logo
Australia's independence and national interest

Australia's independence and national interest

The Age2 days ago
On the flipsideBeing an old Northcote boy, ex Herbert Street, I applaud the residents for refusing Macca's push for a store in their suburb. Here's a chance to boycott the US, so I hope you succeed.
John Cain, McCrae
Broken care systemWhen Australians outsource care to childcare, disability or aged care industries, they do so because of an initial assumed trust, based on their experience of living in Australia, that of all countries, Australia is one where what should happen does happen, and what shouldn't happen doesn't happen.If those who trustingly outsource care have to decide, in the case of childcare, which staff members to deem trustworthy enough to dispense the care, or in the case of aged care, are only able to outsource care under the condition of there being no right of enforceable visitor access to check on the care, those care systems are broken and not worthy of custom.In deregulating care sectors, the Australian government has caused twofold harm. It has not only eroded public trust in deregulated care sectors, but eroded the confidence of citizens in their country and its government.
Ruth Farr, Blackburn South
Tiers of joyThere has been plenty written about a compromised AFL draw, and ″⁣A Radical Fixture Change″⁣ (9/7). But nothing about the introduction of a two-tiered system which would allow for promotion and relegation.With the imminent introduction of the Tasmanian Devils and potentially a Darwin-NT team, two tiers of 10 teams would solve all our current problems.But as a bonus, more supporters from more clubs would have a better chance of supporting a winner as they cheer on their favourite team, and two of those clubs each year, a premiership.Why is this not being discussed in public? Surely two tiers of 10 makes good sense.
Peter Hayne, The Patch
Deregulation failureIn the early 1990s the Labor government, and subsequently the Coalition, became captured by public policy that the solution to economic and productivity growth was market-oriented government characterised by deregulation, privatisation and contracting out. And where did that get us? Major regulatory and performance failures in childcare, aged care, housing and vocational training, and a decline in productivity. And here we go again. Again we find the treasurer, prime minister and the productivity commissioner promoting the idea of getting rid of redtape or freeing up the private sector.Has it ever occurred to policy officials that the mediocre performance of recent decades might be because of the deregulation and related market-oriented reforms and the so-called solution may be part of the problem? We should be looking at more effective and nuanced regulation than just more deregulation. The risk is that other muted productivity reforms, such as taxation, will be successfully blocked by vested interests while the low-hanging fruit of further deregulation will become ″⁣the reform″⁣.
Terry Burke, Paterson
A drive for lifeAs retiring Baby Boomers practise the art of golf, conversation often settles on various ailments and what remains on your 'bucket list'. I try to combine the two.Each week, I seek perfection in every drive, chip, and putt. It never happens and I thought would never happen until the other day when I got a hole-in-one, the holy grail of most golfers. I was ecstatic. A friend, trying to keep matters in perspective, produced some statistics that suggest it is not as rare as you would think. But how many of them have had Parkinson's disease for nearly 20 years, I protested.I'm a bit slower around the course nowadays and my golfing friends fetch a lot of my wayward shots but it's one thing I can cross off my bucket list. A diagnosis of Parkinson's is not the end of the world. Put whatever you want on your bucket list and go for it. You, too, might get a hole-in-one.
Phillip Hoysted, South Hobart, Tas
Trump, call PutinI would suggest a rapid call to Vladimir Putin if Donald Trump expects to raise the Nobel Peace Prize above his head if the recent drone and missile strikes on Ukraine over the past 24 hours are any indication of his ability to bring peace comparable with Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela.
David West, Essendon
Education for allThe recommendation in the Special Envoy's Plan to Combat Antisemitism to introduce a school program on how to deal with antisemitism is a positive one.I hope it can be matched with a school program on how to deal with the grief of witnessing starvation, maiming and killing of thousands of children in Gaza.It is devastating to see no punitive sanctions against Israel from our government.
Colleen Coghlan, Prahran
Tragedy's reachRather than the demonisation of Israel being the biggest tragedy of the conflict in Palestine (Letters, 9/7) might one suggest that the killing of tens of thousands of people and the near total destruction of their homeland is a far greater tragedy on every level. Further, might one also suggest that if the public image of Israel is such an issue, then Israel itself may want to consider the actions that create that perception and maybe even cease them.
