How did the House spend this morning? Changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
'This majority keeps replacing science with slogans, governance with grievance, and policy making with cheap performance art,' Huffman said. 'The truth is, this bill won't fix a single problem. It does absolutely nothing to help the Gulf Coast. It won't create a single job. It's not going to fix our climate crisis. It's just dumb. The only thing this bill will do is waste time and your taxpayer dollars to stroke the ego of a guy who
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
While Greene and Republican
Representative Bruce Westerman of Arkansas, championed
the bill on the House floor, Fox News reported,
Still,
Advertisement
Greene defended the bill on the House floor as an important step to building up American pride. At one point, she compared renaming the gulf to the pride a parent takes in naming their child.
Advertisement
'Names matter, and the Democrats know that parents take a lot of time when they think about what to name a child that they're happy to welcome in the world, because they have pride,' she said. 'As we rename the gulf, the Gulf of America, we are also taking pride in those waters.'
Greene, at one point, falsely asserted that the United States owns the gulf. 'This is such an important thing to do for the American people,' she said. 'They deserve pride in the waters that we own.'
In reality, the American, Mexican, and Cuban governments each
Rep. Steny Hoyer, a Maryland Democrat, started his debate time with an attempt at humor.
'Live from Washington DC, this is Saturday Night Live!' he said, in a riff on the famous opening of the sketch comedy show. 'You can't make this up. ...Republicans think this juvenile legislation is the best use of this house's time. This is the only thing we're doing today, folks. What a sick joke.'
Julian E.J. Sorapuru can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Governor Greg Abbott Orders Arrest of Democratic Lawmakers. Can He Do That?
Democrats left the state before the Texas House could vote on a new congressional map that would likely grant Republicans more seats in the U.S. HouseNEED TO KNOW Texas House Democrats left the state on Sunday to deny quorum, which was required for the State House to pass legislation Gov. Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of Texas House Democrats who left the state, and the House Speaker vowed to sign civil warrants, which will only apply to Democrats within state lines The Texas House was set to vote on a new congressional map that could lead to more Republicans in the U.S. HouseTexas Gov. Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of Texas House Democrats who left the state to prevent the passage of a new congressional map of the state designed to give Republicans more seats in the U.S. House. Dozens of Democrats left Texas, making it impossible for the Texas House, which is dominated by Republicans, to establish the quorum needed to pass legislation. On Monday, Aug. 4, House members in Austin voted 85-6 to arrest the Democratic lawmakers who were not in the Capitol, per the Texas Tribune. House Speaker Dustin Burrows vowed to sign civil warrants for the Democrats who left the state, but the warrants will only apply to Democrats within state lines. Many have already left for Illinois, New York and Massachusetts. "This house will not sit quietly while you obstruct the work of the people," Burrows said, per CBS Austin. "The people of Texas are watching and so is the nation." After the House issued the warrants, Abbott, 67, also ordered the arrest of 'delinquent' Texas Democrats. 'Texas House Democrats abandoned their duty to Texans,' The governor said in a statement. 'By fleeing the state, Texas House Democrats are holding hostage critical legislation to aid flood victims and advance property tax relief. There are consequences for dereliction of duty." Abbott said he ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to 'locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans,' adding, 'This order will remain in effect until all missing Democrat House members are accounted for and brought to the Texas Capitol.' 'He has no legal mechanism,' Texas Rep. Jolanda Jones, who traveled to New York, said on Monday, per the Associated Press. 'Subpoenas from Texas don't work in New York, so he can't come and get us. Subpoenas in Texas don't work in Chicago... He's putting up smoke and mirrors.' Abbott also sent a letter to the members who left Texas on Sunday, Aug. 3, threatening to invoke a legal opinion by the state's attorney general to "remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House." He claimed members could also face felony charges for fundraising to pay the $500 daily fine that would rack up for each they they are out of Austin. "Come and take it,' the Texas House Democratic Caucus said in response Sunday night. The Texas House has 150 members, and at least 100 are needed to attend to reach a quorum. There are 62 Democrats, meaning that if 51 or more are missing, the ongoing special session can't pass any bills. There are just over two weeks left of the special session, which Abbott called after the devastating Hill Country floods. In his proclamation calling for the legislature to meet, Abbott also listed other priorities, including redrawing congressional districts and passing a bathroom bill that would require transgender people to use bathrooms that match their birth sex in public buildings. Democrats haven't said how long they plan to stay out of Texas. State Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader who traveled to Illinois, said they will 'do whatever it takes,' but added, 'What that looks like, we don't know.' Texas Democrats also left the state in 2021 to protest new voting restrictions. In that case, the Texas Supreme Court said House leaders could 'physically compel' missing members to attend, but Democrats weren't forcibly brought back. They returned after 38 days, and the bill passed anyway. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Texas House adjourned on Monday after the arrest warrants were approved and is scheduled to meet again on Tuesday. Read the original article on People
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Democrat who fled Texas reacts to Abbott issuing arrest warrant for skipping special session
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has now ordered the State Department of Public Safety to conduct civil arrests of Democrats who did not show up for this afternoon's special legislative session. Democrat Linda Garcia joins CNN Chief Domestic Correspondent Phil Mattingly to explain why lawmakers, faced with Trump-led partisan redrawing of the state's congressional map, are fleeing.
