Randi Weingarten's ‘No Kings' push shows teachers union is prioritizing activism over education: source
Critics say unions taking part are undermining their members by taking an overtly partisan stance. The American Federation of Teachers, American Postal Workers Union, and Communications Workers of America are all listed as partners of No Kings Day.
AFT president Randi Weingarten is set to speak at the Philadelphia No Kings Rally.
Advertisement
8 Randi Weingarten spoke at a No Kings Day virtual town hall and is expected to appear at a Saturday rally.
@rweingarten/X
School choice activist Corey DeAngelis told The Post Weingarten's involvement reveals 'that teachers unions are more invested in political activism than in prioritizing education.'
'Their actions expose them as little more than an arm of the Democratic Party, pushing a radical agenda that puts taxpayers on the hook for funding the K-12 education of illegal immigrants,' DeAngelis said.
Advertisement
Weingarten spearheaded a No Kings town hall on Tuesday, declaring the event is 'about strong public schools, supporting working families, and our fundamental freedoms.'
8 More than 1,500 No Kings Day protests are planned for Saturday.
ZUMAPRESS.com
The Zoom call also featured Democrat Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky and Al Sharpton.
'The people are the most important decision makers in the country. Not a king, not a dictator,' Weingarten said during the call. She is set to speak at the Philadelphia event, and the AFT has an entire webpage of volunteer opportunities populated with No Kings Day events.
Advertisement
Weingarten has also promoted the event to her more than 100,000 followers on X.
'Where was this outrage from Randi Weingarten when her local affiliates fought to keep schools closed for years during the COVID era?' DeAngelis asked.
8 An interactive map shows hundreds of protests, spread across every single state.
nokings.org
8 Christy Walton took out an ad in the New York Times promoting the protests.
Getty Images
Advertisement
'Imagine if Randi Weingarten fought half as hard to improve public education. Maybe then more than a quarter of American kids would be proficient in math.'
The protests are billed as a counter to the Army's 250th anniversary military parade in DC, as well as the president's 79th birthday, which falls on the same day.
The rallies are expected to disrupt hundreds of cities in all fifty states, and have been backed by activist organizations like Black Lives Matter and the ACLU.
The day's military parade will travel down the National Mall in Washington DC and will reportedly include uniforms, arms, and vehicles from every major American war, starting with the Revolutionary War, then moving on to display more recent Abrams tanks and P-51 Mustangs.
8 Organizers of No Kings Day say the event is a 'rejection' of 'authoritarianism.'
AP
No Kings Day organizers have dubbed the parade 'a made-for-TV display of dominance,' while their own events on Saturday are 'a national day of action and mass mobilization in response to the increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption of the Trump administration' – somehow omitting the president was overwhelmingly democratically elected just seven months ago.
Jamie Bauer, a representative of No Kings, told The Post that they have indication that their crowd could exceed 75,000 in New York City alone. Other 'flagship' rallies are planned in Philadelphia, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Charlotte, and Atlanta.
No Kings is orchestrated by the 50501 Movement (short for 50 protests, 50 states, one movement), a grassroots anti-Trump group that reportedly formed on Reddit.
Advertisement
8 Senator Chris Murphy said the call gave him 'chills' and lauded protesters.
No Kings June 14/ YouTube
8 Florida Representative Maxwell Frost attended Thursday's planning call.
No Kings June 14/ YouTube
8 Organizers say they won't hold a No Kings Day rally in DC on Saturday.
Aashish Kiphayet/NurPhoto/Shutterstock
They first held a No Kings rally on February 5th, then another on President's Day, and a third in March.
Advertisement
No Kings pledged not to hold a rally in DC, after President Trump warned that protesters at the military parade would face 'very heavy force.'
'Instead of allowing this birthday parade to be the center of gravity, we will make action everywhere else the story of America that day: people coming together,' the group declared on their website.
But Trump, for one, doesn't agree with the characterization of him.