Graeme Gardner, Reservoir
Unpeaceful marchesUnfortunately, the regular anti-Israel protests in the city are not peaceful, as your correspondent claims (Letters, 9/7). How can they be when they regularly feature calls for the destruction of Israel, chants demonising all Zionists as terrorists, flags and photos of terrorist groups and their leaders, and now chants calling for death to Israel's defence force?Your correspondent claims the marchers are demonised for what others do around them, but it's hard to believe that the incitement from these marches doesn't directly lead to antisemitic attacks. Why does the correspondent not arrange for her own peaceful demonstrations just like the peaceful protests in support of Israel do?These demonstrations are not genuinely about peace, or they would also condemn Hamas, which started this war, perpetuates this war, and sacrifices its people for PR purposes.
Stephen Lazar, Elwood
The human tollI wonder whether anyone else feels just deeply saddened by the story of a woman who lured three people to their deaths, and another to illness and deep grief?It is an extraordinary story: idyllic town, religious community, marriage breakdown, and a very exotic choice of murder weapon. Indeed, all true crime storytellers must be eager to bring their version to an audience: those who travelled to the court or breathlessly awaited media updates.And yet, despite the fascinating details of this case, this is just a deeply sad story. I do not know – as was 'diagnosed' by a columnist in The Age this week – whether Erin Patterson has narcissistic personality disorder, but I do know she has her own sad story that led her to do something truly terrible. I know there are confused and hurting children, a devastated new widower, a haunted ex-husband/son and an aching community.This story is not salacious, it is just very sad. I hope that we can remember the human toll of our curiosity in our rush to gobble up the latest details of this awful case.
Nickie Gyomber, Alphington
Interlocking logicThe wearing of seatbelts became mandatory in Victoria in 1970. We were the first in the world to do so. Initially, there was some resistance based on the removal of freedom of choice. The impact on the road toll was instant, and continues to be significant today.The 'interlock device″⁣ prevents anyone with a blood alcohol level of above the maximum allowable level from starting their vehicle. This is a case of after-the-fact protection of the community and the driver.What if we were to again be trailblazers of road safety? What if it every vehicle was fitted with this device and was mandatory as were seatbelts? Would the additional cost not be worth the guarantee of no drunk drivers on the road? What if it became as accepted and automatic as clicking seatbelts?
Ray Way, Blackburn South
Relief from miseryOn a miserable day with miserable news reports and miserable weather, thank you John Silvester for in-depth analysis of the world and local events surrounding the, but not of, the Morwell trial (″⁣The butcher, the fashion choice and the old job: The red flags in killer's claims″⁣, 10/7). I am still giggling while I am writing this and will probably do so throughout the day.
Veronica Padkins, Somers
Credit: Matt Golding AND ANOTHER THING
QantasQantas should introduce a frequent hacker account, where you earn points every time your personal information is used.
Paul Custance, Highett
I am finally in an exclusive club. My Qantas data has been hacked just the same as the members of The Chairman's Lounge.
Marie Nash, Balwyn
TrumpDonald Trump thinks he rules the world. If only we'd stayed with the French nuclear submarine deal.
Katriona Fahey, Alphington
After seeing Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu at their formal dinner, I feel moved to nominate both for the Nobel Comb Over of the Year Prize. Their follicular excellence deserves international recognition, while their leadership and humanity do not.
Mick Hussey, Beaconsfield
If Donald Trump doesn't win the Nobel Peace Prize he will no doubt claim he was robbed and threaten to annex Norway.
Bernd Rieve, Brighton
″⁣Netanyahu nominates Trump for peace prize″⁣ (9/7). Was that part of the deal?
Martin Shaw, Mirboo North
I would, formally, like to nominate Donald Trump for the 'nobble' prize.
Robert Juozas, Eaglemont
FurthermoreDump AUKUS. War has changed. What can a submarine, even a wiz-bang nuclear one, do to stop a drone, or an explosive device in a mobile phone?
Wendy Brennan, Bendigo
It is apparent at least six RBA members have never experienced family living in the outer suburbs while trying to pay down a mortgage.
Arthur Pritchard, Ascot Vale
The people of Gaza aren't responsible for the crimes of Hamas. Neither should our Jewish citizens be blamed for the crimes of Israel.
Malcolm McDonald, Burwood
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Issue with Tim Lester: Diplomat Geoff Raby on Anthony Albanese's all-important meeting with Xi Jinping in China
The Issue with Tim Lester: Diplomat Geoff Raby on Anthony Albanese's all-important meeting with Xi Jinping in China

