logo
Trump Administration Live Updates: President to Sign Sweeping Domestic Policy Bill Into Law

Trump Administration Live Updates: President to Sign Sweeping Domestic Policy Bill Into Law

New York Times2 days ago
The United States has held eight migrants at a military base in Djibouti while court cases played out. But an official said the Trump administration would now promptly send the men to South Sudan.
The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the government to deport eight men who have spent more than a month held under guard on an American military base on Djibouti to South Sudan, granting a request from the Trump administration.
An administration official said it would promptly send the men, who hail from countries around the world, to the war-torn nation. Neither the United States nor South Sudan has said what will happen to the men on their arrival.
This was the second time the court has ruled in the case. Last month, in a broader ruling that was unsigned and offered no reasoning, the court paused a trial judge's order that had barred the administration from deporting migrants to countries other than their own unless they had a chance to argue that they would face torture.
Lawyers for the eight men rushed back to the trial judge, who blocked their removal again. The administration then asked the justices to clarify that last month's order properly applied to the men, too.
Thursday's Supreme Court order, which was unsigned but included two pages of reasoning, said that it did.
In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, said the ruling could have grave consequences.
'What the government wants to do, concretely,' Justice Sotomayor wrote, 'is send the eight noncitizens it illegally removed from the United States from Djibouti to South Sudan, where they will be turned over to the local authorities without regard for the likelihood that they will face torture or death.'
In May, the government loaded eight men onto a plane said to be headed to South Sudan, a violence-plagued African country where only one held citizenship.
After Judge Brian E. Murphy of the U.S. District Court in Boston intervened, their flight landed instead in the East African nation of Djibouti.
The men, who have all been convicted of serious crimes in the United States, have been detained at Camp Lemonnier, a military base, ever since. They spend almost all their time inside a modular, air-conditioned container that the military usually uses as a conference room, according to court filings. Under constant guard, they wear shackles around their ankles, except when showering, using the bathroom or meeting remotely with their lawyers, a member of their legal team has said.
Before coming to the United States, they hailed from Vietnam, South Korea, Mexico, Laos, Cuba and Myanmar. Just one is from South Sudan.
Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, welcomed Thursday's ruling.
'These sickos will be in South Sudan by Independence Day,' she said.
Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants, said the ruling comes 'at the expense of the lives of eight men who are now subject to immediate removal to a war-torn country to which they have no ties.'
In a court filing last month, the administration said it had received 'credible diplomatic assurances' from the government of South Sudan that the men would not be tortured. But Ms. Realmuto said she had no direct knowledge of those assurances and did not know what the South Sudanese government in Juba intended to do with the men after they landed.
In a filing by the migrants' lawyers, an expert on South Sudan said it was likely that the men would by detained by the country's security forces and then experience 'torture, or conditions that amount to torture,' at their hands.
The court's first involvement with the case came last month, when the justices first paused Judge Murphy's ruling that all migrants whom the government seeks to deport to countries other than their own must first be given a chance to show that they would face risk of torture.
Within hours, lawyers for the eight men returned to Judge Murphy, asking him to continue blocking the deportations of the group.
Judge Murphy, who was appointed by President Joseph R. Biden Jr., denied the motion as unnecessary. He said he had issued a separate ruling last month, different from the one the Supreme Court had paused, protecting the men in Djibouti from immediate removal.
He added that Justice Sotomayor had made the same point in her dissent from the ruling, which Justices Kagan and Jackson joined. 'The district court's remedial orders are not properly before this court because the government has not appealed them,' she wrote.
In Thursday's ruling, the majority rejected that distinction, paused both sets of rulings and allowed the deportations to South Sudan.
Justice Kagan, who dissented previously, this time issued a concurring opinion. 'I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed,' she wrote.
Justice Sotomayor, in dissent, said the court's new order continued to give Judge Murphy inadequate guidance.
'Today's order not only excuses (once again) the government's undisguised contempt for the judiciary; it also leaves the district court without any guidance about how this litigation should proceed,' she wrote.
'Today's order,' she added, 'clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.'
Thursday's order was the latest in a series of rulings related to immigration decided by the justices in summary fashion on what critics call the court's shadow docket.
Some early decisions insisted on due process — notice and an opportunity to be heard — for migrants before they are deported.
More recent orders lifted protections for hundreds of thousands of people who had been granted temporary protected status or humanitarian parole, allowing them to be deported. And the rulings concerning so-called third-country deportations to places other than migrants' home nations appeared to give little weight to due process.
The court's recent moves have been cheered by the Trump administration, which has been negotiating with countries around the world to get them to accept deportees to help speed its efforts to remove thousands of migrants. 'Fire up the deportation planes,' a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security said after the court's ruling on third-country deportations last month.
Hamed Aleaziz contributed reporting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

41-year-old New Bedford man killed in New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge crash
41-year-old New Bedford man killed in New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge crash

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

41-year-old New Bedford man killed in New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge crash

