
With federal support uncertain, states and nonprofits scramble to safeguard access to vaccines
After recent moves by the US Department of Health and Human Services to restrict the approval and use of some vaccines — and signs that more changes might be coming — some states and private partnerships are scrambling to ensure that vaccines will still be available to those who want them.
People familiar with various efforts that are underway described them as necessary but not ideal.
'When you start splintering the message from the federal government down states and local health departments, people end up losing faith in everybody. They don't know who to believe,' said one official familiar with several ongoing efforts who spoke on the condition they not be named because they weren't authorized to share the details of those plans.
Several groups, for example, are working to create panels of subject matter experts who would review the latest science behind vaccines and make evidence-based recommendations for their use, much like the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, has done for the past 60 years.
Nine states have banded together to create the Northeast Public Health Collaboration, which is staffed by state and city health officials. The group is organized into committees, and their work has intensified quickly in response to shifting federal health priorities and deep cuts to health agencies, according to a person familiar with the group who was not authorized to share the details of their plans.
'They're specifically looking at how, as a collaborative of states, they can address gaps in federal support and resources moving forward in key public health areas,' the person said. One of the areas they're preparing to address is flagging federal support for vaccines, but the member states also have efforts underway to address pandemic preparedness, laboratory services, epidemiology and other key public health priorities.
One state represented in that group, Maine, has even recently struck language in its vaccine access law referencing ACIP and created a pathway to purchase vaccines outside of the federal Vaccines for Children Program, which provides vaccines for free to children whose families can't afford them, and which public health advocates fear may also be under threat.
Organizers for the effort declined to offer many specifics about the collaboration. They described their work as being in an early stage and said the collaboration was intended only to share information between partners. They stressed that it was not intended to replace or duplicate any federal programs.
'New York state maintains its commitment to protecting access to essential public health services and regularly engages in informal conversations with other states to share information and best practices on public health preparedness,' said a spokesperson for the New York State Department of Health, one of the states involved in the effort.
The Massachusetts Department of Health also declined to share more specific details about the collaboration but issued a statement: 'The Department of Public Health is committed to maintaining access to evidence-based vaccines for all people in the state. As federal policy decisions are proposed and enacted that impact vaccine infrastructure, Massachusetts is evaluating what may be necessary to have undisrupted access.'
Like Maine, Colorado recently passed legislation to protect coverage for a range of preventive services, including vaccines. In the event the federal government repeals, modifies or gets rid of recommendations for preventive services made by ACIP, the US Preventive Services Task Force or the Health Resources and Services Administration, the new law gives the state's health commissioner leeway to make rules based off recommendations as they existed in January.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to bypass ACIP's process and change the recommendations for Covid-19 vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women in May was a red flag for vaccine access, according to a source familiar with the deliberations of state health departments who asked not to be named because they were not authorized to share the details of those discussions.
His subsequent decision to dismiss all 17 sitting members of ACIP and replace them with eight of his own choices, including several new members who have expressed doubts about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, spurred the drive for change at the state level, the official said.
'I think states are concerned that, based on these early indications, potentially there will be some new challenges for them in terms of being able to support and offer vaccines,' the official said, 'and so I think they are trying to think of different ways in this new environment that we're in that they still are able to provide vaccines.'
ACIP's recommendations are intertwined with state laws in numerous ways, according to the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, which created a reference list.
For example, several states – including Minnesota, Vermont and Maine – have laws that allow pharmacists and even dentists to give vaccines as long as they're recommended by ACIP. Changing those recommendations could affect the ability of pharmacists or other health care providers to deliver certain shots.
States like New Mexico, Missouri and Alabama tie their requirements for public school enrollment to the most recent version of ACIP's recommendations.
Additionally, states sometimes require educational materials for vaccines to hew to ACIP recommendations. Tennessee, for example, requires hospitals to provide parents of newborns with information about pertussis, or whooping cough, and about the availability of a vaccine for pertussis, using information that's in line with ACIP recommendations.
Beyond state efforts, there are nonprofit startups working to maintain vaccine access.
One such effort is the Vaccine Integrity Project, which is being coordinated by the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota and supported by an unrestricted grant from Walmart heiress Christy Walton. The group's steering committee comprises medical and public health experts, former elected officials and former leaders of federal agencies.
The initiative aims to counter disinformation around vaccines and provide updated guidelines on their use based on evolving science and safety information.
It's also seeking to work with states to help them identify ways their vaccine access laws and funding mechanisms may need to change so they can continue to deliver vaccines to their health care providers and pharmacies.
'The emergence of organizations that collaborate to help fill the gap in the federal government is happening, and it needs to happen,' said Lori Tremmel Freeman, chief executive officer of the National Association of County and City Health Officials.
