill 'galvanized a movement — one that continues to push for a healthier, more resilient coast,' said Simone Maloz, campaign director for Restore the Mississippi River Delta, a conservation coalition.
The influx of billions of dollars in penalties paid by BP 'allowed us to think bigger, act faster and rely on science to guide large-scale solutions,' she added.
Yet what many conservationists see as the flagship of the restoration projects funded by the Deepwater Horizon disaster payout — an approximately $3 billion effort to divert sediment from the Mississippi River to rebuild 21 square miles (54 square kilometers) of land in southeast Louisiana — has stalled over concerns of its impact on the livelihoods of local communities and dolphin populations.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry has said the project would 'break our culture' by harming local oyster and shrimp fisheries due to the influx of freshwater. Earlier this month, his administration paused the project for 90 days, citing its high costs, and its future remains uncertain.
More offshore drilling planned for Gulf
The Trump administration is seeking to sell more offshore oil and gas leases, which the industry trade group American Petroleum Institute called 'a big step forward for American energy dominance.'
BP announced an oil discovery in the Gulf last week and plans more than 40 new wells in the next three years. The company told the AP it has improved safety standards and oversight.
'We remain keenly aware that we must always put safety first,' BP said in an emailed statement. 'We have made many changes so that such an event should never happen again.'
Still, Joseph Gordon, climate and energy director for the nonprofit Oceana, warned Deepwater Horizon's legacy should be 'an alarm bell' against the expansion of offshore drilling.
Originally Published: April 20, 2025 at 3:29 PM CDT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
New York has increased PFAS regulations as understanding has improved
Aug. 2—PFAS, a class of chemicals used to make nonstick cooking pans and waterproof clothing among hundreds of other applications, have become a serious health concern for officials across the country and in New York. PFAS, formally per- and polyflouroalkyl substances, are a class of chemicals that were heavily used from the 1940s to the late 2000s, although they persist in some applications to this day. Produced by companies like 3M, contamination can come from a variety of sources and typically results in contamination of the water table. They're known as 'forever chemicals' because there's no way to fully remove them from the water or soil they contaminate, and they don't break down fast enough to disappear over even centuries. They build up in the environment including plants and animals, causing health problems for them and also moving up the food chain. People who consume high levels of PFAS, or a smaller volume over a long period of time, can develop rare cancers, pre-eclampsia or a whole host of other chronic illnesses and diseases. In 2016, New York was one of the first states to urge the federal Environmental Protection Agency to acknowledge that PFAS contamination is a major concern — joined with Vermont and New Hampshire, they pushed the EPA to implement its first health advisory for PFAS consumption later that year. New York was the first state in the country to regulate PFAS, specifically the chemical perflourooctanoic acid or PFOA, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection. Officials took a wide survey of businesses, fire departments, fire training centers and federal Department of Defense facilities that year as well. State DEC officials collected 25,000 gallons of PFAS-containing firefighting foam up to 2018. In 2016, federal officials acknowledged that Fort Drum in Jefferson County had contaminated water near the Wheeler-Sack Army Airfield, resulting in the closure of nearly a half-dozen on-post water wells and a multi-million dollar federal grant to restore water sufficiency on post. In 2018, officials in New York were expressing disappointment with federal efforts to regulate and address PFAS. The EPA maintains a list of over 100 contaminants that are proven to harm human health, but officials have identified over 80,000 potentially toxic substances to be concerned about. "The federal government is charged with having a monitoring system to potentially add other chemicals to the ones we are required to test, but the EPA has not been moving fast enough," said Brad J. Hutton, former deputy commissioner for the state Public Health Office, speaking with the Watertown Daily Times in 2018. Action has come since then. In 2019, the EPA launched a PFAS action plan, outlining a roadmap for addressing chemical contamination in water and soil. In January of 2024, the EPA moved to ban nearly 330 'inactive' PFAS compounds from use or processing without an agency review, effectively taking the substances off the market. Inactive substances are those that aren't used in any major manufacturing, import or export operations in any U.S. territories. In April 2024, the EPA finalized a rule regulating six PFAS contaminants, including PFOA. The EPA also designated PFOA and PFOS, another similar compound, as hazardous to human health under the terms of the federal 'Superfund' law, allowing for cleanup and cost recovery from polluters. Questions arose in 2025 over whether the Trump administration would change or drop any of the new regulations adopted after his first term ended in 2021, and in May, the new EPA administrator and former New York gubernatorial candidate Lee Zeldin announced the agency would keep the Biden-era restrictions for PFOA and PFOS, another PFAS chemical, but would drop regulations and reconsider findings for four other substances including PFNA and HDFO-DA. The latter substance is known colloquially as 'GenX' and was a next-generation replacement to more harmful substances like PFOA. 