
Slovakia's situation offers lessons for resisting Trump
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
William Miller
Advertisement
Roslindale
Jay Rumas's Ideas pieces set off a lively debate among online readers. Following is an edited sampling of their comments on BostonGlobe.com:
Agree [with Rumas] that Democrats have no strategy and no energy. The people are ready, but leadership is largely absent. Americans are not proving themselves to be courageous, and the 'opposition' party is doing little more than waiting for the next election, which Elon Musk and Donald Trump will almost certainly rig in favor of the GOP. (SAD04)
Advertisement
Democrats don't have a sense of humor either. When was the last time you heard a national Democrat say a funny thing? (Hanscome)
Political leadership that begins on the farthest fringe of either party is concerning. The current direction is not about leadership [but] about taking total control and telling all that any opposing opinion is wrong. In today's two political parties there is no leader who represents the growing group of independent voters. (olderbutwiser1)
Slovakia is a parliamentary democratic republic with a multiparty system. The prime minister needs to form a majority coalition in the parliament. Compared with the two-party system in our country, forming a governing coalition is much more difficult. (winterleaf)
Rumas writes, 'The more time Fico spends putting out his party's own fires, the less time he has to purge institutions.' The problem here is that Trump doesn't have to spend time putting out his party's own fires since he has the Republican Party completely cowed. The few who have stood up to him have been rejected. (sbrooks103)
The few who have stood up to him need to become the many who stand together. They ought to be embarrassed to be afraid of this tin demigod. What good is it to avoid being primaried if it means you have to continue to submit the Trump? (Sandy68)
A detail question: How much of the media in Slovakia is owned by corporations with other, bigger units that have priority over news? The Democratic Party could certainly stand to improve their messaging about Trump's drive for autocracy, but Trump's ability to get news organizations to bend over for him by threatening their corporate parents is not something Democrats have any control over. (NER_MCFC)
Advertisement
Dems need to have a financial message that can reach independents and people from red states and rural areas. Their message can't just be they are against Trump and the MAGAS. Got to be for something, not just against something. (bigguymass)
Democratic initiatives pour hundreds of billions of federal tax dollars annually into red states and rural areas,
The Democrats don't have a vision, a solution, or any leaders. Kamala Harris, the worst presidential nominee ever, is still the leader in the clubhouse, according to
What policies do the Trumpets have? Wreck the government, forcibly expel anyone who doesn't look right, punish everyone who disagrees with Trump, destroy Social Security, education, health care, villainize the media. Name one positive policy. The Dems do have leaders (Josh Shapiro, Gavin Newsom, AOC, Gretchen Whitmer). You may disagree with some of the politics but they get positive things done. (outside-lookin-in)
This is two months into Trump's presidency. People are still processing, and in many ways it's like going through the stages of grief. On top of that, this administration has been throwing so much mud at the wall to see what sticks that it's virtually impossible to see the wall anymore. Bottom line is: I would expect the Democrats to be a mess right now. But time heals all wounds and things will get sorted out. (NorthHollywood)
Advertisement
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Tanks and thousands of soldiers marched in DC Army parade. What was the cost?
