logo
14% of young children not living with fathers

14% of young children not living with fathers

RTÉ News​04-06-2025
14% of children in Ireland between nine months and five years do not live with their fathers full-time according to research published by the Economic and Social Research Institute.
By the age of nine, the figure rises to 18%, according to the ESRI.
Using data from the Growing Up in Ireland study, which is produced in partnership with the Department of Children, it found that households with parental separation were more disadvantaged in profile.
Where fathers were not resident in the home, mothers were "much younger", tended to have lower levels of education and were more likely to live in urban areas.
It found that the fathers had lower educational levels, higher unemployment levels and greater financial difficulties.
Mothers reported that half of fathers who were not resident at home saw their babies or toddlers several times a week.
Contact was somewhat less frequent as children made the transition to school, although around a third of five-year-olds and nine-year-olds saw their fathers at least a few times a week.
Just over a quarter of "non-resident fathers" had little to no contact with their children at each age examined.
Although the fathers surveyed who were not living with their children tended to be actively involved in their children's lives, around half of them said would like more frequent contact with their child.
Parental accounts of the father's frequency of contact differed. Mothers reported lower levels of contact than fathers did.
From the child's perspective, just over half (53%) reported getting on "very well" with their father at age nine, which indicated the importance of their father in their lives according to the report.
Over a third (38%) of separated mothers received regular payments from the non-resident father, while 11% received payments on "an ad hoc basis".
The ESRI noted the importance of these payments for "a significant group of families".
In order to conduct the research, mothers were asked to help access the fathers by providing contact details or passing on information.
When the children were between nine months and three years old, around a third of mothers were willing to give permission for fathers to be contacted. This dropped to just over a quarter when the child was aged nine.
In order to get a comprehensive picture of the range of influences on the lives of children, it required input from parents who were not living with them according to researchers.
"Parents can differ in their perceptions of the father-child relationship, so capturing both perspectives is important," according to co-author of the report Emer Smyth.
Fathers who were in more frequent contact with their child were more likely to complete the survey.
Of the fathers who were contacted when their child was aged three, 35% completed the survey. However, the response rate fell to 14% when the child was aged nine.
Separated parents said they would be more likely to take part in research if its purpose and how the information would be used was made very clear, according to co-author Merike Darmody.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man (81) calls for family DNA samples for Tuam remains to extend to cousins
Man (81) calls for family DNA samples for Tuam remains to extend to cousins

