
Greek health sector welcomes WHO resolution targeting rare diseases
This is the first time rare diseases have been formally recognised as a significant international public health concern, offering a long-overdue platform to address the challenges faced by over 300 million people worldwide.
The resolution sets the stage for the creation of a comprehensive, ten-year Global Action Plan for Rare Diseases.
Dimitris Athanasiou, Vice President of Rare Disease Greece, described the resolution as a "historic breakthrough" and a moral imperative for governments to act. "For the first time," he told Euractiv, "the international community has acknowledged that people living with rare diseases face systemic inequality, and it is now our responsibility to act on this recognition."
The Hellenic Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies (SFEE) welcomed the adoption of the resolution.
"The adoption of the World Health Assembly Resolution on Rare Diseases is an important international development, which lays the foundations for the formulation of meaningful and coordinated policies, geared towards the needs of the 300 million people living with a rare disease," Mihalis Himonas, General Director of SFEE, told Euractiv.
Evolving rare disease care
Pushing towards an international strategic framework for rare diseases, the resolution also calls on the WHO Director-General to work closely with member states and stakeholders to develop a structured framework that improves early diagnosis, strengthens healthcare delivery systems, promotes research and data sharing, and integrates rare diseases into national health strategies.
This includes placing rare conditions within the context of universal healthcare coverage, education, social services, and registries.
Twenty-six countries have already co-signed the resolution, including Greece, and many others have initiated national-level discussions and debates to develop or revise their own Rare Disease Action Plans.
Towards a national strategy
For Greece, a country where progress has been made but challenges remain, this resolution arrives at a critical moment. It is estimated that rare diseases affect up to 6% of the country's population.
Patients with rare diseases in Greece still face substantial delays in diagnosis, while access to innovative treatments faces hurdles. In addition, rare disease patients and their families often encounter significant social and economic hardship due to inadequate support systems and fragmented care.
Within this landscape, the resolution assumes added significance for Greek stakeholders, including both patients and the healthcare industry.
Athanasiou emphasises the need for a different approach to managing rare diseases.
"This requires close collaboration between governments, regulatory authorities, the pharmaceutical industry, and patient organisations," he told Euractiv, adding that "only through coordinated action can we move beyond fragmented solutions and transition toward a holistic and sustainable model of care."
In a recent policy brief on rare diseases, SFEE emphasised the importance of cross-sector collaboration, calling on Greek authorities to move swiftly toward a fully developed and operational national action plan.
"With a firm commitment and active participation, SfEE and its Platform on Rare Diseases are working to produce evidence-based pharma policy, in their effort to contribute at the same time to the formulation of effective and sustainable healthcare and pharma policies at both national and European levels," Himonas commented to Euractiv.
"Greece, as a signatory country, is called upon to proceed with the design and implementation of a National Action Plan, which will respond to the specific needs of patients, ensuring their equal and unhindered access to diagnosis, treatment and innovation," he added.
[Edited by Brian Maguire]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
4 days ago
- Euractiv
Roche steps in as Trump aims for 1500% drug price cuts
'We're gonna get the drug prices down – not 30% or 40%. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000%, 1,500%,' said the US president. Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Thomas Mangin Euractiv Jul 24, 2025 15:17 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Amid a crusade against overpriced medicine, US President Donald Trump has promised to bring drug prices down by 1,500%. While the world still puzzles over his maths, the industry appears ready to offer solutions. 'We're gonna get the drug prices down – not 30% or 40%, which would be great. Not 50% or 60%. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' said the US president at the White House on 22 July 22. 'Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable, because I've used a certain talent that I have,' he added. The pharmaceutical industry remains one of President Trump's primary targets. In his first term, Trump vowed to lower drug prices – but with little effect. A study by the Rand Corporation estimated that in 2024, drug prices in the United States were 2.7 times higher than in the 32 other OECD countries. The U.S. president continues to put pressure on big pharma groups and is pushing them to relocate to the United States, notably by threatening to impose tariffs of up to 200%. Several European companies have announced massive investments across the Atlantic in recent months. On 22 July, AstraZeneca unveiled a $50 billion investment plan in the United States by 2030. In April, Roche announced a similar investment for production as well as research and development in the U.S. 'We hope the U.S. government will see, through all the investments we and other companies are making, that pharmaceutical firms want to produce the medicines needed in the United States, for the United States,' said Schinecker. (bms, aw)