7NEWS

time43 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

The Issue with Tim Lester: Diplomat Geoff Raby on Anthony Albanese's all-important meeting with Xi Jinping in China

Geoff Raby has no doubt how he would advise Anthony Albanese if he were briefing the Prime Minister in the minutes before this coming week's planned talks with China's President Xi Jinping. 'I'd be telling him that this is a very important moment in Australia-China relations,' Raby said. As Australia's Ambassador in Beijing, Raby counselled prime ministers John Howard, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard on the critical relationship with China. In the decade-and-a-half since, China has surged as a military superpower, while two-way trade has all but trebled — built on $100 billion a year of Australian iron ore exports. Before leaving Sydney, the Prime Minister acknowledged that — on the list of our trading partners — China is bigger than the next three combined. 'The relationship in China means jobs in Australia. It's as simple as that,' Albanese said. China is the export market we can't live without, at the same time as our longtime security guarantor, the United States, regards China as its greatest military rival. After decades of experience in China diplomacy — stretching back to a stint in Australia's Beijing Embassy in the 1980s — Geoff Raby acknowledges China 'needs to be watched' but says the common assumption that it's now the world's great military threat, is wrong. 'My own view is that China is not a threat to Australia's security as such. China is much more interested in its own stability (and) economic performance,' Raby said. More important to Raby is the fact China has land borders with 14 countries and territorial issues with Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan and Hong Kong that loom large in Beijing's calculations. Add in a dependence on foreign energy and natural resources, and China is a 'constrained superpower'. 'This is all part of us having to recognise an emerging new power and be smart in how we deal with it,' Raby said. But one feature of Australia's recent security policy has been anything but 'smart', according to Raby. AUKUS, the giant nuclear submarine pact with the United States and the United Kingdom is set to cost hundreds of billions of dollars over coming decades. Raby called it 'a foreign policy failure for Australia'. 'We have had decades of trying to integrate ourselves into Asia … That has been the cornerstone of our foreign policy for 40-odd years. AUKUS really tears that up,' he said. As Prime Minister Albanese visits China, AUKUS approaches a crossroad in Washington. The Pentagon is reassessing the security pact to see if it fits with President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. As well, the Trump Administration's demand that the Albanese government sharply increase military spending has stoked doubts in Australia about the commitment of the United States to our defence. Raby shares that concern. 'Having put this big bet on the US, can we rely on them to be there whenever we need them? Serious defence analysts question that these days,' he said. Raby argued more of Australia's security ought to rest on regional relationships and less on our AUKUS partners. 'Independent foreign policy is essential. We have to be able to make these decisions for ourselves,' he said. So where does that leave Anthony Albanese in his Beijing meeting with Xi Jinping? Raby said the Prime Minister must raise human rights issues and consular cases involving imprisoned Australians. As well he needs from President Xi 'a very clear understanding that China sees a future in a close economic relationship with Australia'. The veteran diplomat also cautioned that the 'personal dynamic is extremely important'. It may be even more so at this, the fourth leaders' meeting between Xi and Albanese. Our Prime Minister has yet to clinch his first Trump meeting. Relations with the U.S. President appear cool. Any sign of warmth in the talks with Xi is sure to stand out. For more from Tim Lester and his interview with Geoff Raby, you can listen to The Issue in the player below or watch their full conversation in the video above.

