logo
These Colleges Are Most At Risk From Proposed GOP Cuts To Pell Grants

These Colleges Are Most At Risk From Proposed GOP Cuts To Pell Grants

Forbes25-06-2025
As part of the huge tax and budget cutting package Republicans are rushing through Congress, they're aiming to reduce Uncle Sam's spending on college aid by more than $300 billion over the next decade, primarily by overhauling student loans, with reduced borrowing limits, stiffer repayment terms and the end of subsidized student loans for lower income undergraduates.
But both the House-passed 2025 budget 'reconciliation' bill and the Trump Administration's 2026 budget proposal, would also take a chunk out of Pell Grants for low and moderate income students. These half century old awards, which don't need to be repaid, make a big difference in whether students from families of modest means enroll in and finish college, their supporters say.
Under current policy, Pell Grants of up to $7,395 will be awarded to 7.4 million students during the 2025-26 school year, at a cost of $38.1 billion, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects. The Trump Administration, in a fiscal 2026 budget proposal submitted this month, calls for chopping the maximum award for the 2026-2027 school year to just $5,710, arguing that this 23% cut (even bigger if inflation is taken into account) is needed to combat a projected funding shortfall.
'To see a cut that's almost $2,000 in scope could really be very detrimental to these institutions that are a lifeline for access and completion for low-income students,' says Jen Engle, the director of policy and strategy at Georgetown's Center on Education and the Workforce.
Although Pell Grants play a big role in the budgets of two-year community colleges, they're also crucial to a surprising collection of small four-year institutions. We identified 36 four-year schools where Pell aid made up at least 25% percent of total revenue in 2022-23, the last year for which federal data is available. This list is dominated by colleges in Puerto Rico and religious-affiliated schools, primarily Orthodox Jewish schools in New York. Surprisingly, none is one of the nation's Historical Black Colleges and Universities, even though more than 70% of HBCU students are eligible for at least some Pell Grant money.
The top six on our list–three in Puerto Rico and three in New York–relied on Pell Grants for more than half their revenue, with 75% to 95% of their students receiving the aid. None of the six responded to our requests for comment, but it's no mystery why so many of their students get Pell Grants. The median family income in Puerto Rico in 2023 was just $25,621, compared to a national median of $77,719. The Jewish students qualify because they come from unusually large Ultra-Orthodox families. Currently, children from two-parent families with income of up to 175% of the poverty level can qualify for the maximum Pell Grants, while those from families earning up to 275% of the poverty level can get at least some Pell aid. The poverty level, of course, climbs with family size. So this past school year, a family with four or more dependent children could have income in excess of $100,000 and still qualify for some Pell money.
While those small private schools are the most Pell dependent, we crunched the same government data to identify the 40 four-year colleges who received the most Pell dollars—more than $50 million each—in 2022-2023. Thirty-six of them are public colleges, with 14 from California, nine from Texas and four from Florida. The Biggest Pell Recipients These 40 four-year colleges, 36 of them public schools, collected $50 million or more in Pell Grant money in 2022-2023.
The top Pell Grant recipient, however, was private Southern New Hampshire University, with $207 million, or 16% of its revenue from Pell Grants. In large part, that's due to the school's extensive online enrollment—nearly 140,000. Just one school is on both our most Pell dependent and most Pell dollars lists; Brigham Young University-Idaho got $77 million, or 30% of its revenue, from Pell Grants in 2022-2023.
Among other changes, the House-passed reconciliation bill—now officially dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) to reflect Trump's branding of it—narrows Pell Grant eligibility in ways that would reduce grants for more than half of recipients, while saving about $7.1 billion over the next decade, the CBO figures, (In fact, that's only part of what the changes would ultimately save, because of the complicated way these grants are funded, with both mandatory spending and annual discretionary appropriations. The current maximum award for the discretionary component of the grant is $6,335, with a $1,060 mandatory add-on. The $7.1 billion, the CBO says, includes only savings to the mandatory add-on.)
One change would eliminate smaller, pro-rated Pell Grants for students who attend less than half time. They now make up about 10% of all recipients and the CBO estimates only a third would boost their hours enough to stay eligible, while the rest would lose out completely. The new half-time requirement would be particularly hard on adult students who also work full time and attend either community colleges or universities' 'continuing education' schools, which typically offer courses in the evenings, or online. At the College of Continuing Professional Studies at private non-profit Drury University in Springfield, Missouri, 59% of students get Pell money. The school offers both four-year and two-year degrees, including practical associate degrees in business administration and paralegal studies.
'This will have an echo effect, a snowball effect rolling downhill on workforce development, things that we as a country, as a community, the state of Missouri, everybody wants to accomplish,' says Drury University President Jeff Frederick.
It's notable that at the same time that the House-passed bill makes it tougher for working adults to pursue a two- or four-year degree or a certificate, it creates a new 'workforce Pell Grant' for eight to 15 week career training programs which wouldn't have to be taken at an accredited institution. That change would be a particular boon to for-profit schools.
The House bill also raises the required course load for a student to receive the maximum Pell Grant from a minimum of 12 credit hours per semester (typically four courses) to 30 credit hours per year, meaning a five-course load. That change alone would potentially reduce grants to more than half of Pell recipients, the CBO says.
Kim Cook, CEO of the National College Attainment Network, says the increased course load requirement could leave both students and administrators to make tough choices. 'Could they carry that (extra class) with their workload, with their family load, with their caregiving responsibilities, and could they do that well and maintain satisfactory academic progress?'
Some colleges are considering how to help their students adjust. California State Polytechnic University-Pomona reviewed the 48% of its undergraduates who get Pell Grants and found many take between 12 and 14 credits a semester, says Jessica Wagoner, senior associate vice president for enrollment management and services. The school isn't structured to offer one or two credit classes, but is discussing what it could add as a 'temporary solution,'' she says.
But the school isn't rushing to make changes. While the Senate has yet to pass its version of reconciliation, the draft plan released by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee wouldn't raise the course load requirements for maximum Pell Grants, or cut off those going to school less than half time. The Senate would also allocate more money to cover the budget shortfall—the one the Trump Administration has used as its reason to slash grants. It allocates $10.5 billion in additional funding for fiscal year 2026, compared to $10.5 billion in the House passed bill to cover three fiscal years—2026-2028. The Senate would also go easier on the wealthiest schools, raising the tax on their endowments by less than the House passed bill would.
Ultimately, the thin Republican majorities in the House and Senate need to pass identical reconciliation bills—all without any Democratic votes.
More from Forbes Forbes Trump's Foreign Student Crackdown Puts These 16 Struggling Colleges At Risk By Emma Whitford Forbes As Harvard Struggles, For-Profit Colleges Are Poised To Flourish Under Trump By Emma Whitford Forbes These Colleges Are At Risk As Congress Takes Aim At Endowments By Emma Whitford Forbes Forbes College Financial Grades 2025: America's Strongest And Weakest Schools By Emma Whitford
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top South Dakota official apologizes for releasing voter data
Top South Dakota official apologizes for releasing voter data