WASHINGTON – The Army spent $30 million on the massive 250th anniversary parade that rumbled down the streets of the nation's capital for hours on June 14, coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday, Army officials told reporters on July 22. The cost of the military parade was initially estimated at $25 million to $45 million. The money covered the cost of hauling dozens of tanks and armored vehicles by train and truck from military bases in Texas to the nation's capital. Approximately 7,000 soldiers also converged on Washington for the occasion, with some marching the route in historic costumes. Warplanes flew overhead, and Army parachutists sailed down from the skies before a crowd of thousands. The Army's final tabulation does not include the cost of the parade's significant security requirements, including for the Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, FBI and local police personnel to secure a chunk of downtown Washington and monitor possible threats. The parade was designated as a "National Security Special Event," a category for large events that could be targets for terrorist attacks and thus require additional work for law enforcement. Before the parade, authorities laid down 18.5 miles of fencing and installed 175 magnetometers to screen everyone who entered the restricted area to watch the parade or participate in the Army festival held that day. Local officials in Washington raised concerns in the lead-up to the parade about possible damage to city streets. Officials on July 22 said that it did not turn out to be a major problem. Steve Warren, an Army spokesperson, said damage done by the tanks to Washington's roads was "minimal" – one street curb at a park along the Potomac River was crushed. The Army had promised to cover the cost of repairs for damage to the city's roads after Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said she was "concerned" the tanks would chew them up. Critics, including Democratic lawmakers, said the parade politicized the military in a celebration of Trump's birthday that seemed reminiscent of the ostentatious scenes to celebrate dictators abroad. Trump presided over the parade from a presidential booth, but the Army and White House denied allegations that his birthday was the reason for the event or that the timing was intentional. Trump opponents across the country held thousands of "No Kings Day" protests on the day of the parade. Demonstrators in Washington marched to the White House in a "Refuse Fascism" protest. Warren said the Army experienced a marketing boost in the two weeks leading up to the parade, including a spike in website and social media views and a 31% increase in incoming calls. "We wanted Americans to feel connected to the Army," he said.


USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee ban transgender women athletes, per Trump's order
Bowing to pressure from President Donald Trump, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee quietly changed its rules to prevent participation by transgender women athletes. Buried on page five of its "Athlete Safety Policy" is a paragraph stating, "The USOPC is committed to protecting opportunities for athletes participating in sport. The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act." While that mentions nothing about transgender athletes, the executive order signed by Trump is designed to prevent transgender girls and women from participating in sports. In a letter sent Tuesday to the U.S. Olympic community, USOPC president Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland said the change came after "a series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials" following the executive order, which Trump signed in February. "As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations. The guidance we've received aligns with the Ted Stevens Act, reinforcing our mandated responsibility to promote athlete safety and competitive fairness," the letter read. The letter also said individual national governing bodies are required to update their policies to align with the USOPC's change, first reported by the New York Times. Prior to this change, which was adopted last month, the USOPC had said decisions on transgender participation were to be made based on "fairness" and should be up to each individual sport's governing body. "In our world of elite sport, these elements of fairness demand that we reconcile athlete inclusion and athlete opportunity. The only way to do that for all genders, and specifically for those who are transgender, is to rely on real data and science-based evidence rather than ideology," according to a page on the USOPC's website, which now carries a note at the top referring to the Athlete Safety Policy. The United States has never had an openly transgender woman athlete compete at the Olympics. In fact, in the 20 years the IOC allowed the participation of transgender athletes, New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard is the only openly transgender woman to compete at an Olympic Games. Hubbard was knocked out in the opening round. But inclusion of transgender athletes has become an increasingly charged political issue, despite a lack of science showing they have a competitive advantage. World Athletics and World Aquatics have both banned transgender women who have gone through male puberty from competing, and International Olympic Committee president Kirsty Coventry last month announced the creation of a task force to examine how to "protect the female category." The USOPC had said little about the issue. But with Los Angeles hosting the Summer Games in 2028, it has been careful not to say or do anything that could draw the ire of the Trump administration. While the USOPC is not funded by the government, as many other countries are, it does use government services. The Department of Homeland Security, for example, will help provide security for Los Angeles.


