First female, Hispanic chair takes the reins at the Dallas Arboretum: Women's History Month
The smell of beautiful flowers filled the air Wednesday at the Dallas Arboretum. Its new chair, Regina Montoya, is making history.
"To be the first woman and to be the first Latina is so, so special," Montoya said.
Men have served as the chair of the Arboretum since it opened in 1984. Montoya is not only a Harvard-trained lawyer but is also of Mexican descent.
"It's telling women who are Latina, girls of color, that everything is an opportunity here," Montoya said. "That's the best part about being involved here because I know people are welcoming, and I hope maybe when people see me here, they know that this is an arboretum for everyone."
The Dallas Arboretum's Women's Council was founded in 1982, and the Council opened the Woman's Garden in 1997. It's a space designed by women for all to enjoy.
The Dallas Arboretum's CEO is also a woman. Montoya hopes it's a place where young women and girls can find inspiration.
"NASA was here, and they had all of these NASA astronauts, including some women astronauts," Montoya said. "That's what the Arboretum does. It is a magnet for people to come here, and those are the role models."
She aims to be an example for other women and show them they can blossom into the careers they want with determination and vision.
"I just want to be sure that young girls and women have that opportunity to know that the sky is the limit," Montoya said. "I would say to young girls, this is an area that you should consider being part of and looking at as a profession because you have a lot of opportunities."
The woman who's making history has a new strategic plan for the Arboretum, focusing on excellence in education and the environment, as she brings the 66-acre botanical garden into the 21st century.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
14 hours ago
- Forbes
Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—By Solving The Wrong Problem
Psychological safety, problems at work, mistake, fatigue, dismissal, stress and overwork. Two months ago, Harvard Business School professor Amy C. Edmondson and associate professor Michaela J. Kerrissey wrote an eloquent article in the May-June issue of Harvard Business Review., 'What People Get Wrong About Psychological Safety.' A Massive Effort To Enhance Psychological Safety With Little Effect 'Psychological safety' was once an obscure term in psychology and management research. Professor Edmondson changed all that with her best-selling book, The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth (2017) HBRP. According to her recent article, 'Today the concept is downright popular. Countless managers, consultants, and training companies have worked hard to create psychologically safe workplaces, and thousands of articles have been devoted to the topic.' In 2017, the need for the effort was obvious: 'A 2017 Gallup poll found that only 3 in 10 employees strongly agree with the statement that their opinions count at work.' Yet today, 8 years later, those Gallup numbers have hardly budged. What went wrong? According to the 2025 article, 'As the popularity of psychological safety has grown, so too have misconceptions about it.' The authors identify six common misperceptions: 'Psychological safety means being nice; it means getting your way; it means job security; it requires a trade-off with performance; it's a policy; and it requires a top-down approach.' They explain why each misperception gets in the way and give advice on how to counter it. The Key Problem: What Is The Problem? What is the problem that this massive effort is trying to solve? One useful insight sometimes (unreliably) attributed to Albert Einstein is to rethink fundamentals. 'If I had an hour to solve a problem, I'd spend the first 55 minutes defining the problem and the last five minutes solving it." The effort on psychological safety may be doing the opposite. Thus, a closer look at the lack of progress on enhancing psychological safety points to another possible cause: a focus of the effort on the team level of the firm. As Professor Edmondson's 2017 book stated, 'My field-based research has primarily focused on groups and teams, because that's how most work gets done.' So too, the 2025 article focuses almost exclusively on leaders trying to enhance psychological safety at the team level. The team level may be where most of the work gets done, but not necessarily where most of the problems are caused. The Real Problem Behind Lack Of Psychological Safety Guess what? In many other aspects of management, the principal problem today is not at the team level, and rather in the way the whole organization is run. For the last half-century, the central problem addressed by management was how to cut costs so as to maximize shareholder value and enhance bonuses for the executives. That was the official position of the U.S. Business Roundtable for several decades. Business schools still teach it. Most of the processes, systems, and mindsets that support it are still in place in many big firms. So that is the problem that managers are required to address, whether they agree with it or not. Is it any wonder that there is a lack of psychological safety in such settings? The Shift From Cutting Costs To Creating Value For Customers The good news is that in a smaller group of public firms—perhaps 20% of public companies-- the primary dynamic of a business has shifted from cutting costs and