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Top South Dakota official apologizes for releasing voter data

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota's top elections official has apologized for the state releasing information about voters who also were seeking public assistance, such as food aid. Secretary of State Monae Johnson made the voter registration rolls of more than 600,000 voters public last month to comply with a new state law. But the spreadsheet of voter information also included a field for source of registration, which disclosed whether an individual registered to vote at a public assistance agency, such as those offering housing help and food assistance. Federal law prohibits the government from releasing information about those receiving public assistance. The data leak drew condemnation from across the state, and the American Civil Liberties Union called it an 'egregious violation of voters' privacy rights.' Johnson apologized on Friday. 'As Secretary of State, I take full responsibility for the release of this information. My office is committed to both transparency and protecting voter privacy," Johnson said in statement. 'Upon discovering the issue, we acted immediately to remove the data and prevent further dissemination.' The information was taken off the website Friday, the day after the ACLU sent a letter to the office demanding the state fix the issue. Individuals who had their information disclosed have been notified by mail, and those with access to the information will be asked to delete it. The secretary of state also clarified that registering at a public assistance agency does not necessarily mean an individual is receiving benefits. In South Dakota, a person can register to vote at driver's license exam stations, disability service offices, military recruitment centers and county auditor offices in addition to public assistance agencies. The ACLU is now encouraging those who were impacted to fill out their legal intake form. "Essentially, voters who exercised their right to register to vote at public benefits offices were punished for it through this substantial privacy violation,' ACLU South Dakota Advocacy Manager Samantha Chapman said. South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley is appointing legal counsel to represent the Secretary of State's office and the state legislature in case of potential lawsuits. Sarah Raza, The Associated Press