Irish Times

time5 days ago

  • Irish Times

Man (81) calls for family DNA samples for Tuam remains to extend to cousins

An 81-year-old man has called for the range of DNA samples being collected from family members, in order to to identify remains at Tuam Mother and Baby Home , to be extended to cousins. The rules governing the search for relatives of those buried at the site exclude cousins, with the Department of Children, Disability and Equality citing 'scientific challenges' in relation to their inclusion. However, other relatives at a similar level of distance from the deceased, such as grandnieces and grandnephews, are included. Ted Steede says that his cousin, Josephine, was born in the Central Hospital in Galway in 1933, before being moved to Tuam Mother and Baby Home. She died of whooping cough shortly after. Mr Steede's aunt, Agnes, died almost a week after giving birth. Josephine's name was listed among the 796 children who died at the Tuam Mother and Baby Home between 1925 and 1960, compiled by historian Catherine Corless . READ MORE Mr Steede became a member of the Tuam Mother and Baby Home Alliance, which was involved in putting pressure on the Government to investigate and excavate the site of the home. Part of the process, under the Institutional Burials Act 2022, which was drawn up by the Department of Children, involves a collection of DNA samples from 'eligible family members', who believe they are related to someone buried at the site. This aims to assist in the identification of human remains that may be recovered. The Act defines eligible family members as people who have reasonable grounds to believe that they are a child, parent, sibling, half-sibling, grandparent, grandchild, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, half-niece, half-nephew, grandniece or grandnephew of the person who is buried at a site. 'They listed so many people', but 'first cousins were excluded,' said Mr Steede. He said it had 'annoyed' him that he cannot supply a DNA sample. The excavation of the Tuam site began on July 14th and access to it is now closed off to the public. [ How Tuam, synonymous with a dark side of Irish history, can finally 'do the right thing' Opens in new window ] Dr. Niamh McCullagh, Senior Forensic Consultant to the Office of the Director of Authorised Intervention, Tuam (ODAIT) shows where excavations will commence at the excavation of the site of the former Mother and Baby Institution, Tuam Mr Steede said he visited the site during the official opening of the excavation, when survivors of the Mother and Baby Home and their families were invited. He said he wasin touch with local TDs regarding his situation, however he was 'still getting no satisfaction' on the issue of providing his DNA for identification. Speaking of their forensic work, he said 'it looks like their hands are tied unless the Government revisits the legislation'. When asked if there was a reason for cousins to be excluded as eligible family members, Forensic Science Ireland (FSI), who will perform DNA testing and matching for The Office of the Director of Authorised Intervention, Tuam (ODAIT), who are in charge of the excavation, said: 'The level of participation by FSI regarding DNA sample testing at Tuam Mother and Baby Home is set out in The Institutional Burials Act 2022″. A spokesperson for the Department of Children, Disability and Equality said that scientific advice outlined during the Pre-Legislative Scrutiny process 'highlighted scientific challenges in relation to the inclusion of cousins'. 'In the case of cousins, the variation in shared DNA can be much greater as the common ancestor is the grandparent rather than the parent. 'This makes it notably more difficult to draw conclusions about a familial link as, at the lower levels, first cousins will be indistinguishable from more distant relatives.' Around 800 babies and young children are believed to be buried in former sewer at site of home run by Bon Secours religious order They added that issues arise due to the 'likely low levels of DNA that will be available from the remains, due to degradation and the size of the bones involved, as well as the general level of relatedness in a country like Ireland. 'These factors increase uncertainty in estimating relationships, particularly relationships, such as cousins, where the variability in shared DNA is greater.' Dr David MacHugh, professor of functional genomics at University College Dublin, told The Irish Times that a 'half niece, half nephew, grand niece and grand nephew have the same expected familial genomic relationship as would a first cousin'. A familial genomic relationship is the degree to which individuals are genetically related. It considers how much genetic material (DNA) two people who come from the same family share. He said it was 'a mystery' why cousins were not eligible to provide DNA. He noted that the average familial genomic relationship from cousin to cousin was, on average, 12.5%. The same figure was true in the relationship of a grandaunt/ granduncle to grandniece/ grandnephew and vice versa. [ Tuam families can see 'light at the end of a very long tunnel' Opens in new window ] Daniel MacSweeney, director of ODAIT, said the process of identifying remains will be 'challenging for many reasons'. Similarly, the familial genomic relationship from a half aunt/ half uncle to half niece/ half nephew was also on average, 12.5%. Daniel Loftus, an independent genealogist and founder of Project Infant, which aims to compile the names of those who died in Mother and Baby Homes and other institutions, said the exclusion of cousins as eligible family members for DNA samples is a 'missed opportunity'. 'Leaving it down to half siblings, and I think nieces, nephews, grandnieces, grandnephews, there's only a limited amount of relationships that would be feasible to try to identify a Tuam baby.' He added that 'we should try to pull out all the stops', given that the excavation is 'monumental in that it's the first of its kind of operation'. Daniel Loftus, founder of Project Infant. Photo: Gráinne Sophia Photography He called for a wider net to be cast in the collection of DNA during the historic excavation and identification process. He suggested there be a 'means of allowing people to submit their DNA voluntarily, even if they suspect that they're related to a Tuam baby'. Breeda Murphy, of Tuam Mother and Baby Home Alliance, said if it was not possible to match remains to the DNA of cousins now, 'with technologies being developed it should be available' in the future. She commended Daniel McSweeney, the director of authorised intervention at Tuam, and his team for their work with Tuam Mother and Baby Home Alliance, including 'for their openness and willingness to include us at every opportunity – it's a completely stark difference to how the Government has behaved". She said families should be able to find remains. 'They have not been fully supported, matter of fact they've been ignored for decades.' She said many people had died 'without ever seeking closure' for what happened to them or a relative in one of these institutions. 'We're losing them regularly. We have people in hospital at the moment who might not make it – they are the voice of the survivor." Mr Steede has had a sample of his DNA taken on his own accord, so that 'even if I passed away in the morning, my DNA could be kept and stored, just in case they found my cousin'. The ODAIT's website states that those who fall outside the definition of an 'eligible family member' can get in touch to 'clarify your relationship and your family's relationship to the Tuam institution' and 'to consider the possibility that there is another living family member who may be eligible to give a DNA sample'. It also states they will hear the 'concerns and wishes' of the family member, allow them to 'contribute to the consultation for the memorialisation process', and allow them to be 'kept up to date on work of ODAIT'. It says that 'if appropriate, the individual falling outside the definition of an 'eligible family member' will be directed to the Tuam Identification Programme, or an Administrative Scheme set up to take DNA samples from eligible family members who are elderly or vulnerable, and who therefore require a sample to be taken on a more urgent basis.