'I don't feel like a king, I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' he said on Thursday. 'We're not a king at all, thank you very much.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Jumps With Liberals
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has increased among liberals in the past month. According to polling by I&I/TIPP released on August 4, the proportion of liberals who said they approved of Trump's job performance increased by 4 percentage points from 19 percent at the end of June to 23 percent in early August. Why It Matters Approval ratings are a good way of measuring the temperature of the nation and Trump's popularity has fluctuated in the first six-plus months of his term in the Oval Office. Liberals do not generally have a positive view of the president or his policies so an uptick in approval rating is noteworthy. It remains to be seen whether this will sustain and ultimately affect the 2026 midterm elections. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025, in Allentown, Pa. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport, Sunday, Aug. 3, 2025, in Allentown, Pa. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What To Know While the proportion of liberals who said they approved of Trump has increased, the majority of liberals (72 percent) still see him in an unfavorable light. The proportion of liberals with a favorable view of the president increased from 18 percent at the end of June to 23 percent in August—an increase of 5 percentage points. Overall, Trump's favorability rating among all voters was net -1 percent in July and net 0 percent in August. The June poll was conducted between June 25 and 27 had a sample size of 1,421 adults. In August, 1,362 adults were polled from July 30 to August 1. Both polls had a margin of error of +/- 2.7 percentage points. Polling elsewhere has been less positive. A survey conducted by Quantus Insights from July 21 to July 23 among 1,123 registered voters showed his rating stands at 47 percent, while 50 percent disapproved. According to the YouGov polling for British newspaper The Times, the proportion of people who disapprove of Trump's job performance has increased from 52 percent in April to 57 percent in July. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the U.K, previously said: "Trump's second term has been less of a honeymoon, but more of a divorce from half the country: one where he's got to keep the house, the kids and just about all of the assets. From day one of his rule by Executive Order he has never sought to bring the USA together and, indeed, has exploited differences to highlight how he's delivering on his campaign commitments, not least through DOGE [Department of Government Efficiency], through his clampdown on immigration and through his America First foreign policy." "Public services are already beginning to creak thanks to the actions of Musk and his cohort, and tariffs are driving up prices at home, while the economic benefits of the One Big Beautiful act have yet to be felt. And around all this, the whiff of Epstein is tainting the president's achievements." What Happens Next The midterms are scheduled to take place in November 2026 where Trump's popularity will be tested in earnest.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Greene talks about her ‘genocide' comment and being an ‘early indicator' of GOP discontent
The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. Sign up here or in the box below. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) says that Republicans should take her vocal criticisms of the GOP — which she insists are not criticisms of President Trump — as a warning about coming troubles with their base. 'I'm an early indicator, and my complaints are felt and being said far and wide among your average American people who voted for the President and Republicans in 2024,' Greene told me in a phone interview on Monday. 'The Republican Party is the one drifting away from what we campaigned on.' Greene also expanded to me on being the only Republican in Congress to call Israel's actions in Gaza a 'genocide.' Far from backing away from the term, Greene said: 'It's easy to call it a genocide.' More on that in a moment. I had reached out to the firebrand Georgia congresswoman in wake of her comments to the Daily Mail that the GOP had 'turned its back on America First' and that she was unsure of whether 'the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore.' The comments surprised some, given Greene's ardent support of Trump, who is the leader of the GOP. She told me it is 'ridiculous' to suggest she does not support the president. But they are part of a pattern of Greene breaking with leaders in the GOP, including Trump. In recent weeks, she called the crisis in Gaza a genocide; raised the alarm about U.S. strikes in Iran; critiqued the U.S. continuing to sell weapons to help Ukraine; and pushed for more Jeffrey Epstein disclosures despite resistance from Trump, among other gripes. Just on Monday, Greene in a post lamented that there have been zero arrests in a number of MAGA-amplified scandals like the 'Russian Collusion Hoax,' 'COVID,' 'Mar-A-Lago Raid,' and 'Epstein Pedophile Arrest,' among others. She posted: 'Don't talk about it if you aren't going to do it.' Who was she talking about in that post, and who needs to change? Greene declined to name specific names. 