Interview: Sevilla ‘A Critical Test' Of Multilateralism
During the conference UN News spoke to Li Junhua, the UN Under-Secretary General for Economic and Social Affairs and Secretary-General of the international summit.
Li Junhua: The adoption of the Sevilla Agreement was an exceptional moment at an event which has brough together some 60 Heads of State and Government and seen 130 major initiatives announced as part of the Sevilla Platform for Action, which is aiming to implement the outcome document and turbocharge financing for sustainable development.
A record number of business leaders from various sectors actively participated in and positively contributed to the entire process and to the outcome of Conference. They all committed to supporting the implementation of the new roadmap.
UN News: What benefits do you think vulnerable communities in developing countries can look forward to, as a direct result of the decisions made here in Sevilla?
Li Junhua: The Sevilla Commitment firmly recognizes that poverty eradication is indispensable to achieving sustainable development. This is the most essential point for all the developing countries. It proposes a package of actions for a large-scale investment push for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the long run. This includes boosting investment in vital areas such as social protection systems, agrifood systems and inclusive, affordable and quality health systems.
Furthermore, it aims to strengthen the global response to crises which affect vulnerable communities the most. For instance, it calls for the implementation of the decision concerning climate finance agreed at the UN Climate Conference in Baku, and also the fund for responding to Loss and Damage.
To me, significant steps and commitments have been made to support countries in special situations to close the significant infrastructure gap in critical sectors. The most vulnerable populations can benefit significantly by gaining essential services and employment opportunities generated by, for instance, energy, transport, ICT [information and communication technology], water and sanitation infrastructure development.
Last but not least, there is a strong resolve to expand access to financial products and services across society, particularly for women, youth, persons with disabilities, displaced people, migrants and other persons in vulnerable situations. These are very tangible outcomes for vulnerable communities.
UN News: In what ways is this conference a real test of multilateralism, at a time when it's under more strain than ever, and with a deeply uncertain global economic outlook?
Li Junhua: This conference is a critical test of our ability to solve problems together.
We know that, at its core, the sustainable development crisis is a crisis of funding and financing. We need to tackle these challenges to bring the SDGs back on track, but it is far from easy. Commitments on development finance directly impact national budgets, and reforming the international financial architecture will inevitably shift the power dynamics between States.
The fact that Member States adopted the Sevilla Agreement by consensus sends a powerful signal that multilateralism can still deliver. Of course, the real challenge now lies in translating these commitments into actions. So I would say that, ultimately, success depends on the collective efforts of all Member States and all stakeholders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Tourism's role in peace and prosperity
Samoan development entrepreneur Lelei Tuisamoa Lelaulu Photo: Supplied The Nobel Peace Prize has been won by presidents, fighters for the oppressed, people who've changed history and who've put their lives on the line for a cause. So when Washington-based Auckland-educated Lelei Tuisamoa Lelaulu found out he'd been nominated, it's not surprising he thought it was a prank. He is a Samoan development entrepreneur whose leadership has extended across the globe including the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation, and the World Indigenous Games. He chairs the Earth Council Alliance and a council at George Washington University School of Business. This year he told the Metropolitan Museum of Art to take its reimagined Rockefeller Wing arts collections on tour to the places they came from. Lelaulu is nominated "for his work in reshaping the narrative around tourism - not just for leisure, but as a vessel of peace." He's still trying to get his head around the nomination. "It's a huge honour and I'm just a little bit stunned waiting for something to happen. It's a little bit overwhelming." Lelaulu was nominated by NGOs associated with the Anglican Church and the United Nations. "It was a bit out-of-the-blue in a sense 'cause I don't really go to Anglican churches or any churches generally, so I thought it was a prank initially, and then they called back and it was true, and they sent the recommendation and I saw it and away it went. We'll see what happens." But what does tourism have to do with peace? "I think that tourism is the only real peace dividend," he said. "It's basically the industry of peace because if you think about it ..... this is the largest transfer of resources from the haves to the have nots in history - voluntarily. No one's forcing it. "Then you think about the hundreds of millions of lives that have been lost because people tried to wrest resources from others over the centuries it's just astounding but tourism has reversed all that," Lelaulu said. If it's handled properly tourism gets resources and money to communities instead of corporations "and it has enormous possibilities for allowing communities to improve their education, their health, their welfare and their dignity - their ability to live lives of dignity. That's why I think the industry of peace is tourism," he said. Lelaulu explained to Lei'ataualesa Susana Lei'ataua in a special episode of The Detail that bilateral aid goes mostly to the treasuries of countries whereas tourism handled properly goes to families and the communities directly "and it builds them up and gives them a whole new dignity of life". But how does tourism fit in when it comes to conflict zones? "In terms of conflict we have to end the conflicts before tourism can apply. It is very much the industry of peace because once there's peace then people tend to stream across borders to see what their former adversaries are like and what they did and how they live, and this then builds up connections between former adversaries and this is what I hope for," Lelaulu said. Lelaulu is quick to point out the "holus bolus" introduction of tourists is not the answer. The wine routes in France are a successful example of a planned approach to directing a huge percentage of tourists outside of an over-crowded Paris, benefiting the agricultural sector. He said we could take a leaf out of that book. "New Zealand is obviously one of the most beautiful countries on the planet but it also has one of the richest cultural ethnic heritages that should be looked at, and pulling people out of the major tourist destinations is the way to do it." Lelaulu highlights Māori tourism. "It's incredibly innovative and very effective. If you look at what they're doing in the South Island, looking at Kaikōura and what the iwi are doing there that's enormous. It's one of the most successful tourism projects in New Zealand ... and they're very, very generous with the local communities which is an important thing." Lelaulu was a guest speaker at re-opening of the Metropolitan Museum of Art's US$70m revamped Michael Wing in New York, and had a strong message for them. "We should move these wonderful pieces of art around the world so that more and more people should see them...... move it overseas to the major art capitals of the world and also to the places of origin like Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Samoa, Fiji. Let the people there see the beauty of what emerged from their artists a long, long time ago." Lelaulu suggested these collections would tour for six months at a time and door-take profits would be split with the destinations to upgrade and build "museologically sound" facilities for the artefacts. "In a sense as the collection goes around and as you return some of the artefacts now and then where applicable, the collection that comes back to the Metropolitan Museum is going to be richer and more valuable than the exhibit that left, so I called it a cultural diplomatic continuum." The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize will be announced on 10 October, with the award ceremony taking place on 10 December in Oslo, Norway. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran as standoff over access drags on