Los Angeles Times
9 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
As Stephen Colbert drops F-bomb on gloating Trump, late-night counterparts join the fray
Stephen Colbert shared a pointed message for President Trump days after the latter rejoiced on social media that 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired.' 'Go f— yourself,' the late-night veteran said Monday during his opening monologue. Monday's episode was Colbert's first time behind the desk after he announced last week that CBS had decided to cancel 'The Late Show,' bringing the franchise to an end after more than 30 years. The network's stunning decision — apparently 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night' — was met with disappointment and shock from Colbert's loyal viewers, concern from his late-night cohorts and delight from his critics, notably President Trump. On his Truth Social app, Trump wrote that Colbert's 'talent was even less than his ratings' and took an additional swipe at Jimmy Kimmel, who he claimed 'has even less talent than Colbert.' Advertisement Earlier in his monologue, Colbert, 61, told his in-studio audience and viewers that until the 'Late Show' goes dark in May, the gloves are officially off and 'he can finally speak unvarnished truth to power and say what I really think about Donald Trump.' Colbert, who took over the 'Late Show' from original host David Letterman in 2015, has long been critical of Trump, even before the former reality TV star and businessman took office. Since becoming president, Trump has given Colbert and his late-night cohorts plenty of material to work with. In recent weeks, Colbert chided his own bosses for their decision to cave to Trump by settling the president's lawsuit over '60 Minutes' edits, a case that most 1st Amendment experts called frivolous. Paramount agreed to pay $16 million, with most of that going to Trump's future presidential library. Though Colbert kept things mostly light in his monologue, he questioned CBS' justification for canceling his show. 'How could it be a 'purely financial decision' if 'The Late Show' is number one in ratings? It's confusing,' he said, echoing concerns that fans have also voiced on social media. He continued his segment, citing reports that specified the alleged losses were somewhere between $40 million and $50 million. Advertisement '$40 million's a big number. I could see us losing $24 million, but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other $16 million — oh yeah,' he said, alluding to the settlement. Mulling on Trump's diss on Truth Social, Colbert joked about the president's desire to see Kimmel's program go dark: 'I'm the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross and I gotta tell you the view is fantastic up here.' Amid the cancellation news, Colbert has found support in his fellow late-night peers including 'The Daily Show' host Jon Stewart ('The Daily Show' airs on Comedy Central, also owned by Paramount) and 'Last Week Tonight' host John Oliver, among others. On Monday, the late-night personalities took their support to the Ed Sullivan Theater, which Colbert has called home for the majority of the past decade. In a segment spoofing that viral kiss-cam fiasco at a recent Coldplay concert, guests Lin Manuel-Miranda and 'Weird Al' Yankovic perform a version of 'Viva La Vida,' and the camera pans to the audience where Anderson Cooper, Andy Cohen, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers, Adam Sandler, Christopher McDonald, Stewart and Oliver are spotted in the crowd. The hush-hush pair exposed by the kiss-cam? An animated Trump lovingly cuddling the Paramount logo. Advertisement Though Letterman didn't return to his old stomping grounds to join the other late-night stars on Monday, his YouTube account shared a 20-minute compilation of him throwing shade at CBS throughout his 'Late Show' tenure. 'You can't spell CBS without BS,' says the description for the video. Voices Commentary: Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' is canceled, but he won't go quietly into that goodnight CBS announced on Thursday that 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' would end in 2026, but the timing, coincidental or not, comes as Paramount tries to sell itself to Skydance. Over on Comedy Central on Monday, Stewart dedicated a portion of his latest episode to discuss the 'Late Show' cancellation. Stewart reminded audiences that he and Colbert were both 'Daily Show' alumni, recalled watching his colleague 'exceed all expectations in the role' over the years and skewered CBS for 'killing a show you know wrinkled a fragile and vengeful president.' Stewart ended his opening segment dancing and singing along with a choir to a familiar phrase. 'If you're afraid and you protect your bottom line, I've got but one thing to say. Just one little phrase: 'Go f— yourself.'' Amid the uncertainty at Paramount, Stewart contemplated the future of the 'Daily Show' in a podcast interview published before the 'Late Show' cancellation. Speaking to the 'Weekly Show' podcast, Stewart said he had not gotten any word about his series getting the ax. 'They haven't called me and said like, 'Don't get too comfortable in that office, Stewart!'' he said, adding, 'I've been kicked out of [more] s— establishments than that. We'll land on our feet.' This week 'The Daily Show' will push forward with former writer and current on-air correspondent Josh Johnson set to make his anchoring debut, starting Tuesday through Thursday. He joins a host rotation that also includes 'Daily Show' personalities Ronny Chieng, Jordan Klepper, Michael Kosta and Desi Lydic. Advertisement Times staff writer Meg James contributed to this report.