logo
Religious leaders call HC ‘ignorant' for calling Puranic texts ‘hearsay' in Krishna Janmabhoomi case

Religious leaders call HC ‘ignorant' for calling Puranic texts ‘hearsay' in Krishna Janmabhoomi case

The Print29-05-2025
'The things that Allahabad HC has said that Radhaji is kaalpanik (imaginary) reflect the ignorance of the court. Maybe he is not aware how religious law functions in India,' said Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati of Uttarakhand's Jyotir Math.
Religious leaders–including Uttarakhand Jyotir Math Shankaracharya, Mahamandaleshwar of Niranjani Akhara Kailashanand Giri, Mahamandaleshwar of Juna Akhara and Swami Jitendranand Saraswati of the Sant Samiti—condemned the move, saying the scriptures cannot be dismissed as hearsay.
New Delhi: Several religious leaders have sharply criticised an Allahabad High Court ruling rejecting an application by the deity, Shriji Radha Rani Vrishbhanu Kumar Vrindavani (Goddess Radha), seeking to be made a party to one of the 18 suits related to the Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah after it called scriptural evidence 'hearsay'.
'He should at least have remembered that in 2019 itself, the Supreme Court had given a verdict on Ram-Janmabhoomi. The verdict was in favour of Ram Lalla. In this, too, Skanda Purana and other Hindu texts were the basis. Courts should not hurt the sentiments of crores of Sanatani Hindus,' he added.
In its order dated 23 May, Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra said that 'Pauranic illustrations' cited by the applicant are 'considered hearsay evidence' and there was no proof to support the claim that the deity was a joint holder of the 13.37 acres of land in question.
Mishra said the petitioner's claim is based on some reference in various Purans and Sanhitas in which Shriji Radha Rani is considered the soul of Lord Krishna.
'The Pauranic illustrations are generally considered as hearsay evidence in legal context. In the case of Pauranic illustrations, these are graphic representation of story and events and truth of events, they depict, is usually based on narrative and not on direct observation or testimony,' the court said.
'There is no evidence in support of the claim raised by the applicant that the applicant is entitled as joint holder of said land of 13.37 acres and property of the applicant is also involved in suit property claimed by the plaintiff no.1 as birth place of lord Krishna,' it added.
Other religious leaders also said the court had undermined their faith.
'Shrimad Bhagwat Mahapuran and Gita both are part of the Mahabharat. We cannot in any way call them suni sunayi,' Jitendranand Saraswati, general secretary of Akhil Bhartiya Sant Samiti, told ThePrint.
'Thousand years ago, the Mahabharat happened, Dwarka is of Lord Krishna and Radhika ji Surya Sarovar Kurukshetra mai purnima ka snaan karne gayi thi. Every scripture of Sanatan Dharma, including Lord Ram, has been called controversial. People have called it a myth and we have seen what happened to them. If the HC has said something like this, it should reconsider its view,' he said.
The Mahamandaleshwar of Juna Akhara, Swami Yatindranand Giri, told ThePrint that in a religious dispute, such religious texts are quoted while pointing out that Puranas, Vedas and Upanishads are 'granths' (religious texts).
'Puranas are not 'suni sunayi baatein' (hearsay). They are our granths and their truth cannot be negated. The kind of things that are being said should not be told in the first place and one should be careful while making such statements as it is linked to faith,' he said.
Mahamandaleshwar of Niranjani Akhara Kailashanand Giri told the media that things written in the Puranas are not hearsay but completely authentic. He said it is on the basis of the things written in the Puranas that one believes and worships the Gods.
The Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute is a long-standing legal battle centred around claims that the mosque stands on a site, which Hindus believe was the birthplace of Lord Krishna. The mosque lies adjacent to the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura.
(Edited by Sugita Katyal)
Also Read: No option but to be powerful in face of evil forces at our borders—RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat in Organiser
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MLA seeks anti-conversion law, writes to union minister
MLA seeks anti-conversion law, writes to union minister

