Organon & Co. (NYSE: OGN) Deadline Approaching: Berger Montague Advises Investors of Deadline in Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased or acquired Organon securities during the Class Period may, no later than JULY 22, 2025, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class. To learn your rights, CLICK HERE.
Organon, headquartered in Jersey City, NJ, is a healthcare company focused on women's health. In October 2024, Organon acquired Dermavant, a biopharmaceutical company focused on dermatological conditions, for $1.2 billion.
According to the lawsuit, despite the increase in debt from the Dermavant acquisition, the Company assured investors that it would maintain its dividend, which it described as its "#1 capital allocation priority.'
On May 1, 2025, investors learned the truth when Organon announced that management reset the Company's dividend payout from $0.28 per share to $0.02 per share. Organon's senior management explained that the Company had 'reset our capital allocation priorities to accelerate progress towards deleveraging' and that 'returning capital to shareholders is right now, less of a priority.'
On this news, the price of Organon stock declined $3.48 per share – approximately 27% – from a closing price of $12.93 per share on April 30, 2025 to a close of $9.45 per share on May 1, 2025.
To learn your rights or for more information, CLICK HERE or please contact Berger Montague: Andrew Abramowitz at [email protected] or (215) 875-3015, or Peter Hamner at [email protected].
A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff is usually the investor or small group of investors who have the largest financial interest and who are also adequate and typical of the proposed class of investors. The lead plaintiff selects counsel to represent the lead plaintiff and the class and these attorneys, if approved by the court, are lead or class counsel. Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. Communicating with any counsel is not necessary to participate or share in any recovery achieved in this case. Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as a lead plaintiff through counsel of his/her choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an inactive class member.
Berger Montague, with offices in Philadelphia, Minneapolis, Delaware, Washington, D.C., San Diego, San Francisco and Chicago, has been a pioneer in securities class action litigation since its founding in 1970. Berger Montague has represented individual and institutional investors for over five decades and serves as lead counsel in courts throughout the United States.
Contact:
Andrew Abramowitz, Senior Counsel
Berger Montague
(215) 875-3015
[email protected]
Peter Hamner
Berger Montague PC
[email protected]
View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/organon--co-nyse-ogn-deadline-approaching-berger-montague-advises-investors-of-deadline-in-securities-fraud-lawsuit-302497855.html
SOURCE Berger Montague
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sonic Automotive Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Sonic Automotive (NYSE:SAH) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$3.66b (up 5.9% from 2Q 2024). Net loss: US$45.6m (down by 211% from US$41.2m profit in 2Q 2024). US$1.34 loss per share (down from US$1.21 profit in 2Q 2024). AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Sonic Automotive EPS Misses Expectations Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 6.2% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 5.3% growth forecast for the Specialty Retail industry in the US. Performance of the American Specialty Retail industry. The company's shares are up 2.4% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Sonic Automotive (including 1 which is concerning). Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CTS Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Beats Expectations
CTS (NYSE:CTS) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$135.3m (up 4.0% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$18.5m (up 26% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 14% (up from 11% in 2Q 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue. EPS: US$0.62 (up from US$0.48 in 2Q 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period CTS Revenues and Earnings Beat Expectations Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 2.0%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 13%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 6.2% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 7.9% growth forecast for the Electronic industry in the US. Performance of the American Electronic industry. The company's share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago. Balance Sheet Analysis While earnings are important, another area to consider is the balance sheet. We have a graphic representation of CTS' balance sheet and an in-depth analysis of the company's financial position. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Japan 'investment vehicle' could become trade talk template — even if nobody is sure what it is
A closely watched piece of a trade deal announced with Japan this past week is a plan for a "new Japanese/USA investment vehicle" that Trump and his team said will put $550 billion aside for the president to personally deploy to finance new investments in the US. Observers are watching this unusual provision closely amid a growing expectation it will serve as a template of sorts for remaining trade talks — even as conflicts grow over exactly what was agreed to, especially a disagreement on how profits might be split. It's just one of the questions that cropped up immediately after the president's announcement Tuesday — and appears to have only grown in the days since. Trump and his team have deployed a range of metaphors to describe this part of the deal, from a "signing bonus for the country" (Trump) to a "national security sovereign fund" (Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick) to a "blank check" (trade adviser Peter Navarro). The Japanese are describing things very differently, suggesting that the provision is more akin to a non-legally binding agreement to look for joint investment opportunities for both US and Japanese companies. "There are a lot of details that need to be worked out here," former trade negotiator Wendy Cutler, now at the Asia Society Policy Institute, noted on Yahoo Finance on Friday. She added that the very different accounts from different sides at the very least "does not bode well for smooth implementation." Yet the bumpiness has done little to slow momentum for the idea in Trump's orbit, with a sense that similar provisions could be part of any possible deal with South Korea and perhaps Taiwan. Trump also appeared to suggest Friday that it may be what's needed to close a deal with the European Union. As he left for Scotland, the president described a deal with the EU as far from a sure thing, adding that what might push talks over the line is a pact "where they buy down their tariffs." Trump officials, for their part, stand by their side's version of the deal with Japan and often note they have an easy way to make sure things work out to their liking: the constant threat of re-raising tariffs. A White House spokesperson declined to offer further details Friday on exactly how the investment vehicle would work and what Trump meant with Friday's comments around EU negotiations, which are set to continue this Sunday while the president is in Scotland. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet 'Hardly the operation of the free market' What is known about the investment portion of the deal has come under growing criticism. Iain Murray, a vice president at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, called the outline "hardly the operation of the free market in action." He added that the government-run process to direct funds could quickly become messy, with "all the usual problems of state-directed, industrial policy." This piece of the deal was one that was clearly hammered out quickly and late in the negotiating process. A social media post by White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino earlier this week showed the president sitting across from Japan's chief negotiator Ryosei Akazawa. Before him was a paper outlining the deal, with $400 billion crossed out and replaced in pen with $500 billion. The final agreement of $550 billion was then subsequently announced. The full text of the trade agreement has not been released, but a White House fact sheet describes the plan as for "a new Japanese/USA investment vehicle" that will be "over $550 billion." "At President Trump's direction, these funds will be targeted toward the revitalization of America's strategic industrial base," the document adds, listing energy, semiconductors, critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, and shipbuilding as the five areas of focus. It's a provision Trump has likened to "a $550 billion signing bonus for the country," adding of the money, "We control the whole lot of it and it's really been great." Lutnick has gone further and described this part of the deal as "literally the government of Japan giving Donald Trump and the American people $550 billion to invest, at his direction, on things that are important to America and national security." Mounting disagreements around the deal The Japanese appear to disagree fundamentally. Japan's top trade negotiator told Reuters this week that "some people are saying Japan is simply handing over $550 billion, but such claims are completely off the mark." It all could complicate the overall pact that is set to reduce "reciprocal" and automotive tariffs on Japanese imports to the US from previously threatened levels of 25% to 15%. Murray of the Competitive Enterprise Institute added that the deal, depending on how much power the president ultimately has to direct funds, "has all the sorts of things that the founders were worried about about presidential power: the power of patronage, the capacity for corruption." It all adds up to a potential "end run around constitutional checks and balances," according to Murray. And as financial writer James Surowiecki put it on social media: "Trump and his people are pure, top-down central planners. They're just convinced they can allocate capital better than the market." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices