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Don't whine about federal budget cuts, lefties — put your money where your mouths are
Before politics overwhelmed the word, the primary meaning of 'liberal' was 'generous.' President Donald Trump and the Republican Congress have given political liberals a chance to take that meaning back — by opening their wallets to show just how much they value NPR, PBS and other programs defunded by the GOP. There's no shortage of funds on the left. Laurene Powell Jobs, the mega-rich backer of The Atlantic, has a net worth estimated at above $11 billion a year ago and believed to be even higher today. George Soros, at 94, has a fortune in the vicinity of $7 billion, with billions more in his Open Society Foundation. Bill Gates has about $115 billion, his ex-wife Melinda around $30 billion. Any one of these left-leaning billionaires could single-handedly make up the $535 million that NPR, PBS and local stations were getting annually from taxpayers before Congress zeroed out the subsidies. If half a billion a year is too much for one zillionaire, a half-dozen of them — or more — could share the burden without feeling a pinch. But are wealthy liberals willing to put their money where their mouths are? Citing Michal Heiplik, president of the public-media analytics organization Contributor Development Partnership, The New York Times reports PBS and NPR have reaped a windfall from small-dollar donors in recent months, with 120,000 new supporters stepping up to give some $20 million. Overall, donations are running $70 million above last year. And what works for PBS and NPR will work for humanitarian programs formerly funded as part of USAID as well, though the cuts to be made up there are bigger: Congress has eliminated about $8 billion in funding for USAID and other foreign-aid efforts, according to the Cato Institute. That's a lot of money — but not a dime of it has disappeared. After all, where does government get its money in the first place? Washington could only give to foreign aid or nonprofit broadcasting what it took — or borrowed — from the American people in the first place. When government doesn't spend money, society doesn't lose any of its resources: They just stay with the taxpayers, and the middlemen in government don't get their cut. That, for liberals, is a big part of the problem. The Democratic Party depends on shunting everyone's tax (or debt) dollars into the hands of bureaucrats, one of the party's most loyal constituencies. It's not just NPR and PBS that have been publicly financed — it's also liberalism as a movement. Bureaucrats in government, in government-supported nonprofits and other less-than-fully-private parts of the 'private sector' may work for organizations that are officially nonpartisan, but their campaign-giving heavily favors Democrats. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Their employers may be nonpartisan in theory, but the employees have a strong partisan tilt, and personnel is policy: Any organization is only a collection of people. USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting were both born in the Kennedy-Johnson years, at mid-century liberalism's zenith. Liberalism had been dominant for so long — starting with the New Deal and Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration — that liberal intellectuals and policymakers came to think of themselves as more than just one side of American politics. They claimed to speak for everyone, as if a single party could define what it meant to be nonpartisan. But even then, the conservative movement was taking off while the Democrats were being dragged to the left by young radicals who wanted 'acid, amnesty and abortion.' Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The agencies and programs the Republican Congress has defunded were never as neutral as they claimed to be. And as liberals, under the influence of the left, adopted a more adversarial attitude toward America's past and present, it only became more obvious that the agencies and public-private partnerships they ran represented only one side of any argument. But this doesn't mean liberals can't continue to fund everything they funded before. Now they just have to do it with their own money. Some centrist liberals rightly see that as an opportunity, not an imposition: When I told a friend at a government-supported think tank I was sorry for the professional upheaval he was going though, he noted that his institution had in fact been coasting by ever since the end of the Cold War. He said it needed a renewed sense of mission, and having to raise private funds would give it the impetus it had been lacking for decades. Republicans aren't worried NPR or PBS will move further left if they court progressive billionaires, considering what little presence conservatives had on those networks already. But if they're smart, the broadcasters will see the loss of government funding as a spur to court a wider spectrum of support — and to put to the test what it means to be nonpartisan. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.