By Francois Murphy , Reuters Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi. Photo: HELMUT FOHRINGER / APA / AFP The UN nuclear watchdog said it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff over their return to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the United States and Israel deepens. Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency's inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran's facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority. Iran's parliament has now passed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran. "An IAEA team of inspectors today (Friday, local time) safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict," the IAEA said on X. Diplomats said the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran was reduced to a handful after the 13 June start of the war. Some have also expressed concern about the inspectors' safety since the end of the conflict, given fierce criticism of the agency by Iranian officials and Iranian media. Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on 31 May that led to a resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said he stands by the report. He has denied it provided diplomatic cover for military action. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday (local time) Iran remained committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). "(Grossi) reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible," the IAEA said. The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran's nine tonnes of enriched uranium , especially the more than 400 kg enriched to up to 60 percent purity, a short step from weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful but Western powers say there is no civil justification for enriching to such a high level, and the IAEA says no country has done so without developing the atom bomb. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its enriched uranium, which normally is closely monitored by the IAEA, the body that enforces the NPT and verifies countries' declarations. But the bombing of Iran's facilities has now muddied the waters. "We cannot afford that ... the inspection regime is interrupted," Grossi told a press conference in Vienna last week. - Reuters
Scoop
21 hours ago
- Scoop
Forever-Occupation, Genocide, And Profit: Report Exposes Corporate Forces Behind Destruction Of Palestine
GENEVA (3 July 2025) – Israel's genocide against Palestinians is being sustained by a system of exploitative occupation and profit, a UN expert warned today in a new report to the Human Rights Council that reveals how corporate profiteering and monetary gain has enabled and legitimised Israel's illegal presence and actions. 'In the past 21 months, while Israel's genocide has devastated Palestinian lives and landscapes, the Tel Aviv stock exchange soared by 213 percent (USD), amassing $225.7 billion in market gains—including $67.8 billion in the past month alone. For some, genocide is profitable,' said Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967. Albanese's report exposes the corporate infrastructure profiting from Israel's economy of occupation — and its deadly transformation into an economy of genocide. The report underscores how Palestine has become the epicentre of a global reckoning, exposing the failure of international business and legal systems to uphold even the most basic rights of one of the world's most dispossessed peoples. 'Corporate actors are deeply entwined in the system of occupation, apartheid and genocide in the occupied Palestinian territory,' the Special Rapporteur said. 'For decades, Israel's repression of Palestinian people has been scaffolded by corporations, fully aware of and yet indifferent to, decades of human rights violations and international crimes.' Forty-eight separate corporate actors, along with their parents, subsidiaries, franchisees, licensees and consortium partners across sectors are identified in the Special Rapporteur's report, including weapons manufacturers, technological corporations, financial institutions and construction and energy firms. Albanese found that these entities have failed their most basic legal responsibilities to exercise their leverage to bring an end to the violation at stake or terminate relations and disengage. Instead, they have treated Israel's illegal enterprise in the occupied Palestinian territory as ordinary economic activity—wilfully ignoring documented, systemic abuses, even as atrocities mounted after 7 October 2023. 'These actors have entrenched and expanded Israel's settler-colonial logic of displacement and replacement – and this is not accidental,' the Special Rapporteur said. 'It is the function of an economy built to dominate, dispossess, and erase Palestinians from their land.' The report named companies supplying F-35s, drones, and targeting tech that enabled 85,000 tons of bombs – six times the amount of Hiroshima – to be unleashed on Gaza. It highlighted tech giants that have set up R&D hubs and data centres in Israel, using Palestinian data for AI warfare, fueling what Albanese calls a 'livestreamed genocide.' The report points to energy giants having fuelled Israel's blockade, while construction companies continued to supply the equipment that has turned Gaza to rubble and prevented the return and reconstitution of Palestinian life. Even seemingly neutral actors – tourism sites, supermarkets, and universities are normalising apartheid and the systematic erasure of Palestinian life, the Special Rapporteur's report found. 'This report shows why Israel's genocide continues: because it is lucrative for many,' Albanese said. She warned that the International Court of Justice 2024 rulings and the ICC arrest warrants should have put all actors—including corporations—on notice. 'The serious, structural and sustained nature of Israel's crimes and violations triggered a prima facie responsibility to disengage — one that many corporations ignored,' she said. 'Corporate fixation on narrow technicalities and isolated violations rather than confronting the structural illegality of their ties to Israel's occupation is disingenuous,' she said. Albanese urged member states to impose a full arms embargo, suspend trade and investment agreements, and hold corporate entities accountable for violations of international law. 'Meanwhile, corporations cannot claim neutrality: they are either part of the machinery of displacement—or part of dismantling it.' 'Palestine is a mirror held up to the world's moral and political failures,' she said. Recalling reckonings over corporate complicity in apartheid South Africa and Nazi Germany, Albanese said Palestine today represents a defining moment of whether global markets can exist without promoting and profiting from injustice and impunity. 'Ending this genocide requires not only outrage but rupture, reckoning, and the courage to dismantle what enables it.'