'That criticism is to everyone, literally everyone, and no one's left out of that,' Greene said. 'If you're going to go on television — and this is for everybody — and point their fingers at all these people and call them criminals, say they committed treason, then do something about it,' Greene said. 'If they make these accusations, but yet hold no one accountable, they're going to lose everybody. They're going to lose a vast majority of people who really were told they had to care about this, and they cared about it, but yet nothing got done.' After Greene and I spoke on Monday, CNN reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi was directing federal prosecutors to start a grand jury probe into Obama administration officials over their role in the 2016 Russia election interference investigation. The question is whether Greene is a canary in the MAGA coal mine, or whether her criticisms just put her on an island. She is a giant figure in terms of followers and attention, but some could dismiss her concerns as representing only a minor faction on the right. Greene said she is reflecting what she is hearing in her deep-red Georgia district. But there is clearly some annoyance with the criticism from Greene. Asked about Greene's comments in the Daily Mail and on X, a White House official told me: 'President Trump campaigned on securing the border, signing tax cuts, and ending the genital mutilation of minors. He's accomplished all three within the first 200 days. Those are all promises MTG campaigned for and should be happy about.' Greene in response told me that she had posted over the weekend praising zero crossings in the past three months, and noted that she voted for Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' that locked in tax cuts. But she pushed back by saying Trump has not had the opportunity to sign her bill, the Protect Children's Innocence Act, to codify Trump's executive order to ban gender-affirming care for minors because it hasn't yet gotten a vote in the House or Senate. 'I'm not criticizing the President on this. I'm criticizing everyone around him. They're actually working against the president by making his executive orders, his accomplishments only temporary,' Greene said. Greene's 'America First' critique of U.S. foreign policy — going as far as to call the crisis and conflict in Gaza a 'genocide' — is perhaps the most notable break. Greene said she dubbed the situation a 'genocide' by 'simply looking at the truth and being willing to speak,' saying that there are 'many others' who agree but 'they're afraid to say it.' 'I support Israel, and we want to see every single hostage released …. It was horrific what happened on October 7,' Greene said. 'But it's also horrific what's happening in Gaza and many innocent people are being killed, have been killed. Christians have been killed, and children have been killed and are being starved.' 'It's easy to call it a genocide. And I think Israel has made clear what they want to do. They really want to, basically, move all the Palestinians out of Gaza, and that's what they're in the process of systematically doing,' Greene said. I noted that even many progressive Democrats critical of Israel have not used the term 'genocide' to describe what's happening in Gaza, since the term implies targeted destruction of an ethnic group based on their identity. American Jewish groups, not to mention Israel itself, strongly reject accusations of 'genocide.' 'I think it's pretty easy to understand. It's targeted at who they are, so that's their identity,' Greene said. 'I mean, they've bombed it to the point where it's unlivable … They are in talks of trying to get other countries to take Palestinian refugees. So I don't think it can be any more clear.' Welcome to The Movement, a weekly newsletter looking at the influences and debates on the right in Washington. I'm Emily Brooks, House leadership reporter at The Hill. Tell me what's on your radar: ebrooks@ STRANGE BEDFELLOWS FOR 'ORGASMIC MEDITATION' CONVICTS Can the right-wing outrage over 'weaponized' prosecution give a boost to those involved with a salacious case? Those defending the sexual wellness company OneTaste are finding strange bedfellows on the right as they fight convictions of the group's founder and former CEO Nicole Daedone and its former head of sales Rachel Cherwitz. Daedone and Cherwitz were convicted in June for 'forced labor conspiracy in connection with their coercive scheme to obtain the labor and services of certain OneTaste employees.' The company, which taught 'orgasmic meditation,' turned from a start-up celebrated for its focus on female sexuality to being criticized for alleged abuse of employees. It was the subject of a controversial 2022 Lena Dunham -produced Netflix documentary, 'Orgasm Inc.' It's not the type of case that immediately invites a conservative defense, but defenders of Daedone and Cherwitz see an opening with those skeptical of overzealous prosecutors — like those in the MAGA movement supportive of Trump and outraged about his prosecutions, as well as those of Jan. 6 rioters. 