'GenX' was later found to be similarly harmful to human health, and is similarly able to persist in the environment. "We are on a path to uphold the agency's nationwide standards to protect Americans from PFOA and PFOS in their water," Zeldin said. "At the same time, we will work to provide common-sense flexibility in the form of additional time for compliance. This will support water systems across the country, including small systems in rural communities, as they work to address these contaminants. EPA will also continue to use its regulatory and enforcement tools to hold polluters accountable." Zeldin pushed the compliance deadline for the new regulations, and promised to establish an outreach program focused on reaching noncompliant water systems, especially those in rural and small communities, to connect them with resources to bring their projects into compliance with the new rules. The initial rules required water systems to properly filter and remove the six contaminants by 2029, but the changes made by Zeldin push the broad deadline for PFOA and PFOS compliance to 2031. The EPA also has plans to establish an exemption framework to give noncompliant systems even more time to fix their systems, but the specifics for that aren't out yet. That move was lauded by some water district officials, including the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators Director, Alan Roberson. "With the current compliance date of 2029, states and water systems are struggling with the timeframes to complete the pilot testing, development of construction plans, and building the necessary treatment improvements. EPA's proposed extension of the compliance date and increased technical assistance will address the number of systems that would be out of compliance in 2029 due to not being able complete all of these tasks on time," Roberson said. Most of these changes aren't official yet — the EPA still has to introduce the new rules and usher them through the process, which could be done as early as the spring of next year. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
11 hours ago
- CNN
More than 10 years later, Flint declares its water safe after replacing lead pipes, but health issues and doubts persist
Melissa Mays said she may never trust the water from her Flint, Michigan, tap again. In the 11 years since the city's historic water crisis, Mays said she has battled Legionnaires' disease, autoimmune and seizure disorders, high blood pressure, and other illnesses. Her youngest son, now 21, experienced speech delays as a child after unknowingly drinking lead-poisoned water, she added. Mays still believes the plumbing lines in her neighborhood are contaminated. The water from her faucets is often yellow and has a foul smell unless it is filtered, she said. So when Michigan submitted a progress report to a federal court in July stating it had completed the replacement of 11,000 lead pipes, restored 28,000 damaged properties, and the US Environmental Protection Agency lifted its emergency order on Flint's drinking water earlier this year, Mays said she remained skeptical. Mays is among many Flint residents who said they have lost faith in lawmakers and elected officials after the water crisis devastated their community in 2014, and they still refuse to drink or bathe in the water without a filter. 'Flint is not fixed,' said Mays, a leading activist in the fight for clean, safe drinking water in Flint. 'And we are not going to shut up and go away. Fix us properly because it's the right thing to do.' Federal officials, however, insist Flint's water is now safe and meets the requirements of the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Act. 'Lifting this emergency order is a cause for great celebration for residents of Flint who worked so hard and sacrificed so much to get to this point,' EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in May. 'Even though the emergency order is lifted, all levels of government must continue to stay in contact and work closely to be a continued resource for the Flint community and ensure their water remains pristine.' Flint's water crisis began in 2014 when local and state officials switched the city's water supply from Detroit's system to the Flint River as part of a cost-cutting measure. Officials detected bacteria in the water in August 2014. Warnings were issued to residents, and subsequent testing revealed dangerous levels of lead in the water. Local pediatricians also raised concerns about a growing number of children with elevated lead levels in their blood. But Flint did not switch its water supply back to Detroit until October 2015. A landmark settlement reached in March 2017 required the replacement of every Flint resident's lead pipe after residents and nonprofit groups sued city and state officials for exposing the community to contaminated drinking water. The settlement also required officials to conduct tap water tests, distribute faucet filters and provide education on their use, and fund health programs for residents affected by the contaminated water. In a separate $600 million settlement, the state of Michigan agreed in 2020 to make direct payments to Flint residents affected by the water crisis. Nearly 80% of the funds are reserved for people who were under 18 when the crisis began. Flint's water crisis prompted a national call to action, with former President Joe Biden last year setting a 10-year deadline for cities to replace lead pipes. At the time, Biden said more than 9 million lead pipes were still in use across the country. Lead can enter tap water when pipes and plumbing fixtures corrode. In children, lead exposure can cause hearing, speech, and behavioral problems, brain damage, and slowed growth. In adults, it has been linked to high blood pressure, joint pain, reproductive health issues, and cardiovascular disease. Matthew Tejada, senior vice president of environmental health for the Natural Resources Defense Council — which was among the nonprofit groups that sued the city and state — said the lead pipe replacement was a victory for Flint residents and activists, who have gone to court multiple times since 2017 to ensure the work was completed. Tejada said Flint residents should feel safe drinking and using the water now because it is 'being delivered through lead-free pipes.' He said lead service lines remain a major threat to cities across the country and are often neglected in poor, majority-Black communities like Flint. 'We don't see these problems in wealthy White communities,' Tejada said. 'When they (Flint residents) were shouting from the rooftops looking for help, every level of government failed them. That doesn't happen in a community where there is affluence. That happens in the communities that have been oppressed.' The Rev. Allen C. Overton of Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church in Flint said residents have a deep mistrust of local and state government because of the health problems, trauma, and financial burdens they have faced since 2014. Overton said some members of his congregation still suffer from skin rashes and hair loss caused by the lead-tainted water they drank and showered in. He added that residents had to buy new water heaters, washing machines, and plumbing systems that were damaged during the crisis. They were never compensated for these losses, Overton said. He also believes the officials who switched the water supply and ignored Flint residents' concerns at the height of the crisis were not fully held accountable. 