Only RDO can demarcate area for water conservancy, rules Kerala HC
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In such cases, 10% of the applied land must be set apart for water conservancy measures, in accordance with Section 27A (2) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
Justice C S Dias issued the ruling in a petition by Chitranjan Thampan of Alappuzha, who sought a direction to RDO to consider his application for changing the nature of his property in the revenue records. The petitioner, who holds possession of 28.25 Ares of unnotified land, had applied to change the nature of only 25.42 Ares, excluding 10% of the total area for water conservancy as required under the Act.
However, his application was rejected, prompting him to approach HC.
The single bench observed that the power to demarcate the area for water conservancy is vested with the RDO. Although the applicant is required to submit a sketch showing the area proposed to be set apart for water conservancy, the RDO, based on reports from the village officer and agricultural officer, is the competent authority to demarcate and approve such an area. The applicant cannot unilaterally deduct 10% of the land and apply for the remainder.
Accordingly, the court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh application along with a new sketch as stipulated under the Rules for changing the nature of the unnotified land.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court paves the way for BMC to continue operations at Kanjurmarg landfill
In a much needed relief to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, the Supreme Court on Friday stayed the Bombay High Court verdict which had declared the Kanjurmarg landfill a 'protected forest' and allowed the civic body to continue operating the landfill here, which caters to nearly 90 per cent of the city's solid waste. While senior civic officials maintained that the BMC has no plans to explore alternative sites for a new dumping ground, the petitioner—who fought a 15-year-long legal battle—deemed the apex court's stay a case of 'environmental injustice'. Of the 6,500 metric tonnes (MT) of solid waste generated in Mumbai, nearly 5,900 metric tonnes of waste is processed at the Kanjurmarg dumping ground, which is Mumbai's sole sanitary landfill (SLF) or disposal facility. In what had nudged the BMC into a tight spot, the Bombay HC on May 2, declared a 119.91-hectare portion of the 141.77 hectare landfill at Kanjurmarg as a 'protected forest' under the forest conservation act (FCA) and forest act, quashing a 2009 notification of the state government that denotified the land parcel as a forest. The HC had granted the BMC three months to comply with the judgment. However, amid concerns of the city coming to a standstill with the closure of the largest landfill, the BMC had filed a special leave petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court. On Friday, the SC stayed the HC order that restored the Kanjurmarg landfill's forest status. Senior officials confirmed that the landfill will continue to cater to the city's solid waste with the BMC having no immediate plans of looking at alternative dumping sites. According to officials, for the future, the BMC has charted plans to install a 60 MW waste-to-energy plant to process dry waste at the Kanjurmarg site as well as install a 500 TPD plant for wet waste, which will generate approximately 16.25 tonnes of compressed biogas (CBG) per day. Stalin D , director of Vanashakti who had filed four different petitions against the dumpsite, said that the Supreme Court's stay was a case of 'environmental injustice'. 'Even though their petition was readied by July 7, we found out about the SLP, which was listed for Friday, only at 3pm on Thursday, after we asked for it. While this barely left us with any time to prepare, we were ready to fight virtually. However, even then, we did not get to argue our case. The HC had extensively studied and written the judgment after 10 months of hard work. However, it wasn't even read properly before it was trashed,' said Stalin, adding, 'In such cases, the environment is the petitioner in absentia and we are just the representatives. With the SC failing to even hear us, environmental justice was buried.'
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Kerala HC rejects man's plea against maintenance for 100-year-old mother
Kochi: High court has stated that if a mother seeks maintenance from her son, he cannot claim that he need not pay maintenance because the mother has other children who can support her. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The bench of Justice P V Kunhikrishnan delivered the ruling while dismissing a petition by a 57-year-old Kollam native challenging a family court order which directed him to pay maintenance of Rs 2,000 per month to his 100-year-old mother. HC observed that even if the other children are not maintaining the mother or are displaying a negative attitude towards her, it is the duty of the petitioner, who is admittedly her son, to look after her affairs; otherwise, he cannot be considered a human being. The petitioner contended that his mother is currently with his 72-year-old elder brother, who allegedly harbours personal animosity against him and is manipulating the mother to settle personal scores. HC responded that, even if it is true, such family issues should be resolved within the four walls of the house. A 100-year-old mother should not have been forced to approach court for maintenance when her children are alive, HC added. HC also noted that the 72-year-old elder brother not only cares for the mother but also looks after another brother, who is mentally retarded. In addition, the mother has another son and two daughters. Although the petitioner argued that he is willing to maintain his mother if she agrees to stay with him, HC firmly stated that this is not an act of charity; it is a son's duty to care for his mother. If he fails to do so, he should be ashamed of himself. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A son is indebted to his parents in countless ways, and it is his duty to serve them. The bench further observed that as parents grow old, their tastes, attitudes and temperaments may change. It is natural for elderly people to exhibit childlike behaviour. Just as mothers were patient with their children's tantrums and whims, children must reciprocate that patience when their parents age.
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
‘Increasing number of orphans, abandoned children being institutionalised in Child Care Centres not a good sign'
'Every year in the State, the number of orphans and abandoned children getting institutionalised in government and private Child Care Centres is increasing. This is not a good sign,' said Arundhati, programme manager, Directorate of Child Protection, Karnataka. Speaking on the 'Status of the Family Based Care in Karnataka' during a 'Consultation on Family-Based Care and Nurturing for Children in Karnataka,' here on Friday, Ms. Arundhati said there are 711 child care institutions in the State, including 108 government Bala Mandiras. Currently, there are about 19,000 to 20,000 children in these institutions. Of these, 350 are adoptable children in the 'Orphan Abandonment Surrendered' (OAS) category. The rest are in the No-Visitation or Unfit Guardian category , she said. 'According to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2025, institutionalisation of children shall be a last resort. But we are promoting institutionalisation without properly understanding the Act. As per the rules, children registered with the Child Welfare Committee and the Children's Welfare Board should be re-integrated with their families as a first priority. If there is no family, they can be re-integrated with the extended family. If this is not possible, steps should be taken to provide them with a permanent family through adoption. When none of this is possible, arrangements should be made for them in Foster Care Family. We all need to work more in this regard,' she said. 'There is a good response to adoption in the State. However, the public is not showing much interest in becoming foster care parents for children above six years,' she said, adding that no one is coming forward to adopt or foster care for special needs children. 'This year, already 70 children have been given to foster care. Currently, there are 150 children identified for foster care in the State. Out of these, 61 are in immediate placement, all of whom are in the special needs category. Of the remaining 89 children, six are in the normal, 61 in the no-visitation, and 22 are in the unfit guardian category. After consulting with the children, 67 children are ready to be given to foster care, and 129 prospective foster parents have registered to receive the children in the District Child Protection Committees. However, none of them have come forward to take in special needs children,' she lamented. Further, she explained that there are no proper guidelines or rules for foster children completing 18 years of age, and steps have been taken to make separate Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in this regard. However, the recently amended Juvenile Justice Act has allowed the same parents to adopt the child if the child has been in the foster family for more than two years, she added. K. Naganna Gowda, chairperson of the Karnataka State Commission for Protection of Child Rights, said, 'Children are the asset of the country, and the care and upbringing of abandoned children is the responsibility of all of us. A family atmosphere should be created for those children in Child Care Centers. There is a committee headed by the Deputy Commissioner in all districts. It should take an appropriate action to ensure the safety and protection of these children.' The programme was jointly organised by the KSCPCR and India Alternative Care Network at Institute for Social and Economic Change.