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

MLA seeks anti-conversion law, writes to union minister

Lucknow: Amid the ongoing probe into alleged forced conversions linked to Jamaluddin alias Chhangur Baba, Sarojininagar MLA Rajeshwar Singh has written to union law minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, urging the enactment of a national anti-conversion law. Singh described the issue as an "organised, well-funded campaign" that threatens India's civilisational identity, social harmony, and national security. In his letter dated July 20, Singh cited the Chhangur Baba network and an ISIS-linked conversion module exposed in Agra, arguing that such incidents indicate a systemic pattern rather than isolated crimes. He wrote that conversion syndicates "weaponise deception," targeting vulnerable girls from Hindu, Scheduled Caste, and tribal communities through false identities, romantic grooming (" love jihad "), sham marriages, and mass "healing" congregations where victims are isolated and indoctrinated. He also alleged that foreign-funded NGOs act as covert financial channels. While states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttarakhand have passed laws to regulate religious conversions, Singh said the absence of a uniform central framework leaves exploitable gaps, as these networks operate across state lines. Current penalties—ranging from 1 to 10 years, depending on the state—are "grossly inadequate" against such organised mafias, he argued. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like I thought my dad was 'boring'. Now, I'm learning that boring stuff is often what matters most CNA Read More Undo Singh called for stricter punishments, including life imprisonment for masterminds of mass conversion rings and a minimum of 7–10 years for facilitators. He also proposed mandatory pre- and post-conversion declarations to the district magistrate and judicial scrutiny of conversions linked to marriage. Other recommendations include the creation of a National Anti-Conversion Authority to track inter-state events and financial flows, and empowering the NIA in cases involving foreign funding or terror links. Singh further urged immediate rescue and shelter support for victims, free legal aid, and strict penalties for identity concealment and digital radicalisation. He also called for audits of religious charities and the suspension or banning of entities found abetting illegal conversions. Citing legal frameworks in countries such as Nepal, Myanmar, Indonesia, and Russia that restrict conversions by coercion or inducement, Singh said India must act decisively to preserve its diversity and protect women and children.

Congress-IUML mounts pressure on Kerala government to hold Vellappally Natesan accountable for stoking religious schism
Congress-IUML mounts pressure on Kerala government to hold Vellappally Natesan accountable for stoking religious schism

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Congress-IUML mounts pressure on Kerala government to hold Vellappally Natesan accountable for stoking religious schism

The Congress and the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) sought to mount pressure on the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government on Sunday (July 20, 2025) to hold Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana (SNDP) Yogam general secretary Vellappally Natesan accountable for allegedly stoking religious schisms in society through 'communal and caste grievance-weighted hate speeches.' Almost synchronously, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] appeared to scramble to distance itself from the Hindu backward class organisation leader's contentious remarks. It seemed not lost on the CPI(M) that Mr. Natesan headed the Left Democratic Front (LDF)-backed Renaissance Protection Samiti (RPS), a collective formed in 2019 ostensibly to further progressive and secular values to counter a perceived right-wing drift towards identity politics in Kerala society. The CPI(M) State secretariat urged the SNDP Yogam leadership to pursue the humanist, progressive, and secular values expounded by social reformer and Renaissance leader Sree Narayana Guru. The CPI(M) stated that social organisations were free to raise any issue concerning the people. However, it should not be in a manner that created religious divisions and hate. Chandrika flays Natesan The fraught relationship between the IUML-Congress leadership and Mr. Natesan appeared to fray further on Sunday, with IUML mouthpiece Chandrika criticising Mr. Natesan for allegedly spewing 'communal venom to claw back socio-political relevance.' Mr. Natesan had invited the UDF leadership's ire by remarking on Saturday that both the ruling front and the Opposition were uniformly beholden to the Muslim community, given its 'growing electoral and economic heft.' He said both fronts were hostages to minority vote bank politics. He had alleged that the IUML planned to expand its presence to central and south Kerala by demanding more seats in the regions in the 2026 Assembly polls, possibly with an eye on the Chief Minister's post. IUML national general secretary P.K. Kunhalikutty emphasised that it was the responsibility of the LDF government to act against individuals who exploited the bully pulpit of influential social organisations to cause communal divisions in Kerala's secular society. Nevertheless, he avoided addressing the question of whether the police should charge Mr. Natesan with creating enmity between different sets of people and instead placed the burden on the government to 'determine the proper course of action.' Leader of the Opposition V. D. Satheesan alleged that Mr. Natesan raised dog whistle issues such as caste and religion at the behest of Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. He accused the CPI(M) of sending a subtly aimed political message through Mr. Natesan to galvanise the majority community votes by othering minorities. Mr. Satheesan accused the CPI(M) of sacrificing secularism at the altar of political expediency. Mr. Natesan stated that some quarters sought to quell the Ezhava communities' 'struggle for social, economic, and political justice' by cherry-picking Sree Narayana Guru's teachings. He said he was 'willing to go to jail for speaking social truths.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store