'Prolonged campaign of cruelty': Inside the chilling maid murder by MasterChef finalist
A former MasterChef Malaysia finalist, Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong and her ex-husband Mohammad Ambree Yunos, have been sentenced to 34 years in prison for the horrific torture and murder of their 28-year-old maid, Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin, in December 2021. Etiqah (left) and her ex-husband, Mohammad Ambree Yunos.
The case, described by prosecutors as "a prolonged campaign of cruelty," has sent shockwaves through Malaysia and beyond.
A House of Terror in Penampang
Between Dec 8 and Dec 11, 2021, what should have been a safe workplace for Afiyah turned into her final days of terror.
Employed as a domestic helper in a condominium in Penampang, Sabah, she was systematically abused, tortured and ultimately killed by the very people tasked with providing her shelter and protection.
The Kota Kinabalu High Court, presided by Judge Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng, delivered the sentence on the couple in June after concluding that the prosecution had proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
While Ambree, 44, received an additional 12 strokes of the cane, Etiqah, 37, was spared whipping under Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which exempts women from corporal punishment.
"This Was Not a Murder of Passion, It Was Deliberate Torture"
In court, Deputy Public Prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus reportedly painted a chilling picture.
'This was not a murder out of anger or provocation. This was a prolonged, cruel and deliberate torture,' she said.
According to Dacia, the abuse was not impulsive, but methodically inflicted over time.
The couple had subjected Afiyah to such extensive physical torment that her body was unrecognisable.
'The condition of the deceased's body was so severely deteriorated that her husband was only able to identify her by the bangle she wore on her wrist,' she revealed.
The evidence was damning. Videos and images recovered from the couple's mobile phones documented the torture in gruesome detail, revealing not only the physical abuse but the chilling intent to preserve it.
'The deceased was a young woman who left her home and entered the home of the accused persons to work honestly and earn a living during a global pandemic.
"While others remained at home in search of safety and protection, the deceased experienced the opposite. She endured prolonged suffering in her place of employment, which ultimately became the site of her tragic demise,' Dacia said.
A MasterChef Finalist's Fall from Grace
Etiqah was just 24 years old when she appeared on MasterChef Malaysia Season 2 in 2012.
The show, a local adaptation of the global cooking competition, brought amateur home cooks into the spotlight, many of whom went on to launch careers in Malaysia's vibrant culinary scene.
She had been described then as a promising university graduate with a postgraduate degree in geology from Sabah.
Her appearance on the show gave her a platform, but what followed was a far cry from public admiration.
A Conviction Years in the Making
The case was first brought to court on Dec 29, 2021, and the couple claimed trial on Nov 17, 2022.
During the proceedings, Judge Lim stated the prosecution had succeeded in establishing all critical elements under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which relates to murder.
These included: That the victim died from injuries.
That the injuries were inflicted with intent.
That both accused acted with common intention.
Despite passionate mitigation pleas from their defence lawyers, Datuk Ram Singh (for Ambree) and Datuk Seri Rakhbir Singh (for Etiqah), the court found that the severity and nature of the injuries could not be ignored.
The Demand for the Death Penalty
Although the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 was already in force, the prosecution had still urged the court to impose the death penalty, citing the cruelty involved.
'This case shocked the conscience not only of Sabahans but the nation as a whole. The law must reflect the value we place on human life and in this case, justice demands nothing less than the ultimate sentence,' Dacia reportedly told the court.
However, the judge opted for a custodial sentence of 34 years each, reflecting the current sentencing trends for deaths caused by prolonged abuse, while ordering Ambree to be caned 12 times.
A Public Reckoning
As the case gained national attention, it triggered intense public outrage. Many questioned how a figure once in the public eye, admired for her passion in the kitchen, could be part of such a monstrous act behind closed doors.
The verdict serves as a grim reminder that abuse of domestic workers remains an issue, even among the most seemingly 'respectable' employers. It also underscores the urgent need for better protection and oversight for vulnerable workers in Malaysia.
Justice Served But the Scars Remain
While justice has now been delivered in the courtroom, the psychological and social scars left by this case are far from healed.
Afiyah's tragic end remains a symbol of the invisible violence domestic workers often endure and a call to action for Malaysians to demand better accountability and compassion for all lives, regardless of status or citizenship.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Open by default
WHEN the explosion and fire shook a residential area in Putra Heights, Selangor, in early April this year, residents were left not just with anxiety and trauma but also with lingering doubts. Even after the investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Department – which was made public in June – revealed that ground instability was what led to the gas pipeline explosion, and the police subsequently classified the case as 'No Further Action', residents continue to grapple with unresolved questions, calling on the government to provide them with answers. Why did the explosion happen only there? What about the construction of shop lots near the pipeline's location? And why is it so difficult to access such information? Incidents like this reveal a deeper truth that access to information is not just a tool for journalists or watchdogs – it can affect the lives of everyday Malaysians too. This is one reason why advocates say it is important the government keeps its promise to table a Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill in Parliament soon. FOI supporters say the law could empower citizens in ways that extend far beyond politics and media; from holding the government accountable for safety and land use decisions, to improving services through smarter, more transparent data sharing. Changing the mindset Lawyer and former Selangor Bar chairman Kokila Vaani Vadiveloo says a federal FOI law would benefit ordinary citizens seeking information about government activities that directly affect them, including issues of environmental hazards, land use, and healthcare policies. She cites the example of a notable judgment in 2023 involving a High Court order that required the government to release an accident investigation report about a plane crash that killed 11 people almost half a century ago in 1976. 'This case illustrated how families struggled to access information without FOI provisions,' she says. But beyond that, she says it could also help so many segments of society, such as students and researchers wanting to carry out evidence-based analysis, small business owners who may need to investigate regulations and obtain contract information, or legal professionals looking to gain evidence or background for court cases. Kokila says in South Africa, for example, environmental groups and minority shareholders have used FOI laws to obtain critical information on corporate projects affecting their interests. 'FOI is recognised as a consumer right to enable informed choices,' Kokila says. State and culture The Malaysian public has a right to know how the government conducts activities that shape daily lives, stresses senior manager (research) for the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas), Alissa Rode. Because of the lack of an FOI law, she says only seven out of the 13 states and territories published their annual budget estimates online as of 2024. 'Expenditure information should be considered critical information that is proactively disclosed, but failing that, a minimal right to information would enable citizens to obtain this information,' she says. This also shows that it is important for an FOI law to be adopted by all states, not just at the federal level, she adds, as state governments also possess data that is important to the average citizen. Sinar Project coordinator Khairil Yusof points out that two states – Penang and Selangor – already have FOI laws at the state level. From their interactions with the two state governments, he says the implementation of an FOI law creates not only a legal change, but also a change in culture within the government from being the gatekeeper of information to an 'open by default' approach. 'The cultural change is the under-standing that government information and knowledge resources are publicly funded and that they should be freely available and accessible to the public. 'It also creates an enabling environment for government agencies to proactively share public information and data, not just with the public but also between government agencies,' says Khairil. In practice, existing laws and bureau-cracy often hinder this as government officials are prevented from sharing information with the public. There is a provision in the Penal Code, Section 203A, which Khairil describes as being 'very vague', that discourages civil servants from sharing information. Section 203A states that it is a crime for civil servants to disclose any information obtained by them in the performance of their duties under any written law. 'So often, even if the information requested is not secret, it requires a lot of additional work for both parties to share that information. 'For example, the cleanliness of rivers that the officer already had on their computer.' Indirect beneficiary Another main obstacle to information access in Malaysia is the Official Secrets Act (OSA), as Rode points out. The OSA makes all information confidential by default. 'Without an FOI law, a citizen seeking information would commonly get shunted around the bureaucracy looking for a sympathetic and empowered officer, as there is no obligation on the part of public officials to meet the request or even reveal who is responsible for that data. 'Even if the department in question is willing to provide the data, requests are often deprioritised,' she says. Kokila adds that without FOI protections, any whistleblower disclosing public interest information becomes at risk of prosecution and their disclosures often end up being suppressed by secrecy laws. Thus, Rode says, although an FOI law should at minimum mandate passive disclosure – that is, information is provided upon request – countries with the highest standards of transparency would go one step further and embrace active disclosure and an 'open by default' approach to information. 'Ideally, the upcoming FOI law should set up the expectation that critical information is made available online by default. Exceptions can still be made for security and privacy purposes, but such exceptions should be narrowly defined,' she says. Is there hope? Khairil says there are already examples in Malaysia of a more 'open by default' approach to data collected by the government, such as the Health Ministry's Covid-Now dashboard, the Department of Statistics's OpenDOSM portal, and the Public Sector Open Data initiatives. The results of such initiatives have shown that beyond governance and rights issues, an FOI law also immediately paves the way for an open government and unlocks the full value of the work done by the civil service by making public information open by default. 'It enables rapid digital transformation innovations not only for the governments, but for everyone,' says Khairil. But usually, the general public is an indirect beneficiary of access to information, mostly without realising it, he says, providing what he calls a relatable example: Local councils like the Petaling Jaya City Council and the Subang Jaya City Council do spot checks and grade restaurant cleanliness; the rating is displayed on the inspected premises. 'If this dataset were publicly available, then companies like Google, FoodPanda, or Grab could incorporate these grades in their apps.' To drive home the point of how much the people take the indirect benefits of open data for granted, Khairil points to a global example; the GPS system used worldwide is only possible because the United States government made it public. 'Imagine a world where only limited people could have access to GPS navigation.'