Euractiv
5 days ago
- Euractiv
New study finds Dutch support higher drug costs, if benefits are clear
Dutch citizens are willing to accept higher public spending on a medicine if it provides significant health benefits, a study has found. To better understand how the Dutch might prioritise cost when considering a socially acceptable price for specific medicines, researchers from Radboud University Medical Centre selected a group of 11 men and 13 women with diverse backgrounds to participate in a Citizens' Forum over two weekends. They later ran an online survey among 884 people in the Netherlands to gather further insights and determine whether the results from the forum were broadly supported. "The main aim of gaining insight into citizens' considerations regarding the societal acceptability of high-priced medicines was successfully achieved," lead researcher Prof. Rob Baltussen told Euractiv. Study background The study, part of the Dutch Socially Acceptable Spending on Medicines programme (MAUG), examined medicines that are reimbursed through the Dutch basic health insurance system, which is mandatory for anyone who lives or works in the Netherlands. Health insurers are not allowed to reimburse a medicine until the government negotiates its price with its manufacturer. These discussions take place behind closed doors. To help the forum's participants gain more insight into the subject, an ethicist, a former senior employee of a pharmaceutical company, a senior employee of an NGO that works for fair access to medicines worldwide, and a former member of the Insured Package Advisory Committee (ACP) were enlisted to share their expertise. "Despite the confidentiality of price negotiations, the provided information was deemed sufficient for participants to make nuanced judgements," Baltussen said. The researchers wrote in their report that they did not select any patients to be part of the forum or questionnaire to avoid bias "because patients understandably focus primarily on their own health and access to care". Medicines offering complete recovery The online survey used a 5-point Likert scale to measure how strongly citizens agreed with different reasons for accepting higher medicine prices. Respondents were most supportive when a medicine offered complete recovery (4.16), enabled participation in society (3.87), or had a favourable cost-benefit ratio (3.85). Support was lowest when a medicine was significantly more expensive in the Netherlands than abroad, scoring just 1.95. The results of the online survey largely confirmed the outcome of the Citizen Forum, that citizens are willing to accept a higher price for a medicine if it provides significant health benefits, offers fair access, and contributes to social participation. 'Reinvest 50% of profits in R&D' Participants said the government, where necessary, should refuse to reimburse expensive medicines that are not sufficiently effective or whose prices are socially unacceptable. They recommended that pharmaceutical manufacturers should be transparent about the price structure of medicines, set reasonable profit margins to prevent excessive prices and keep healthcare affordable. They also said the companies should reinvest at least 50% of their profits in research and development. The participants further recommended that citizens should understand there are limits to what the Netherlands can afford to spend on healthcare and that they should set realistic expectations. Researchers said they expected the topic to appear regularly in the run-up to the Dutch general elections set to take place this October. The study's results will be included in a recommendation on drug pricing to be submitted to the Health Ministry in the coming months. "This research confirms that there is support for the difficult decisions we as a society have to make," Baltussen said. "With these insights, politicians can develop healthcare policies that are both effective and supported by society." [Edited by Vasiliki Angouridi, Brian Maguire]


Euractiv
6 days ago
- Euractiv
Wild Animals Not Pets – The Case for an EU Positive List
Health This video captures highlights from the event: Wild Animals Not Pets – The Case for an EU Positive List. A gathering of policymakers, experts, and animal welfare advocates at the European Parliament to discuss the trade in wild animals and its implications for welfare, health, and biodiversity | 22 Jul 2025 | 12:00 | 1 min. read | video This video captures highlights from the event: Wild Animals Not Pets – The Case for an EU Positive List. A gathering of policymakers, experts, and animal welfare advocates at the European Parliament to discuss the trade in wild animals and its implications for welfare, health, and biodiversity. Speakers reflected on the importance of: Establishing an EU-wide positive list of species permitted as pets Addressing the risks wild animal trade poses to animal welfare, public health, and biodiversity Tackling fragmented national rules and the need for harmonised EU legislation Strengthening EU animal welfare frameworks to better protect wild species At a time when animal welfare and biodiversity face increasing pressures, these insights point to the need for coherent, science-based policies that safeguard both animals and society. Euractiv is part of the Trust Project More from this section