Meet the two Indian Army generals who were promoted as field marshal
Field marshal Sam Maneskshaw was conferred this rank in recognition of his service and leadership in the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War. Born, 1914 in Amritsar to a Parsi family, Manekshaw was also known as 'Sam Bahadur'.
After he completed his higher command course at the Imperial Defence College, Manekshaw was appointed the general officer commanding of the 26th Infantry Division. He was the first Indian field marshal, which is the highest rank in the Indian Army.
His extraordinary leadership in the Indo-Pak war led to the creation of Bangladesh, in which his strategic brilliance proved instrumental for India's victory. In 1968, Manekshaw was awarded Padma Bhushan, the third highest civillian honour for his response to the Nagalan and Mizoram insurgencies. In 2008 he died due to a progressive lung disease.
The first Indian commander-in-chief of the Indian Army was field marshal Kodandera Madappa Cariappa was the first Indian commander-in-chief and assumed position in 1949. While he is credited with many firsts, he had an instrumental role in the transition of the Indian military from colonial to independent India. Born into a family of farmers in Coorg province, his family called him 'Chimma'.
After independence, Cariappa took the role of deputy chief of general staff and organised three successive attacks. The attacks were aimed at reclaiming the strategic areas of Naushera, Jhangar, Poonch, Zoji La, Dras, and Kargil.
Cariappa was the first Indian officer to attend the Staff College, Quetta, and was later commanded the 1/7 Rajputs, making him the first Indian to lead a battalion. His career of three decades came to an end when he passed away on May 15, 1993.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India's urban climate crisis is the result of our own policy failures
Next Story Deepanshu Mohan The poor are hardest hit by what climate change is doing to city life in India, even as urban development seems bent on devouring its own future. To spell hope, top-down policy needs alignment with ground engagement. The effects of an urban model that builds by displacing ecology are most evident in rising urban heat. Gift this article A recent World Bank study warns that 70% of India's 2050 urban infrastructure is yet to be built. As cities expand, India's urbanization is becoming metabolically unsustainable: a system that produces climate effects as much as it endures them. A recent World Bank study warns that 70% of India's 2050 urban infrastructure is yet to be built. As cities expand, India's urbanization is becoming metabolically unsustainable: a system that produces climate effects as much as it endures them. Cities function like living organisms, consuming energy, water and materials while emitting heat, waste and pollutants. This 'urban metabolism' has breached ecological limits, creating a 'metabolic rift,' or a disconnect between relentless construction and nature's capacity to regenerate. In Bengaluru, over 1,000 storm- water drains were encroached in 2024 alone, while Kolkata has lost over 44% of its water bodies in the last two decades. These are reflections of an urban model that builds by displacing ecology. The effects are most evident in rising urban heat. Urban heat island (UHI) effects, intensified by glass, asphalt and shrinking green cover, trap dangerous levels of heat. In May 2024, the temperature in New Delhi hit 47.3°C. The city's climate severity index has risen 1.5% over 15 years to 57. These are outcomes of flawed heat-amplifying design. Also Read: India's growth and urban planning: On different planets It's similar with urban flooding. It is no longer just a 'drainage issue,' but a systemic hydrological failure. Sealed landscapes can't absorb rainfall. As a result, pluvial floods are expected to intensify from 3.6 to 7 times by 2070. As Anthropocene constructs, Indian cities now have climate risk hardwired into infrastructure, governance and growth patterns. With urban waste projected to reach 435 million tonnes by 2050, urban development is devouring its own future. Urban resilience in India is far more than a technical term. It's a social and political coinage. Our capacity to adapt to climate change is inseparable from structural inequalities embedded in our urban fabric. Climate effects magnify disparities, placing the heaviest burden on the vulnerable. Nowhere is this more evident than in the nexus of heat stress and income inequality. In Chennai, extreme heat is already estimated to drain $1.9 billion annually, 2.3% of the city's GDP. This could rise to 3.2% by 2050. But this cost is unequally shared. Low-income zones, often built with heat-retaining materials and lacking shade, consistently register higher temperatures, worsening health risks and eroding productivity. Also Read: Urban renewal: Indian cities need a governance overhaul A similar story unfolds in relation to urban flooding and informal settlements. In 2020, nearly half of India's urban population was living in informal settlements, many in flood-prone areas. India has lost over 1,500 lives annually to floods over the past decade. Add the heat-related deaths, estimated at 0.2 to 0.4 per 1,000 people annually in cities like Chennai, Surat and Lucknow, with 20% higher mortality among seniors, and the picture is clear: urban climate effects are deeply unequal. To address these risks, we need more than infrastructure. It demands adaptive governance and a build-up of local capacity. Yet, only 