'Somebody should have had to go to jail,' Overton said. In 2022, a panel of Michigan Supreme Court judges ruled that indictments against former top state officials, including former Gov. Rick Snyder, for their roles in the Flint water crisis were invalid. Overton said settlement payments for residents are long overdue. 'Make Flint whole,' he said. 'Give the residents what they truly deserve. Flint Mayor Sheldon Neeley said replacing the lead pipes was a milestone that has helped the city of about 80,000 residents move 'from crisis to recovery.' Neeley said local officials are focused on regaining the community's trust and understand there are lingering concerns about water quality. He encourages Flint residents to continue using filters if they are not comfortable with the tap water. However, he said Flint's water is 'testing the best in the state of Michigan, if not the best in the country.' 'We are doing everything we need to do to be in that good space where we can say, 'Yes, our water is tested and monitored,'' Neeley said. 'We are following all the environmental protection agencies at the state level and federal level to make sure we maintain the highest level of standard that we can.' CNN has reached out to Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's office for comment. Neeley said he submitted a letter in April urging the court-appointed administrator of the $600 million Flint water crisis settlement to release payments to residents. 'Justice delayed is justice denied — we must move from compliance to compensation,' Neely said. For some people who drank the contaminated water in Flint, their lives have been forever changed. Nakiya Wakes said she suffered two miscarriages — both with twins — in 2015 and 2017. Wakes said she didn't stop drinking Flint's tap water until after she returned home from the hospital in 2015 and found a flyer in her mailbox advising pregnant women and elderly people to stop consuming the water. 'The damage had already been done to my system,' she said. Frustrated by the city's ongoing water problems and separate issues with her landlord, Wakes moved to Niles, Michigan, in 2022. But the family's health issues — which Wakes believes may be a result of drinking Flint's water in 2014 and 2015 — have followed them. Wakes' son, now 16, suffers from severe shoulder and neck pain and has experienced behavioral and cognitive problems since he was 5, which forced him to be homeschooled. Wakes, 49, said she recently underwent emergency surgery for blood clots in her lungs. 'They poisoned Flint, and I couldn't protect my own child,' she said. Mays said the celebration over the lead pipe replacement came at a cost for Flint residents like herself. She said residents and activists have spent the past decade pleading for clean water, new pipes, and financial compensation for the people of Flint. 'We have people who are just tired of fighting because this is exhausting,' Mays said. 'Not a dime has been given out to residents, nobody is in jail, so it's hard to stay positive.'
a day ago
Canada wildfire smoke brings unhealthy air to large swaths of the Midwest
Smoke from Canadian wildfires hovered over several Midwestern states Saturday, bringing warnings of unhealthy air for at least the third day. Air quality alerts were in effect in Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, as well as eastern Nebraska and parts of Indiana and Illinois. Forecasters said the smoky skies would remain for much of the day. People with lung disease, heart disease, children, older adults and pregnant women are most susceptible to the poor breathing conditions. Canadian environmental officials said smoke from forest fires that was causing reduced visibility and poor quality would persist into Sunday for some areas. The Switzerland-based air quality monitoring database IQAir, which assesses air quality in real time, listed the city of Minneapolis as having some of the worst air pollution in the world since Friday. The Air Quality Index (AQI) is expected to reach the red or unhealthy category in a large swath of Minnesota and will likely remain through Saturday. AQI is a system used to communicate how much air pollution is in the air. It breaks pollution down into six categories and colors, and advice on what isn't safe to do. They range from 'good' (the color green) to 'hazardous' (maroon). 'What's been unique in this go-around is that we've had this prolonged stretch of smoke particulates towards the surface, so that's where we've really had the air quality in the red here for the past few days," said Joe Strus, meteorologist with the National Weather Service in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul area in Minnesota. 'We've sort of been dealing with this, day in and day out, where you walk outside and you can taste the smoke, you can smell it," he said. "Sometimes we've been in higher concentrations than others. Other times it's just looked a little hazy out there.' The air quality on Saturday was improving, specifically across the Twin Cities and southwestern Minnesota, he said, but state health officials warned the air could remain unhealthy for sensitive groups through Monday. The smoke could start to dissipate Saturday before spreading as far south as Tennessee and Missouri. The EPA's Air Quality Index converts all pollutant levels into a single number. The lower the number, the better. Anything below 50 is classified as 'healthy.' Fifty to 100 is 'moderate' while 100-150 is unhealthy for 'sensitive groups." Anything above 150 is bad for everyone. Parts of Minnesota exceeded that number on Saturday. Health officials advise people with asthma and other lung disease, heart disease, children and older adults to avoid prolonged exposure to smoke and limit strenuous activities. They said to avoid burning things that could make the air pollution worse, and keep windows and doors closed to keep the smoke from getting inside. 'This is something that's become part of our summer here the last few years," said Strus, "and I think a lot of us are just looking forward to seeing a little more movement in the atmospheric winds and we'll be able to hopefully disperse some of the smoke out of here in the next few days.' ___ The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP's environmental coverage, visit
