Claims made by HDFC Bank don't add up: Lilavati Trust; HDFC denies charges
HDFC Bank
MD and CEO
Sashidhar Jagdishan
, Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMM Trust) on Wednesday said the claims made by the bank about a single loan are not consistent and it has never produced any official loan ledger or agreement in court regarding its transaction with the Trust.
Refuting allegations, an
HDFC Bank
spokesperson in a statement said the allegations and insinuations made by the trustees are devoid of any iota of truth whatsoever and neither the bank nor its CEO has engaged in any activity that is illegal, unethical or improper.
The LKMM Trust manages and runs the prestigious
Lilavati Hospital
in Mumbai.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
Various documents from the bank reflect widely inconsistent loan amounts for instance, Rs 4.8 crore was cited initially, Rs 450 crore in another filing, and now Rs 65.22 crore, LKMM said in a statement.
"How can one of India's largest banks make three different claims about a single loan, and not back it up with a basic loan agreement and ledger?" LKMM Prashant Mehta, Permanent Trustee wondered.
Live Events
MORE STORIES FOR YOU
✕
HDFC Bank says timing of allegations against CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan reveals 'devious' motive of Lilavati Trust
Lilavati Trust says no dues owed to HDFC Bank
«
Back to recommendation stories
I don't want to see these stories because
They are not relevant to me
They disrupt the reading flow
Others
SUBMIT
The LKMM Trust and Prashant Mehta maintained that they had never taken a loan from HDFC Bank, and these inconsistencies support that claim, rather than refute it.
The bank's refusal to present even basic documents in court undermines the credibility of the entire case and hints at deliberate narrative manipulation, it alleged.
The Trust also alleged that the Rs 2.05 crore bribe money was paid to HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan to help Chetan Mehta group remain illegally in control of the LKMM Trust.
However, the HDFC Bank's spokesperson said, "We reiterate our unequivocal, categorical and unambiguous denial and condemnation of these egregiously malicious, false and defamatory allegations and insinuations."
The bank said it is concerned about its stakeholders and is on the verge of taking strong legal actions as per expert advice, against those who are initiating these baseless allegations with malafide and ulterior motives or involved in propagating the same.
Members of the public and media are urged to exercise their critical judgement in reporting or amplifying the unsubstantiated allegations and insinuations, the spokesperson added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Months after Ratan Tata's death, BIG achievement by Noel Tata, this company's profit jumps ten times higher in…, earns Rs 262320000000, it is…
Months after Ratan Tata's death, BIG achievement by Noel Tata, this company's profit jumps ten times higher in…, earns Rs 262320000000, it is… Tata Sons net profit has jumped nearly 10 times in the last half-decade to Rs 26,232 cr in FY25. By Anirudha Yerunkar Edited by Anirudha Yerunkar Advertisement Tata Sons, the primary investment holding company of the Tata Group, recorded a nearly ten times increase in its profit after tax over the past five years, rising to Rs 26,232 crore in FY 2024-25 from Rs 2,680 crore in FY 2019-20, as per its latest annual report. In terms of revenue, the company saw it climb over one-and-a-half fold to Rs 38,835 crore in FY25 from Rs 24,896 crore in FY20. Advertisement === The net worth of the company also surged nearly three-and-a-half times to Rs 1,49,680 crore in FY25 from Rs 45,586 crore in FY20. Tata Sons Revenue Tata Group's aggregate revenue stood at Rs 15,34,341 crore in FY25 as compared to Rs 7,89,057 crore in FY20, as per Tata Sons' annual report for 2024-25. Advertisement === Tata Motors remained the biggest revenue earner for the group at Rs 4,45,939 crore in FY25, up from Rs 2,64,041 crore in FY20. Tata Consultancy Services was the next with a revenue of Rs 2,59,286 crore in FY25, up from Rs 1,61,541 crore in FY20. Tata Steel was the third biggest revenue earner for the group at Rs 2,20,083 crore in FY25, up from Rs 1,50,794 crore in FY20. Tata Sons Performance Among the unlisted entities, Air India, which was acquired by the Tata Group in 2021, reported revenue of Rs 78,636 crore in FY25 and Tata Electronics, established in 2020, posted revenue of Rs 66,601 crore in FY25. Tata Digital posted revenue of Rs 32,188 