We need to confront the reality that the housing shortage can't be solved
We need to confront the reality that the housing shortage can't be solved

Irish Times

time23-07-2025

  • Irish Times

We need to confront the reality that the housing shortage can't be solved

There is a throwaway line in a recent Davy report on the economy that concludes that if Ireland's population continues to grow at its current rate, and we want to reach European levels of housing supply we would need to build 122,000 new homes each year until 2030. 'This would be close to a quadrupling of current housing output, which seems unlikely to be feasible,' the author observes rather drily. It is something of a mic drop. The takeaway is that the housing shortage is intractable, and for the foreseeable future we could be condemned to live in some sort of housing purgatory, never to enter affordable housing heaven. Davy's pessimism seems well grounded. The State's current housing target, set out in the revised National Planning Framework published in April, calls for the construction of 50,000 homes a year. It is based on population projections from the State-funded independent think tank, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI). The ESRI used the 2022 census data to model future population growth and estimate it will reach 5.53 million by 2027 and 5.67 million in 2030. The Central Statistics Office (CSO), which conducted the census, has its own projections. They estimate that the population will reach between 5.49 million and 5.58 million by 2027 depending on migration and 5.59 million and 5.75 million in 2030. [ The Irish Times view on Ireland's rising population: a landmark moment Opens in new window ] But both official estimates – which it must be remembered underpin the national housing strategy – already seem to have wildly underestimated the impact of migration on population growth. Last month, the CSO released a separate estimate based on people's interactions with the State via services such as social welfare and education. This estimate found that the population had already hit 5.45 million in 2023, some two years before the CSO and ESRI modelling predicted it would happen. Clearly someone is wrong, or, in the case of the CSO, wrong and right. There is little reason to believe that population growth is not continuing to outstrip the CSO and the ESRI's estimates, says Davy's chief economist Kevin Timoney. 'The biggest mistake is to assume population growth will slow,' he says. David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city Listen | 36:51 The last significant wave of migration into Ireland in the 2000s was driven by a combination of cyclical economic factors and the accession of Poland and other central and eastern European states to the European Union. Ireland, unlike other member states, did not impose temporary immigration controls. The current wave, Timoney believes, is more structural than cyclical and is driven by factors such as Brexit, wars and climate change. It will be mostly 'south to north', with migrants drawn by our relative economic wealth compared with their country of origin. There is also the inconvenient truth that we need to attract migrants to underpin economic growth. Davy expects the population to hit 5.9 million by 2030 and to reach European levels of housing provision by that date would be an almost impossible task. [ The people behind the numbers as Ireland's population grows by nearly a third in 20 years Opens in new window ] Timoney believes that building 70,000 houses year is the best that we can hope for, and even that would require a big increase in productivity. The best year on record for house building was in 2006, when 88,500 houses were completed. There were roughly 2,000 building firms operating in the State but the largest only built 1,000 homes. There are far fewer builders now and the sector is dominated by two large home builders who have around 15 per cent of the market. They have the potential to scale up production through greater use of technologies such as off-site manufacturing but much more would be required to hit 70,000 homes a year, including significant investment by the Government into social housing. It is obvious that the gap between the Government target of 50,000 homes and Davy's projected requirement of 120,000 is simply unbridgeable given that we only built 33,000 homes last year. [ Ireland's population outperforms increasingly ageing EU Opens in new window ] The Government has an unpalatable choice. It can stick its head in the sand and cleave to the increasingly dubious prediction that 50,000 houses per year is a both achievable in the short term and sufficient. The alternative is to say that it may have underestimated migration and needs to revise its figures. It's not a good look, but the planning framework did flag the possibility that the numbers may have to be revised to account for higher net immigration. Their problem is that whatever new housing target they produce will stretch credulity even further than the current 50,000. [ David McWilliams: This is what we need to do in Ireland if we want stable, affordable house prices Opens in new window ] The correct but pretty much politically impossible thing to do is to level with the electorate that fixing the problem is going to take far longer than anyone is prepared to admit. And it will probably never be fixed if the definition of fixed is that we achieve European levels of housing provision.