NEW BEDFORD – A 41-year-old New Bedford man was killed in a two-car motor-vehicle crash on New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge. At approximately 11 a.m. July 2, New Bedford Police and EMS received a 911 call regarding a serious motor vehicle crash on the bridge, according to the Bristol County District Attorney's Office. Upon arrival, police located a 2015 Chevy Silverado which was occupied by a 26-year-old man who was transported by EMS for minor injuries. The Silverado had a moderate amount of damage to the front end and came to a rest in the right lane of travel facing eastbound. The second vehicle involved was determined to be a 2001 Mazda Miata which was observed to have catastrophic damage to the front of end of the vehicle. The Miata was located on the eastbound side of the highway facing west as it lost control while crossing the bridge and struck the Silverado. The Miata's driver was identified as 41-year-old Gregory Crook McGuire of New Bedford. Crook McGuire was transported to St. Luke's Hospital where he was pronounced dead a short time later. The crash closed the bridge for several hours. Massachusetts State Police assigned to the Bristol County District Attorney's Office also responded to the scene. This matter is under investigation although charges are not anticipated at this time. This article originally appeared on Standard-Times: Charges not anticipated in fatal New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge crash

Donald Trump Wants to Add His Face to Mount Rushmore. Here's What Its Former Keeper Says About 'the Reality of the Rock'
Donald Trump Wants to Add His Face to Mount Rushmore. Here's What Its Former Keeper Says About 'the Reality of the Rock'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump Wants to Add His Face to Mount Rushmore. Here's What Its Former Keeper Says About 'the Reality of the Rock'

Experts are weighing in on Donald Trump's open desire to be the fifth face on Mount Rushmore. Trump has floated the idea of adding himself to the famed South Dakota mountainside since his first term, reportedly fancying the idea so much that then-South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem gifted him an $1,100 bust of his face in the lineup during his park visit in 2020. The possibility of a five-face Rushmore has garnered renewed interest among Trump's most loyal supporters since his return to office, culminating in a House bill introduced by Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna. But the question of whether the plan could — or should — work still looms. Trump isn't the first proposed addition to the landmark — Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan have also been mentioned in the past as possible additions. But a longstanding argument against any updates to the sculpture, said Dan Wenk, the former superintendent of Mount Rushmore National Memorial, is that the piece of art is already finished, visually and rhetorically. According to the National Park Service, the four presidents carved on Mount Rushmore were specifically chosen by sculptor Gutzon Borglum to represent major facets of the United States' first 150 years: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln represent the birth, growth, development and preservation of the country, respectively. 'You wouldn't add another face to Borglum's Mount Rushmore just like you wouldn't add one to da Vinci's 'Last Supper,'' Wenk told The New York Times. 'But I recognize that these types of ideas are no longer off the table.' Another, more practical point is that the mountain may not be able to withstand any further alteration. During the sculpture's creation from 1927 to 1941, questions were constantly raised about the reliability of the mountain's composite, as the rock was in many places delicate and unpredictable. The National Park Service told the Times in a statement that there simply isn't room for another face on the side of the mountain. 'The carved portion of Mount Rushmore has been thoroughly evaluated, and there are no viable locations left for additional carvings,' the park service told the outlet. Borglum — the main mind behind Mount Rushmore's design — ultimately changed his plan nine times, due to rock inconsistency, fractures and fragility in the mountain. Early plans, according to Smithsonian magazine, included an entablature with a short history of the country, a staircase, a Hall of Records to include the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and the torsos of each president featured. But each idea was abandoned due to the rock's fragility. While there is, technically, free mountainside space on either side of the historic sculpture, Borglum believed only the space he ended up using in the final product was actually workable, and there would be no more room for any sort of addition. Thus, those wishing to see Mount Rushmore evolve in any artistic way are likely to be disappointed, Wenk told the Times. 'Fortunately, from my view — and not just for Trump but anybody else — they're fighting against the reality of the rock," Wenk said. Read the original article on People

Musk forms 'America Party' opposing Trump's tax bill
Musk forms 'America Party' opposing Trump's tax bill

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk forms 'America Party' opposing Trump's tax bill

The dispute between US President Donald Trump and campaign financier Elon Musk has taken another fractious turn after the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Trump's "big, beautiful" tax bill will bankrupt America. A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new US political party should be created, Musk declared in a post on Saturday that "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he wrote. By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025 The announcement from Musk comes after Republican President Trump signed his self-styled "big, beautiful" tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which Musk fiercely opposed. Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term aimed at slashing government spending. The first sign of investor dissatisfaction with Musk's announcement followed later in the day. Investment firm Azoria Partners will postpone the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund, Azoria CEO James Fishback said in a post on X. Fishback, who has asked Tesla's board to clarify Musk's political ambitions, said the new party undermined the confidence shareholders had that he would focus more on the company after leaving government service in May. Elon has gone too investment firm (@InvestAzoria) has decided to postpone next week's public listing of our Azoria Tesla Convexity decision comes in direct response to @ElonMusk's announcement that he is launching a new national political party. This creates… — James Fishback (@j_fishback) July 6, 2025 Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Trump to attacking him, Musk said: "Increasing the deficit from an already insane $US2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country." There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Trump's November re-election and hit a high of more than $US488 ($A745) in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing at $315.35 on Friday. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years and Trump's approval ratings in polls during his second term have generally held firm above 40 per cent, despite often divisive policies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store