Brand called out for ‘deceptive' move
Brand called out for ‘deceptive' move

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Brand called out for ‘deceptive' move

Shoppers have voiced outrage after a popular e-commerce retailer advertised AI-generated models and product images on its platform, labelling the move 'deceptive'. An Australian woman called out Atoir, a Melbourne-based label, for using AI-generated images of a model and clothing, available for purchase on The Iconic. 'Saw this on The Iconic,' she wrote on Reddit. 'The brand ATOIR is using AI models for their clothing. Feels so deceptive.' The Melbourne fashion brand created a model using AI. The Iconic Credit: Supplied The dress in this image isn't real either. The Iconic Credit: Supplied The website features two images of a brunette woman wearing a white dress, taken from the front and back. At the very bottom of the item's product description, the brand said the model's measurements 'represents a size S/8 and is standing at 5'10' but disclosed neither the clothing, nor the model, were real. 'Please note that this eCommerce imagery has been crated (sic) using artificial intelligence technology and does not feature a real model,' the product description read. 'These AI generated visuals are designed to represent our products accurately and creatively.' The same AI model displays other Atoir items on the website without any mention of AI-generated imagery. The Iconic disclosed the brand was using AI-generated models in some product descriptions but failed to mention it in others. Reddit Credit: Supplied Online, Australian customers voiced their frustration with the AI-generated models, arguing it did not accurately represent the item they wanted to buy. '(A) $400 dress and you can only see an image generated version of it before you buy it,' a comment read. Others argued the AI-generated image failed to represent the fit of the clothing on a human body and other angles of the clothing. 'AI cannot replicate the way a garment sits on the body, or the way different types of fabric drape,' a person wrote. 'They might as well just take a flat lay photo of the garment, that would actually be more useful.' Another said the move was 'so wildly unappealing' and discouraged them from making a purchase. 'It's just a realistic looking line drawing at this point,' they wrote. 'I can't say I'm prepared to shell out hundreds of dollars online when I don't even get to see an actual garment.' Many other products featured the same AI-generated model. The Iconic Credit: Supplied Many shoppers voiced their concern with the AI-generated images. The Iconic Credit: Supplied Interlunar Media director Krishna Chandak said AI visuals could 'often miss the mark' if used for advertising retail, skincare and fitness products compared with 'commoditised sectors' and could 'definitely affect consumer trust and brand credibility'. 'In categories like skincare, fashion, or wellness, where authenticity and emotional connection matter, AI visuals often miss the mark,' he told NewsWire. He said 'real content consistently outperforms' AI-generated content, which may '(raise) questions around transparency and ethics'. 'Whether it's user-generated content, branded shoots, or genuine storytelling, the return on investment is almost always stronger with authentic visuals,' he said. Retail experts warn brands about relying on AI-generated images, as they could dissuade shoppers. The Iconic Credit: Supplied Experts suggest sticking to 'traditional' methods of creating product images, including real photographers and models. The Iconic Credit: Supplied The Ad Firm chief executive Kevin Heimlich said retailers using AI were walking on an 'ethical tightrope' that could discourage shoppers from trusting a brand. He said while AI may 'create a technically perfect image', it may also 'lack the soul and relatability that genuinely resonate with a target audience and encourage them to convert'. 'AI can whip up these incredibly slick, almost perfect images. They look amazing, truly aspirational,' he told NewsWire. 'If that image does not exactly match the real item a customer receives, you have a problem.'Mr Heimlich said shoppers may be disappointed when the item arrived at their doorstep. 'When a customer opens their package and sees something that does not quite align with what they saw online, it is a direct path to disappointment, frustration, and often, a return,' he said. Shoppers may lose trust in a brand if it relies on AI-generated images, retail experts say. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Heimlich said there was a risk of 'breeding distrust' if retailers relied on AI-generated product images, leading customers to wonder if the brand is 'intentionally trying to mislead them'. 'Such damage to a brand's reputation and consumer trust can take a considerable amount of time to repair, and it undoubtedly impacts future sales,' he said. Mr Heimlich urged retailers to consider relying on traditional photography and models to negate the lack of 'emotional connection and storytelling' that came with AJ-generated imagery. 'A skilled photographer, or a model who embodies the essence of your brand, does so much more than show the product,' he told NewsWire. 'AI, in its current form, often struggles to replicate that nuanced human artistry and emotional depth.' The Iconic and Atoir did not immediately respond to NewsWire's questions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store