10 of 126 cities under the Climate Smart Cities Assessment Framework have conducted flood-risk assessments. Gaps in policy implementation are glaring. Community-led innovation offers hope, though. In Ahmedabad, the Mahila Housing Trust has enabled informal settlers to access microfinance and install cool roofs, a low-cost and effective heat mitigation strategy. Similarly, the city's heat action plan has helped prevent over 1,100 deaths annually since 2013. These are proof that a top-down policy aligned well with ground engagement can save lives. Also Read: Plot twist: Can the monsoon become urban India's hero again? This brings us to the ethics and justice of urban resilience. Establishing a 'Right to a resilient city' demands a significant financial step-up. India needs nearly $2.4 trillion by 2050 for resilient urban infrastructure. Current spending lags at $120.5 billion. This massive gap hits the poorest the hardest, denying them access to essential protections. Market-based models rarely deliver resilience as a public good and with private financing at just 5% and green bonds yet to prove transformative, we must ask: do these tools democratize resilience or merely repackage risk? India's emerging circular economy is projected to create $2 trillion in value and 10 million jobs by 2050. But resilience isn't just about engineering. A socially resilient India must prioritize community knowledge, participatory planning and equitable finance. India's urban resilience is hampered by institutional inertia. Fragmented governance, rooted in colonial legacies and outdated planning, creates a significant 'policy-implementation gap,' where ambitious goals falter locally due to limited capacity and underspending. Examples like Mumbai's pioneering climate budget and Ahmedabad's resilient investment planning offer pathways, but these isolated successes struggle to scale against systemic resistance. True urban resilience needs a basic shift to regenerative urbanism and a holistic as well as socially just development model. This future will depend not just on technology, but on re-wilding urban spaces, fostering circular economies and using participatory processes. We should ensure that India's next urban chapter is one of profound regeneration rather than an inevitable reckoning. Ankur Singh, research analyst at CNES, contributed to this article. The author is professor and dean, O.P. Jindal Global University, visiting professor, London School of Economics, and a visiting research fellow at the University of Oxford. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
NEET UG 2025: Medical Counselling Committee approves 188 NRI quota conversions
The Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) has granted approval for 188 NEET UG 2025 candidates to be shifted from the Indian category to the Non-Resident Indian (NRI) quota. As per the guidelines, these candidates must email their scanned documents to by August 3, updated list of NRI applicants was prepared after a detailed verification of the documents submitted, ensuring that all candidates met the eligibility requirements prescribed by to the official notification, 'The eligibility of candidates for seats reserved under the NRI quota is provisional, based on the documents submitted. Final verification will be carried out by the allotted colleges during reporting, and Embassy Certificates will be forwarded to the Ministry of External Affairs or the respective High Commissions for confirmation.'DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR NRI ADMISSION To secure admission under the NRI quota for MBBS or BDS courses, candidates must provide the following documents:NEET UG 2025 scorecard issued by NTASelf-attested declaration confirming NRI/OCI/PIO status or parent's NRI statusOCI/PIO card, if applicableNRI Embassy certificate for the candidate or parentMCC has clarified that candidates must present their original documents at the time of reporting to the allotted college. Failure to do so will lead to the cancellation of their seat under the NRI EXTENDED FOR PWBD CANDIDATESMeanwhile, MCC has extended the registration deadline for candidates under the Persons with Benchmark Disability (PwBD) category for round one counselling. The last date for completing registration is now August 3, 2025, following requests from several PwBD applicants who faced delays in obtaining certificates from designated disability results of the round one seat allotment will be announced on August 6, 2025. Candidates can view the revised schedule and complete their application process on the official MCC website EndsMust Watch
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Tricolour hoisted only at Red Fort and not on other Mughal-era buildings because…, what is the Nehru connection?
Tricolour hoisted only at Red Fort and not on other Mughal-era buildings because…, what is the Nehru connection? Independence Day Facts: 15th August is about to come, and people are ready to celebrate the day with full zeal and patriotic fervour. Independence Day is not just a day but its an emotion for every Indians. It is the result of numerous sacrifices. When the Prime Minister of the country hoists the flag at the Red Fort, every Indian, whether he is living in abroad, get emotional, remembering the sacrifices people made for the independence of the country from the British rule. But do you know why the tricolor hoisted only at the Red Fort and not at any other Mughal buildings like Taj Mahal or Fatehpur Sikri? Let us know the reason behind this.