crore in FY25, up from just Rs 7 crore in FY20. As per the annual report, Tata Sons Chairman N Chandrasekaran's total compensation in FY25 was at Rs 155.81 crore, up 15 per cent from Rs 135.32 crore in FY24. He is among the highest-paid industry leaders in India. For FY25, Tata Sons said based on its performance, the directors have recommended a dividend of Rs 64,900 per ordinary share on 4,04,146 ordinary shares, which if declared by the shareholders, would involve a cash outflow of Rs 2,622.91 crore. In the previous year, the dividend was at Rs 35,000 with an outgo of Rs 1,414.51 crore. The directors have also recommended a dividend on the cumulative redeemable preference shares (CRPS) amounting to Rs 13 lakh. In the previous year, it was at Rs 19.78 crore. (With Inputs From PTI)
New Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Employment-linked incentive scheme to be effective from August 1
NEW DELHI: The Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) Scheme, which aims at providing inclusive and sustainable employment opportunities in the country, will come into effect from August 1. It will be renamed as `PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana (PM-VBRY)'. The scheme was cleared on July 1 by the Union Cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi. The benefits of it would be applicable to jobs created between August 1, 2025 and July 31, 2027. An official release from the Labour department said, 'With an outlay of Rs 99,446 crore, the PM-VBRY aims to incentivise the creation of more than 3.5 crore jobs in the country, over a period of 2 years. Out of these, 1.92 crore beneficiaries will be first timers entering the workforce.' The scheme incentivises employers across different branches to create new jobs. 'It forms a crucial part of India's strategy to accelerate economic growth through employment-led development,' it added. The Scheme consists of two parts with Part A focused on first timers and Part B focused on employers: Part A: Incentive to first-timers Targeting first-time employees registered with Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), it will offer one-month Employees Provident Fund (EPF) wage up to Rs 15,000 in two instalments. Employees with salaries up to Rs 1 lakh will be eligible. The 1st instalment will be payable after 6 months of service and the 2nd instalment will be payable after 12 months of service and completion of a financial literacy programme by the employee. To encourage the habit of saving, a portion of the incentive will be kept in a savings instrument or deposit account for a fixed period and can be withdrawn by the employee at a later date, it added.
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bombay HC issues notice on BCCI's appeal against Rs 538 crore arbitration awards to defunct Kochi Tuskers
The Bombay High Court on Friday issued notice in appeals filed by Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) challenging a single-judge bench order that upheld two arbitration awards worth over Rs 538 crore granted in favour of the now-defunct Indian Premier League franchise Kochi Tuskers Kerala. A division bench of Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Manjusha Deshpande restrained Rendezvous Sports World (RSW) and Kochi Cricket Private Limited (KCPL) from withdrawing the amounts already deposited by the BCCI for eight weeks. The BCCI filed an appeal against the June 18 verdict of the single-judge bench of Justice Riyaz I Chagla that dismissed the BCCI's plea challenging arbitral awards. The franchise took part in only one season of the IPL, in 2011, under a consortium led by RSW and KCPL. The dispute began after the BCCI in September 2011 terminated the Kochi Tuskers Kerala due to alleged breach of the franchise agreement. Aggrieved RSW and KCPL began arbitration proceedings alleging 'wrongful' termination. On June 22, 2015, the arbitral tribunal awarded over Rs 384.83 crore to KCPL and over Rs 153.34 crore to RSW, along with interest and costs. The BCCI challenged the award before Bombay HC, which was upheld on June 18. Justice Chagla had held that arbitrator's conclusion was substantiated by records and there were 'no valid grounds' and 'no patent illegality' raised in BCCI's two pleas to warrant interference with the arbitration awards. Justice Chagla had permitted the KCPL and RSW to withdraw amounts deposited by the BCCI after six weeks. However, the BCCI filed an appeal against the single-judge bench order. The two-judge bench is likely to begin the final hearing on BCCI's appeal from September 17.