'The bulk of the support has come from the conservative movement,' said Juda Engelmayer, the crisis publicist for Daedone and Cherwitz. Getting others to take a deep look at the underlying legal issues, he said, requires 'getting your head around that concept is an ick factor.' The libertarian magazine Reason's senior editor Elizabeth Nolan Brown in February outlined a key argument of those defending OneTaste heads: 'The two face a single count of conspiracy to commit forced labor … Neither woman is charged with actually forcing labor or engaging in other criminal acts.' Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who was once investigated by the DOJ for alleged sex trafficking but never charged, has criticized the case on his One America News show. Trump adviser Roger Stone has critiqued the FBI over the case, as well. And it doesn't end in the conservative media space. There are people privately pressing the DOJ to look into the case. One member of Congress wrote to FBI Director Kash Patel with concerns about the case earlier this year, the Daily Mail reported. The Daily Mail censored the name of the member of Congress who wrote to Patel about the case — identified only as being a House Judiciary Committee member who has a law enforcement background. But Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas), who fits that bill, confirmed to me that he was the one who sent the OneTaste letter to the FBI. The 'ick factor' could be a limiting factor for the defendants as they hope for more support on the right — given social conservative values opposed to the sex-positive OneTaste ethos. Daedone and Cherwitz are scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 23, and plan to appeal the conviction. GAMBLING TAX DIVIDE EMERGING ON THE RIGHT A divide is emerging on the right over whether gamblers should be able to deduct their losses on their taxes, pitting social conservatives against top Republicans who hope to reverse the recent change. At issue is a last-minute provision in the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' that lowered the gambling loss deduction from 100 percent to 90 percent, set to kick in in 2026. That means if a gambler broke even one year, winning $1 million and losing $1 million, the gambler would still be taxed on $100,000 worth of income on winnings. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-Mo.) said in a 'field hearing' in Las Vegas, Nev. last month that he was open to nixing that change. 'I know that many members on both sides of the aisle are open to working to address it before it goes into effect on January 1st,' Smith said. But social conservatives are starting to pipe up encouraging the opposite direction. Advancing American Freedom, the group founded by former Vice President Mike Pence, is circulating a memo opposing that reversal and encouraging to lower the deduction even more: 'Gambling losses should not be deductible at all.' 'Nearly all gamblers lose money, leading to further financial, health, and family problems. Congress should encourage a pro-growth tax code by declining to reinstate full expensing for gambling losses,' the memo said. ON MY CALENDAR It's a quiet August here in Washington. Send me your interesting upcoming seminars, Capitol Hill forums, and galas to be featured in this section: ebrooks@ Monday, August 25 to Thursday, August 28: State Policy Network annual meeting in New Orleans, La. THREE MORE THINGS The Trump administration is not planning to mandate coverage for in vitro fertilization, contrary to the president's campaign pledge, the Washington Post reported. The Young Republicans honored four leaders at its national convention in Nashville, Tenn., over the weekend, inducting them into the 1856 Society: Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Political Affairs Matt Brasseaux; former National Director of Election Integrity for the Trump Campaign and RNC Christina Norton; The Washington Reporter Editor-in-Chief Matthew Foldi; and Trump 2024 National Delegate Selection Director John Findlay. Douglass Mackey, whose conviction over posting memes about the 2016 race was overturned by an appeals court this year, was celebrated at a bash at MAGA Capitol Hill hangout Butterworth's on Friday. Napkins at the event featured the meme telling voters to text to vote that Mackey posted under an anonymous Twitter account that was the center of the conviction of conspiracy to suppress voters. WHAT I'M READING
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge Emil Bove is dangerous, but let's not freak out