Former DOJ Trump ‘loyalty test' prosecutors are planning to run for office and fight back
Former DOJ Trump ‘loyalty test' prosecutors are planning to run for office and fight back

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former DOJ Trump ‘loyalty test' prosecutors are planning to run for office and fight back

At this time last year, Ryan Crosswell was hard at work trying to put New York City's mayor in prison on corruption charges while serving as a prosecutor in the Justice Department. But after resigning in protest over the Trump administration's decision to drop the case against Mayor Eric Adams and cut back on prosecutions of public corruption cases, he's looking at a switching careers to making laws instead of enforcing them. According to CBS News, Crosswell, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran, left the department in February amid the uproar over the dropping of charges against Adams, a move which at the time was framed as a way to enable the mayor to better assist the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. Four months later, he announced a campaign for the House of Representatives seat for Pennsylvania's seventh district against Republican Ryan Mackenzie, telling the television network: "If you're a Marine and you're a former prosecutor, you are protecting people." Crosswell is just one of a number of ex-federal prosecutors looking to continue public service careers by seeking election to various offices across the United States. The former prosecutors all have one thing in common — they left federal service in the tumultuous opening months of the Trump administration amid what have been described as loyalty tests as a condition of remaining in the government. Erika Evans, the granddaughter of Olympic track-and-field medalist Lee Evans, left the Department of Justice in March on account of the changes made to the Civil Rights Division under Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon. Dhillon, a longtime GOP activist, has made it a priority to refocus the division away from protecting racial minorities towards pushing back on alleged anti-white discrimination. Evans told CBS she resigned after receiving emails asking for DOJ employees to report colleagues involved in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion work that the Trump administration has banned. "We received emails requiring that we report any colleagues doing diversity work in the office. We had 10 to 14 days to report them or we would get in trouble ourselves," Evans said. "That was pretty disgusting." Now, she's looking to resume her public service career as Seattle's elected City Attorney. In a video released by her campaign, she says she'll 'take on Trump' if elected and 'demand the community safety we deserve' from the federal government. She explained how she'd wanted to spend her career in public service but felt she had to leave because of the Trump administration's priorities. "When I realized that that was not going to be possible any longer with the values that the Trump administration was having for the department, I knew I needed to shift,' she said.

Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings
Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings

Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings originally appeared on TheStreet. Compass Point has lowered Coinbase's (Nasdaq: COIN) price target from $330 to $248 and downgraded the rating from "Neutral" to "Sell" after the crypto exchange reported disappointing financial results for the second quarter of 2025. The investment firm indicated receding retail interest, poor Q2 records, weak prospects for recurring revenue lines like subscriptions and custody services the next quarter, and more competition from stablecoin and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms as the reasons it downgraded the COIN stock's rating. Compass Point also warned of Coinbase's retail trading under pressure despite a bullish crypto market. Notably, retail trading is Coinbase's main profit are two other factors that the firm highlighted as possible risks for Coinbase. One is a potential delay in the CLARITY Act, which deals with classifying the financial status of crypto assets. Another is Coinbase trailing Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD) and Kraken in launching stock trading. 'We see limited support for COIN's valuation if crypto markets sell off further,' said Compass Point. Founded in 2012, Coinbase is the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. The company, which went public in April 2021, joined the S&P 500 list in May 2025 — the only crypto stock to be included in the hotly contested list so far. During Q2 2025, the exchange generated $1.5 billion in total revenue, $1.4 billion in net income, and earnings per share (EPS) of $5.14 in Q2. The exchange held 11,776 Bitcoin worth $1.3 billion by the end of the quarter. The COIN stock is trading at $319.55 at the time of writing, up 1.54% a day. Analyst downgrades top S&P 500 stock after disappointing earnings first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 4, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 4, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store