logo
Ottawa homeowners facing 5% increase in water bills a year over 10 years to fund infrastructure upgrades

Ottawa homeowners facing 5% increase in water bills a year over 10 years to fund infrastructure upgrades

CTV News03-06-2025
Ottawa residents will be paying $5 more a month on their water bill over the next 10 years, as the city turns on the financial taps to fix up and expand the city's water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure.
A report for the finance and corporate services committee shows the city's water, wastewater and stormwater services need $4.8 billion in capital spending between 2026 and 2035. Of that amount, $4 billion will be spent to renew existing water and wastewater assets.
According to the plan, the city will fund $3 billion of the infrastructure work through water, wastewater and stormwater revenues, with $1.7 billion from new debt.
Staff told the finance and corporate services committee that the city will spend $450 million to $500 million each year over the next 10 years, with the capital assets expected to be in service for up to 100 years.
'The funding strategy addresses all the 'priority needs' in the first 10 years of the plan and leverages debt funding in order to advance these projects,' staff said Tuesday.
Currently, the city's operating revenues provide capital funding of approximately $307 million a year. To fill a $169 million a year financial gap, the city will finance infrastructure upgrades to water, wastewater and stormwater services through rate increases and new debt.
'The recommended funding strategy aims to completely eliminate the funding gap for priority capital needs in every year of the ten-year planning period, by shifting a portion of the cash contributions annually to debt servicing to advance funding,' staff said. 'The impact to the ratepayer is minimized since the overall revenue requirement remains stable but the debt servicing ratio does increase, but within affordable limits.'
Under the plan to cover operating and capital cost requirements, residential water bills will increase between 4.5 per cent and 5.6 per cent a year over the next 10 years, with a 4.5 per cent hike in 2026, a 4.9 per cent jump in 2027 and 5.6 per cent increases in 2031 and 2032. Staff say this is an estimated water rate increase, and the actual increase will be determined each year during the budget process.
'The estimated rate increases required to recover costs will differ by service with an overall estimated average of 5.0 per cent over the 10 years, which equates to $5.00 more per month for the average residential property,' the report says.
The city will also use debt serving charges and reserve fund balances to fund the infrastructure renewal and expansion.
The City of Ottawa says the conditions of its assets range from 'good' for drinking water services, to 'good to fair' for wastewater and stormwater services.
According to the City of Ottawa's Drinking Water Services Asset Management Plan, five per cent of Ottawa's watermains for drinking water services are in poor condition, while seven per cent of water facilities are in poor condition.
The City of Ottawa's water, wastewater and stormwater assets include 9,600 kilometres of water, wastewater and stormwater pipes, the Lemieux and Britannia water purification plans, the Robert O. Pickard Environment Centre, the city's sewage treatment plant, 86 pump stations, and over 6,600 culverts.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline

Vancouver Sun

time40 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline

Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'We don't have a deal with Canada, we haven't been focused on it,' Trump told reporters Friday. Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canadian officials have also downplayed expectations of a new economic and security agreement materializing by Friday. 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses. 'We are hopeful — we can't know for sure obviously — we are hopeful that we will continue to prevail in court,' Somin said. Somin said they are arguing that IEEPA does not 'give the president the power to impose any tariff he wants, on any nation, for any reason, for as long as he wants, whenever he feels like it.' He added that 'the law also says there must be an emergency and an unusual and extraordinary threat to American security or the economy' — and neither the flow of fentanyl from Canada nor a trade deficit meet that definition. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. The White House has said the Trump administration is legally using powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address America's 'national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking.' There have been 18 amicus briefs — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — filed in support of the small businesses and states pushing against Trump's tariffs. Two were filed in support of the Trump administration's actions. Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, said the Trump administration is taking a vague statute and claiming powers never deployed by a president before. The Cato Institute submitted a brief that argued 'the Constitution specifies that Congress has the power to set tariffs and duties.' Skorup said there are serious issues with the Trump administration's interpretation of IEEPA. 'We don't want power consolidated into a single king or president,' he said. It's expected the appeals court will expedite its ruling. Even if it rules against the duties, however, they may not be immediately lifted. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this.' There are at least eight lawsuits challenging the tariffs. Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline

National Post

time40 minutes ago

  • National Post

Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline

Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. Article content While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Article content Article content Article content Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Article content Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Article content Article content Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Article content The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Article content The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. Article content Article content The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. Article content George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called Trump's tariff actions a 'massive power grab.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, is representing the American small businesses.

Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline
Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline

Edmonton Journal

timean hour ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Trump's tariff threats against Canada face legal hurdles ahead of August deadline

Article content Donald Trump's plan to realign global trade faces its latest legal barrier this week in a federal appeals court — and Canada is bracing for the U.S. president to follow through on his threat to impose higher tariffs. Article content While Trump set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to make trade deals with the United States, the president's ultimatum has so far resulted in only a handful of frameworks for trade agreements. Article content Article content Article content Deals have been announced for Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — but Trump indicated last week that an agreement with Canada is far from complete. Article content Trump sent a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by the deadline. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Article content 'We'll use all the time that's necessary,' Carney said last week. Article content Article content Countries around the world will also be watching as Trump's use of a national security statute to hit nations with tariffs faces scrutiny in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Article content Article content The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in May that Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Article content Article content The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. No previous president had ever used it for tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. Article content The Trump administration quickly appealed the lower court's ruling on the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs and arguments are set to be heard in the appeal court on Thursday. Article content The hearing combines two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One involves five American small businesses arguing specifically against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other came from 12 states pushing back on both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store