The appointment of Trump apparatchik Emil Bove to the influential Third Circuit Court of Appeals is terrible, deeply compromising the standards of integrity and judicial independence that have been at the core of our constitutional system since 1789. The judiciary is, as Alexander Hamilton declared it, 'the weakest of the three' branches of government. It does not need to be any weaker. But it is not yet the end of the world. The clear and present danger is that the Bove appointment, perhaps the worst Trump has made, is a chip-shot away from our supremely partisan Supreme Court. Only one judge has made it from the Third Circuit to the Supreme Court — the hard-right Justice Samuel Alito, appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006. Alito is 75, at the threshold of a reasonable retirement. But beware, with Bove waiting in the wings, the stage is set for Alito to get off the court. Some of the elements a good judge must possess are experience, intellect, judgment, temperament, integrity, character and fairness. Bove flunks on all counts. Forget that he has no prior federal judicial experience. This has been true of the greatest of our Supreme Court justices, the venerated Chief Justice John Marshall, and the very worst, Chief Justice Roger Taney, who wrote the infamous Dred Scott opinion denying citizenship to Black people. It is also true of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Louis Brandeis. Fifty senators shamefully caved on Bove, just as they did with the hideous appointments of Pam Bondi, Pete Hegseth, Kristi Noem, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kash Patel, to name a few. But remember, Bove gets a lifetime appointment, while the others will be there only so long as Trump is. Bove is joined even more closely with Trump at the hip, having defended him as his personal lawyer in multiple criminal cases. A group of former prosecutors wrote a letter urging Bove's rejection and calling him 'the worst conceivable nominee.' Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) voted against confirming Bove, stating that his 'political profile and some of the actions he has taken in his leadership roles at the Department of Justice cause me to conclude he would not serve as an impartial jurist.' Bove makes us queasy with statements that put his temperament and judgment in doubt. What is the temperament of someone quoted by Justice Department colleagues as advocating defiance of court orders with the crude battle cry, 'F— the courts!' What is the judgment of someone who has described the investigation and prosecution of those who attacked the Capitol as 'a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people'? What is the integrity of someone who told the court there was no quid pro quo in the Justice Department decision he led to dismiss the indictment of New York City Mayor Eric Adams 'without prejudice'? The federal judge who had the case found this representation to lack credibility and dismissed with prejudice, stating, 'There may or may not be good reasons to drop this prosecution. But the reasons articulated by [the Justice Department], if taken at face value, are inconsistent with a decision to leave the charges in the indictment hanging like the proverbial sword of Damocles over the mayor.' But even though Trump has cheapened the standards for appointment to the federal judiciary, there is still some hope. Sitting in the Third Circuit, which comprises Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the Virgin Islands, Bove will have to come to terms with a complement of 13 judges, seven Democrats and six Republicans. There is one remaining vacancy which Trump will try to fill. But take a deep breath. The Third Circuit rarely hears cases with ideological implications. Because its jurisdiction includes Delaware, where many corporations are housed, many of the cases coming before it are business or corporate disputes. Bove will mostly sit on a panel of three judges, and some Republican judges on the court have shown considerable independence. In a 2020 election case, for example, Third Circuit Court Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, authored a unanimous decision rejecting the Trump campaign's claims of fraud in Pennsylvania, writing that 'calling an election unfair does not make it so.' The MAGA-era Supreme Court is a horse of a different color from Bove's Third Circuit. If not historically a political policy-making body, it certainly is one now. The Supreme Court has arrogated to itself untrammeled policymaking authority. With cases like the Dobbs decision overruling Roe v. Wade, the immunity decision giving Trump a free pass for criminal deeds while in office, and the shadow docket decisions giving Trump carte blanche to ride roughshod on constitutional rights without opinion or reasoning, we now have a supremely partisan Supreme Court. Emil Bove is 44. If he makes it to the Supreme Court, he will be there for a generation or longer. But of course, he may never make it. Adults in the appointing authority may make a sounder judgment next time around. However fraught, it would be premature for liberals to wear the hair shirt. James D. Zirin, author and legal analyst, is a former federal prosecutor in New York's Southern District. He is the author of ' Supremely Partisan,' a book arguing that the Supreme Court has become politicized. He is also the host of the public television talk show and podcast .