Daily Express
a day ago
- Daily Express
Many unanswered questions: Zara's mum
Published on: Saturday, August 02, 2025 Published on: Sat, Aug 02, 2025 Text Size: Noraidah showing a photo of her and Zara. Kota Kinabalu: Noraidah Lamat, mother of the late Zara Qairina Mahathir, has raised serious concerns over investigations into her death at the Papar school dormitory on July 17, highlighting the lack of a post-mortem and delays in police updates. 'Our client does not believe Zara took her own life. She believes there are criminal elements involved,' her counsel Hamid Ismail and Shahlan Jufri said in a statement. They revealed that Zara had confided to her mother about bullying by senior students, including one who allegedly said: 'If I touch you, you'll bleed.' The family claims to have received no updates from police between July 17 and 27 – silence spanning 10 days. 'This silence worries our client. It gives the impression that the police did not investigate the death,' they added. Police only issued a short statement on July 28, and on July 31, it was disclosed that 60 individuals had been called in for questioning. On July 30, Noraidah filed a supplementary police report in Sipitang urging a thorough probe and revealed that school authorities had advised her not to lodge a report. The lawyers also questioned the claim that Zara fell from the third floor noting her face showed no injuries, bruises, or wounds typically associated with a fall from such height. Despite these circumstances, no post-mortem was conducted before Zara was buried. The lawyers have since written to the State Attorney General's Office, urging an inquest under Section 339(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and requesting Zara's body be exhumed to determine the true cause of death. Noraidah said she was in deep shock when her daughter died and agreed to proceed with the burial, unaware that an autopsy could or should have been requested. 'No one advised me to ask for one,' she said, adding that her grief clouded her ability to think clearly at the time. Noraidah said her daughter had previously reported being sexually harassed by a fellow student — a claim she said was addressed by school counsellors — and denied knowing whether bullying played a role in Zara's death. Zara was discovered around 3am on July 16 in critical condition beneath the hostel block. She was taken to Queen Elizabeth I Hospital in Kota Kinabalu, where she died the next day. Initial reports suggested she had fallen from the third floor. Noraidah said she and her husband rushed to the hospital after being informed of the fall by a school warden. 'At the emergency ward lobby, I was shocked to see so many officials — police, school administrators,' she recalled. She described Zara's face as uninjured when she saw her. 'The doctor and counsellor told me even if she survived, she would never be the same. 'Her brain was already damaged. I couldn't fully grasp what they were saying,' she was quoted as saying. Whatever the outcome of the post-mortem and investigation, Noraidah said, she is prepared to accept it — as long as it brings clarity. 'The pain will never go away,' she said. 'But I need to know the truth.' * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
Appeals court orders return of Port Dickson land after fraudulent sale
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has affirmed a High Court decision to return a parcel of land in Port Dickson to its rightful owner, after it was transferred through a series of fraudulent transactions. A three-judge panel led by Datuk S. Nantha Balan ruled that both Top ATC Industries Sdn Bhd and businessman Lee Kok Chian had failed to prove they were bona fide (genuine) purchasers of the land, which had been fraudulently transferred by an imposter posing as the registered trustee. The appellate court also upheld the High Court's order for the land to be re-registered in the name of its rightful owner, Cheok Lam Chuan, who filed the suit after discovering the illicit transfer in 2018. On Jan 21, 2016, the subject land was fraudulently "transferred" to Fu Zhi Mao Group Sdn Bhd before the latter entered a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Top ATC Industries on Feb 24, the same year. On March 29, 2016, (barely 6 days after the transfer of the land), Top ATC Industries entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Lee. The transfer of the subject land took place on Nov 1, 2016. "Apart from the sinister conclusions that are to be derived from the suspicious timing of the transaction between Fu Zhi Mao Group and Top ATC Industries, there is the added fact that the latter had failed to prove that it had made any payment to the former. "Lee ought to have suspected that the previous transaction could be fraudulent due to the short timeline of sale of the land. "He should have undertaken the ordinary precautions and investigations as a reasonable and prudent purchaser. "However, Lee deliberately shut his eyes to the obvious and refrained from checking or making further inquiries about the earlier land transfer," he said in his ground of judgment yesterday. The court also upheld the lower court's finding that neither Top ATC Industries nor Lee had acted in good faith in their dealings over the land transaction. The court also held that the Negri Sembilan Registrar of Titles and Director of Lands and Mines were negligent for failing to detect or prevent the fraudulent registration. The appellate court affirmed all the lower court's orders, including: -Cancelling the registration of the land in Lee's name and restoring it to Cheok. -The award of RM100,000 in aggravated damages against Top ATC and Lee. -An order for both parties to pay RM50,000 each in legal costs to Cheok. -A cost order of RM10,000 against the two land officers.