Government slammed for 'vague' €275.4 billion National Development Plan
Government slammed for 'vague' €275.4 billion National Development Plan

Irish Daily Mirror

time23-07-2025

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Government slammed for 'vague' €275.4 billion National Development Plan

The government's announcement of the €275.4 billion National Development Plan (NDP) has been slammed as ministers have been accused of keeping it vague due to an expected lacklustre budget. Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris and Independent TD Seán Canney announced funding proposals for the latest NDP on Tuesday. It's the government's long-term plan for large-scale infrastructure projects, covering the period up to 2035. The plan is reworked and reviewed every few years. Despite this being the largest ever capital investment plan in the history of the State, the government has been slammed for the 'unusual' decision to provide few details on the projects. This could be down to an expected disappointing upcoming budget, as politicians may want to save the details of exciting projects until then. However, the Taoiseach said this lack of detail was done purposely to give ministers a chance to draw up a list of projects, with announcements coming 'closer to the budget'. Research Professor at the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) Dr Alan Barrett said it's difficult for anyone to sink their teeth into this report as it's so vague. Speaking on RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne on Tuesday, he said: 'We have been used to over the years getting the details of the projects, why it's not happening on this occasion we are not entirely sure. 'Today's document reminds me of the annual estimates process, where departments are being given an indication of what their allocation is going to be. "The idea that now we are having a document with a significant amount of money being launched but not getting a clear sense of what the projects are - but perhaps more importantly the extent at which they relate to one another - that is a little concern I would have today.' Despite economic experts and the opposition finding the lack of details in the NDP disappointing, here is what we know so far: Housing From 2026 to 2030, the government plans to invest €35.955 billion in housing, with Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers saying housing is the main priority. The Taoiseach echoed this as he outlined a target of 300,000 new homes in this timeframe, with 12,000 a year being social housing. Minister Paschal Donohoe and Minister Jack Chambers announcing details of the revised National Development Plan and the Summer Economic Statement at Government Buildings (Image: Stephen Collins / Collins Photos) This is in line with the current Programme for Government targets. Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne said 'throwing billions of euros at the housing crisis without announcing a radical reset in policy" is not going to work. He added that the NDP 'gives no indication that the government is planning to move away from the measures that have plagued housing provision in the last decade". Sinn Féin's housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said the plan will not result in "increased delivery of social and affordable homes". Water A total of €12 billion - outside of the housing allocation - has been earmarked for water infrastructure development. The Taoiseach said this investment is critical to 'support new house building industrial development and regional growth'. Health Some €9.25 billion has been allocated to the health service under the NDP, which is almost double the investment of the previous plan in 2021. There is little detail on projects this will be used on, as the new plan outlined seven previous health projects that have been completed under the NDP in the last three years. The Irish Hospital Consultants Association (IHCA) has welcomed this allocation to the sector. However, with little detail on projects, it has called on Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill to ringfence the required funding for the implementation of Electronic Health Records and prioritise the rapid expansion of our current hospital capacity. Transport Some €24.33 billion is being invested into transport up to 2030, with €2 million earmarked for 'low-carbon transportation projects'. This includes the MetroLink underground line for Dublin. However, it's not expected that construction will begin until at least 2028. However, €2.2 billion has been slammed as 'not enough' by some, including Labour's transport spokesperson Ciarán Ahern. He said: 'MetroLink is supposed to be the country's flagship public transport project and €2 billion is no small sum, but in the context of the overall cost of the project, it's nowhere near enough. "We're talking about a fraction of what's actually required to see this project through." There is no mention in the NDP of other projects that the money will be used on with respect to other public transport services such as buses or trains. Climate and energy Exchequer funding of €5.6 billion has been allocated to climate and energy, as the Taoiseach said expanding investment here is 'critical to our national security and to realising the enormous potential of AI to future economic development'. The government is increasing its equity shareholdings in ESB to €1.5 billion and EirGrid to €2 billion, which was widely welcomed by both. Education The Department of Education and Youth is receiving €7.55 billion in the new NDP. It will be used to facilitate the construction of school places in primary, post-primary, special classes and special schools between 2026 and 2030. A further €4.55 billion is allocated to higher and further education. Culture, Communication and Sport Some €2.22 billion has been earmarked for this department, however, there isn't yet any information on how the funding will be used. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store