logo
Moves To Amend Equal Pay Act 1972 Is An Abusive False Economy

Moves To Amend Equal Pay Act 1972 Is An Abusive False Economy

Scoop09-05-2025
Press Release – Primary and Community Health Aotearoa
PCHA Board Chair Steve Chadwick says the governments fast tracked changes to the Equal Pay Act 1972 and halting progress of any existing claims is a kick in the gut to the many nurses who work in primary and community healthcare.
The Primary and Community Health Association (PCHA) says New Zealand's struggling health system has been dealt another significant blow that will have a detrimental impact in local communities.
PCHA Board Chair Steve Chadwick says the government's fast tracked changes to the Equal Pay Act 1972 and halting progress of any existing claims is a kick in the gut to the many nurses who work in primary and community healthcare.
She calls on the Health Minister Simeon Brown to show more respect for the many nurses and carers who have dedicated their lives to supporting their community.
'This government shows absolute disregard for the important role that primary and community care nurses and carers play in the health of New Zealanders,' Steve said.
'Minister Simeon Brown should be ashamed of this action. It is wrong and it is abusive.'
Steve says that by halting pay equity claim action and amending the Equal Pay Act 1972, community nurses and carers who have been battling for years to close the pay gap with their hospital counterparts will have to go back to the drawing board.
'What the government is actually doing is saying to not only community nurses and carers, but also local communities is, 'You don't matter. Your jobs and your health are not a priority to us.''
The Government will ammend the Equal Pay Act 1972 to tighten the pay equity criteria, making it harder for pay equity claims to be sought. Additional to this, any existing pay equity claims will be halted and those claims will need to be resubmitted under the new and more stringent criteria.
'What is also alarming is that the reason for this action is to 'reduce the cost to the Crown',' Steve said.
'This signals that the Government is intent on crushing the health system in order to pay for tax cuts and money for landlords. This will send the health of individuals, families and communities, many of whom are already struggling under this government, into further decline.'
'That in itself is a false economy and drives false savings – while they pinch money from community services, they will inevitably have to spend more money to prop up hospital services when people become very unwell – it's completely nonsensical.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Middle ground needed in healthcare dispute for the sake of public
Middle ground needed in healthcare dispute for the sake of public

NZ Herald

time3 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Middle ground needed in healthcare dispute for the sake of public

Health NZ and the Government are certainly aware of this, but reaching a solution is not as simple as agreeing to the demands of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists (ASMS) and the New Zealand Nurses Organisation (NZNO). Across the Government's Budget, Health NZ is competing with the funding needs of housing, education, transport and more, all amid a cost-of-living crisis for the average Kiwi. Health NZ offered nurses a 3% pay rise over 27 months, plus two lump sum payments of $325. The NZNO sought a 5% pay rise over two years, along with $2000 flat rate increases for senior positions. The union also sought to restore a tikanga Māori allowance. ASMS executive director Sarah Dalton earlier told the Herald hospital specialists sought a 12% pay rise but were being offered an increase of less than 1% per year. Health NZ has described its offers to nurses and senior medical staff as 'fair'. Dalton acknowledged at the time that 12% may not be achievable but said the dispute may not be settled without a better offer. There is room for Health NZ to manoeuvre between 1% and 12%. Dalton's acknowledgment shows that compromise, at least where ASMS is concerned, is not impossible. Health Minister Simeon Brown estimated 4300 procedures, such as hip and knee operations, were delayed because of the 24-hour strike on May 1. Wait times for elective surgeries have already ballooned since the Covid pandemic, and the wait for specialist appointments and operations has continued to grow in many regions. In February, the Herald reported all of the country's hospital emergency departments were failing to assess patients with 'imminently' or 'potentially' life-threatening conditions on time. Striking doctors and nurses have rightfully pointed out staffing issues, with Health NZ recognising another 4100 nurses were needed in the next decade, on top of 2250 nursing vacancies, despite half of nursing graduates not getting job offers from Health NZ last year. Another 3450 doctors were needed in the next decade to keep up with demand. Concessions are needed from both Health NZ and its striking staff. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Unlabelled GE Food Leaves Consumers In The Dark
Unlabelled GE Food Leaves Consumers In The Dark

Scoop

time7 hours ago

  • Scoop

Unlabelled GE Food Leaves Consumers In The Dark

Aotearoa New Zealand – Consumers have just lost a fundamental right to informed choice about the food they're eating, says the Soil & Health Association. New Zealand Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard and his eight Australian state counterparts have approved a decision to allow genetically engineered food ingredients to enter unlabelled into the food chain of both countries. 'This is an alarming and unscientific move that removes our right to know what's in our food,' says Charles Hyland, chair of the Soil & Health Association. 'New Zealanders want to know what they're eating, and be able to avoid things they don't want.' 'Allowing unlabelled GE ingredients that have no novel DNA ignores the fact that changes can and do occur as a result of all types of genetic engineering – whether it introduces novel DNA or not.' Gene edited cattle in the USA were heralded as a success and claimed to have no novel DNA. However it was then found that bacterial DNA had been introduced, conferring antibiotic resistance, and the cattle were withdrawn from the market. Similar situations could happen with food that supposedly has no novel DNA. Our knowledge of the risks to health from GE foods is still very limited, and there is very little long-term independent research to draw from. 'What happens if there is a health issue from GE food? How could we pinpoint it to that GE food? If it's unlabelled, authorities won't be able to trace it or issue a food recall.' The onus will now be on consumers to ask retailers and food companies whether there are any GE ingredients in their food. 'The best ways to avoid GE food ingredients are to eat organic food, grow your own, favour whole foods and avoid ultra-processed foods.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store