'We have to be very forward-thinking about it, because these are programs and services that impact every community in this country in different ways, some more than others. And therefore the impact of programs and services being reduced or whole scale being removed or going away is not known, but we can be sure it will impact the health of every community in this country,' Freeman said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Advocates, families rally against Medicaid cuts in Philadelphia: "It's a lifeline"
Advocates gather in Philadelphia to sound alarm about possible Medicaid cuts Advocates gather in Philadelphia to sound alarm about possible Medicaid cuts Advocates gather in Philadelphia to sound alarm about possible Medicaid cuts Concern is growing about potential cuts to Medicaid benefits hurting millions of families even though President Trump says his massive tax bill will protect the most vulnerable. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said Monday the legislation will have devastating effects for hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians and drive up health care costs. Health advocates and families gathered at Philadelphia City Hall Monday to implore politicians not to cut Medicaid, the program that pays for health care for those who can't afford it. About 80 million people nationwide receive the benefits. "If they succeed, the consequences will be devastating not just for individuals, but for entire communities," said Cherie Brummans with the Alliance of Community Service Providers. Khadijah Phillips said she depends on Medicaid to cover health costs for her twins who have autism. "I'm looking at a potential crisis in my household," Phillips said. "I can't imagine what would happen to them if they don't have access to the therapies they need and medications they need to help them function." In a statement about what the president has called the "big, beautiful bill," the White House said in part, "there will be no cuts to Medicaid." The bill "protects and strengthens Medicaid for those who rely on it—pregnant women, children, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families—while eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse." The legislation "removes illegal aliens, enforces work requirements, and protects Medicaid for the truly vulnerable." "Let's be clear, cutting Medicaid does not save money. It shifts the costs. It pushes people into ERs, jails, shelters and foster care," said Dr. Jeannine Lisitski with Mental Health Partnerships. Dan Miller said he depends on Medicaid for mental health services. "It's not just a safety net, it's a lifeline," Miller said. "Without it, recovery and hope would be impossible." About 3 million Pennsylvanians are on Medicaid, including nearly 700,000 here in Philadelphia. Advocates say a majority of mental health and addiction services in Philly are supported with Medicaid funding. "These are the kinds of services that keep people out of emergency rooms, off the streets and away from preventable crises," said Dr. Deja Gilbert with Gaudenzia Addiction Treatment and Recovery Services. The independent Congressional Budget Office says the bill being debated in congress will cut medicaid by $930 billion.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A Mom Went Viral For Breaking Down The Cost Of Giving Birth In America, And People Are Calling It "Crazy"
Kayla Kosuga (@kaylakosuga), a 24-year-old living in Florida, recently went viral for explaining how much it cost to give birth to her most recent child. The video has been viewed over 18 million times and is, once again, an example of how America's healthcare system continues to highlight just how difficult and costly it can be to get basic care. TikTok: @kaylakosuga / Via Kayla starts off the TikTok with: "This is how much it costs to give birth in America: $44,318.41. I had my little guy three weeks ago, so they definitely wasted no time sending me that bill." The social media influencer, who was in the hospital for two days, noted she had a vaginal birth with epidural and no complications. Kayla then shares a screenshot of her itemized bill after giving birth, revealing several costs: A private one-bed room and board was $10,100, pharmacy was $89.40, anesthesia was $1,845, labor room/delivery was $10,275, and more. Other care services Kayla was charged for: • Laboratory: $859 • Specialty Services: $585 • Other Diagnostic Services: $1,347 "And that's just one bill," the 24-year-old explains in the video. "We have multiple bills to go through, guys." For transparency, Kayla shares that insurance paid $20,353.62 of the first bill, leaving her and her partner responsible for the other $4,746.78. However, the cost to pay the doctor who delivered her baby with insurance was an additional $4,395.85. Kayla continues saying in the TikTok that she also received an epidural bill for $2,060.86 — the cost of the doctor and "not the epidural itself." Lastly, Kayla reveals that her baby received a bill, too, which added up to $12,761.30 without insurance. For their family of five now, the cost of insurance per month is $2,500 — a nearly $400 increase from when they were just a family of four. "We're still waiting for him to process on our insurance," she explains, "so, for now, this is the cost without it." Kayla's TikTok received over 2.2 million likes and over 22,000 comments, with a majority of people expressing their shock at all the charges that come with pregnancy and giving birth. One user said, "americas healthcare system is a joke... how does the newborn have a $12k bill? 😭😭😭." Another TikTok user commented, "And they wonder why the birth rate is declining 🫠 44k!!!" Meanwhile, people outside of the US are sharing the drastic differences when it comes to the cost of giving birth. One TikTok user said, "I love living in Sweden sometimes. It was all FREE!! I used three different kinds of pain killers (epidural, gas, and syringe), had some complications and had to stay at the hospital 4 four nights." In America, the average cost to have a child is $19,000 — but for many women, that number varies based on insurance and whether or not there are complications with the pregnancy. Notably, 1 in 12 Americans is in medical debt, with a study suggesting that Americans owe $220 billion. As said by Kayla as she concludes her TikTok breaking down her $44,318.41 bill — and as many others have shared — it truly is "crazy." If you're a mother, how much did it cost you to give birth? If you've had children years apart, did you notice a difference in the costs? Which costs surprised you the most? Let us know in the comments, or you can anonymously submit your story using the form below. For more content, follow Kayla on TikTok.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Rejected by his mother, a rare wild Asian horse foal finds a new mom in a grieving domestic mare
APPLE VALLEY, Minn. — An endangered wild Asian horse foal is thriving thanks to an unlikely hero. Marat, a Przewalski's horse, fell critically ill soon after his birth at the Minnesota Zoo nearly two months ago. He survived thanks to intensive care. But his mother rejected him when he returned.