extracting value to creating more value for customers. Value-creating enterprises emerged from the combination of two elements: first, entrepreneurs began using digital technology and AI to deliver exponentially more value than traditionally-managed firms; and second, digital technology gave customers the power to demand more value from businesses. The killer insight: value-creating enterprises not only satisfy customers: they make much more money than firms focused on making money. Workplaces devoted to creating value for customers are also likely to be more congenial as workplaces than those focused on extracting value from customers and boosting executive bonuses. Meanwhile, profit-seeking firms that still focus primarily on improving efficiency and cost-cutting are generating below-average value and are having difficulty in surviving. Two-thirds of the famous blue-chip firms in the Dow Jones Industrial Average are now performing below average (See the table below). The performance problems that these firms are facing of course aggravates even further the problem of workplace psychological safety, as workers in those firms are likely to be blamed for shortfalls in performance. Thus, many of the managers in struggling efforts to enhance psychological safety may be trying to solve the wrong problem. If they shifted the focus of their efforts to updating the goal of their firms and creating more value for their customers, their workplaces could transition from the dispiriting goal of extracting value from customers to the potentially inspiring purpose of creating value for them. And read also Why Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—It's Not Rocket Science—Or AI Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete: Master Value Creation Now 5-Year Total Returns of firms in the Dow Jones Industrial Average as of July 2025
Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
As B.C. miners await rescue, here's how other operations have played out
Rescue operations involving a remote-controlled scoop and drones are underway at the Red Chris mine in northern British Columbia, where three miners are trapped underground. Here is a look at some previous mine rescues in Canada and around the world. September 2021: Thirty-nine miners at Vale's Totten mine in Sudbury, Ont., survive being trapped almost a kilometre underground for four days, after the main shaft is damaged by falling equipment. The miners climb or are hauled to the surface via ropes and ladders. October 2010: Thirty-three gold miners in Chile are extracted from deep underground, after a complex 69-day operation that garners worldwide attention. The rescue that included Nasa engineers involves boring through 600 metres of rock to reach the men. The men went more than two weeks without any contact from the surface. April 2010: Flooding of the Wangjialing coal mine in Shanxi Province traps more than 150 workers underground. Thirty-eight are killed, but 115 are rescued after 11 days trapped underground. Chinese state media says a team of 3,000 workers help drain the flooded shafts. May 2006: An earthquake at the Beaconsfield gold mine in Tasmania traps two workers in a lift. They survive on a single cereal bar and by licking water from rocks before supplies are delivered via a small shaft. They are rescued after two weeks trapped about a kilometre underground. January 2006: Rescuers in Esterhazy, Sask., retrieve all 72 workers who were trapped in the Mosaic potash mine by an underground fire. The miners retreated to refuge rooms sealed off from the toxic smoke, and all were brought to the surface after 30 hours. — With files from Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
A B.C. miners await rescue, here's how other operations have played out
Rescue operations involving a remote-controlled scoop and drones are underway at the Red Chris mine in northern British Columbia, where three miners are trapped underground. Here is a look at some previous mine rescues in Canada and around the world. September 2021: Thirty-nine miners at Vale's Totten mine in Sudbury, Ont., survive being trapped almost a kilometre underground for four days, after the main shaft is damaged by falling equipment. The miners climb or are hauled to the surface via ropes and ladders. October 2010: Thirty-three gold miners in Chile are extracted from deep underground, after a complex 69-day operation that garners worldwide attention. The rescue that included Nasa engineers involves boring through 600 metres of rock to reach the men. The men went more than two weeks without any contact from the surface. April 2010: Flooding of the Wangjialing coal mine in Shanxi Province traps more than 150 workers underground. Thirty-eight are killed, but 115 are rescued after 11 days trapped underground. Chinese state media says a team of 3,000 workers help drain the flooded shafts. May 2006: An earthquake at the Beaconsfield gold mine in Tasmania traps two workers in a lift. They survive on a single cereal bar and by licking water from rocks before supplies are delivered via a small shaft. They are rescued after two weeks trapped about a kilometre underground. January 2006: Rescuers in Esterhazy, Sask., retrieve all 72 workers who were trapped in the Mosaic potash mine by an underground fire. The miners retreated to refuge rooms sealed off from the toxic smoke, and all were brought to the surface after 30 hours. — With files from Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
